This chapter describes the requirements of the network infrastructure needed to build a Cisco Unified Communications System in an enterprise environment. Figure 3-1 illustrates the roles of the various devices that form the network infrastructure, and Table 3-1 summarizes the features required to support each of these roles.
Unified Communications places strict requirements on IP packet loss, packet delay, and delay variation (or jitter). Therefore, you need to enable most of the Quality of Service (QoS) mechanisms available on Cisco switches and routers throughout the network. For the same reasons, redundant devices and network links that provide quick convergence after network failures or topology changes are also important to ensure a highly available infrastructure
The following sections describe the network infrastructure features as they relate to:
Campus LAN infrastructure design is extremely important for proper Unified Communications operation on a converged network. Proper LAN infrastructure design requires following basic configuration and design best practices for deploying a highly available network. Further, proper LAN infrastructure design requires deploying end-to-end QoS on the network. The following sections discuss these requirements:
Properly designing a LAN requires building a robust and redundant network from the top down. By structuring the LAN as a layered model (see Figure 3-1) and developing the LAN infrastructure one step of the model at a time, you can build a highly available, fault tolerant, and redundant network. Once these layers have been designed correctly, you can add network services such as DHCP and TFTP to provide additional network functionality. The following sections examine the infrastructure layers and network services:
The access layer of the Campus LAN includes the portion of the network from the desktop port(s) to the wiring closet switch. Access layer switches have traditionally been configured as Layer 2 devices with Layer 2 uplinks to the distribution layer. The Layer 2 and spanning tree recommendations for Layer 2 access designs are well documented and are discussed briefly below. For newer Cisco Catalyst switches supporting Layer 3 protocols, new routed access designs are possible and offer improvements in convergence times and design simplicity. Routed access designs are discussed in the section on Routed Access Layer Designs.
Layer 2 Access Design Recommendations
Proper access layer design starts with assigning a single IP subnet per virtual LAN (VLAN). Typically, a VLAN should not span multiple wiring closet switches; that is, a VLAN should have presence in one and only one access layer switch (see Figure 3-2). This practice eliminates topological loops at Layer 2, thus avoiding temporary flow interruptions due to Spanning Tree convergence. However, with the introduction of standards-based IEEE 802.1w Rapid Spanning Tree Protocol (RSTP) and 802.1s Multiple Instance Spanning Tree Protocol (MISTP), Spanning Tree can converge at much higher rates. More importantly, confining a VLAN to a single access layer switch also serves to limit the size of the broadcast domain. There is the potential for large numbers of devices within a single VLAN or broadcast domain to generate large amounts of broadcast traffic periodically, which can be problematic. A good rule of thumb is to limit the number of devices per VLAN to about 512, which is equivalent to two Class C subnets (that is, a 23-bit subnet masked Class C address). For more information on the campus access layer, refer to the documentation on available at http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/switches/index.html .
NoteThe recommendation to limit the number of devices in a single Unified Communications VLAN to approximately 512 is not solely due to the need to control the amount of VLAN broadcast traffic. Installing Unified CM in a VLAN with an IP subnet containing more than 1024 devices can cause the Unified CM server ARP cache to fill up quickly, which can seriously affect communications between the Unified CM server and other Unified Communications endpoints.
Figure 3-2 Access Layer Switches and VLANs for Voice and Data
When you deploy voice, Cisco recommends that you enable two VLANs at the access layer: a native VLAN for data traffic (VLANs 10, 11, 30, 31, and 32 in Figure 3-2) and a voice VLAN under Cisco IOS or Auxiliary VLAN under CatOS for voice traffic (represented by VVIDs 110, 111, 310, 311, and 312 in Figure 3-2).
Separate voice and data VLANs are recommended for the following reasons:
Address space conservation and voice device protection from external networks
Private addressing of phones on the voice or auxiliary VLAN ensures address conservation and ensures that phones are not accessible directly through public networks. PCs and servers are typically addressed with publicly routed subnet addresses; however, voice endpoints may be addressed using RFC 1918 private subnet addresses.
QoS trust boundary extension to voice devices
QoS trust boundaries can be extended to voice devices without extending these trust boundaries and, in turn, QoS features to PCs and other data devices.
Protection from malicious network attacks
VLAN access control, 802.1Q, and 802.1p tagging can provide protection for voice devices from malicious internal and external network attacks such as worms, denial of service (DoS) attacks, and attempts by data devices to gain access to priority queues through packet tagging.
Ease of management and configuration
Separate VLANs for voice and data devices at the access layer provide ease of management and simplified QoS configuration.
To provide high-quality voice and to take advantage of the full voice feature set, access layer switches should provide support for:
802.1Q trunking and 802.1p for proper treatment of Layer 2 CoS packet marking on ports with phones connected
Multiple egress queues to provide priority queuing of RTP voice packet streams
The ability to classify or reclassify traffic and establish a network trust boundary
Inline power capability (Although inline power capability is not mandatory, it is highly recommended for the access layer switches.)
Layer 3 awareness and the ability to implement QoS access control lists (These features are recommended if you are using certain Unified Communications endpoints such as a PC running a softphone application that cannot benefit from an extended trust boundary.)
Spanning Tree Protocol (STP)
To minimize convergence times and maximize fault tolerance at Layer 2, enable the following STP features:
Enable PortFast on all access ports. The phones, PCs, or servers connected to these ports do not forward bridge protocol data units (BPDUs) that could affect STP operation. PortFast ensures that the phone or PC, when connected to the port, is able to begin receiving and transmitting traffic immediately without having to wait for STP to converge.
Root guard or BPDU guard
Enable root guard or BPDU guard on all access ports to prevent the introduction of a rogue switch that might attempt to become the Spanning Tree root, thereby causing STP re-convergence events and potentially interrupting network traffic flows. Ports that are set to errdisable state by BPDU guard must either be re-enabled manually or the switch must be configured to re-enable ports automatically from the errdisable state after a configured period of time.
UplinkFast and BackboneFast
Enable these features where appropriate to ensure that, when changes occur on the Layer 2 network, STP converges as rapidly as possible to provide high availability. When using Cisco stackable switches, enable Cross-Stack UplinkFast (CSUF) to provide fast failover and convergence if a switch in the stack fails.
UniDirectional Link Detection (UDLD)
Enable this feature to reduce convergence and downtime on the network when link failures or misbehaviors occur, thus ensuring minimal interruption of network service. UDLD detects, and takes out of service, links where traffic is flowing in only one direction. This feature prevents defective links from being mistakenly considered as part of the network topology by the Spanning Tree and routing protocols.
NoteWith the introduction of RSTP 802.1w, features such as PortFast and UplinkFast are not required because these mechanisms are built in to this standard. If RSTP has been enabled on the Catalyst switch, these commands are not necessary.
Routed Access Layer Designs
For campus designs requiring simplified configuration, common end-to-end troubleshooting tools, and the fastest convergence, a hierarchical design using Layer 3 switching in the access layer (routed access) in combination with Layer 3 switching at the distribution layer provides the fastest restoration of voice and data traffic flows.
Migrating the L2/L3 Boundary to the Access Layer
In the typical hierarchical campus design, the distribution layer uses a combination of Layer 2, Layer 3, and Layer 4 protocols and services to provide for optimal convergence, scalability, security, and manageability. In the most common distribution layer configurations, the access switch is configured as a Layer 2 switch that forwards traffic on high-speed trunk ports to the distribution switches. The distribution switches are configured to support both Layer 2 switching on their downstream access switch trunks and Layer 3 switching on their upstream ports toward the core of the network, as shown in Figure 3-3.
Figure 3-3 Traditional Campus Design — Layer 2 Access with Layer 3 Distribution
The purpose of the distribution switch in this design is to provide boundary functions between the bridged Layer 2 portion of the campus and the routed Layer 3 portion, including support for the default gateway, Layer 3 policy control, and all the multicast services required.
An alternative configuration to the traditional distribution layer model illustrated in Figure 3-3 is one in which the access switch acts as a full Layer 3 routing node (providing both Layer 2 and Layer 3 switching) and the access-to-distribution Layer 2 uplink trunks are replaced with Layer 3 point-to-point routed links. This alternative configuration, in which the Layer 2/3 demarcation is moved from the distribution switch to the access switch (as shown in Figure 3-4), appears to be a major change to the design but is actually just an extension of the current best-practice design.
Figure 3-4 Routed Access Campus Design — Layer 3 Access with Layer 3 Distribution
In both the traditional Layer 2 and the Layer 3 routed access designs, each access switch is configured with unique voice and data VLANs. In the Layer 3 design, the default gateway and root bridge for these VLANs is simply moved from the distribution switch to the access switch. Addressing for all end stations and for the default gateway remains the same. VLAN and specific port configurations remain unchanged on the access switch. Router interface configuration, access lists, "ip helper," and any other configuration for each VLAN remain identical but are configured on the VLAN Switched Virtual Interface (SVI) defined on the access switch instead of on the distribution switches.
There are several notable configuration changes associated with the move of the Layer 3 interface down to the access switch. It is no longer necessary to configure a Hot Standby Router Protocol (HSRP) or Gateway Load Balancing Protocol (GLBP) virtual gateway address as the "router" interfaces because all the VLANs are now local. Similarly, with a single multicast router, for each VLAN it is not necessary to perform any of the traditional multicast tuning such as tuning PIM query intervals or ensuring that the designated router is synchronized with the active HSRP gateway.
Routed Access Convergence
The many potential advantages of using a Layer 3 access design include the following:
Simplified multicast configuration
Dynamic traffic load balancing
Single control plane
Single set of troubleshooting tools (for example, ping and traceroute)
Of these advantages, perhaps the most significant is the improvement in network convergence times possible when using a routed access design configured with Enhanced Interior Gateway Routing Protocol (EIGRP) or Open Shortest Path First (OSPF) as the routing protocol. Comparing the convergence times for an optimal Layer 2 access design (either with a spanning tree loop or without a loop) against that of the Layer 3 access design, you can obtain a four-fold improvement in convergence times, from 800 to 900 msec for the Layer 2 design to less than 200 msec for the Layer 3 access design.
For more information on routed access designs, refer to the document on High Availability Campus Network Design – Routed Access Layer using EIGRP or OSPF , available at
The distribution layer of the Campus LAN includes the portion of the network from the wiring closet switches to the next-hop switch. For more information on the campus distribution layer switches, refer to the product documentation available at
At the distribution layer, it is important to provide redundancy to ensure high availability, including redundant links between the distribution layer switches (or routers) and the access layer switches. To avoid creating topological loops at Layer 2, use Layer 3 links for the connections between redundant Distribution switches when possible.
First-Hop Redundancy Protocols
In the campus hierarchical model, where the distribution switches are the L2/L3 boundary, they also act as the default gateway for the entire L2 domain that they support. Some form of redundancy is required because this environment can be large and a considerable outage could occur if the device acting as the default gateway fails.
Gateway Load Balancing Protocol (GLBP), Hot Standby Router Protocol (HSRP), and Virtual Router Redundancy Protocol (VRRP) are all first-hop redundancy protocols. Cisco initially developed HSRP to address the need for default gateway redundancy. The Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) subsequently ratified Virtual Router Redundancy Protocol (VRRP) as the standards-based method of providing default gateway redundancy. More recently, Cisco developed GLBP to overcome some the limitations inherent in both HSRP and VRRP.
