CVD Chad

1            PURPOSE AND OVERVIEW   3

2            FMPS PRODUCT OVERVIEW   4

2.1               COMPONENTS. 4

3            PANDUIT FMPS BENEFITS  12

3.1               INSTALLATION COSTS. 12

3.2               CENTRALIZED POWER ARCHITECTURE. 12

3.3               MONITORING AND CONTROL. 14

3.4               SCALABILITY. 14

4            TEST CASE WITH CISCO CATALYST 9300  18

4.1               COMPONENTS OF ARCHITECTURE. 19

4.2               VARIABLES. 20

4.3               VALIDATION METHODOLOGY. 23

4.4               NOTABLE OBSERVATIONS. 27

5            DESIGN ARCHITECTURES AND TESTS OUTCOME  28

5.1               DISTRIBUTED NETWORK ARCHITECTURE WITH CENTRALIZED POWER. 28

5.2               CENTRALIZED DC POWER BACK-UP FOR POWER REDUNDANCY. 48

5.3               DUAL HOMING POWER AND NETWORK ARCHITECTURE. 64

6            CONCLUSION  80

 

1          PURPOSE AND OVERVIEW

 

Organizations worldwide are under increasing pressure to reduce energy consumption, improve operational efficiency, and minimize their environmental impact. These demands, coupled with rising energy costs and stringent sustainability regulations, have created a need for innovative power distribution solutions. Through Cisco's Engineering Alliances initiative, Cisco and Panduit have collaborated to develop a validated architecture that combines Fault Managed Power System (FMPS) and Power over Ethernet (PoE) technologies, addressing these critical business and environmental challenges.

By combining Cisco's industry-leading Catalyst 9300 PoE switching platform with Panduit's UL-1400-1 certified Fault Managed Power System, we've created a comprehensive solution that has been engineered and validated to meet rigorous standards of performance, safety, and reliability while supporting organizations' sustainability and cost optimization goals

This architecture validation ensures partners can integrate the solution efficiently, reducing implementation time and risk. This is particularly important as the solution introduces new capabilities such as delivering up to hundreds of watts per copper pair over distances exceeding 1km while maintaining UL-1400-1 compliance. The detailed engineering validation and documentation provides the technical foundation for integrating building management systems with IT networks, establishing a standards-based infrastructure for power distribution and network connectivity.

The test cases covered in this document have been validated in a collaborative effort between Panduit and Cisco to show that FMPS can be implemented successfully to power Cisco’s Catalyst switches with direct current (DC) power. The FMPS can power a DC power supply in a PoE solution to serve multiple purposes that include, but are not limited to:

-        Serve as the primary power delivery to one or both power supplies on a PoE switch

-        Serve as a backup solution to a brownfield PoE deployment with an existing power supply

-        Serve as a supplementary delivery solution that requires additional power to a switch

 

The intended audience for this document is for all parties involved in purchasing, designing, and implementing a PoE solution with Panduit’s FMPS, including but not limited to the following:

-        project and/or account managers

-        MEP (mechanical, electrical, plumbing) engineers and/or partners

-        system integrators

-        installers

-        supply vendors

2          FMPS PRODUCT OVERVIEW

 

The Panduit FMPS delivers DC power over long distances to remote equipment.

The Panduit FMPS uses Pulse Current as its power delivery method. The Transmitter converts standard alternating current (AC), into a touch-safe pulse current waveform delivered over a Class 4 multi-conductor copper cable to the Receiver. The Receiver converts the pulse current waveform into +/- 48 VDC power, which can power the necessary devices.

2.1              COMPONENTS

The following section will outline the individual components of the FMPS.

 

2.1.1    Chassis

The chassis is 1U rack-mountable device that will traditionally be deployed in a location where the local AC power source will be available. The chassis has three bays in the rear where the power supplies will be mounted, as well as nine bays in the front where the Transmitter modules will be mounted.

 

The chassis has an RJ-45 network interface card in the front where an IP address can be configured to gain access to the graphical user interface where an administrator can manage and monitor the entire FMPS. Supported communication protocols are SNMP versions 2 and 3, and Rest APIs are also supported to allow third party applications, services, and tools to interface with the FMPS. Parameters that can be monitored from the management dashboard include temperature, voltage, current, power consumption, and power capacity.

Each component of the FMPS, the Receiver, Transmitter, and power supply, can all be remotely powered on or off through the management interface to service the needs of the administrator.

Additional information about the FMPS chassis can be found at:

https://www.panduit.com/en/products/power-distribution-environmental-connectivity-hardware/fault-managed-power-systems/fault-managed-power-systems/pxtc1ara.html

 

2.1.2    Power Supply

The power supplies are mounted in the rear of the chassis and is supplied with power through a cable connected from the C19 plug in the rear to a source such as a wall outlet or power distribution unit. Each power supply can receive up to 1600 watts, so a chassis with all three bays mounted can receive up to 4800 watts in total. It converts the AC power to 360-volt DC power and delivers it to the Transmitter modules.

 

 

 

Additional information about the FMPS power supply can be found at:

https://www.panduit.com/en/products/power-distribution-environmental-connectivity-hardware/fault-managed-power-systems/fault-managed-power-systems/pxu1ajannnxx.html

 

2.1.3    Transmitter

The Transmitter is mounted to the front of the FMPS chassis, where up to 9 modules can be connected. These modules output pulse current which can be terminated to a multiconductor cable. Section 2.1.5 addresses the Class 4 cables used in FMPS.

FMPS uses pulse current and delivers in the namesake pulses, with each cycle lasting around 3 milliseconds. Each cycle has 1 millisecond where a safety check is conducted, and 2 milliseconds where it is delivering power.

