Describes how actual paths are used in LSP routing simulations and how their states affect overall MPLS routing predictions.
Actual path is a path that
-
represents the real routes taken by routed LSP paths
-
is read from the live network, per LSP path, and
-
reflects current LSP path states, including successful and failed routings.
RSVP-TE routing is not always completely predictable because it depends on the order in which LSPs are established and reserve their bandwidth on the network. Cisco Crosswork Planning uses actual paths in LSP routing simulations to match the current LSP routing state of a network as accurately as possible.
When an LSP path is routed, the actual route is attempted first. If this routing fails due to CSPF constraints, such as not enough reservable bandwidth or affinity restrictions, Cisco Crosswork Planning reverts to the standard CSPF routing algorithm.
Example
Cisco Crosswork Planning routes all LSPs in its simulation according to the actual paths read from the network, and the routings completely match the network. If a circuit fails, only the LSPs through this circuit are rerouted. Because they cannot be established along their actual paths, standard CSPF is used. The result is a prediction of incremental routing changes that would occur on the current network if such a failure were to occur.
An LSP or an LSP path might have a corresponding actual path. An LSP path with no actual path inherits its LSP actual path, if available.
Two columns in the LSPs and LSP Paths tables are useful to refer to the result of actual paths on LSP routing.
| Column |
Description |
|---|---|
| Actual column in the LSP Paths table |
The simulation can only use actual paths if they are resolved. If the network discovery was incomplete, this might not be possible.
|
| Routed column in the LSPs table |
|