HSRP and VRRP with Cisco enhancements both provide a robust method of backing up the default gateway, and they can provide failover in less than one second to the redundant distribution switch when tuned properly.
Gateway Load Balancing Protocol (GLBP)
Like HSRP and VRRP, Cisco's Gateway Load Balancing Protocol (GLBP) protects data traffic from a failed router or circuit, while also allowing packet load sharing between a group of redundant routers. When HSRP or VRRP are used to provide default gateway redundancy, the backup members of the peer relationship are idle, waiting for a failure event to occur for them to take over and actively forward traffic.
Before the development of GLBP, methods to utilize uplinks more efficiently were difficult to implement and manage. In one technique, the HSRP and STP/RSTP root alternated between distribution node peers, with the even VLANs homed on one peer and the odd VLANs homed on the alternate. Another technique used multiple HSRP groups on a single interface and used DHCP to alternate between the multiple default gateways. These techniques worked but were not optimal from a configuration, maintenance, or management perspective.
GLBP is configured and functions like HSRP. For HSRP, a single virtual MAC address is given to the endpoints when they use Address Resolution Protocol (ARP) to learn the physical MAC address of their default gateways (see Figure 3-5).
Figure 3-5 HSRP Uses One Virtual MAC Address
Two virtual MAC addresses exist with GLBP, one for each GLBP peer (see Figure 3-6). When an endpoint uses ARP to determine its default gateway, the virtual MAC addresses are checked in a round-robin basis. Failover and convergence work just like with HSRP. The backup peer assumes the virtual MAC address of the device that has failed, and begins forwarding traffic for its failed peer.
Figure 3-6 GLBP Uses Two Virtual MAC Addresses, One for Each GLBP Peer
The end result is that a more equal utilization of the uplinks is achieved with minimal configuration. As a side effect, a convergence event on the uplink or on the primary distribution node affects only half as many hosts, giving a convergence event an average of 50 percent less impact.
For more information on HSRP, VRRP, and GLBP, refer to the Campus Network for High Availability Design Guide , available at
Configure Layer 3 routing protocols such as OSPF and EIGRP at the distribution layer to ensure fast convergence, load balancing, and fault tolerance. Use parameters such as routing protocol timers, path or link costs, and address summaries to optimize and control convergence times as well as to distribute traffic across multiple paths and devices. Cisco also recommends using the passive-interface command to prevent routing neighbor adjacencies via the access layer. These adjacencies are typically unnecessary, and they create extra CPU overhead and increased memory utilization because the routing protocol keeps track of them. By using the passive-interface command on all interfaces facing the access layer, you prevent routing updates from being sent out on these interfaces and, therefore, neighbor adjacencies are not formed.
Campus Core Layer
The core layer of the Campus LAN includes the portion of the network from the distribution routers or Layer 3 switches to one or more high-end core Layer 3 switches or routers. Layer 3-capable Catalyst switches at the core layer can provide connectivity between numerous campus distribution layers. For more details on the campus core layer switches, refer to the documentation on available at http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/switches/index.html .
At the core layer, it is again very important to provide the following types of redundancy to ensure high availability:
Redundant link or cable paths
Redundancy here ensures that traffic can be rerouted around downed or malfunctioning links.
Redundancy here ensures that, in the event of a device failure, another device in the network can continue performing tasks that the failed device was doing.
Redundant device sub-systems
This type of redundancy ensures that multiple power supplies and modules are available within a device so that the device can continue to function in the event that one of these components fails.
The Cisco Catalyst switches with Virtual Switching System (VSS) is a method to ensure redundancy in all of these areas by pooling together two Catalyst supervisor engines to act as one. For more information regarding VSS, refer to the product documentation available at
Routing protocols at the core layer should again be configured and optimized for path redundancy and fast convergence. There should be no STP in the core because network connectivity should be routed at Layer 3. Finally, each link between the core and distribution devices should belong to its own VLAN or subnet and be configured using a 30-bit subnet mask.
Data Center and Server Farm
Typically, Cisco Unified Communications Manager (Unified CM) cluster servers, including media resource servers, reside in a firewall-secured data center or server farm environment. In addition, centralized gateways and centralized hardware media resources such as conference bridges, DSP or transcoder farms, and media termination points may be located in the data center or server farm. The placement of firewalls in relation to Cisco Unified Communications Manager (Unified CM) cluster servers and media resources can affect how you design and implement security in your network. For design guidance on firewall placement in relation to Unified Communications systems and media resources, see Firewalls.
Because these servers and resources are critical to voice networks, Cisco recommends distributing all Unified CM cluster servers, centralized voice gateways, and centralized hardware resources between multiple physical switches and, if possible, multiple physical locations within the campus. This distribution of resources ensures that, given a hardware failure (such as a switch or switch line card failure), at least some servers in the cluster will still be available to provide telephony services. In addition, some gateways and hardware resources will still be available to provide access to the PSTN and to provide auxiliary services. Besides being physically distributed, these servers, gateways, and hardware resources should be distributed among separate VLANs or subnets so that, if a broadcast storm or denial of service attack occurs on a particular VLAN, not all voice connectivity and services will be disrupted.
Power over Ethernet (PoE)
PoE (or inline power) is 48 Volt DC power provided over standard Ethernet unshielded twisted-pair (UTP) cable. Instead of using wall power, IP phones and other inline powered devices (PDs) such as the Aironet Wireless Access Points can receive power provided by inline power-capable Catalyst Ethernet switches or other inline power source equipment (PSE). Inline power is enabled by default on all inline power-capable Catalyst switches.
Deploying inline power-capable switches with uninterruptible power supplies (UPS) ensures that IP phones continue to receive power during power failure situations. Provided the rest of the telephony network is available during these periods of power failure, then IP phones should be able to continue making and receiving calls. You should deploy inline power-capable switches at the campus access layer within wiring closets to provide inline-powered Ethernet ports for IP phones, thus eliminating the need for wall power.
Caution The use of power injectors or power patch panels to deliver PoE can damage some devices because power is always applied to the Ethernet pairs. PoE switch ports automatically detect the presence of a device that requires PoE before enabling it on a port-by-port basis.
In addition to Cisco PoE inline power, Cisco now supports the IEEE 802.3af PoE and the IEEE 802.3at Enhanced PoE standards. For information on which Cisco Unified IP Phones support the 802.3af and 802.3at standards, refer to the product documentation for your particular phone models.
Energy Conservation for IP Phones
Cisco EnergyWise Technology provides intelligent management of energy usage for devices on the IP network, including Unified Communications endpoints that use Power over Ethernet (PoE). Cisco EnergyWise architecture can turn power on and off to devices connected with PoE on EnergyWise enabled switches, based on a configurable schedule. For more information on EnergyWise, refer to the documentation at
When the PoE switch powers off IP phones for EnergyWise conservation, the phones are completely powered down. EnergyWise shuts down inline power on the ports that connect to IP phones and does so by a schedule or by commands from network management tools. When power is disabled, no verification occurs to determine whether a phone has an active call. The power is turned off and any active call is torn down. The IP phone loses registration from Cisco Unified Communications Manager and no calls can be made to or from the phone. There is no mechanism on the phone to power it on, therefore emergency calling will not be available on that phone.
The IP phone can be restarted only when the switch powers it on again. After power is restored, the IP phones will reboot and undergo a recovery process that includes requesting a new IP address, downloading a configuration file, applying any new configuration parameters, downloading new firmware or locales, and registering with Cisco Unified CM.
The EnergyWise schedule is configured and managed on the Cisco Network Infrastructure. It does not require any configuration on the IP phone or on Cisco Unified CM. However, power consumption on the phone can also be managed by a device profile configured on Unified CM. The energy saving options provided by Unified CM include the following:
In Power Save Plus mode, the phone on and off times and the idle timeout periods can be configured on the IP phones. The Cisco IP Phones' EnergyWise Power Save Plus configuration options specify the schedule for the IP phones to sleep (power down) and wake (power up). This mode requires an EnergyWise enabled network. If EnergyWise is enabled, then the sleep and wake times, as well as other parameters, can be used to control power to the phones. The Power Save Plus parameters are configured in the product-specific device profile in Cisco Unified CM Administration and sent to the IP phones as part of the phone configuration XML file.
During the configured power off period in this power saving mode, the IP phone sends a request to the switch asking for a wake-up at a specified time. If the switch is EnergyWise enabled, it accepts the request and reduces the power to the phone port, putting the phone to sleep. The sleep mode reduces the power consumption of the phone to 1 watt or less. The phone is not completely powered off in this case. When the phone is sleeping, the PoE switch provides minimal power that illuminates the Select key on the phone. A user can wake up the IP phone by using the Select button. The IP phone does not go into sleep mode if a call is active on the phone. Audio and visual alerts can optionally be configured to warn users before a phone enters the Power Save Plus mode. While the phone is in sleep mode, it is not registered to Cisco Unified CM and cannot receive any inbound calls. Use the Forward Unregistered setting in the phone's device configuration profile to specify how to treat any inbound calls to the phone's number.
NoteThe Cisco EnergyWise Power Save Plus mode is supported in Unified CM 8.6 and later releases, and it requires phone firmware version 9.(2)1 or later. It is available on the Cisco Unified IP Phone 6900, 8900, and 9900 Series.
Power Save Mode
In Power Save mode, the backlight on the screen is not lit when the phone is not in use. The phone stays registered to Cisco Unified CM in this mode and can receive inbound calls and make outbound calls. Cisco Unified CM Administration has product-specific configuration options to turn off the display at a designated time on some days and all day on other days. The phone remains in Power Save mode for the scheduled duration or until the user lifts the handset or presses any button. An EnergyWise enabled network is not required for the Power Save mode. Idle times can be scheduled so that the display remains on until the timeout and then turns off automatically. The phone is still powered on in this mode and can receive inbound calls.
The Power Save mode can be used together with the Power Save Plus mode. Using both significantly reduces the total power consumption by Cisco Unified IP Phones.
For information on configuring these modes, refer to the administration guides for the Cisco Unified IP Phones, available at the following locations:
Until recently, quality of service was not an issue in the enterprise campus due to the asynchronous nature of data traffic and the ability of network devices to tolerate buffer overflow and packet loss. However, with new applications such as voice and video, which are sensitive to packet loss and delay, buffers and not bandwidth are the key QoS issue in the enterprise campus.
Figure 3-7 illustrates the typical oversubscription that occurs in LAN infrastructures.
Figure 3-7 Data Traffic Oversubscription in the LAN
This oversubscription, coupled with individual traffic volumes and the cumulative effects of multiple independent traffic sources, can result in the egress interface buffers becoming full instantaneously, thus causing additional packets to drop when they attempt to enter the egress buffer. The fact that campus switches use hardware-based buffers, which compared to the interface speed are much smaller than those found on WAN interfaces in routers, merely increases the potential for even short-lived traffic bursts to cause buffer overflow and dropped packets.
Applications such as file sharing (both peer-to-peer and server-based), remote networked storage, network-based backup software, and emails with large attachments, can create conditions where network congestion occurs more frequently and/or for longer durations. Some of the negative effects of recent worm attacks have been an overwhelming volume of network traffic (both unicast and broadcast-storm based), increasing network congestion. If no buffer management policy is in place, loss, delay, and jitter performance of the LAN may be affected for all traffic.