 

 

 

The intent of delivering power in this fashion is to allow the FMPS to detect any faults in the circuit and to respond to the check accordingly. UL-1400-1 outlines the faults that must be addressed, and Panduit has designed the solution accordingly.

Each Transmitter module can output up to 600 watts of power at the source through Class 4 multi-conductor cables of varying gauges. The expected wattage at the termination on the Receiver will be addressed in Section 4.2.2, Distance/Length of Cables later in this document.

 

 

 

 

Additional information about the FMPS Transmitter can be found at:

https://www.panduit.com/en/products/power-distribution-environmental-connectivity-hardware/fault-managed-power-systems/fault-managed-power-systems/pxtm1af.html

 

2.1.4    Receiver

The Receiver connects to the Transmitters via screw terminal plugs that connect to one of the three input channels available on the unit. The Receiver will draw the pulse current and convert it to traditional 48-volt DC power to output 600 watts from a single Transmitter module, or up to 1600 watts from three Transmitter modules, using the available output channels.

 

 

 

 

 

 

The Receiver has brackets built into the unit that will allow it to be mounted in various locations such as racks, enclosures, and other locations that can sustain and support the required operational environment.

Additional information about the FMPS Receiver can be found at:

https://www.panduit.com/en/products/power-distribution-environmental-connectivity-hardware/fault-managed-power-systems/fault-managed-power-systems/pxr1ajd.html

 

Panduit has a product portfolio of enclosures to support the deployment of Receivers and accompanying devices such as PoE switches to enable a plethora of use cases. The enclosures can be modified with modules such as fans, cable management systems, and other components to meet the requirements necessitated by the use case.

 

 

 

 

Panduit TrueEdge™ Vertical Wall Mount Enclosure, 6RU, Black, WME6BL shown. Additional information about enclosures from Panduit can be found at:

https://www.panduit.com/en/products/cabinets-thermal-management-racks-enclosures.html

 

2.1.5    Cable

The cable in an FMPS solution connecting the Transmitter to a Receiver is a crucial part of the overall solution. It will be delivering the current from the headend or MDF, where the FMPS chassis is centrally located, to the remote location where the Receiver is.

The cable connecting the FMPS Transmitter to the Receiver is essential, as it carries current from the headend/MDF where the FMPS chassis is located to the remote Receiver site

 

Panduit manufactures a line of 3-pair 16-gauge copper cables that were designed to meet the requirements outlined in UL1400-2 class 4 standards. To meet the UL 1400-2 requirements, the cables must be tested to meet several criteria including but not limited to the following:

-        Operating temperatures

-        Insulation thickness

-        Cable gauge range

-        Part numbering for manufacturers

 

 

 

 

Additional information about Panduit’s 3-pair 16-gauge Class 4 multiconductor cable can be found at:

https://www.panduit.com/en/products/copper-systems/bulk-copper-cable/enterprise-data-center-copper-cable/pxup316abu-uq.html

3          PANDUIT FMPS BENEFITS

Regardless of the architecture and design of the power delivery infrastructure where FMPS would be implemented, there are benefits to the solution that are gained almost universally.

 

3.1              INSTALLATION COSTS

The cost to install Class 4 FMPS is lower in comparison to installing other power delivery solutions due to the reduced labor costs for installers, as well as reduced costs in materials.

Due to the built-in safety, the Class 4 FMPS can be installed using Class 2 wiring methods, making it a faster and easier to install power solution compared to a traditional Class 1 circuit. The same low voltage labor installing data cables to the switch can be leveraged to install the Class 4 FMPS cables in the same data cable pathways at minimal additional cost. In comparison, a Class 1 Circuit requires licensed electricians to install conduit and run the electrical wiring separate from the data cables.

Material costs are also reduced by installing Class 4 FMPS cables to the required locations using the same cable pathways for data cables. In comparison, a Class 1 circuit required the installation of conduits, gang boxes, circuit breakers, and outlets for each location. As for PoE cabling, bringing the switch closer to the endpoints significantly reduce the required length of ethernet cabling to connect the switch to the endpoints.

 

3.2              CENTRALIZED POWER ARCHITECTURE

A recommended practice by Panduit for FMPS is to centralize the power delivery architecture to as few physical locations and square footage throughout a floor. FMPS enables this recommendation by permitting devices to be deployed at remote sites a considerable distance away. The remote sites will then converge to the FMPS in the center of the deployment.

 

 

 

 

 

In the example above, the FMPS, AC power source, uninterruptible power supply, to be called UPS henceforth, and necessary environmental controls can all be located on the main floor in the headend/main distribution frame, and the DC power from the FMPS can be distributed to provide the required power as necessary. This reduces the need for solutions infrastructure such as wall outlets, power distribution units, and other high-voltage delivery solutions to be implemented in remote locations.

Instead, enclosures containing the FMPS Receiver and PoE switch to power the access points can be installed on each floor, and the requisite connections:

●     multiconductor connections from Transmitters in headend/main distribution frame to Receivers in enclosures

●     ethernet connections from PoE switches to access points

 

can then be made to provide wireless network connectivity to the building depicted above.

The use case can be deployed to power a multitude of PoE endpoints such as access points, cameras, phones, digital signage, and any endpoint that is powered through an ethernet connection back to the PoE switch. This permits for flexible deployments as opposed to traditional high-voltage AC circuits since endpoint deployment would be dictated by location of power delivery such as power outlets along a wall, junction boxes, and other mechanisms.

By having components such as the circuit breakers, transformers, UPS, FMPS chassis, power supply, and Transmitters in one centralized location, a centralized architecture will reduce the complexity of installation, maintenance and monitoring the power system.

