Explains asset groups as the segmentation identity model, including interface-based membership, custom and network groups, global and local scope, SGT precedence, and fallback behavior.
Asset groups are the segmentation identities that Cyber Vision uses to evaluate policy. When an asset interface belongs to an asset group, that group determines the SGT for the interface and the rules that can apply to its traffic.
Cyber Vision includes an asset group for a switch only after it has seen at least one asset interface from that group in traffic related to that switch.
When Cyber Vision has seen interfaces from two asset groups on the same switch, it can evaluate rules between those groups for that switch. The two groups do not need to have communicated directly with each other on that switch.
If Cyber Vision has not seen any interface from an asset group on a switch, Cyber Vision excludes that group from that switch. Rules that involve that group are not evaluated for that switch.
Group membership is based on asset interfaces, not an asset. One asset can have multiple IP addresses, and different interfaces of the same asset can belong to different groups.
Global and local group behavior
Use this table to distinguish asset group families.
|
Group family |
Source of membership |
Segmentation role |
|---|---|---|
|
Custom asset group |
User-created or recommendation-derived membership from observed asset interfaces. |
Explicit segmentation identity with an SGT. The group can be global or local. |
|
Network group |
Subnet-backed membership from Cyber Vision network definitions. |
Fallback segmentation identity when an interface has no effective custom group. |
Global groups are the default and preferred model for shared segmentation intent. A global assignment follows the interface wherever that interface is observed.
Local groups are switch-scoped. They are visible only on the switch where they are defined and override global membership on that switch. The local SGT replaces the policy context; it does not add another permission layer on top of the global group.
An observed interface can have only one effective SGT on a switch. Cyber Vision resolves identity in this order:
|
Order |
Effective identity |
|---|---|
|
1 |
Local custom group on the selected switch. |
|
2 |
Global custom group assigned to the observed interface. |
|
3 |
Network group fallback for the network that contains the interface. |
Use this fallback behavior to predict what happens when local or custom group membership changes.
|
Situation |
Effective behavior |
|---|---|
|
An interface is assigned to a local custom group on the selected switch. |
The local group is the effective identity on that switch, even if the interface also has a global group. |
|
An interface has no local custom group but has a global custom group. |
The global group is the effective identity. |
|
An interface has no effective custom group. |
The network group for the interface network is the fallback identity. |
|
A local group is deleted. |
Former member interfaces fall back to a global custom group when one exists. Otherwise, they fall back to the network group for their network. |