Another situation to consider is the effect of failures of redundant network elements, which cause topology changes. For example, if a distribution switch fails, all traffic flows will be reestablished through the remaining distribution switch. Prior to the failure, the load balancing design shared the load between two switches, but after the failure all flows are concentrated in a single switch, potentially causing egress buffer conditions that normally would not be present.
For applications such as voice, this packet loss and delay results in severe voice quality degradation. Therefore, QoS tools are required to manage these buffers and to minimize packet loss, delay, and delay variation (jitter).
The following types of QoS tools are needed from end to end on the network to manage traffic and ensure voice quality:
Classification involves the marking of packets with a specific priority denoting a requirement for class of service (CoS) from the network. The point at which these packet markings are trusted or not trusted is considered the trust boundary. Trust is typically extended to voice devices (phones) and not to data devices (PCs).
Queuing or scheduling
Interface queuing or scheduling involves assigning packets to one of several queues based on classification for expedited treatment throughout the network.
Provisioning involves accurately calculating the required bandwidth for all applications plus element overhead.
The following sections discuss the use of these QoS mechanisms in a campus environment:
It has always been an integral part of the Cisco network design architecture to classify or mark traffic as close to the edge of the network as possible. Traffic classification is an entrance criterion for access into the various queuing schemes used within the campus switches and WAN interfaces. Cisco IP Phones mark voice control signaling and voice RTP streams at the source, and they adhere to the values presented in Table 3-3. As such, the IP phone can and should classify traffic flows.
Table 3-3 lists the traffic classification requirements for the LAN infrastructure.
Table 3-3 Traffic Classification Guidelines for Various Types of Network Traffic
3.The recommended DSCP/PHB marking for call control signaling traffic has been changed from 26/AF31 to 24/CS3. A marking migration has occurred within Cisco to reflect this change, however some products still mark signaling traffic as 26/AF31. Therefore, in the interim, Cisco recommends that both AF31 and CS3 be reserved for call signaling.
For more information about traffic classification, refer to the Enterprise QoS Solution Reference Network Design (SRND) , available at
The main classes of interest for IP Video Telephony are:
Voice is classified as CoS 5 (IP Precedence 5, PHB EF, or DSCP 46).
Videoconferencing is classified as CoS 4 (IP Precedence 4, PHB AF41, or DSCP 34).
Call signaling for voice and videoconferencing is now classified as CoS 3 (IP Precedence 3, PHB CS3, or DSCP 24) but was previously classified as PHB AF31 or DSCP 26.
Cisco highly recommends these classifications as best practices in a Cisco Unified Communications network.
QoS Marking Differences Between Video Calls and Voice-Only Calls
The voice component of a call can be classified in one of two ways, depending on the type of call in progress. A voice-only telephone call would have its media classified as CoS 5 (IP Precedence 5 or PHB EF), while the voice channel of a video conference would have its media classified as CoS 4 (IP Precedence 4 or PHB AF41). All the Cisco IP Video Telephony products adhere to the Cisco Corporate QoS Baseline standard, which requires that the audio and video channels of a video call both be marked as CoS 4 (IP Precedence 4 or PHB AF41). The reasons for this recommendation include, but are not limited to, the following:
To preserve lip-sync between the audio and video channels
To provide separate classes for audio-only calls and video calls
The signaling class is applicable to all voice signaling protocols (such as SCCP, MGCP, and so on) as well as video signaling protocols (such as SCCP, H.225, RAS, CAST, and so on).
Given the recommended classes, the first step is to decide where the packets will be classified (that is, which device will be the first to mark the traffic with its QoS classification). There are essentially two places to mark or classify traffic:
On the originating endpoint — the classification is then trusted by the upstream switches and routers
On the switches and/or routers — because the endpoint is either not capable of classifying its own packets or is not trustworthy to classify them correctly
QoS Enforcement Using a Trusted Relay Point (TRP)
A Trusted Relay Point (TRP) can be used to enforce and/or re-mark the DSCP values of media flows from endpoints. This feature allows QoS to be enforced for media from endpoints such as softphones, where the media QoS values might have been modified locally.
A TRP is a media resource based upon the existing Cisco IOS media termination point (MTP) function.
Endpoints can be configured to "Use Trusted Relay Point," which will invoke a TRP for all calls.
For QoS enforcement, the TRP uses the configured QoS values for media in Unified CM's Service Parameters to re-mark and enforce the QoS values in media streams from the endpoint.
TRP functionality is supported by Cisco IOS MTPs and transcoding resources. (Use Unified CM to check "Enable TRP" on the MTP or transcoding resource to activate TRP functionality.)
After packets have been marked with the appropriate tag at Layer 2 (CoS) and Layer 3 (DSCP or PHB), it is important to configure the network to schedule or queue traffic based on this classification, so as to provide each class of traffic with the service it needs from the network. By enabling QoS on campus switches, you can configure all voice traffic to use separate queues, thus virtually eliminating the possibility of dropped voice packets when an interface buffer fills instantaneously.
Although network management tools may show that the campus network is not congested, QoS tools are still required to guarantee voice quality. Network management tools show only the average congestion over a sample time span. While useful, this average does not show the congestion peaks on a campus interface.
Transmit interface buffers within a campus tend to congest in small, finite intervals as a result of the bursty nature of network traffic. When this congestion occurs, any packets destined for that transmit interface are dropped. The only way to prevent dropped voice traffic is to configure multiple queues on campus switches. For this reason, Cisco recommends always using a switch that has at least two output queues on each port and the ability to send packets to these queues based on QoS Layer 2 and/or Layer 3 classification. The majority of Cisco Catalyst Switches support two or more output queues per port. For more information on Cisco Catalyst Switch interface queuing capabilities, refer to the documentation at http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/switches/index.html
In the campus LAN, bandwidth provisioning recommendations can be summarized by the motto, Over provision and under subscribe . This motto implies careful planning of the LAN infrastructure so that the available bandwidth is always considerably higher than the load and there is no steady-state congestion over the LAN links.
The addition of voice traffic onto a converged network does not represent a significant increase in overall network traffic load; the bandwidth provisioning is still driven by the demands of the data traffic requirements. The design goal is to avoid extensive data traffic congestion on any link that will be traversed by telephony signaling or media flows. Contrasting the bandwidth requirements of a single G.711 voice call (approximately 86 kbps) to the raw bandwidth of a FastEthernet link (100 Mbps) indicates that voice is not a source of traffic that causes network congestion in the LAN, but rather it is a traffic flow to be protected from LAN network congestion.
Impairments to IP Communications if QoS is Not Employed
If QoS is not deployed, packet drops and excessive delay and jitter can occur, leading to impairments of the telephony services. When media packets are subjected to drops, delay, and jitter, the user-perceivable effects include clicking sound, harsh-sounding voice, extended periods of silence, and echo.
When signaling packets are subjected to the same conditions, user-perceivable impairments include unresponsiveness to user input (such as delay to dial tone), continued ringing upon answer, and double dialing of digits due to the user's belief that the first attempt was not effective (thus requiring hang-up and redial). More extreme cases can include endpoint re-initialization, call termination, and the spurious activation of SRST functionality at branch offices (leading to interruption of gateway calls).
These effects apply to all deployment models. However, single-site (campus) deployments tend to be less likely to experience the conditions caused by sustained link interruptions because the larger quantity of bandwidth typically deployed in LAN environments (minimum links of 100 Mbps) allows for some residual bandwidth to be available for the IP Communications system.
In any WAN-based deployment model, traffic congestion is more likely to produce sustained and/or more frequent link interruptions because the available bandwidth is much less than in a LAN (typically less than 2 Mbps), so the link is more easily saturated. The effects of link interruptions can impact the user experience, whether or not the voice media traverses the packet network, because signaling traffic between endpoints and the Unified CM servers can also be delayed or dropped.
QoS Design Considerations for Virtual Unified Communications with Cisco UCS Servers
Unified Communications applications such as Cisco Unified Communications Manager (Unified CM) run as virtual machines on top of the VMware Hypervisor. These Unified Communications virtual machines are connected to a virtual software switch rather than a hardware-based Ethernet. The following types of virtual software switches are available:
VMware vSphere Standard Switch
Available with all VMware vSphere editions and independent of the type of VMware licensing scheme. The vSphere Standard Switch exists only on the host on which it is configured.
VMware vSphere Distributed Switch
Available only with the Enterprise Plus Edition of VMware vSphere. The vSphere Distributed Switch acts as a single switch across all associated hosts on a datacenter and helps simplify manageability of the software virtual switch.
Cisco Nexus 1000V Switch
Cisco has a software switch called the Nexus 1000 Virtual (1000V) Switch. The Cisco Nexus 1000V requires the Enterprise Plus Edition of VMware vSphere. It is a distributed virtual switch visible to multiple VMware hosts and virtual machines. The Cisco Nexus 1000V Series provides policy-based virtual machine connectivity, mobile virtual machine security, enhanced QoS, and network policy.
From the point of view of virtual connectivity, each virtual machine can connect to any one of the above virtual switches residing on a blade server. When using Cisco UCS B-Series blade servers, the blade servers physically connect to the rest of the network through a Fabric Extender in the UCS chassis to a UCS Fabric Interconnect Switch (for example, Cisco UCS 6100 or 6200 Series). The UCS Fabric Interconnect Switch is where the physical wiring connects to a customer's Ethernet LAN and FC SAN.
From the point of view of traffic flow, traffic from the virtual machines first goes to the software virtual switch (for example, vSphere Standard Switch, vSphere Distributed Switch, or Cisco Nexus 1000V Switch). The virtual switch then sends the traffic to the physical UCS Fabric Interconnect Switch through its blade server's Network Adapter and Fabric Extender. The UCS Fabric Interconnect Switch carries both the IP and fibre channel SAN traffic via Fibre Channel over Ethernet (FCoE) on a single wire. The UCS Fabric Interconnect Switch sends IP traffic to an IP switch (for example, Cisco Catalyst or Nexus Series Switch), and it sends SAN traffic to a Fibre Channel SAN Switch (for example, Cisco MDS Series Switch).
In a deployment with Cisco UCS B-Series blades servers and with Cisco Collaboration applications only, network congestion or an oversubscription scenario is unlikely because the UCS Fabric Interconnect Switch provides a high-capacity switching fabric, and the usable bandwidth per server blade far exceeds the maximum traffic requirements of a typical Collaboration application.
However, there might be scenarios where congestion could arise. For example, with a large number of B-Series blade servers and chassis, a large number of applications, and/or third-party applications requiring high network bandwidth, there is a potential for congestion on the different network elements of the UCS B-Series system (adapters, IO modules, Fabric Interconnects). In addition, FCoE traffic is sharing the same network elements as IP traffic, therefore applications performing a high amount of storage transfer would increase the utilization on the network elements and contribute to this potential congestion.
To address this potential congestion, QoS should be implemented.
