PDF(429.1 KB) View with Adobe Reader on a variety of devices
ePub(244.2 KB) View in various apps on iPhone, iPad, Android, Sony Reader, or Windows Phone
Mobi (Kindle)(250.5 KB) View on Kindle device or Kindle app on multiple devices
Updated:October 22, 2019
The documentation set for this product strives to use bias-free language. For the purposes of this documentation set, bias-free is defined as language that does not imply discrimination based on age, disability, gender, racial identity, ethnic identity, sexual orientation, socioeconomic status, and intersectionality. Exceptions may be present in the documentation due to language that is hardcoded in the user interfaces of the product software, language used based on RFP documentation, or language that is used by a referenced third-party product. Learn more about how Cisco is using Inclusive Language.
The objective of this document is to provide you with best practices when migrating to Multiple Spanning Tree
(MSTP). Utilizing MSTP over other Spanning Tree variants can improve network efficiency and reliability.
The need to optimize Layer 2 in a mixed hardware environment
This guide will omit steps like logging into the device via SSH, or the management interface - instead we'll
highlight the core commands. Each best practice will contain a sub-task outlining appropriate steps for mixed
hardware (Enterprise & SMB). For configuration guides, see the following two
section is intended to give you an accessible mental model of the
protocol at play. The definitions are interlocking components of the MSTP protocol.
Further details are contained in the sub-bullet points.
BPDU - Bridge Protocol Data Unit - These are multicast frames
containing all the information a switch needs to continue operating.
Note: that the instance mappings themselves are not in the BPDU.
Region - (Specific to MSTP) - A region solves the problem encountered by other STP
sends one BPDU per VLAN. As with Per Vlan Spanning Tree, sending so many BPDUs causes strain on the
CPU load and thereby hindering network performance. Instead, with MSTP all VLANs are mapped to a single
Instance - An instance is a of logical table of a VLAN, or many VLANs, to a
particular region. This instance then maps to a zone. You will complete these steps as a part of your
The default instance 0 (zero), is synonymous with the following terms
MST0, Internal Spanning Tree (IST).
Any instances that are
created by you, are be referenced to as Multiple Spanning Tree
Instances, or MSTIs.
This is where good documentation of your network's
VLANs will save you headaches.
If an instance fails, it will not affect other instances.
MSTI - Multiple Spanning Tree Instances - Contains the
administratively created instance. These mappings are
contained in what's known as an "MRecord", visible via Wireshark. The records encompass details
necessary to manage the instance's topology.
IST - Internal Spanning Tree - is the record of switches participating in a MSTP zone. The
matter how many) contained within a zone, are represented to areas outside the zone as a single switch.
CST - Common Spanning Tree - is composed of MSTP regions running its own traditional spanning
uses links between the switches at the boundary of the MSTP zone.
CIST - Common and Internal Spanning Tree - Composed of both CST and IST that traverses multiple
a shared mapping of
VLANs to the instance.
Common and Internal Spanning Tree is not Common Spanning Tree.
Now that we've established who this article is for and the pertinent definitions, let's get to the best
Best Practice #1 - Validate the need for migrating to MSTP
The first best practice involves confirming your need to migrate to MSTP. Understanding your network's existing
spanning tree performance is a key factor in this decision. Migrating to MSTP would be a great option for a few
reasons, introducing load sharing, which creates the biggest impact to your network efficiency. If layer 2
has increased ahead of your
projections, moving to MSTP can increase usefulness/lifetime of your gear via improved performance. Other
considerations could be:
Existing STP performance is unsatisfactory - convergence time or the amount of BPDUs
transmitted is causing issues
Segment Spanning Tree - reduces the resource load on the switches contained in the MSTP
Mixed hardware environment - MSTP is an open standard, meaning
it is great for a mixed vendor environment. It is widely supported.
Note: A common misconception is when migrating to Multiple Spanning Tree you must map one VLAN
Flavors of spanning tree have
sprung up, with variations and twists on previous versions. Compared to Per VLAN Spanning Tree (PVST+), MSTP
less resources (BPDUS, CPU cycles, transmit time) by maintaining instances of Spanning Tree, or logical versions
Spanning Tree. VLAN traffic is enabled to flow through the layer 2 segments of a network. Forwarding for one
(and VLAN), can also block for a different VLAN. On top of that, if a loop forms in one instance, it will not
the other instance(s).
Best Practice #2 - Strategize your migration
Once you've validated the need to migrate, ideally, migration is achieved with
minimal downtime and existing connectivity is preserved. A little strategy
on tackling the migration will go a long way toward ensuring a smooth
rollout. To aid with that process, we recommend the following tactical
Document, document, document - Keeping detailed notes will reduce migration time and potential
Identify and document all point to point ports, or ports that lead to
another switch or router.
Identify and document all edge ports, or ports that lead to an end point
like a PC or printer.