 

3.3              MONITORING AND CONTROL

Traditional power methods offer no monitoring or control capabilities of the electrical circuits. The Class 4 FMPS offers granular monitoring and control capabilities to all edge points from a single, centralized location. Users improve operational efficiency with the ability to troubleshoot and power cycle switches remotely without having to send a technician on-site. The monitoring capabilities of the Class 4 FMPS give users a view of available power capacity at each remote location simplifying future moves/adds/changes. 

 

3.4              SCALABILITY

The modularity of Panduit FMPS allows the solution to be tailored to meet the immediate power delivery requirements, while allowing the solution to grow to meet the power demands of the future. FMPS is designed with Hot-Swappable components that make it easy to make move/add/change for a more flexible and scalable power infrastructure, unlike fixed local power.

As evidenced by the test case in this document, the requirement to power a single 715-watt DC power supply on a Cisco Catalyst C9300-24H can be met with the following configuration of FMPS:

●     1 chassis

●     1 power supply

●     2 Transmitters

●     1 Receiver

 

 

 

 

If the chassis were to be populated with the modules in the following configuration:

●     1 chassis

●     3 power supplies

●     8 Transmitters

●     4 Receivers

 

the system above, using 16-AWG cables to connect the Transmitters to Receivers, could power 4 C9300 switches each powered by a single 715-watt DC power supply up to 1000 meters away, as illustrated below.

 

 

 

 

If the chassis were to be populated with the modules in the following configuration:

●     1 chassis

●     3 power supplies

●     9 Transmitters

●     3 Receivers

 

the system above, using 16-AWG cables to connect the Transmitters to Receivers, could power 3 C9300 switches each powered by two 715-watt DC power supply up to 450 meters away, as illustrated below.

 

 

 

 

Leveraging its modularity, FMPS can be scaled down or up to meet the current needs of a solution while permitting growth in the future.

 

4          TEST CASE WITH CISCO CATALYST 9300

To demonstrate the capabilities of the FMPS, a PoE solution was deployed where the FMPS acted as both the primary method of power delivery as well as a backup to a Cisco Catalyst 9300 switch, C9300-24H. This switch The C9300 can deliver up to 90 watts to a PoE device from each interface, so certain tests were conducted with PoE endpoints drawing as low as 15 watts on each interface to as high as 90 watts on each interface. The diagram for the architecture of the deployment is below.

 

 

4.1              COMPONENTS OF ARCHITECTURE

The FMPS will be connected to the AC power source to deliver the power to the C9300.

The C9300 will receive both DC power from the FMPS Receivers as well as traditional high-voltage AC power to power on PoE endpoints. For this test, the switch will be running software version Cisco IOS XE Dublin 17.12.3, which at the time of writing this document is the Cisco suggested release for this specific model, the Catalyst C9300-24H.

 

The release notes for the software can be found at:

https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/switches/lan/catalyst9300/software/release/17-12/release_notes/ol-17-12-9300/whats_new_in_cisco_ios_dublin_1712x.html

 

The PoE endpoints will serve to act as a point of validation to confirm that the C9300 is successfully receiving power from the FMPS to turn them on.

The Panduit Class 4 3-pair 16 AWG, to be called multiconductor cable henceforth, will connect the Transmitter modules to the Receivers to deliver the pulse current.

 

4.2              VARIABLES

The variables that will change for individual test cases are outlined below.

4.2.1    Configuration of FMPS

The FMPS will be deployed in the PoE solution with a variety of configurations, where the number of power supplies, Transmitter modules, and Receivers will be adjusted to deliver the necessary power to the C9300.

4.2.2    Distance/Length of Cables

The distance of the multiconductor cable will vary between 1000 meters and 450 meters to meet the requirements to power the C9300. As we will demonstrate, In some test cases, the current delivered across 1000 meters will suffice to power the C9300, while in others, the current will not be sufficient, so the distance will have to be reduced to 450 meters. The calculated wattage across distance relative to the number of cable pairs and gauge of said cables can be found in the graphs below.

 

 

 

 

Table 1.        Wattage Delivered Relative to Distance Using 16 AWG Multiconductor Cable and Pair Count

67

 

 

Table 2.        Wattage Delivered Relative to Distance Using 18 AWG Multiconductor Cable and Pair Count

 

 

 

 

 

 

4.2.3    Catalyst 9300 Power Supply Configurations

A variety of power supply configurations for the C9300 will be tested to ensure that the desired outcomes are achieved to validate certain use cases. The quantity of AC and DC power supplies mounted will be varied to test features such as power redundancy and port priority. The configurations are as follows:

1.      One 715 W DC power supply

2.      One 715 W DC power supply and one 1900 W AC power supply

3.      Two 715 W DC power supplies

In the third configuration, a single homing and dual homing configuration will be tested, where in the single homing, each power supply will be connected to its own dedicated Receiver, and the dual homing architecture, consisting of two Receivers and two C9300’s, will have two Receivers powering one DC power supply on each C9300 for complete redundancy.

4.3              VALIDATION METHODOLOGY

4.3.1    Operation of FMPS

To validate that the FMPS is operating as intended, the management graphical user interface will be referenced to check for conditions of all the components of the FMPS.

 

 

 

 

Leveraging the interface will allow the FMPS to be monitored to ensure that the system is receiving the power from the source as well as delivering the requisite amount to power on the C9300.

4.3.2    Operation of 9300

The C9300 command line interface will also be used to validate the FMPS as a viable source of power. There are several commands where the outputs will be able to verify the switch is receiving enough power to run its own systems as well as deliver power to the connected PoE endpoints.

The following commands, which will be executed with in EXEC mode with elevated privileges, will reveal the operational parameters on the switch:

●     show environment all

●     show power detail

●     show power inline upoe-plus

 

For the sake of simplicity and readability, the outputs of some commands will be shown as tables with parameters of interest and not raw text outputs in the results section of the test cases. The parameters of interest have been made into bold and italics for easier viewing, and to provide an opportunity for administrators to locate the said values from the sample outputs above.