QoS Implementation with Cisco UCS B-Series
Cisco UCS Fabric Interconnect Switches and adapters such as the Cisco VIC adapter perform QoS based on Layer 2 CoS values. Traffic types are classified by CoS value into QoS system classes that determine, for example, the minimum amount of bandwidth guaranteed and the packet drop policy to be used for each class. However, Cisco Collaboration applications perform QoS marking at Layer 3 only, not at the Layer 2. Hence the need for mapping the L3 values used by the applications to the L2 CoS values used by the Cisco UCS elements.
The VMware vSphere Standard Switch, vSphere Distributed Switch, Cisco UCS Fabric Interconnect switches, and other UCS network elements do not have the ability to perform this mapping between L3 and L2 values. Use the Cisco Nexus 1000V, which like the traditional Cisco switches, can perform this mapping. For example, the Nexus 1000V can map PHB EF (real-time media traffic) to CoS 5 and PHB CS3 (voice/video signaling traffic) to CoS 3.
NoteFibre Channel over Ethernet (FCoE) traffic has a reserved QoS system class that should not be used by any other type of traffic. By default, this system class has a CoS value of 3, which is the same value assigned to the system class used by voice and video signaling traffic in the example above. To prevent voice and video signaling traffic from using the FCoE system class, assign a different CoS value to the FCoE system class (2 or 4, for instance).
NoteThe decision to use the Nexus 1000V will vary on a case-by-case basis, depending on the available bandwidth for Unified Communications applications within the UCS architecture. If there is a possibility that a congestion scenario will arise, then the Nexus 1000V switch should be deployed.
If the Nexus 1000V is not deployed, it is still possible to provide some QoS, but it would not be an optimal solution. For example, you could create multiple virtual switches and assign a different CoS value for the uplink ports of each of those switches. For example, virtual switch 1 would have uplink ports configured with a CoS value of 1, virtual switch 2 would have uplink ports configured with a CoS value of 2, and so forth. Then the application virtual machines would be assigned to a virtual switch, depending on the desired QoS system class. The downside to this approach is that all traffic types from a virtual machine will have the same CoS value. For example, with a Unified CM virtual machine, real-time media traffic such as MoH traffic, signaling traffic, and non-voice traffic (for example, backups, CDRs, logs, Web traffic, and so forth) would share the same CoS value.
QoS Design Considerations for Video
Cisco recommends using different DSCP markings for different video applications. Unified CM 9. x provides support for different DSCP markings for immersive video traffic and videoconferencing (IP video telephony) traffic. By default, Unified CM 9. x has preconfigured the recommended DSCP values for TelePresence (immersive video) calls at CS4 and video (IP video telephony) calls at AF41. Figure 3-8 depicts the different video applications in a converged environment using the recommended DSCP values.
Figure 3-8 Recommended QoS Traffic Markings in a Converged Network
Calculating Overhead for QoS
Unlike voice, real-time IP video traffic in general is a somewhat bursty, variable bit rate stream. Therefore video, unlike voice, does not have clear formulas for calculating network overhead because video packet sizes and rates vary proportionally to the degree of motion within the video image itself. From a network administrator's point of view, bandwidth is always provisioned at Layer 2, but the variability in the packet sizes and the variety of Layer 2 media that the packets may traverse from end-to-end make it difficult to calculate the real bandwidth that should be provisioned at Layer 2. However, the conservative rule that has been thoroughly tested and widely used is to over-provision video bandwidth by 20%. This accommodates the 10% burst and the network overhead from Layer 2 to Layer 4.
The deployment of an IP Communications system requires the coordinated design of a well structured, highly available, and resilient network infrastructure as well as an integrated set of network services including Domain Name System (DNS), Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol (DHCP), Trivial File Transfer Protocol (TFTP), and Network Time Protocol (NTP).
Domain Name System (DNS)
DNS enables the mapping of host names and network services to IP addresses within a network or networks. DNS server(s) deployed within a network provide a database that maps network services to hostnames and, in turn, hostnames to IP addresses. Devices on the network can query the DNS server and receive IP addresses for other devices in the network, thereby facilitating communication between network devices.
A complete collaboration solution relies on DNS in order to function correctly for a number of services and thus requires a highly available DNS structure in place. For basic IP telephony deployments where reliance on DNS is not desired, Unified CM can be configured to support and ensure communication between Unified CM(s), gateways, and endpoint devices using IP addresses rather than hostnames.
Deploying Unified CM without DNS
For basic IP telephony deployments where DNS is not desired, Cisco recommends that you configure Unified CM(s), gateways, and endpoint devices to use IP addresses rather than hostnames. This should be done during installation of the Unified CM cluster. During installation of the publisher and subscriber nodes, Cisco recommends that you do not select the option to enable DNS. After the initial installation of the publisher node in a Unified CM cluster, the publisher will be referenced in the server table by the hostname you provided for the system. Before installation and configuration of any subsequent subscriber nodes or the definition of any endpoints, you should change this server entry to the IP address of the publisher node rather than the hostname. Each subscriber node added to the cluster should be defined in this same server table by IP address and not by hostname. Each subscriber node should be added to this server table one device at a time, and there should be no definitions for non-existent subscriber nodes at any time other than for the new subscriber node being installed.
Deploying Unified CM with DNS
You should always deploy DNS servers in a geographically redundant fashion so that a single DNS server failure will not prevent network communications between IP telephony devices. By providing DNS server redundancy in the event of a single DNS server failure, you ensure that devices relying on DNS to communicate on the network can still receive hostname-to-IP-address mappings from a backup or secondary DNS server.
Unified CM can use DNS to:
Provide simplified system management
Resolve fully qualified domain names to IP addresses for trunk destinations
Resolve fully qualified domain names to IP addresses for SIP route patterns based on domain name
Resolve service (SRV) records to host names and then to IP addresses for SIP trunk destinations
Provide certificate-based security
Collaboration clients use DNS for:
Single Sign-On (SSO)
Jabber deployments requiring user registration auto-discovery
Certificate-based security for secure signaling and media
When DNS is used, Cisco recommends defining each Unified CM cluster as a member of a valid sub-domain within the larger organizational DNS domain, defining the DNS domain on each Cisco Unified CM server, and defining the primary and secondary DNS server addresses on each Unified CM server.
Table 3-4 shows an example of how DNS server could use A records (Hostname-to-IP-address resolution), Cname records (aliases), and SRV records (service records for redundancy, load balancing, and service discovery) in a Unified CM environment.
Table 3-4 Example Use of DNS with Unified CM
For Jabber clients, refer to the Cisco Jabber DNS Configuration Guide , available at
DHCP is used by hosts on the network to obtain initial configuration information, including IP address, subnet mask, default gateway, and TFTP server address. DHCP eases the administrative burden of manually configuring each host with an IP address and other configuration information. DHCP also provides automatic reconfiguration of network configuration when devices are moved between subnets. The configuration information is provided by a DHCP server located in the network, which responds to DHCP requests from DHCP-capable clients.
You should configure IP Communications endpoints to use DHCP to simplify deployment of these devices. Any RFC 2131 compliant DHCP server can be used to provide configuration information to IP Communications network devices. When deploying IP telephony devices in an existing data-only network, all you have to do is add DHCP voice scopes to an existing DHCP server for these new voice devices. Because IP telephony devices are configured to use and rely on a DHCP server for IP configuration information, you must deploy DHCP servers in a redundant fashion. At least two DHCP servers should be deployed within the telephony network such that, if one of the servers fails, the other can continue to answer DHCP client requests. You should also ensure that DHCP server(s) are configured with enough IP subnet addresses to handle all DHCP-reliant clients within the network.
DHCP Option 150
IP telephony endpoints can be configured to rely on DHCP Option 150 to identify the source of telephony configuration information, available from a server running the Trivial File Transfer Protocol (TFTP).
In the simplest configuration, where a single TFTP server is offering service to all deployed endpoints, Option 150 is delivered as a single IP address pointing to the system's designated TFTP server. The DHCP scope can also deliver two IP addresses under Option 150, for deployments where there are two TFTP servers within the same cluster. The phone would use the second address if it fails to contact the primary TFTP server, thus providing redundancy. To achieve both redundancy and load sharing between the TFTP servers, you can configure Option 150 to provide the two TFTP server addresses in reverse order for half of the DHCP scopes.
NoteIf the primary TFTP server is available but is not able to grant the requested file to the phone (for example, because the requesting phone is not configured on that cluster), the phone will not attempt to contact the secondary TFTP server.
Cisco highly recommends using a direct IP address (that is, not relying on a DNS service) for Option 150 because doing so eliminates dependencies on DNS service availability during the phone boot-up and registration process.
NoteEven though IP phones support a maximum of two TFTP servers under Option 150, you could configure a Unified CM cluster with more than two TFTP servers. For instance, if a Unified CM system is clustered over a WAN at three separate sites, three TFTP servers could be deployed (one at each site). Phones within each site could then be granted a DHCP scope containing that site's TFTP server within Option 150. This configuration would bring the TFTP service closer to the endpoints, thus reducing latency and ensuring failure isolation between the sites (one site's failure would not affect TFTP service at another site).
Phone DHCP Operation Following a Power Recycle
If a phone is powered down and comes back up while the DHCP server is still offline, it will attempt to use DHCP to obtain IP addressing information (as normal). In the absence of a response from a DHCP server, the phone will re-use the previously received DHCP information to register with Unified CM.
DHCP Lease Times
Configure DHCP lease times as appropriate for the network environment. Given a fairly static network in which PCs and telephony devices remain in the same place for long periods of time, Cisco recommends longer DHCP lease times (for example, one week). Shorter lease times require more frequent renewal of the DHCP configuration and increase the amount of DHCP traffic on the network. Conversely, networks that incorporate large numbers of mobile devices, such as laptops and wireless telephony devices, should be configured with shorter DHCP lease times (for example, one day) to prevent depletion of DHCP-managed subnet addresses. Mobile devices typically use IP addresses for short increments of time and then might not request a DHCP renewal or new address for a long period of time. Longer lease times will tie up these IP addresses and prevent them from being reassigned even when they are no longer being used.
Cisco Unified IP Phones adhere to the conditions of the DHCP lease duration as specified in the DHCP server's scope configuration. Once half the lease time has expired since the last successful DHCP server acknowledgment, the IP phone will request a lease renewal. This DHCP client Request, once acknowledged by the DHCP server, will allow the IP phone to retain use of the IP scope (that is, the IP address, default gateway, subnet mask, DNS server (optional), and TFTP server (optional)) for another lease period. If the DHCP server becomes unavailable, an IP phone will not be able to renew its DHCP lease, and as soon as the lease expires, it will relinquish its IP configuration and will thus become unregistered from Unified CM until a DHCP server can grant it another valid scope.
In centralized call processing deployments, if a remote site is configured to use a centralized DHCP server (through the use of a DHCP relay agent such as the IP Helper Address in Cisco IOS) and if connectivity to the central site is severed, IP phones within the branch will not be able to renew their DHCP scope leases. In this situation, branch IP phones are at risk of seeing their DHCP lease expire, thus losing the use of their IP address, which would lead to service interruption. Given the fact that phones attempt to renew their leases at half the lease time, DHCP lease expiration can occur as soon as half the lease time since the DHCP server became unreachable. For example, if the lease time of a DHCP scope is set to 4 days and a WAN failure causes the DHCP server to be unavailable to the phones in a branch, those phones will be unable to renew their leases at half the lease time (in this case, 2 days). The IP phones could stop functioning as early as 2 days after the WAN failure, unless the WAN comes back up and the DHCP server is available before that time. If the WAN connectivity failure persists, all phones see their DHCP scope expire after a maximum of 4 days from the WAN failure.
