PDF(248.4 KB) View with Adobe Reader on a variety of devices
Updated:March 12, 2014
Scope of Document
This document addresses some of the advanced features configured for the Cisco
® Virtual Office deployment. Although the default configuration in the Cisco Virtual Office Deployment guide would suffice for configuring a functional VPN network, this guide provides information about extra features and control over the network.
Three features are discussed in detail in this document:
1. Per-Dynamic Multipoint VPN (DMVPN) tunnel quality of service (QoS)
2. Border Gateway Protocol (BGP) routing between hub and spoke (in lieu of Enhanced IGRP [EIGRP])
3. Next-hop server (NHS) clustering
Per-DMVPN tunnel QoS enables more granular control over the network on a spoke-per-spoke basis.
BGP routing between hub and spoke provides an alternative to routing using EIGRP, and potentially increases scalability.
NHS clustering allows more deployment flexibility when multiple VPN headend devices are present.
This document details the recommended settings of each of the features for Cisco Virtual Office. It is assumed that a functional Cisco Virtual Office network is operational before these settings are attempted.
This guide is based on Cisco 881 Integrated Services Routers as spokes with wireless running Cisco IOS® Software Release 15.1(2)T1. Hub routers are based on Cisco 3945 Integrated Service Routers. For other Cisco router platforms, the sample configurations may need minor modifications. For a list of all supported hardware and software, please refer to the Cisco Virtual Office Hardware and Software list.
Cisco Virtual Office: Per-Tunnel QoS Deployment
Per-tunnel QoS allows traffic from a hub to spokes to be regulated on a per-spoke basis. It allows QoS to be configured on tunnel interfaces used for DMVPN and IPsec, whereas previously QoS was restricted to physical interface support.
Per-tunnel QoS solves two problems commonly found in hub-and-spoke topologies:
1. Prevents lower-end spoke routers from being overrun by higher-end hubs
2. Prevents some spokes from hogging hub resources and starving other spokes.
Case 1 occurs in many DMVPN networks, because the hub is usually a high-end router, whereas spokes are often lower-end routers. In this case, if the link between the hub and spoke is unregulated, the hub may send traffic at a higher rate than the spoke can handle, causing congestion and packet loss. In case 2, one spoke may be performing traffic-intensive operations, such as VoIP calls. Because that spoke is requesting a lot of traffic, it may overrun the link between the hub and itself, not allowing traffic to flow from the hub to other spokes.
Previously, QoS could be configured on spokes, but the hub is not aware of the policies and cannot prevent the problem indicated in case 2. Alternatively, past configurations of QoS on the hub cannot adjust for multiple classes of service for the spokes.
Per-tunnel QoS is most advantageous when different levels of service are desired for separate subsets of spokes, or when the spoke routers themselves vary in capability. One of the first design considerations is to divide the spokes into groups, which have different QoS policies.
In the Cisco Virtual Office configuration, there are three different class levels to which spokes belong: data, voice, and telepresence. Figure 1 shows the Cisco Virtual Office hub-and-spoke topology and the spoke groups.
In Figure 1, group A comprises spokes with data traffic being the primary traffic flowing from hub to spoke. Users in group B make frequent calls and so require a QoS policy that can guarantee good voice and video quality for the calls, whereas users in group C are executives who use Cisco TelePresence
® conferencing applications and need guaranteed bandwidth to ensure adequate telepresence quality. With the deployment of per-tunnel QoS, different QoS policies can be applied to each tunnel, depending on which group the spoke belongs to, helping ensure that users in each group receive adequate bandwidth for their applications without overstressing the hub or their spokes.
Per-Tunnel QoS Configuration
The bulk of per-tunnel QoS configuration is on the hub, which uses Cisco Policy Language to set up a hierarchy of class maps and policy maps. On the DMVPN hub interface, these policy mappings are tied together through the use of an
nhrp-group command. Similarly on the spoke side, the
nhrp-group command specifying the policy name is configured on the spoke router DMVPN interface. The hub receives the
nhrp-group string from the spoke to the hub in the periodic NHRP registration requests. The
nhrp-group string is then mapped to the QoS policy defined on the hub, and the policy is applied to the tunnel from the hub to the spoke.
The following is a sample Cisco Virtual Office configuration for per-tunnel QoS:
!!! Hub configuration !!!
! The QoS configuration on the hub side follows a parent-child hierarchy in which a
! child policy is defined and then can be called by the parent policy.
! This configuration creates 3 classes to support data; voice and video;
! and Telepresence QoS
! Define parent class `data,' which provides default QoS policy for spokes requiring
! just data traffic
shape average 1000000
! Configure the default behavior. Parent classes of `data,' `voice,' and
! `Telepresence' will all call the default class as it is assumed data traffic will be
! common to all the groups.
! Define parent class `voice,' which provides voice and video QoS policy
shape average 2000000
! Child policy `voice_and_video' is called by parent policy `voice' above
! Define parent class `tp,' which provides QoS policy for spokes needing Telepresence
! Child class `TelePresence' is called by parent policy `tp' above
! Policies are attached to the DMVPN tunnel interface using the `nhrp map group'
ip nhrp map group persa_data service-policy output data
ip nhrp map group persa_voice service-policy output voice
ip nhrp map group persa_tp service-policy output tp
!!! Spoke configuration !!!
! Spokes requiring data-only QoS policy should configure the following on their DMVPN
! tunnel interface
ip nhrp group data
! Spokes requiring voice and video QoS policies should configure the following on
! their DMVPN tunnel interface
ip nhrp group voice
! Spokes requiring Telepresence QoS policy should configure the following on their
! DMVPN tunnel interface
ip nhrp group tp
Per-Tunnel QoS Diagnostic Commands
Table 1 lists the per-tunnel QoS diagnostic commands.