 

The “show environment all” command displays the fan, temperature, and power information of the internal power supplies connected to the switch. A sample of the output of the command is shown below:

 

Sensor List: Environmental Monitoring

 Sensor          Location        State               Reading       Range(min-max)

 PS1 Vout        1               GOOD               56238 mV          na

 PS1 Vin         1               GOOD               48063 mV        90 - 264

 PS1 CURin       1               GOOD                8250 mA          na

 PS1 Curout      1               GOOD                6453 mA          na

 PS1 POWin       1               GOOD              397000 mW          na

 PS1 POWout      1               GOOD              362500 mW          na

 PS1 FAN         1               GOOD                6736 rpm         na

 PS2 Vout        1               FAULTY                 0 mV          na

 PS2 Vin         1               FAULTY                 0 mV        90 - 264

 PS2 CURin       1               FAULTY                 0 mA          na

 PS2 CURout      1               FAULTY                 0 mA          na

 PS2 POWin       1               FAULTY                 0 mW          na

 PS2 POWout      1               FAULTY                 0 mW          na

 PS2 FAN         1               FAULTY                 0 rpm         na

 SYSTEM INLET    1               GREEN                 25 Celsius   0 - 56

 SYSTEM OUTLET   1               GREEN                 34 Celsius   0 - 125

 SYSTEM HOTSPOT  1               GREEN                 51 Celsius   0 - 125

 

Switch   FAN     Speed   State   Airflow direction

---------------------------------------------------

  1       1     5440      OK     Front to Back

  1       2     5440      OK     Front to Back

  1       3     5440      OK     Front to Back

 

SW  PID                 Serial#     Status           Sys Pwr  PoE Pwr  Watts

--  ------------------  ----------  ---------------  -------  -------  -----

1A  PWR-C1-715WDC       DCC2316E1GU  OK              Good     Good     715

1B  Unknown             Unknown      No Input Power  Bad      Bad      Unknown 

 

---------------------------------------------------

The “show power detail” command will display the cumulative power allocation information on a 9300 in detail. The values of particular interest are instantaneous power used, and the power summary which have been highlighted in the sample to follow. The instantaneous power shows the real-time value of the wattage being consumed to keep the switch in an operational state, while the power summary table shows the allocated wattage, and not the consumed wattage.

 

A sample of the output of the command is shown below:

 

SW  PID                 Serial#     Status           Sys Pwr  PoE Pwr  Watts

--  ------------------  ----------  ---------------  -------  -------  -----

1A  PWR-C1-715WDC       DCC2316E1GU  OK              Good     Good     715

1B  Unknown             Unknown      No Input Power  Bad      Bad      Unknown 

 

PS Configuration Mode  : SP-PS

PS Operating state     : Stndaln

 

Power supplies currently active    : 1

Power supplies currently available : 2

 

Automatic Module Shutdown : Enabled

Power Budget Mode = SP-PS

 

                           shutdown  Power                                  Out of  In

Mod  Model No              Priority  State     Budget  Instantaneous  Peak  Reset   Reset

---  --------------------  --------  --------  ------  -------------  ----  ------  -----

1    C9300-24H             4         accepted  240     70             99    240     50

---  --------------------  --------  --------  ------  -------------  ----  ------  -----

Total 240

 

Power Summary          Maximum

 (in Watts)    Used    Available

-------------  ------  ---------

System Power   240     240

POE Power      323     475

-------------  ------  ---------

Total          563     715

 

The “show power inline upoe-plus” command will display the detailed PoE status of the entire switch. A sample of the output of the command is shown below:

 

 

Module   Available     Used     Remaining

          (Watts)     (Watts)    (Watts)

------   ---------   --------   ---------

1           475.0      323.4       151.6

 

Device IEEE Mode - BT

 

Codes: DS - Dual Signature device, SS - Single Signature device

       SP - Single Pairset device

 

Interface   Admin  Type Oper-State       Power(Watts)     Class   Device Name

            State       Alt-A,B       Allocated Utilized  Alt-A,B

----------- ------ ---- ------------- --------- --------- ------- -----------

 

Gi1/0/1     auto   SS   on,off        15.4      14.1      3       Ieee PD      

Gi1/0/2     auto   SS   on,off        15.4      14.1      3       Ieee PD      

Gi1/0/3     auto   SS   on,off        15.4      14.3      3       Ieee PD      

Gi1/0/4     auto   SS   on,off        15.4      14.2      3       Ieee PD      

Gi1/0/5     auto   SS   on,off        15.4      14.1      3       Ieee PD      

Gi1/0/6     auto   SS   on,off        15.4      14.0      3       Ieee PD      

Gi1/0/7     auto   SS   on,off        15.4      14.1      3       Ieee PD      

Gi1/0/8     auto   SS   on,off        15.4      13.9      3       Ieee PD      

Gi1/0/9     auto   SS   on,off        15.4      13.9      3       Ieee PD      

Gi1/0/10    auto   SS   on,off        15.4      14.1      3       Ieee PD      

Gi1/0/11    auto   SS   on,off        15.4      14.1      3       Ieee PD      

Gi1/0/12    auto   SS   on,off        15.4      14.0      3       Ieee PD      

Gi1/0/13    auto   SS   on,off        15.4      13.9      3       Ieee PD      

Gi1/0/14    auto   SS   on,off        15.4      13.9      3       Ieee PD      

Gi1/0/15    auto   SS   on,off        15.4      13.9      3       Ieee PD      

Gi1/0/16    auto   SS   on,off        15.4      14.0      3       Ieee PD      

Gi1/0/17    auto   SS   on,off        15.4      13.9      3       Ieee PD      

Gi1/0/18    auto   SS   on,off        15.4      13.9      3       Ieee PD      

Gi1/0/19    auto   SS   on,off        15.4      14.1      3       Ieee PD      

Gi1/0/20    auto   SS   on,off        15.4      13.9      3       Ieee PD      

Gi1/0/21    auto   SS   on,off        15.4      14.1      3       Ieee PD      

Gi1/0/22    auto   n/a  off           0.0       0.0       n/a                  

Gi1/0/23    auto   n/a  off           0.0       0.0       n/a                  

Gi1/0/24    auto   n/a  off           0.0       0.0       n/a                   

--------- ------ ---------- ---------- ---------- ------------------- -----

 

Totals:            21   on          323.4    294.7

 

 

Additional information regarding the commands for software version 17.12.3 can be found at:

 

https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/switches/lan/catalyst9300/software/release/17-12/command_reference/b_1712_9300_cr/interface_and_hardware_commands.html?bookSearch=true#wp3418727943

 

4.4              NOTABLE OBSERVATIONS

During testing, some notable observations were made:

1.      Power inline port priority high command only works when total load of endpoints connected to them do not exceed the total capacity of operational power supply

a.     If a power supply is rated for 715 watts and 240 is budgeted for system operations, the load on the interfaces configured with high port priority should not exceed the remaining 475

2.      Hardware versions of the power supply must match to ensure proper function and operations. The versions of the power supply can only be found by looking at the label on the power supply. Running “show environment all” on the switch will provide the product identification, but not the version.

a.     Using mismatching versions have led to issues and power resilience not working

i.      switch reloading when one power supply loses power

ii.     current overdraw and extreme fan operation in response to heat

b.     For these tests, two pairs of 715-watt power supplies were used

i.      PIDVID: PWR-C1-715WDC V00

ii.     PIDVID: PWR-C1-715WDC V01

c.     When the version of the hardware had a mismatch, the switches did not operate as intended, but when the tests were conducted with matching hardware versions, the switches operated as intended

 

 

5          DESIGN ARCHITECTURES AND TESTS OUTCOME

 

5.1              DISTRIBUTED NETWORK ARCHITECTURE WITH CENTRALIZED POWER

This architectural design enables the placement of switches closer to PoE loads, eliminating the need for a nearby power source. Switches can be installed virtually anywhere with minimal requirements for space or power. This approach significantly reduces the length of Ethernet cabling needed to connect switches to endpoints, while also allowing for future expansion of PoE devices. The two test cases presented follow this architecture and represent two different options for power and distance at the switch.

A sample diagram of the architecture is shown below.

 

 

 

 

5.1.1    Test 1: FMPS to Single DC Power Supply on 9300

For Test 1, the FMPS will provide DC power from a single Receiver to a single DC power supply on the C9300. This is a basic test being conducted to validate FMPS can deliver sufficient power to turn on the switch as well as the PoE endpoints connected to it.

 

The desired outcome for the test is:

 

●     C9300 to successfully provide power to 21 PoE end devices drawing 15 watts

●     C9300 to successfully provide power to 4 PoE end devices drawing 90 watts

5.1.2    Intent of Design

An example where such a design would be implemented is an environment where PoE devices need to be powered a considerable distance away from a power source, beyond the 100 meters that the 802.3bt standards outline.

Using FMPS, a PoE switch can be deployed, 1000 meters tested in this case, remotely from the power source, and from the switch, so long as it is capable of meeting 802.3bt standards, the PoE endpoint to be powered can be installed another 100 meters away.

Of the 715 watts delivered to the switch, 240 will be allocated for switch operations. Therefore, this test seeks to validate that the switch is capable of 475W of PoE load and the PoE endpoints can be powered from 1100 meters away from the FMPS chassis.

5.1.3    Diagram

 

 

 

5.1.4    Parameters

 

5.1.4.1 Bill of Materials

Table 3.        Panduit

Table 4.        Cisco

 

 

5.1.5    FMPS Management Interface Screenshots for Powering 15 Watt Endpoints

 

 

 

 

 

5.1.6    FMPS Management Interface Screenshots for Powering 90 Watt Endpoints

 

 

 

 

 

5.1.7    Catalyst 9300 Show Command Outputs for Powering 15 Watts

5.1.7.1 show environment all

 

 

The second power supply on the switch is in the “FAULTY” state since there is no power supply populating the second bay on the switch.

5.1.7.2 show power detail

 

Table 5.        Power Supply Status

 

 

Table 6.        System Power Status

 

 

Table 7.        Power Summary

 

5.1.7.3 show power inline upoe-plus

 

 

 

5.1.8    Catalyst 9300 Show Command Outputs for Powering 90 Watts

5.1.8.1 show environment all

 

 

The second power supply on the switch is in the “FAULTY” state since there is no power supply populating the second bay on the switch.

 

5.1.8.2 show power detail

 

Table 8.        Power Supply Status

 

Table 9.        System Power Status

 

 

Table 10.     Power Summary

 

5.1.8.3 show power inline upoe-plus

 

The remaining interfaces were in a power-deny state due to insufficient PoE power.

5.1.9    Results

Test 1 was successful and validates FMPS will provide the requisite 715 watts across 1000 meters to the switch with the following parameters of the FMPS:

 

●     1 FMPS power supply

◦     has capacity to provide 1600 watts, exceeding the required 715 watts

●     2 Transmitters

◦     each Transmitter can only provide 600 watts, so requires two

●     1 Receiver

◦     each Receiver has three input channels that can receive power from the Transmitters, only one required to receive input from two Transmitters

●     1000 meters of 16 AWG multiconductor cable

 

The FMPS management console shows that the Transmitters delivered 1600 watts to the Receiver, and the “show power detail” output shows that the switch received all 715 watts from the Receiver.