This situation can be mitigated by one of the following methods:
Set the DHCP scope lease to a long duration (for example, 8 days or more).
This method would give the system administrator a minimum of half the lease time to remedy any DHCP reachability problem. Long lease durations also have the effect of reducing the frequency of network traffic associated with lease renewals.
Configure co-located DHCP server functionality (for example, run a DHCP server function on the branch's Cisco IOS router).
This approach is immune to WAN connectivity interruption. One effect of such an approach is to decentralize the management of IP addresses, requiring incremental configuration efforts in each branch. (See DHCP Network Deployments, for more information.)
Note The term co-located refers to two or more devices in the same physical location, with no WAN or MAN connection between them.
DHCP Network Deployments
There are two options for deploying DHCP functionality within an IP telephony network:
Centralized DHCP Server
Typically, for a single-site campus IP telephony deployment, the DHCP server should be installed at a central location within the campus. As mentioned previously, redundant DHCP servers should be deployed. If the IP telephony deployment also incorporates remote branch telephony sites, as in a centralized multisite Unified CM deployment, a centralized server can be used to provide DHCP service to devices in the remote sites. This type of deployment requires that you configure the ip helper-address on the branch router interface. Keep in mind that, if redundant DHCP servers are deployed at the central site, both servers' IP addresses must be configured as ip helper-address . Also note that, if branch-side telephony devices rely on a centralized DHCP server and the WAN link between the two sites fails, devices at the branch site will be unable to send DHCP requests or receive DHCP responses.
Note By default, service dhcp is enabled on the Cisco IOS device and does not appear in the configuration. Do not disable this service on the branch router because doing so will disable the DHCP relay agent on the device, and the ip helper-address configuration command will not work.
Centralized DHCP Server and Remote Site Cisco IOS DHCP Server
When configuring DHCP for use in a centralized multisite Unified CM deployment, you can use a centralized DHCP server to provide DHCP service to centrally located devices. Remote devices could receive DHCP service from a locally installed server or from the Cisco IOS router at the remote site. This type of deployment ensures that DHCP services are available to remote telephony devices even during WAN failures. Example 3-1 lists the basic Cisco IOS DHCP server configuration commands.
Example 3-1 Cisco IOS DHCP Server Configuration Commands
! Activate DHCP Service on the IOS Device
! Specify any IP Address or IP Address Range to be excluded from the DHCP pool
ip dhcp excluded-address <ip-address>|<ip-address-low> <ip-address-high>
! Specify the name of this specific DHCP pool, the subnet and mask for this
! pool, the default gateway and up to four TFTP
ip dhcp pool <dhcp-pool name>
network <ip-subnet> <mask>
option 150 ip <tftp-server-ip-1> ...
! Note: IP phones use only the first two addresses supplied in the option 150
! field even if more than two are configured.
Unified CM DHCP Sever (Standalone versus Co-Resident DHCP)
Typically DHCP servers are dedicated machine(s) in most network infrastructures, and they run in conjunction with the DNS and/or the Windows Internet Naming Service (WINS) services used by that network. In some instances, given a small Unified CM deployment with no more than 1000 devices registering to the cluster, you may run the DHCP server on a Unified CM server to support those devices. However, to avoid possible resource contention such as CPU contention with other critical services running on Unified CM, Cisco recommends moving the DHCP Server functionality to a dedicated server. If more than 1000 devices are registered to the cluster, DHCP must not be run on a Unified CM server but instead must be run on a dedicated or standalone server(s).
NoteThe termco-resident refers to two or more services or applications running on the same server or virtual machine.
Trivial File Transfer Protocol (TFTP)
Within a Cisco Unified CM system, endpoints such as IP phones rely on a TFTP-based process to acquire configuration files, software images, and other endpoint-specific information. The Cisco TFTP service is a file serving system that can run on one or more Unified CM servers. It builds configuration files and serves firmware files, ringer files, device configuration files, and so forth, to endpoints.
The TFTP file systems can hold several file types, such as the following:
Phone configuration files
Phone firmware files
Certificate Trust List (CTL) files
Identity Trust List (ITL) files
Tone localization files
User interface (UI) localization and dictionary files
Dial plan files for SIP phones
The TFTP server manages and serves two types of files, those that are not modifiable (for example, firmware files for phones) and those that can be modified (for example, configuration files).
A typical configuration file contains a prioritized list of Unified CMs for a device (for example, an SCCP or SIP phone), the TCP ports on which the device connects to those Unified CMs, and an executable load identifier. Configuration files for selected devices contain locale information and URLs for the messages, directories, services, and information buttons on the phone.
When a device's configuration changes, the TFTP server rebuilds the configuration files by pulling the relevant information from the Unified CM database. The new file(s) is then downloaded to the phone once the phone has been reset. As an example, if a single phone's configuration file is modified (for example, during Extension Mobility login or logout), only that file is rebuilt and downloaded to the phone. However, if the configuration details of a device pool are changed (for example, if the primary Unified CM server is changed), then all devices in that device pool need to have their configuration files rebuilt and downloaded. For device pools that contain large numbers of devices, this file rebuilding process can impact server performance.
NoteThe TFTP server can perform a local database read from the database on its co-resident subscriber server. Local database read not only provides benefits such as the preservation of user-facing features when the publisher in unavailable, but also allows multiple TFTP servers to be distributed by means of clustering over the WAN. (The same latency rules for clustering over the WAN apply to TFTP servers as apply to servers with registered phones.) This configuration brings the TFTP service closer to the endpoints, thus reducing latency and ensuring failure isolation between the sites.
When a device requests a configuration file from the TFTP server, the TFTP server searches for the configuration file in its internal caches, the disk, and then alternate Cisco file servers (if specified). If the TFTP server finds the configuration file, it sends it to the device. If the configuration file provides Unified CM names, the device resolves the name by using DNS and opens a connection to the Unified CM. If the device does not receive an IP address or name, it uses the TFTP server name or IP address to attempt a registration connection. If the TFTP server cannot find the configuration file, it sends a "file not found" message to the device.
A device that requests a configuration file while the TFTP server is rebuilding configuration files or while it is processing the maximum number of requests, will receive a message from the TFTP server that causes the device to request the configuration file later. The Maximum Serving Count service parameter, which can be configured, specifies the maximum number of requests that can be concurrently handled by the TFTP server. (Default value = 500 requests.) Use the default value if the TFTP service is run along with other Cisco CallManager services on the same server. For a dedicated TFTP server, use the following suggested values for the Maximum Serving Count: 1500 for a single-processor system or 3000 for a dual-processor system.
The Cisco Unified IP Phones 8900 Series and 9900 Series request their TFTP configuration files over the HTTP protocol (port 6970), which is much faster than TFTP.
An Example of TFTP in Operation
Every time an endpoint reboots, the endpoint will request a configuration file (via TFTP) whose name is based on the requesting endpoint's MAC address. (For a Cisco Unified IP Phone 7961 with MAC address ABCDEF123456, the file name would be SEPABCDEF123456.cnf.xml.) The received configuration file includes the version of software that the phone must run and a list of Cisco Unified CM servers with which the phone should register. The endpoint might also download, via TFTP, ringer files, softkey templates, and other miscellaneous files to acquire the necessary configuration information before becoming operational.
If the configuration file includes software file(s) version numbers that are different than those the phone is currently using, the phone will also download the new software file(s) from the TFTP server to upgrade itself. The number of files an endpoint must download to upgrade its software varies based on the type of endpoint and the differences between the phone's current software and the new software.
TFTP File Transfer Times
Each time an endpoint requests a file, there is a new TFTP transfer session. For centralized call processing deployments, the time to complete each of these transfers will affect the time it takes for an endpoint to start and become operational as well as the time it takes for an endpoint to upgrade during a scheduled maintenance. While TFTP transfer times are not the only factor that can affect these end states, they are a significant component.
The time to complete each file transfer via TFTP is predictable as a function of the file size, the percentage of TFTP packets that must be retransmitted, and the network latency or round-trip time.
At first glance, network bandwidth might seem to be missing from the previous statement, but it is actually included via the percentage of TFTP packets that must be retransmitted. This is because, if there is not enough network bandwidth to support the file transfer(s), then packets will be dropped by the network interface queuing algorithms and will have to be retransmitted.
TFTP operates on top of the User Datagram Protocol (UDP). Unlike Transmission Control Protocol (TCP), UDP is not a reliable protocol, which means that UDP does not inherently have the ability to detect packet loss. Obviously, detecting packet loss in a file transfer is important, so RFC 1350 defines TFTP as a lock-step protocol. In other words, a TFTP sender will send one packet and wait for a response before sending the next packet (see Figure 3-9).
Figure 3-9 Example of TFTP Packet Transmission Sequence
If a response is not received in the timeout period (4 seconds by default), the sender will resend the data packet or acknowledgment. When a packet has been sent five times without a response, the TFTP session fails. Because the timeout period is always the same and not adaptive like a TCP timeout, packet loss can significantly increase the amount of time a transfer session takes to complete.
Because the delay between each data packet is, at a minimum, equal to the network round-trip time, network latency also is a factor in the maximum throughput that a TFTP session can achieve.
In Figure 3-10, the round-trip time has been increased to 40 ms and one packet has been lost in transit. While the error rate is high at 12%, it is easy to see the effect of latency and packet loss on TFTP because the time to complete the session increased from 30 ms (in Figure 3-9) to 4160 ms (in Figure 3-10).
Figure 3-10 Effect of Packet Loss on TFTP Session Completion Time
Use the following formula to calculate how long a TFTP file transfer will take to complete:
ERR is the error rate, or percentage of packets that are lost.
Timeout is in milliseconds.
512000 = (TFTP packet size) ∗ (1000 millisecond per seconds) = (512 bytes) ∗ (1000 millisecond per seconds)
Cisco Unified IP Phone Firmware Releases 7. x have a 10-minute timeout when downloading new files. If the transfer is not completed within this time, the phone will discard the download even if the transfer completes successfully later. If you experience this problem, Cisco recommends that you use a local TFTP server to upgrade phones to the 8. x firmware releases, which have a timeout value of 61 minutes.
Because network latency and packet loss have such an effect on TFTP transfer times, a local TFTP Server can be advantageous. This local TFTP server may be a Unified CM subscriber in a deployment with cluster over the WAN or an alternative local TFTP "Load Server" running on a Cisco Integrated Services Router (ISR), for example. Newer endpoints (which have larger firmware files) can be configured with a Load Server address, which allows the endpoint to download the relatively small configuration files from the central TFTP server but use a local TFTP Server (which is not part of the Unified CM cluster) to download the larger software files. For details on which Cisco Unified IP Phones support an alternative local TFTP Load Server, refer to the product documentation for your particular phone models (available at http://www.cisco.com ).
NoteThe exact process each phone goes through on startup and the size of the files downloaded will depend on the phone model, the signaling type configured for the phone (SCCP, MGCP, or SIP) and the previous state of the phone. While there are differences in which files are requested, the general process each phone follows is the same, and in all cases the TFTP server is used to request and deliver the appropriate files. The general recommendations for TFTP server deployment do not change based on the protocol and/or phone models deployed.