Define which VLANs are participating in the migration
Interns are really good at this step!
Determine the order of operations for your network.
Be aware of how a change on one switch can affect a different VLAN.
Schedule downtime for your network, or migrate on the weekend.
Start the migration at the core of your network and work down to
distribution and then the access layer.
Best Practice #3 - Enable point-to-point ports to use PortFast
This best practice, and the following one, make good use of all that port documentation. Administrators define an
optional parameter on edge ports via the PortFast feature. PortFast prevents Spanning Tree from running on that
port. The switch-to-gear facing ports could include a server, workstation, router. The intention is for that
never bridge the network to another set of open ports. Which could potentially cause loops if the switch
superior BPDU. Given ports coming online to a network incur a STP calculation on the port, you can save time and
load by assigning blocking status ahead of time. It allows the port to rapidly transition to a BPDU sending -
forwarding state. Because it has been assigned a status ahead of time.
Note: Ensure ports on the switches are configured for full-duplex transmission.
The steps below will be divided between SMB switches (CLI + GUI) and
Enterprise catalyst switches (CLI).
Enabling Portfast on Catalyst Switch - CLI
The CLI commands are presented syntax first, followed by an example of a live command. An extra space has been
added after the # to make highlighting for copy > paste a little easier. Text highlighted in blue denotes
to be replaced with contextual details from your network. Also note for brevity the only privilege elevation
commands we use will be for MSTP Configuration.
SMBswitch(config)# interface range gi1-15
SMBswitch(config-if)# spanning-tree portfast
Enabling Portfast on SMB Switch - GUI
One caveat to note, the SMB switches GUI uses a synonym for PortFast - it's known as Fast Link.
Step 1. Click Spanning Tree > STP Interface Settings.
Step 2. Select an interface and click the Edit button.
Step 3. Click Enable Fast Link.
Note: Remember to apply the changes as well as write the running configuration to the startup
Best Practice #4 - Enable BPDU Guard on edge ports
This best practice is an extension of the previous one. If a BPDU Guard enabled port sees that the port
receiving any superior, topology changing BPDUs, it immediately shuts the port down via err-disable
would require you to access the switch and resolve the situation.
Note: This may seem like one of those best practices that you might be able to skip. Could you get
with it? Maybe, but for the sake of your future-self, make it so. One errant switch brought onto the network
pumping out erroneus BPDUs, could potentially topple your network.
SMBswitch(config)# interface range fa0/1 - 24
SMBswitch(config-if)# spanning-tree bpduguard enable
Enabling BPDU Guard on SMB Switch - GUI
Step 1. Log in to the web configuration utility to choose Spanning Tree > STP Interface Settings. The
Interface Settings page opens.
Step 2. Choose the type of interface you wish to edit from the Interface Type drop-down list.
Step 3. Click Go to show only ports or LAGs on the page.
Step 4. Click the radio button of the port or LAG that is connected to the other switch and click
The Edit STP Interface window appears.
Step 5. Click the BPDU Guard Enable checkbox that corresponds to the desired interface type in the
Best Practice #5 - Map VLANs to MSTIs, not the IST (MST0)
Now the ports know their appropriate role, let's move on to instance mapping. For best results, limit the
of instances you create - note there is some nuance. This is counter to best practice and could dissuade an
engineer from MSTP as a solution. You may have valid network design considerations for multiple instances,
aware the best practice is to have a single instance. Decide what VLANs to map onto the instance(s). Then
configuration name and a revision number that will be common to all switches in the network.
Note: When you edit the MSTI VLAN mappings, MSTP restarts.
Step 1. Click Spanning Tree > VLAN to MSTP Instance.
The VLAN to MSTP Instance page contains the following fields:
ID — All MSTP instances are displayed.
VLANs—All VLANs belonging to the MST
instance are displayed.
Step 2. To add a VLAN to an MSTP instance, select the MST instance, and
MST Instance ID—Select the MST instance.
VLANs—Define the VLANs being mapped to this MST instance.
whether to Add (map) the VLAN to the MST instance or Remove it.
Step 3. Enter your parameters.
Step 4. Click Apply. At this point, the MSTP VLAN mappings are
Best Practice #6 - Place all MSTP-enabled switches within the same region
The best practice is to place as many switches into a single region as possible. There are no benefits to
segmenting the network into multiple regions. As with any routing and switching protocols they require a way
confirm membership to the protocol. The BPDUs sent
enable a switch to recognize itself as a member of a particular region. For the bridge to understand their
membership of a given region, they must share the following settings:
Digest computed from the VLAN-to-instance mapping
Homing the bridge within a region on Catalyst Switch - CLI
Homing the bridge within a region on SMB Switch - GUI
The MSTP Properties page is used to define what region the switch is in. For devices to be in the same
they must have the same region name and revision value.
Step 1. Choose Spanning Tree > MSTP Properties from the menu.