 

5.1.10 How does this design scale?

A single FMPS Transmitter can support four distributed 9300 switches up to 1000 meters away from a centralized point. Refer to section 3.3 on scalability for more details.

 

5.1.11 Test 2: FMPS to Dual DC Power Supplies on C9300

 

For Test 2, the FMPS will provide DC power from a single Receiver to two DC power supplies on the 9300 for basic functionality.

 

The desired outcome for the test is:

●     C9300 to successfully provide power to 21 PoE end devices drawing 15 watts

●     C9300 to successfully provide power to 13 PoE end devices drawing 90 watts

◦     Outcomes from test 1 are expected to carry over, but with the addition of PoE wattage available from the second power supply

 

5.1.12 Intent of Design

An example where such a design would be implemented in such a fashion is where 715 watts from a single power supply on the C9300 is insufficient, and requires additional wattage from the second 715 watt power supply.

Using FMPS, a PoE switch can be deployed, 450 meters tested in this case, remotely from the power source, and from the switch, so long as it is capable of meeting 802.3bt standards, the PoE endpoint to be powered can be another installed another 100 meters away. The switch will receive 1430 watts in total from the Receiver, but 240 will be allocated for switch operations. Therefore this test seeks to validate that the switch is capable of 1190W of PoE load and the PoE endpoint can be powered from 550 meters away from the FMPS chassis.

 

5.1.13 Diagram

 

5.1.14 Parameters

 

5.1.14.1          Bill of Materials

 

Table 11.     Pandu

 

Table 12.     Cisco

 

5.1.15 FMPS Management Interface Screenshots for Powering 15 Watt Endpoints

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5.1.16 FMPS Management Interface Screenshots for Powering 90 Watt Endpoints

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5.1.17 Catalyst 9300 Show Command Outputs for Powering 15 Watts

 

5.1.17.1          show environment all

 

5.1.17.2          show power detail

 

Table 13.     Power Supply Status

 

Table 14.     System Power Status

 

 

Table 15.     Power Summary

 

 

5.1.17.3          show power inline upoe-plus

 

5.1.18 Catalyst 9300 Show Command Outputs for Powering 90 Watts

5.1.18.1          show environment all

 

5.1.18.2          show power detail

 

Table 16.     Power Supply Status

 

Table 17.     System Power Status

 

 

Table 18.     Power Summary

 

5.1.18.3          show power inline upoe-plus

 

The remaining interfaces were in a power-deny state due to lack of available power.

5.1.19 Results

Test 2 was successful and confirms FMPS will provide all 1430 watts across 450 meters split between the two power supplies on the C9300 with the following parameters of the FMPS:

●     1 power supply

◦     has capacity to provide 1600 watts, exceeding the required 1430 watts

●     3 Transmitters

◦     each Transmitter can only provide 600 watts, so requires three

●     1 Receiver

◦     each Receiver has three input channels that can receive power from the Transmitters, only one Receiver required to receive input from two Transmitters

●     450 meters of 16 AWG multiconductor cable

◦     distance reduced to minimize power loss

 

The FMPS management console shows that the Transmitters delivered 1600 watts to the Receiver, and the “show power detail” output shows that the switch received all 1430 watts from the Receiver.

Test 2 conclusively shows that should a solution require more than 715 watts, FMPS can power a second power supply to supplement the first and provide an additional 715 watts to power the endpoints connected the PoE switch.

5.1.9    How does this design scale?

A single FMPS Transmitter can support three distributed 9300 switches up to 450 meters away from a centralized point. Refer to section 3.3 on scalability for more details.

 

5.2              CENTRALIZED DC POWER BACK-UP FOR POWER REDUNDANCY

This architectural design is well-suited for both new construction and retrofit projects. By utilizing a centralized UPS for DC power backup, it enhances power reliability, ensuring uninterrupted power delivery to critical PoE loads. Additionally, it improves operational efficiency by reducing maintenance costs associated with managing multiple distributed UPS units.

A sample diagram where FMPS is deployed to a brownfield PoE deployment with a pre-existing AC power connection is shown below.

 

 

 

5.2.1    Test 3: FMPS to DC Power Supply as Backup

For Test 3, the FMPS will provide DC power from a single Receiver to a DC power supply on the C9300, and an AC power supply will be mounted to the other bay on the C9300. The intent of this use case is to demonstrate FMPS’ ability to serve as a backup to the AC power.

To test FMPS as a backup solution to the AC power, the C9300 was turned on with both DC and AC power supplies, and once the switch was in a steady state, power was cut to the AC power supply to observe whether FMPS powered the DC power supply to maintain continuity to the C9300.

In conjunction with the power redundancy, the “power inline port priority high” command was used with the 90-watt endpoints to ensure that in the event of power shedding, the interfaces configured with high priority would continue with PoE power while the remainder of the interfaces connected to PoE endpoints would shed power and enter into a power-deny state as a result of loss of power.

The desired outcome for the test is:

●     C9300 to successfully provide power to 21 PoE endpoints drawing 15 watts

◦     After a loss of power to the AC power supply, the switch and PoE endpoints remain unimpacted

●     C9300 to successfully provide power to 13 PoE endpoints drawing 90 watts

◦     After a loss of power to the AC power supply, the switch remains unimpacted and the PoE endpoints connected to interfaces with high port priority remain unimpacted while the others are shed due to insufficient PoE power

 

5.2.2    Intent of Design

An example where such a design would be implemented is a brownfield environment, where PoE switches have already been deployed and operate on AC power, with no building or local backup power solution in place.