Table 1. Per-Tunnel QoS Diagnostic Commands
show ip nhrp
Displays NHRP group received from spoke
show dmvpn detailed
Displays NHRP group received from spoke and QoS policy applied to the spoke tunnel
show ip nhrp group-map
Displays group-to-policy maps and tunnels to which QoS policy is applied
show policy-map multipoint tunnel <ip addr> output
Displays QoS policy applied to multipoint tunnels
show tunnel endponts
Displays QoS policy applied
debug nhrp group
Debugs nhrp groups received from spokes, group-to-policy map existence, and policy status
debug tunnel qos
Debugs QoS policy application and removal
debug nhrp extension
Debugs receipt of nhrp group from spoke
debug cce dp target
Debugs data plane Common Classification Engine (CCE) packet classification and QoS policy for packet
debug nhrp extension
Debugs receipt of nhrp group from hub
Cisco Virtual Office: BGP Routing Between Hub and Spoke
In most Cisco Virtual Office deployments, EIGRP is used as the underlining routing protocol between the hub and the spoke. Although EIGRP offers simple configurations and fast convergence times, there are cases when using a Cisco proprietary routing protocol is undesirable. In those cases, BGP could be used as an alternative.
Using the Dynamic Update Peer-Groups feature in the Cisco IOS
® Software, configuring BGP could become as simple as configuring EIGRP. Besides, the number of spokes supported per hub using BGP as the routing protocol might increase as well.
The Cisco Virtual Office spoke will have the Cisco Virtual Office hub configured as a static peer, with a hardcoded IP address. On the Cisco Virtual Office hub, however, the spokes are accepted as dynamic peers under a dynamic peer group. Spokes can dynamically request peering with the hub when they come online, and it is not necessary to configure each spoke IP address on the hub.
The configuration on the spoke follows (arbitrarily assigning 1628 as the AS number on the spoke and 65159 as the AS number on the hub):
router bgp 1628
neighbor 172.16.0.1 remote-as 65159
! 172.16.0.1 is the DMVPN tunnel address on the hub
In the configuration, a peer group called "dynamic" is created in the BGP on the hub. The hub will listen to incoming peering requests from remote AS 1628, originating from source IP in the range of 172.16.0.0/16 (specified in the listen range). The group "dynamic" must be activated using the
neighbor dynamic activate
command under address-family ipv4.
Regular route redistribution can be configured normally on the BGP 65159 instance on the hub.
Note: Dynamic Update peer group does not presently support IPv6.
Cisco Virtual Office: Next-Hop Server Clustering
In situations when more than one DMVPN hub router is deployed, it is possible to logically group multiple hub routers into a cluster in configuration. Connections are made to a cluster instead of to an individual router. The number of connections made to each cluster can be altered, so various combination of connections to hub routers are possible.
Clustering is particularly useful in the following two scenarios:
1. Configure an inactive backup hub router: A hub router can be part of the cluster but not activated, and connection is made only when the primary connection to other hub router(s) fails.
2. Multiple hub routers: If there is a farm of multiple hub routers that the spoke can connect to, hub routers with different priorities can be assigned to a single cluster, and the spoke will attempt connection according to the priority settings dynamically. A limit can be set on each hub router for the number of connections accepted at a given time; excess connections will not establish, and the spoke router will try the router with next priority in the cluster.
Figure 3. Scenario 1: Configure an Inactive Backup Hub Router
Figure 4. Scenario 2: Multiple Hub Routers
Clustering is configured on the remote spoke router only. The hub router has no knowledge of the cluster configuration on the spoke. The hub involved in a cluster can be either geographically co-located, or dispersed. More than one cluster can be configured on the spoke.
The configuration is put on the DMVPN tunnel interface on the remote spoke router:
interface tunnel 0
ip nhrp nhs cluster $cluster_number max-connections $max_connection
ip nhrp nhs $nhs_address priority $nhs_priority cluster $cluster_number
ip nhrp nhs $nhs_address2 priority $nhs_priority2 cluster $cluster_number
$cluster_number is a locally significant number assigned to the cluster for identification.
$max_connection is the maximum number of connections to establish to hubs in the cluster.
$nhs_address/ $nhs_address2 are the outside addresses of the DMVPN hub routers.
$nhs_prority/ $nhs_priority2 are the priorities assigned to each hub; the
lower the number the
higher the priority.
A sample of an actual configuration follows:
interface tunnel 0
ip nhrp nhs cluster 1 max-connections 1
ip nhrp nhs 22.214.171.124 priority 10 cluster 1
ip nhrp nhs 126.96.36.199 priority 20 cluster 1
In the configuration, only one DMVPN connection will be established (max-connection 1), and the spoke will try 188.8.131.52 first (lower-priority number) before trying to connect to 184.108.40.206.
Note: The spoke router will periodically try to establish a tunnel to 220.127.116.11, and it will try indefinitely.
To configure the maximum connections allowed to a hub router (e.g., to accomplish scenario 2), this command is used on the hub router:
call admission limit $num_connection
$num_connection is the maximum number of connections allowed to the hub router, and it should be dependent on the capability of the hub router. For scenario 2 deployment, you should randomize the priority order between each of the spoke routers so as not to overwhelm a single hub router.
The output from a spoke router with two hub routers in the cluster, a maximum connection of one, and the highest-priority hub failing should look like this: