Cisco Routed Optical Networking Solution Guide, Release 4.0

PDF

Legacy architecture and Routed Optical Networking architecture

Want to summarize with AI?

Log in

Overview

This section compares traditional multilayer network designs with the Routed Optical Networking model. It shows how collapsing functions into a converged architecture reduces duplication and improves service visibility across IP and optical layers.

Routed Optical Networking architecture unifies the WDM, OTN, and packet transport layers into a single, easy-to-control layer.

Figure 1. Routed Optical Networking strategy
Routed Optical Networking strategy

Agile Services Networking transport architecture

The Agile Services Networking architecture simplifies the network by converging services on a unified, automated infrastructure, providing scalability and agility for new services in the AI era and beyond. See Agile Services Networking.

Routed Optical Networking as part of Cisco’s Agile Services Networking architecture brings network simplification to the physical network infrastructure, just as EVPN and Segment Routing simplify the service and traffic engineering network layers. Routed Optical Networking collapses complex technologies and network layers into a more cost efficient and easy to manage network infrastructure.

Routed Optical Networking achieves this architecture by leveraging high-density routers, high-capacity digital coherent pluggable optical modules, simplified optical elements, and advanced automation capabilities. Components of Routed Optical Network are also fully compliant ROADM-based networks and can interoperate seamlessly with a mix or traditional transponders and Routed Optical Networking pluggable DCO.

The converged architecture enables

  • unified planning and design

  • seamless multi-layer provisioning

  • unified multi-layer management

  • end-to-end multi-layer and multi-domain network visibility

  • end-to-end network optimization for IP and private line services, and

  • convergence of IP and private line services on a single converged packet network infrastructure with guaranteed SLAs.

Comparison of legacy multilayered and Routed Optical Networking architectures

This table compares legacy multilayered and Routed Optical Networking architectures.

Table 1. Comparison of legacy multilayered and Routed Optical Networking architectures
Layered architecture Routed Optical Networking architecture

Trades off port density and capacity on router line cards for coherent optical transmission

Higher port density and capacity on the router line cards using digital coherent pluggable optical modules

Proprietary components; noninteroperable

Standards-based approach; interoperable across vendors

Siloed approach; separate control and management planes

Common control and management planes for converged optical and IP layer

Manual service stitching necessary across network domains

Enables end-to-end closed-loop automation and manageability

Independent capacity planning on IP and optical layers, where additional capacity is dimensioned on each layer separately leading to CapEx inefficiencies.

Unified capacity planning on a converged network optimizing CapEx investments