TFTP Server Redundancy
Option 150 allows up to two IP addresses to be returned to phones as part of the DHCP scope. The phone tries the first address in the list, and it tries the subsequent address only if it cannot establish communications with the first TFTP server. This address list provides a redundancy mechanism that enables phones to obtain TFTP services from another server even if their primary TFTP server has failed.
TFTP Load Sharing
Cisco recommends that you grant different ordered lists of TFTP servers to different subnets to allow for load balancing. For example:
In subnet 10.1.1.0/24: Option 150: TFTP1_Primary, TFTP1_Secondary
In subnet 10.1.2.0/24: Option 150: TFTP1_Secondary, TFTP1_Primary
Under normal operations, a phone in subnet 10.1.1.0/24 will request TFTP services from TFTP1_Primary, while a phone in subnet 10.1.2.0/24 will request TFTP services from TFTP1_Secondary. If TFTP1_Primary fails, then phones from both subnets will request TFTP services from TFTP1_Secondary.
Load balancing avoids having a single TFTP server hot-spot, where all phones from multiple clusters rely on the same server for service. TFTP load balancing is especially important when phone software loads are transferred, such as during a Unified CM upgrade, because more files of larger size are being transferred, thus imposing a bigger load on the TFTP server.
Centralized TFTP Services
In multi-cluster systems, it is possible to have a single subnet or VLAN containing phones from multiple clusters. In this situation, the TFTP servers whose addresses are provided to all phones in the subnet or VLAN must answer the file transfer requests made by each phone, regardless of which cluster contains the phone. In a centralized TFTP deployment, a set of TFTP servers associated with one of the clusters must provide TFTP services to all the phones in the multi-cluster system.
In order to provide this single point of file access, each cluster's TFTP server must be able to serve files via the central proxy TFTP server. With Cisco Unified CM 5.0 and later releases, this proxy arrangement is accomplished by configuring a set of possible redirect locations in the central TFTP server, pointing to each of the other clusters’ TFTP servers. This configuration uses a HOST redirect statement in the Alternate File Locations on the centralized TFTP server, one for each of the other clusters. Each of the redundant TFTP servers in the centralized cluster should point to one of the redundant servers in each of the child clusters. It is not necessary to point the centralized server to both redundant servers in the child clusters because the redistribution of files within each individual cluster and the failover mechanisms of the phones between the redundant servers in the central cluster provide for a very high degree of fault tolerance.
Figure 3-11 shows an example of the operation of this process. A request from a phone registered to Cluster 3 is directed to the centralized TFTP server configured in Cluster 1 (C1_TFTP_Primary). This server will in turn query each of the configured alternate TFTP servers until one responds with a copy of the file initially requested by the phone. Requests to the centralized secondary TFTP server (C1_TFTP_Secondary) will be sent by proxy to the other clusters’ secondary TFTP servers until either the requested file is found or all servers report that the requested file does not exist.
Figure 3-11 Centralized TFTP Servers
Network Time Protocol (NTP)
NTP allows network devices to synchronize their clocks to a network time server or network-capable clock. NTP is critical for ensuring that all devices in a network have the same time. When troubleshooting or managing a telephony network, it is crucial to synchronize the time stamps within all error and security logs, traces, and system reports on devices throughout the network. This synchronization enables administrators to recreate network activities and behaviors based on a common timeline. Billing records and call detail records (CDRs) also require accurate synchronized time.
Unified CM NTP Time Synchronization
Time synchronization is especially critical on Unified CM servers. In addition to ensuring that CDR records are accurate and that log files are synchronized, having an accurate time source is necessary for any future IPSec features to be enabled within the cluster and for communications with any external entity.
Unified CM automatically synchronizes the NTP time of all subscribers in the cluster to the publisher. During installation, each subscriber is automatically configured to point to an NTP server running on the publisher. The publisher considers itself to be a master server and provides time for the cluster based on its internal hardware clock unless it is configured to synchronize from an external server. Cisco highly recommends configuring the publisher to point to a Stratum-1, Stratum-2, or Stratum-3 NTP server to ensure that the cluster time is synchronized with an external time source.
Cisco recommends synchronizing Unified CM with a Cisco IOS or Linux-based NTP server. Using Windows Time Services as an NTP server is not recommended or supported because Windows Time Services often use Simple Network Time Protocol (SNTP), and Linux-based Unified CM cannot successfully synchronize with SNTP.
The external NTP server specified for the primary node should be NTP v4 (version 4) to avoid potential compatibility, accuracy, and network jitter problems. External NTP servers must be NTP v4 if IPv6 addressing is used.
Cisco IOS and CatOS NTP Time Synchronization
Time synchronization is also important for other devices within the network. Cisco IOS routers and Catalyst switches should be configured to synchronize their time with the rest of the network devices via NTP. This is critical for ensuring that debug, syslog, and console log messages are time-stamped appropriately. Troubleshooting telephony network issues is simplified when a clear timeline can be drawn for events that occur on devices throughout the network.
Proper WAN infrastructure design is also extremely important for normal Unified Communications operation on a converged network. Proper infrastructure design requires following basic configuration and design best practices for deploying a WAN that is as highly available as possible and that provides guaranteed throughput. Furthermore, proper WAN infrastructure design requires deploying end-to-end QoS on all WAN links. The following sections discuss these requirements:
Properly designing a WAN requires building fault-tolerant network links and planning for the possibility that these links might become unavailable. By carefully choosing WAN topologies, provisioning the required bandwidth, and approaching the WAN infrastructure as another layer in the network topology, you can build a fault-tolerant and redundant network. The following sections examine the required infrastructure layers and network services:
WAN deployments for voice networks may use a hub-and-spoke, fully meshed, or partially meshed topology. A hub-and-spoke topology consists of a central hub site and multiple remote spoke sites connected into the central hub site. In this scenario, each remote or spoke site is one WAN-link hop away from the central or hub site and two WAN-link hops away from all other spoke sites. A meshed topology may contain multiple WAN links and any number of hops between the sites. In this scenario there may be many different paths to the same site or there may be different links used for communication with some sites compared to other sites. The simplest example is three sites, each with a WAN link to the other two sites, forming a triangle. In that case there are two potential paths between each site to each other site.
Topology-unaware call admission control requires the WAN to be hub-and-spoke, or a spoke-less hub in the case of MPLS VPN. This topology ensures that call admission control, provided by Unified CM's locations or a gatekeeper, works properly in keeping track of the bandwidth available between any two sites in the WAN. In addition, multiple hub-and-spoke deployments can be interconnected via WAN links.
Topology-aware call admission control may be used with either a hub-and-spoke or an arbitrary WAN topology. This type of call admission control requires parts of the WAN infrastructure to support Resource Reservation Protocol (RSVP). For details on designing this type of call admission control, see the chapter on Call Admission Control.
For more information about centralized and distributed multisite deployment models as well as Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) implications for these deployment models, see the chapter on Collaboration Deployment Models.
WAN links should, when possible, be made redundant to provide higher levels of fault tolerance. Redundant WAN links provided by different service providers or located in different physical ingress/egress points within the network can ensure backup bandwidth and connectivity in the event that a single link fails. In non-failure scenarios, these redundant links may be used to provide additional bandwidth and offer load balancing of traffic on a per-flow basis over multiple paths and equipment within the WAN. Topology-unaware call admission control normally requires redundant paths to be over-provisioned and under-subscribed to allow for failures that reduce the available bandwidth between sites without the call admission control mechanism being aware of those failures or the reduction in bandwidth. Topology-aware call admission control is able to adjust dynamically to many of the topology changes and allows for efficient use of the total available bandwidth.
Voice and data should remain converged at the WAN, just as they are converged at the LAN. QoS provisioning and queuing mechanisms are typically available in a WAN environment to ensure that voice and data can interoperate on the same WAN links. Attempts to separate and forward voice and data over different links can be problematic in many instances because the failure of one link typically forces all traffic over a single link, thus diminishing throughput for each type of traffic and in most cases reducing the quality of voice. Furthermore, maintaining separate network links or devices makes troubleshooting and management difficult at best.
Because of the potential for WAN links to fail or to become oversubscribed, Cisco recommends deploying non-centralized resources as appropriate at sites on the other side of the WAN. Specifically, media resources, DHCP servers, voice gateways, and call processing applications such as Survivable Remote Site Telephony (SRST) and Cisco Unified Communications Manager Express (Unified CME) should be deployed at non-central sites when and if appropriate, depending on the site size and how critical these functions are to that site. Keep in mind that de-centralizing voice applications and devices can increase the complexity of network deployments, the complexity of managing these resources throughout the enterprise, and the overall cost of a the network solution; however, these factors can be mitigated by the fact that the resources will be available during a WAN link failure.
When deploying voice in a WAN environment, Cisco recommends that you use the lower-bandwidth G.729 codec for any voice calls that will traverse WAN links because this practice will provide bandwidth savings on these lower-speed links. Furthermore, media resources such as MoH should be configured to use multicast transport mechanism when possible because this practice will provide additional bandwidth savings.
Where calls are made over best-effort networks with no QoS guarantees for voice, consider using Internet Low Bit Rate Codec (iLBC), which enables graceful speech quality degradation and good error resilience characteristics in networks where frames can get lost. See Table 3-7 for details of bandwidth consumption based on codec type and sample size.
Delay in IP Voice Networks
Recommendation G.114 of the International Telecommunication Union (ITU) states that the one-way delay in a voice network should be less than or equal to 150 milliseconds. It is important to keep this in mind when implementing low-speed WAN links within a network. Topologies, technologies, and physical distance should be considered for WAN links so that one-way delay is kept at or below this 150-millisecond recommendation. Implementing a VoIP network where the one-way delay exceeds 150 milliseconds introduces issues not only with the quality of the voice call but also with call setup and media cut-through times because several call signaling messages need to be exchanged between each device and the call processing application in order to establish the call.
Because voice is typically deemed a critical network application, it is imperative that bearer and signaling voice traffic always reaches its destination. For this reason, it is important to choose a WAN topology and link type that can provide guaranteed dedicated bandwidth. The following WAN link technologies can provide guaranteed dedicated bandwidth:
Asynchronous Transfer Mode (ATM)
ATM/Frame-Relay Service Interworking
Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS)
Cisco Voice and Video Enabled IP Security VPN (IPSec V3PN)
These link technologies, when deployed in a dedicated fashion or when deployed in a private network, can provide guaranteed traffic throughput. All of these WAN link technologies can be provisioned at specific speeds or bandwidth sizes. In addition, these link technologies have built-in mechanisms that help guarantee throughput of network traffic even at low link speeds. Features such as traffic shaping, fragmentation and packet interleaving, and committed information rates (CIR) can help ensure that packets are not dropped in the WAN, that all packets are given access at regular intervals to the WAN link, and that enough bandwidth is available for all network traffic attempting to traverse these links.