Leveraging FMPS, a centralized architecture for backup power can be implemented where rather than implementing redundancy solutions at each remote location, the centralized architecture will allow the FMPS to distribute backup power to the remote locations.

5.2.3    Diagram

 

5.2.4    Parameters

 

5.2.4.1 Bill of Materials

Table 19.     Pandu

Table 20.     Cisco

 

Cisco

5.2.1    Test 3 with 15-Watt Endpoints and Two Power Supplies

 

5.2.1.1 FMPS Management Interface Screenshots

 

 

 

 

 

5.2.1.2 Catalyst 9300 Show Command Outputs

5.2.1.2.1         show environment all

 

In the outputs below, power supply 1 is the 715-watt DC power supply, and power supply 2 is the 1900-watt AC power supply.

 

5.2.1.2.2         show power detail

 

Table 21.     Power Supply Status

 

Table 22.     System Power Status

 

Table 23.     Power Summary

 

5.2.1.2.3         show power inline upoe-plus

 

5.2.2    Test 3 with 15-Watt Endpoints and Loss of AC Power Supply

5.2.2.1 FMPS Management Interface Screenshots

 

 

 

 

5.2.2.2 Catalyst 9300 Show Command Outputs

5.2.2.2.1         show environment all

 

Power supply 2, the 1900-watt AC power supply, was removed from the equation to demonstrate FMPS’ capability to serve as a backup.

 

5.2.2.2.2         show power detail

 

Table 24.     Power Supply Status

 

Table 25.     System Power Status

 

Power Summary

 

5.2.2.2.3         show power inline upoe-plus

 

5.2.3    Test 3 with 90-Watt Endpoints and Two Power Supplies

5.2.3.1 FMPS Management Interface Screenshots

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5.2.3.2 Catalyst 9300 Show Command Outputs

5.2.3.2.1         show environment all

 

In the outputs below, power supply 1 is the 715-watt DC power supply, and power supply 2 is the 1900-watt AC power supply.

 

5.2.3.2.2         show power detail

 

Table 26.     Power Supply Status

                        Watts

 

Table 27.     System Power Status

 

Table 28.     Power Summary

 

5.2.3.2.3         show power inline upoe-plus

 

5.2.4    Test 3 with 90-Watt Endpoints and Loss of AC Power Supply

5.2.4.1 FMPS Management Interface Screenshots

 

 

 

 

 

5.2.4.2 Catalyst 9300 Show Command Outputs

5.2.4.2.1         show environment all

 

5.2.4.2.2         show power detail

 

Table 29.     Power Supply Status

 

 

Table 30.     System Power Status

 

Table 31.     Power Summary

 

5.2.4.2.3         show power inline upoe-plus

 

5.2.5    Results

Test 3 was successful and validates FMPS successfully delivers the requisite 715 watts to the switch with the following parameters of the FMPS:

●     1 FMPS power supply

◦     has capacity to provide 1600 watts, exceeding the required 715 watts

●     2 Transmitters

◦     each Transmitter can only provide 600 watts, so requires two

●     1 Receiver

◦     each Receiver has three input channels that can receive power from the Transmitters, only one required to receive input from two Transmitters

●     1000 meters of 16 AWG multiconductor cable

 

At 1000 meters, the FMPS delivered the full 715 watts required to load the power supply on the switch to maximum capacity. This performance was conclusively demonstrated by the power summary from the "show power detail" command as well as the FMPS management console.

When AC power was lost to the switch, FMPS sustained operations of the DC power supply to power both the switch and PoE endpoints, showing FMPS can serve as a solution to achieve power redundancy at remote locations.

When the load on the interfaces were increased to 90-watt endpoints, when AC power was lost, the switch remained operational, but power was shed and the interfaces where port priority was configured to high, interfaces 11, 12, and 13 in this test, those endpoints were unimpacted while the remaining wattage available was used to power the endpoints on interfaces 7 and 10.

 

5.2.6    How does this design scale?

A single FMPS Transmitter connected to a centralized UPS can support four distributed 9300 switches up to 1000 meters away from a centralized point. Refer to section 3.3 on scalability for more details.

 

 

5.3              DUAL HOMING POWER AND NETWORK ARCHITECTURE

This architectural design is well-suited for critical applications where network uptime and reliability are paramount. From a power perspective, using two FMPS Receivers provides redundant power supply to two 9300 switches, where it reduces the risk of a single point of failure. It allows for maintenance on a Receiver without affecting the operation of the switch.

From a network perspective, using two 9300 switches helps ensure that a network remains operational even if one part of the network fails. It can also help manage network load by distributing traffic across multiple connects.

Having two switches will allow for more PoE devices to also be connected and powered by FMPS, should the need arise for additional endpoints to be deployed in a space.

 

5.3.1    Test 4: FMPS to DC Power Supply in Dual Homing Configuration

For Test 4, the FMPS will provide DC power to the C9300 in a dual homing configuration, where two Receivers will each power one dedicated power supply on the switch, so that one Receiver does not act as a single point of failure and the FMPS architecture provides power resiliency.

In conjunction with the power redundancy, the “power inline port priority high” command was used with the 90-watt endpoints to ensure that during the power shedding, the interfaces configured with high priority would remain unimpacted while the remainder of the interfaces connected to PoE endpoints would shed power and enter into a power-deny state as a result of loss of power.

The desired outcome for the test is:

●     C9300 to successfully provide power to 21 PoE endpoints drawing 15 watts

◦     After a loss of power to one of the power supplies, the switch and PoE endpoints will be unimpacted

●     C9300 to successfully provide power to 13 PoE endpoints drawing 90 watts

◦     After a loss of power to one of the power supplies, the switch and PoE endpoints connected to interfaces with high port priority remain unimpacted, while the others are shed due insufficient PoE power

 

5.3.2    Intent of Design

 

Dual-homing architectures would be implemented in high-availability environments where continuous power is crucial for business operations, such as financial services, healthcare, and cloud service providers.