Step 2. Enter a name for the MSTP region in the Region Name field. The region name defines
boundary of the network. All switches in an MSTP region must have the same configured region name.
Step 3. Enter a revision number in the Revision field. This is a logical number that
for the MSTP Configuration. All switches in an MSTP region must have the same revision number.
Step 4. Enter the maximum number of hops in the Max Hops field. Max Hops specifies the
in hop counts. When a bridge receives a BPDU, it decrements the hop count by one and resends the BPDU with
hop count. Once a bridge receives a BPDU with a hop count of zero, the BPDU is discarded.
Best Practice #7 - Nest the root bridge of the CIST within the primary MST region
This best practice is part of the lynchpin to hold the whole migration together. The idea is to place the
bridge for the MSTP topology - within the primary MSTP region. Given the previous best practice placing all
within the same region, root selection is valid for all VLANs. This is achieved via the feature known as
Guard, which enforces root placement created by you. When a bridge receives a superior BPDU on a root guard
activated port, it will immediately place the port in listening mode, via root-inconsistent STP state. This
prevents forwarding of their inferior BPDUs, thereby preserving the designated ports on the root bridge of
region. Thereby preserving the designated ports on the root bridge of your
Note: Carefully select the root and a back-up root for each instance.
Placing the root bridge onto the CIST on Catalyst Switch - CLI
Placing the root bridge onto the CIST on SMB Switch - GUI
Step 1. Log in to the web configuration utility and choose Spanning Tree > STP Interface
Step 2. Choose an interface from the Interface Type drop-down list.
Step 3. Click Go to display a list of ports or LAGs on the interface.
Step 4. Click the radio button of the port orLAG you want to modify and click
Edit. The Edit STP Interface Setting window appears.
Step 5. Click the radio button that corresponds to the desired interface in the Interface field.
Port — From the Port drop-down list, choose the port to configure. This will only affect the single port
LAG — From the LAG drop down list, choose the LAG to configure. This will affect the group of ports
the LAG configuration.
Step 6. Ensure STP is checked Enable in the STP field to enable STP on the interface.
Step 7. Check Enable in the Root Guard field to enable Root Guard on the interface. This
way to enforce the root bridge placement in the network. Root Guard is used to prevent a new connected
take over as root bridge.
Migration Verification - Is this thing on?
At this point, your MSTP implementation and network should be purring along. For the trust-but-verify crowd,
you're able to verify MSTP status by
performing a frame capture. Then compare the results to your expected
After performing a packet capturing via Wireshark, you will see Mrecords that contain the instance
Below is a
screenshot of the Mrecord, prior to expansion for additional detail.
Expanding the Mrecord Allows you to view more granular data about MSTP.
Internal Path Cost
Bridge Identifier Priority
Port Identifier Priority
Quick verification commands - SMB CLI
If you'd like to verify from the command line, try these commands:
SMBswitch# show spanning-tree mst-configuration
SMBswitch(config)# spanning-tree mst-configuration
SMBswitch(config-mst)# show pending
Note:The Catalyst version of the show command excludes the - between mst and configuration.
EX:"show spanning-tree mst configuration"
What to know about PVST+ and MSTP living on the same
If you need to continue support for legacy switches running PVST+, handle this on a port by port basis. If
these switches runs as a VLAN trunk, ensure the MSTP switch is the root for all VLANS assigned to the trunk.
Further, MSTP attempts to decode PVST+ BPDUs but this simulation is imperfect. Which requires us to dive
idea of Boundary Ports.
The role and state of a MSTP boundary port is determined by the Internal Spanning Tree interacting
exterior topology. This means that if a port is in blocking mode on the IST, then it is blocking in
MSTP. This effect cascades into the PVST+ implementation, affecting the VLANs function. The same holds true
port is forwarding, learning, etc. As you might imagine, this can become an issue.
This can result in an intractable issue whereas a port that should be forwarding for one VLAN, is instead
blocking, due to the needs of another VLAN.
The PVST+ simulation leverages information from the IST to create per VLAN BPDUs. This results in a
"illusion" that the MSTP region appears as a single switch to all the VLANs. Similar to the way switches are
to stack, which isn't half bad. What is bad, from the boundary port's position, is that it creates
need to send individual BPDUs for each simulated VLAN. Any inconsistency between BPDUs can tear down the
simulation in errors. Only receiving consistent BPDUs will allow the simulation to stand itself back up.
Is there anything to know, if my network hardware...isn't entirely Cisco?
MSTP is backwards compatible. As long as your non-Cisco hardware supports Rapid Spanning Tree, you
should be alright. If you run into issues, check
with our switching community.
Thanks for reading through this guide, with these best practices you should be set to improve performance of
Worth noting, spanning tree may not sound thrilling to you, but the benefits of load sharing make it worth
effort for keeping your network efficient. The creator of spanning tree, Radia Perlman, loves it as much as
mother ever could. She even wrote a poem about it.