Dynamic Multipoint VPN (DMVPN)
Spoke-to-spoke DMVPN networks can provide benefits for Cisco Unified Communications compared with hub-and-spoke topologies. Spoke-to-spoke tunnels can provide a reduction in end-to-end latency by reducing the number of WAN hops and decryption/encryption stages. In addition, DMVPN offers a simplified means of configuring the equivalent of a full mesh of point-to-point tunnels without the associated administrative and operational overhead. The use of spoke-to-spoke tunnels also reduces traffic at the hub, thus providing bandwidth and router processing capacity savings. Spoke-to-spoke DMVPN networks, however, are sensitive to the delay variation (jitter) caused during the transition of RTP packets routing from the spoke-hub-spoke path to the spoke-to-spoke path. This variation in delay during the DMVPN path transition occurs very early in the call and is generally unnoticeable, although a single momentary audio distortion might be heard if the latency difference is above 100 ms.
For information on the deployment of multisite DMVPN WANs with centralized call processing, refer to the Cisco Unified Communications Voice over Spoke-to-Spoke DMVPN Test Results and Recommendations , available at http://www.cisco.com/go/designzone .
There are some WAN topologies that are unable to provide guaranteed dedicated bandwidth to ensure that network traffic will reach its destination, even when that traffic is critical. These topologies are extremely problematic for voice traffic, not only because they provide no mechanisms to provision guaranteed network throughput, but also because they provide no traffic shaping, packet fragmentation and interleaving, queuing mechanisms, or end-to-end QoS to ensure that critical traffic such as voice will be given preferential treatment.
The following WAN network topologies and link types are examples of this kind of best-effort bandwidth technology:
In most cases, none of these link types can provide the guaranteed network connectivity and bandwidth required for critical voice and voice applications. However, these technologies might be suitable for personal or telecommuter-type network deployments. At times, these topologies can provide highly available network connectivity and adequate network throughput; but at other times, these topologies can become unavailable for extended periods of time, can be throttled to speeds that render network throughput unacceptable for real-time applications such as voice, or can cause extensive packet losses and require repeated retransmissions. In other words, these links and topologies are unable to provide guaranteed bandwidth, and when traffic is sent on these links, it is sent best-effort with no guarantee that it will reach its destination. For this reason, Cisco recommends that you do not use best-effort WAN topologies for voice-enabled networks that require enterprise-class voice services and quality.
NoteThere are some new QoS mechanisms for DSL and cable technologies that can provide guaranteed bandwidth; however, these mechanisms are not typically deployed by many service providers. For any service that offers QoS guarantees over networks that are typically based on best-effort, it is important to review and understand the bandwidth and QoS guarantees offered in the service provider's service level agreement (SLA).
Before placing voice and video traffic on a network, it is important to ensure that there is adequate bandwidth for all required applications. Once this bandwidth has been provisioned, voice priority queuing must be performed on all interfaces. This queuing is required to reduce jitter and possible packet loss if a burst of traffic oversubscribes a buffer. This queuing requirement is similar to the one for the LAN infrastructure.
Next, the WAN typically requires additional mechanisms such as traffic shaping to ensure that WAN links are not sent more traffic than they can handle, which could cause dropped packets.
Finally, link efficiency techniques can be applied to WAN paths. For example, link fragmentation and interleaving (LFI) can be used to prevent small voice packets from being queued behind large data packets, which could lead to unacceptable delays on low-speed links.
The goal of these QoS mechanisms is to ensure reliable, high-quality voice by reducing delay, packet loss, and jitter for the voice traffic. Table 3-5 lists the QoS features and tools required for the WAN infrastructure to achieve this goal.
Table 3-5 QoS Features and Tools Required to Support Unified Communications for Each WAN Technology and Link Speed
Link Speed: 56 kbps to 768 kbps
Link Speed: Greater than 768 kbps
Multilink Point-to-Point Protocol (MLP)
MLP Link Fragmentation and Interleaving (LFI)
Low Latency Queuing (LLQ)
Optional: Compressed Real-Time Transport Protocol (cRTP)
Frame Relay (FR)
Optional: Voice-Adaptive Traffic Shaping (VATS)
Optional: Voice-Adaptive Fragmentation (VAF)
Asynchronous Transfer Mode (ATM)
TX-ring buffer changes
MLP over ATM
Optional: cRTP (requires MLP)
TX-ring buffer changes
Frame Relay and ATM Service Inter-Working (SIW)
TX-ring buffer changes
MLP over ATM and FR
Optional: cRTP (requires MLP)
TX-ring buffer changes
MLP over ATM and FR
Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS)
Same as above, according to the interface technology
Class-based marking is generally required to re-mark flows according to service provider specifications
Same as above, according to the interface technology
Class-based marking is generally required to re-mark flows according to service provider specifications
The following sections highlight some of the most important features and techniques to consider when designing a WAN to support both voice and data traffic:
In choosing from among the many available prioritization schemes, the major factors to consider include the type of traffic involved and the type of media on the WAN. For multi-service traffic over an IP WAN, Cisco recommends low-latency queuing (LLQ) for all links. This method supports up to 64 traffic classes, with the ability to specify, for example, priority queuing behavior for voice and interactive video, minimum bandwidth class-based weighted fair queuing for voice control traffic, additional minimum bandwidth weighted fair queues for mission critical data, and a default best-effort queue for all other traffic types.
Figure 3-12 Optimized Queuing for VoIP over the WAN
Cisco recommends the following prioritization criteria for LLQ:
The criterion for voice to be placed into a priority queue is the differentiated services code point (DSCP) value of 46, or a per-hop behavior (PHB) value of EF.
The criterion for video conferencing traffic to be placed into a priority queue is a DSCP value of 34, or a PHB value of AF41. However, due to the larger packet sizes of video traffic, these packets should be placed in the priority queue only on WAN links that are faster than 768 Kbps. Link speeds below this value require packet fragmentation, but packets placed in the priority queue are not fragmented, thus smaller voice packets could be queued behind larger video packets. For links speeds of 768 Kbps or lower, video conferencing traffic should be placed in a separate class-based weighted fair queue (CBWFQ).
Note One-way video traffic, such as the traffic generated by streaming video applications for services such as video-on-demand or live video feeds, should always use a CBWFQ scheme because that type of traffic has a much higher delay tolerance than two-way video conferencing traffic
As the WAN links become congested, it is possible to starve the voice control signaling protocols, thereby eliminating the ability of the IP phones to complete calls across the IP WAN. Therefore, voice control protocols, such as H.323, MGCP, and Skinny Client Control Protocol (SCCP), require their own class-based weighted fair queue. The entrance criterion for this queue is a DSCP value of 24 or a PHB value of CS3.
Note Cisco has transitioned the marking of voice control protocols from DSCP 26 (PHB AF31) to DSCP 24 (PHB CS3). However, some products still mark signaling traffic as DSCP 26 (PHB AF31); therefore, Cisco recommends that you reserve both AF31 and CS3 for call signaling.
In some cases, certain data traffic might require better than best-effort treatment. This traffic is referred to as mission-critical data , and it is placed into one or more queues that have the required amount of bandwidth. The queuing scheme within this class is first-in-first-out (FIFO) with a minimum allocated bandwidth. Traffic in this class that exceeds the configured bandwidth limit is placed in the default queue. The entrance criterion for this queue could be a Transmission Control Protocol (TCP) port number, a Layer 3 address, or a DSCP/PHB value.
All remaining enterprise traffic can be placed in a default queue for best-effort treatment. If you specify the keyword fair , the queuing algorithm will be weighted fair queuing (WFQ).
The Scavenger class is intended to provide less than best-effort services to certain applications. Applications assigned to this class have little or no contribution to the organizational objectives of the enterprise and are typically entertainment oriented in nature. Assigning Scavenger traffic to a minimal bandwidth queue forces it to be squelched to virtually nothing during periods of congestion, but it allows it to be available if bandwidth is not being used for business purposes, such as might occur during off-peak hours.
Scavenger traffic should be marked as DSCP CS1.
Scavenger traffic should be assigned the lowest configurable queuing service. For instance, in Cisco IOS, this means assigning a CBWFQ of 1% to Scavenger class.
Link Efficiency Techniques
The following link efficiency techniques improve the quality and efficiency of low-speed WAN links.
Compressed Real-Time Transport Protocol (cRTP)
You can increase link efficiency by using Compressed Real-Time Transport Protocol (cRTP). This protocol compresses a 40-byte IP, User Datagram Protocol (UDP), and RTP header into approximately two to four bytes. cRTP operates on a per-hop basis. Use cRTP on a particular link only if that link meets all of the following conditions:
Voice traffic represents more than 33% of the load on the specific link.
The link uses a low bit-rate codec (such as G.729).
No other real-time application (such as video conferencing) is using the same link.
If the link fails to meet any one of the preceding conditions, then cRTP is not effective and you should not use it on that link. Another important parameter to consider before using cRTP is router CPU utilization, which is adversely affected by compression and decompression operations.
cRTP on ATM and Frame Relay Service Inter-Working (SIW) links requires the use of Multilink Point-to-Point Protocol (MLP).
Note that cRTP compression occurs as the final step before a packet leaves the egress interface; that is, after LLQ class-based queueing has occurred. Beginning in Cisco IOS Release 12.(2)2T and later, cRTP provides a feedback mechanism to the LLQ class-based queueing mechanism that allows the bandwidth in the voice class to be configured based on the compressed packet value. With Cisco IOS releases prior to 12.(2)2T, this mechanism is not in place, so the LLQ is unaware of the compressed bandwidth and, therefore, the voice class bandwidth has to be provisioned as if no compression is taking place. Table 3-6 shows an example of the difference in voice class bandwidth configuration given a 512-kbps link with G.729 codec and a requirement for 10 calls.
Note that Table 3-6 assumes 24 kbps for non-cRTP G.729 calls and 10 kbps for cRTP G.729 calls. These bandwidth numbers are based on voice payload and IP/UDP/RTP headers only. They do not take into consideration Layer 2 header bandwidth. However, actual bandwidth provisioning should also include Layer 2 header bandwidth based on the type WAN link used.
Table 3-6 LLQ Voice Class Bandwidth Requirements for 10 Calls with 512 kbps Link Bandwidth and G.729 Codec
4.140 kbps of unnecessary bandwidth must be configured in the LLQ voice class.
It should also be noted that, beginning in Cisco IOS Release 12.2(13)T, cRTP can be configured as part of the voice class with the Class-Based cRTP feature. This option allows cRTP to be specified within a class, attached to an interface via a service policy. This new feature provides compression statistics and bandwidth status via the show policy interface command, which can be very helpful in determining the offered rate on an interface service policy class given the fact that cRTP is compressing the IP/RTP headers.
For additional recommendations about using cRTP with a Voice and Video Enabled IPSec VPN (V3PN), refer to the V3PN documentation available at
For low-speed links (less than 768 kbps), use of link fragmentation and interleaving (LFI) mechanisms is required for acceptable voice quality. This technique limits jitter by preventing voice traffic from being delayed behind large data frames, as illustrated in Figure 3-13. The two techniques that exist for this purpose are Multilink Point-to-Point Protocol (MLP) LFI (for Leased Lines, ATM, and SIW) and FRF.12 for Frame Relay.