The dual homing configuration achieves redundancy by allowing the switches to be powered by two Receivers rather than one, alleviating the sole responsibility of powering the switch to one single Receiver.

5.3.3    Diagram

 

5.3.4    Parameters

 

5.3.4.1 Bill of Materials

 

Table 32.     Panduit

Table 33.     Cisco

 

5.3.5    Test 4 with 15-Watt Endpoints and Two Power Supplies

 

5.3.5.1 FMPS Management Interface Screenshots

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5.3.5.2 Catalyst 9300 Show Command Outputs

5.3.5.2.1         show environment all

 

5.3.5.2.2         show power detail

 

Table 34.     Power Supply Status

 

Table 35.     System Power Status

 

Table 36.     Power Summary

 

5.3.5.2.3         show power inline upoe-plus

 

5.3.6    Test 4 with 15-Watt Endpoints and Loss of One DC Power Supply

 

5.3.6.1 FMPS Management Interface Screenshots

 

 

 

            

 

 

5.3.6.2 Catalyst 9300 Show Command Outputs

5.3.6.2.1         show environment all

 

The output below shows the result of a simulated failure on the Receiver powering power supply 2.

 

5.3.6.2.2         show power detail

 

Table 37.     Power Supply Status

 

System Power Status

 

Table 38.     Power SummaryPow

er Type         Used               Availabl

5.3.6.2.3         show power inline upoe-plus

 

5.3.7    Test 4 with 90-Watt Endpoints and Two Power Supplies

 

5.3.7.1 FMPS Management Interface Screenshots

 

 

 

 

 

5.3.7.2 Catalyst 9300 Show Command Outputs

5.3.7.2.1         show environment all

 

5.3.7.2.2         show power detail

 

Table 39.     Power Supply Status

 

Table 40.     System Power Status

 

 

Table 41.     Power Summary

 

5.3.7.2.3         show power inline upoe-plus

5.3.8    Test 4 with 90-Watt Endpoints and Loss of One DC Power Supply

5.3.8.1 FMPS Management Interface Screenshots

 

 

 

 

 

 

5.3.8.2 Catalyst 9300 Show Command Outputs

5.3.8.2.1         show environment all

The output below shows the result of a simulated failure on the Receiver powering power supply 2.

 

5.3.8.2.2        show power detail

 

Table 42.     Power Supply Status

 

 

Table 43.     System Power Status

 

 

Table 44.     Power Summary

 

5.3.8.2.3         show power inline upoe-plus

 

5.3.9    Results

Test 4 was successful and confirms FMPS is able to act as a backup solution to itself by using multiple Receivers to power a PoE switch with 1430 watts with the following parameters of the FMPS:

 

●     2 FMPS power supply

◦     tested power redundancy, necessitating the use of two power supplies

●     6 Transmitters

◦     each Transmitter can only provide 600 watts, simulated the use of two separate Receivers, requiring 6 Transmitters

●     2 Receivers

◦     simulated power loss to single Receiver to demonstrate dual-homing architecture that one Receiver can power a power supply on multiple switches

●     450 meters of 16 AWG multiconductor cable

◦     distance reduced to minimize power loss

 

Each Receiver in the FMPS was able to deliver all requisite 715 watts across 450 meters to load each power supply on the switch to full capacity, as evidenced by the power summary from the “show power detail” command as well as FMPS management console corroborating said state of PoE switches.

Power redundancy was successful in keeping the switch operational while also powering all the 15-watt endpoints when power to a DC power supply was lost through the failure of one Receiver.

When the load on the interfaces were increased to 90-watt endpoints, when one DC power supply lost power, the switch remained operational, but power was shed and the interfaces where port priority was configured to high, interfaces 11, 12, and 13 in this test, remained unimpacted.

6          CONCLUSION

 

The tests conducted and outcomes observed have shown the capability of FMPS to play an integral role in a PoE solution. The battery of tests conducted to validate its capabilities shows that so long as the requisite components and modules are present in the FMPS to ensure the Receiver can draw the necessary power, it can deliver it as required, as evidenced by the operations of both the C9300 as well as the PoE endpoints connected to it.

The amount of power expected to be delivered to the Receivers relative to the distance of the 16-AWG multiconductor cable in the graph referenced in section 4.2.2 was successfully delivered to the Receivers.

There are additional factors to consider when designing the power delivery infrastructure using FMPS. Such things include, but are not limited to:

●     Selected cable must be UL 1400-2 certified and must be listed under the Panduit UL 1400-1 listing. Contact Panduit for the most up to date listed cables.

●     gauge of multiconductor cable connecting Transmitter to Receiver

●     distance from headend/MDF to remote location where Receivers will be deployed

●     environmental conditions to which FMPS components will be exposed to

●     requirements such as redundancy and scalability

 

As evidenced in the tests conducted, many of the factors can be adjusted to fit the needs of a deployment as simple as powering a single DC power supply on a PoE switch to power connected PoE endpoints, to as complex as implementing a dual-homing architecture to provide power redundancy to multiple switches to eliminate a single point of failure. The modularity and scalability of the individual components allows for FMPS to be deployed to meet immediate needs while permitting for growth in the future both near and distant.

Panduit's FMPS, combined with Cisco Catalyst 9300 PoE switches, extends network reach and delivers high-wattage power over long distances, allowing Cisco switches to maintain performance and utilize PoE features effectively. FMPS not only enhances network flexibility but also simplifies installation by reducing local power source requirements. The integrated power and network management tools support efficient distributed network architectures.