![]() |
Layer 3 Switching Software Feature and Configuration Guide, 12.0(4a)WX5(11a)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Quality of Service Feature Summary
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Table of ContentsQuality of Service Feature SummaryOverview of Layer 3 Switching Quality of Service (QoS)
About Scheduling and Weighted Round-Robin Configuring Precedence to WRR Scheduling Quality of Service Feature SummaryThis chapter describes the Quality of Service (QoS) features built into your switch router, and how to map QoS scheduling at both the system and interface levels. This chapter includes the following topics:
Overview of Layer 3 Switching Quality of Service (QoS)Extensive core Quality of Service (QoS) mechanisms are built into the switch router architecture to ensure policy enforcement and queuing of the ingress port, as well as weighted round-robin (WRR) scheduling at the egress port. IP precedence can be mapped into adjacent technologies (for example, tag switching or ATM) to deliver end-to-end network QoS policies. This enables service classes to be established with no changes to existing applications and with no complicated network signaling requirements. The system gathers IP precedence information from the IP header type-of-service field. For an incoming IP packet, the first two (most significant) bits of the service type field determine the delay priority. Layer 3 switching recognizes four QoS classes, Q-0 to Q-3, as summarized in Table 9-1. Table 9-1: QoS Delay Priorities and Queues
Your switch router can read the precedence field and switch the packet accordingly, but it cannot reclassify traffic. The edge router or switch is expected to set the precedence field according to its local policy. The switch router queues packets based on the delay priority and the target next-hop interface. About Scheduling and Weighted Round-Robin
You can find the effective bandwidth (in Mbps) for a particular queue with the following formula:
For example, if W is 4, S is 15, and B is 100, the formula would be (4/15) x 100 = 26 Mbps, and the effective bandwidth for the specified queue in this example is 26 Mbps. Configuring Precedence to WRR SchedulingLayer 3 switching software enables QoS-based forwarding by default. If disabled, issue the following command to enable QoS switching: # [no] qos switching The [no] version of this command disables QoS switching on the entire system. Table 9-2 shows an example of configuring QoS scheduling at the system level. Table 9-2: Mapping QoS Scheduling at the System Level
The syntax used in Table 9-2 is described below:
To set the precedence back to the default setting for the switch router, use the no version of the qos mapping precedence command. Table 9-3 shows the default WRR weights for IP Precedence. Table 9-3: IP Precedence and Default WRR Weights
Mapping QoS Scheduling at the Interface LevelTable 9-4 shows and example of configuring QoS scheduling at the interface level. Table 9-4: Mapping QoS Scheduling at the Interface Level
The QoS commands are applicable to both Gigabit Ethernet and Fast Ethernet interfaces. To set the precedence back to the system-level default setting for the switch router, use the no version of the qos mapping precedence wrr-weight command. Both the source and destination interface parameters are optional. When both are not specified, the system-level QoS mapping is configured. Otherwise, you can specify the source interface, or the destination interface, or both to configure the WRR weight for the traffic streams listed below. The configuration takes precedence in the following order: 1. Traffic streams with a certain precedence, from a particular source interface to a particular destination interface. 2. Traffic streams with a certain precedence to a particular destination interface. 3. Traffic streams with a certain precedence from a particular source interface. Monitoring the QoS ConfigurationThe Cisco IOS show commands for QoS are shown in Table 9-5. Table 9-5: Monitoring QoS Operation
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|