Figure 3-13 Link Fragmentation and Interleaving (LFI)
Voice-Adaptive Fragmentation (VAF)
In addition to the LFI mechanisms mentioned above, voice-adaptive fragmentation (VAF) is another LFI mechanism for Frame Relay links. VAF uses FRF.12 Frame Relay LFI; however, once configured, fragmentation occurs only when traffic is present in the LLQ priority queue or when H.323 signaling packets are detected on the interface. This method ensures that, when voice traffic is being sent on the WAN interface, large packets are fragmented and interleaved. However, when voice traffic is not present on the WAN link, traffic is forwarded across the link unfragmented, thus reducing the overhead required for fragmentation.
VAF is typically used in combination with voice-adaptive traffic shaping (see Voice-Adaptive Traffic Shaping (VATS)). VAF is an optional LFI tool, and you should exercise care when enabling it because there is a slight delay between the time when voice activity is detected and the time when the LFI mechanism engages. In addition, a configurable deactivation timer (default of 30 seconds) must expire after the last voice packet is detected and before VAF is deactivated, so during that time LFI will occur unnecessarily. VAF is available in Cisco IOS Release 12.2(15)T and later.
Traffic shaping is required for multiple-access, non-broadcast media such as ATM and Frame Relay, where the physical access speed varies between two endpoints and several branch sites are typically aggregated to a single router interface at the central site.
Figure 3-14 illustrates the main reasons why traffic shaping is needed when transporting voice and data on the same IP WAN.
Figure 3-14 Traffic Shaping with Frame Relay and ATM
While the central-site interface is typically a high-speed one (such as T1 or higher), smaller remote branch interfaces may have significantly lower line speeds, such as 64 kbps. If data is sent at full rate from the central site to a slow-speed remote site, the interface at the remote site might become congested, resulting in dropped packets which causes a degradation in voice quality.
2. Oversubscription of the link between the central site and the remote sites
It is common practice in Frame Relay or ATM networks to oversubscribe bandwidth when aggregating many remote sites to a single central site. For example, there may be multiple remote sites that connect to the WAN with a T1 interface, yet the central site has only a single T1 interface. While this configuration allows the deployment to benefit from statistical multiplexing, the router interface at the central site can become congested during traffic bursts, thus degrading voice quality.
3. Bursting above Committed Information Rate (CIR)
Another common configuration is to allow traffic bursts above the CIR, which represents the rate that the service provider has guaranteed to transport across its network with no loss and low delay. For example, a remote site with a T1 interface might have a CIR of only 64 kbps. When more than 64 kbps worth of traffic is sent across the WAN, the provider marks the additional traffic as "discard eligible." If congestion occurs in the provider network, this traffic will be dropped with no regard to traffic classification, possibly having a negative effect on voice quality.
Traffic shaping provides a solution to these issues by limiting the traffic sent out an interface to a rate lower than the line rate, thus ensuring that no congestion occurs on either end of the WAN. Figure 3-15 illustrates this mechanism with a generic example, where R is the rate with traffic shaping applied.
Figure 3-15 Traffic Shaping Mechanism
Voice-Adaptive Traffic Shaping (VATS)
VATS is an optional dynamic mechanism that shapes traffic on Frame Relay permanent virtual circuits (PVCs) at different rates based on whether voice is being sent across the WAN. The presence of traffic in the LLQ voice priority queue or the detection of H.323 signaling on the link causes VATS to engage. Typically, Frame Relay shapes traffic to the guaranteed bandwidth or CIR of the PVC at all times. However, because these PVCs are typically allowed to burst above the CIR (up to line speed), traffic shaping keeps traffic from using the additional bandwidth that might be present in the WAN. With VATS enabled on Frame Relay PVCs, WAN interfaces are able to send at CIR when voice traffic is present on the link. However, when voice is not present, non-voice traffic is able to burst up to line speed and take advantage of the additional bandwidth that might be present in the WAN.
When VATS is used in combination with voice-adaptive fragmentation (VAF) (see Link Fragmentation and Interleaving (LFI)), all non-voice traffic is fragmented and all traffic is shaped to the CIR of the WAN link when voice activity is detected on the interface.
As with VAF, exercise care when enabling VATS because activation can have an adverse effect on non-voice traffic. When voice is present on the link, data applications will experience decreased throughput because they are throttled back to well below CIR. This behavior will likely result in packet drops and delays for non-voice traffic. Furthermore, after voice traffic is no longer detected, the deactivation timer (default of 30 seconds) must expire before traffic can burst back to line speed. It is important, when using VATS, to set end-user expectations and make them aware that data applications will experience slowdowns on a regular basis due to the presence of voice calls across the WAN. VATS is available in Cisco IOS Release 12.2(15)T and later.
For more information on the Voice-Adaptive Traffic Shaping and Fragmentation features and how to configure them, refer to the documentation at
Properly provisioning the network bandwidth is a major component of designing a successful IP network. You can calculate the required bandwidth by adding the bandwidth requirements for each major application (for example, voice, video, and data). This sum then represents the minimum bandwidth requirement for any given link, and it should not exceed approximately 75% of the total available bandwidth for the link. This 75% rule assumes that some bandwidth is required for overhead traffic, such as routing and Layer 2 keep-alives. Figure 3-16 illustrates this bandwidth provisioning process.
Figure 3-16 Link Bandwidth Provisioning
In addition to using no more than 75% of the total available bandwidth for data, voice, and video, the total bandwidth configured for all LLQ priority queues should typically not exceed 33% of the total link bandwidth. Provisioning more than 33% of the available bandwidth for the priority queue can be problematic for a number of reasons. First, provisioning more than 33% of the bandwidth for voice can result in increased CPU usage. Because each voice call will send 50 packets per second (with 20 ms samples), provisioning for large numbers of calls in the priority queue can lead to high CPU levels due to high packet rates. In addition, if more than one type of traffic is provisioned in the priority queue (for example, voice and video), this configuration defeats the purpose of enabling QoS because the priority queue essentially becomes a first-in, first-out (FIFO) queue. A larger percentage of reserved priority bandwidth effectively dampens the QoS effects by making more of the link bandwidth FIFO. Finally, allocating more than 33% of the available bandwidth can effectively starve any data queues that are provisioned. Obviously, for very slow links (less than 192 kbps), the recommendation to provision no more than 33% of the link bandwidth for the priority queue(s) might be unrealistic because a single call could require more than 33% of the link bandwidth. In these situations, and in situations where specific business needs cannot be met while holding to this recommendation, it may be necessary to exceed the 33% rule.
From a traffic standpoint, an IP telephony call consists of two parts:
The voice and video bearer streams, which consists of Real-Time Transport Protocol (RTP) packets that contain the actual voice samples.
The call control signaling, which consists of packets belonging to one of several protocols, according to the endpoints involved in the call (for example, H.323, MGCP, SCCP, or (J)TAPI). Call control functions are, for instance, those used to set up, maintain, tear down, or redirect a call.
Bandwidth provisioning should include not only the bearer traffic but also the call control traffic. In fact, in multisite WAN deployments, the call control traffic (as well as the bearer traffic) must traverse the WAN, and failure to allocate sufficient bandwidth for it can adversely affect the user experience.
The next three sub-sections describe the bandwidth provisioning recommendations for the following types of traffic:
As illustrated in Figure 3-17, a voice-over-IP (VoIP) packet consists of the voice payload, IP header, User Datagram Protocol (UDP) header, Real-Time Transport Protocol (RTP) header, and Layer 2 Link header. When Secure Real-Time Transport Protocol (SRTP) encryption is used, the voice payload for each packet is increased by 4 bytes. The link header varies in size according to the Layer 2 media used.
Figure 3-17 Typical VoIP Packet
The bandwidth consumed by VoIP streams is calculated by adding the packet payload and all headers (in bits), then multiplying by the packet rate per second, as follows:
Layer 2 bandwidth in kbps = [(Packets per second) ∗ ( X bytes for voice payload + 40 bytes for RTP/UDP/IP headers + Y bytes for Layer 2 overhead) ∗ 8 bits] / 1000
Layer 3 bandwidth in kbps = [(Packets per second) ∗ ( X bytes for voice payload + 40 bytes for RTP/UDP/IP headers) ∗ 8 bits] / 1000
Packets per second = [1/(sampling rate in msec)] ∗ 1000
Voice payload in bytes = [(codec bit rate in kbps) ∗ (sampling rate in msec)] / 8
Table 3-7 details the Layer 3 bandwidth per VoIP flow. Table 3-7 lists the bandwidth consumed by the voice payload and IP header only, at a default packet rate of 50 packets per second (pps) and at a rate of 33.3 pps for both non-encrypted and encrypted payloads. Table 3-7 does not include Layer 2 header overhead and does not take into account any possible compression schemes, such as compressed Real-Time Transport Protocol (cRTP). You can use the Service Parameters menu in Unified CM Administration to adjust the codec sampling rate.
Table 3-7 Bandwidth Consumption for Voice Payload and IP Header Only
Voice Payload in Bytes
Packets per Second
Bandwidth per Conversation
G.711 and G.722-64k
G.711 and G.722-64k (SRTP)
G.711 and G.722-64k
G.711 and G.722-64k (SRTP)
A more accurate method for provisioning is to include the Layer 2 headers in the bandwidth calculations. Table 3-8 lists the amount of bandwidth consumed by voice traffic when the Layer 2 headers are included in the calculations.
Table 3-8 Bandwidth Consumption with Layer 2 Headers Included
Header Type and Size
53-Byte Cells with a 48-Byte Payload
G.711 and G.722-64k at 50.0 pps
G.711 and G.722-64k (SRTP) at 50.0 pps
G.711 and G.722-64k at 33.3 pps
G.711 and G.722-64k (SRTP) at 33.3 pps
iLBC at 50.0 pps
iLBC (SRTP) at 50.0 pps
iLBC at 33.3 pps
iLBC (SRTP) at 33.3 pps
G.729A at 50.0 pps
G.729A (SRTP) at 50.0 pps
G.729A at 33.3 pps
G729A (SRTP) at 33.3 pps
While it is possible to configure the sampling rate above 30 ms, doing so usually results in very poor voice quality. As illustrated in Figure 3-18, as sampling size increases, the number of packets per second decreases, resulting in a smaller impact to the CPU of the device. Likewise, as the sample size increases, IP header overhead is lower because the payload per packet is larger. However, as sample size increases, so does packetization delay, resulting in higher end-to-end delay for voice traffic. The trade-off between packetization delay and packets per second must be considered when configuring sample size. While this trade-off is optimized at 20 ms, 30 ms sample sizes still provide a reasonable ratio of delay to packets per second; however, with 40 ms sample sizes, the packetization delay becomes too high.
Figure 3-18 Voice Sample Size: Packets per Second vs. Packetization Delay
Video Bearer Traffic
For audio, it is relatively easy to calculate a percentage of overhead per packet given the sample size of each packet. For video, however, it is nearly impossible to calculate an exact percentage of overhead because the payload varies depending upon how much motion is present in the video (that is, how many pixels changed since the last frame).
To resolve this inability to calculate the exact overhead ratio for video, Cisco recommends that you add 20% to the call speed regardless of which type of Layer-2 medium the packets are traversing. The additional 20% gives plenty of headroom to allow for the differences between Ethernet, ATM, Frame Relay, PPP, HDLC, and other transport protocols, as well as some cushion for the bursty nature of video traffic.
Note that the call speed requested by the endpoint (for example, 128 kbps, 256 kbps, and so forth) represents the maximum burst speed of the call, with some additional amount for a cushion. The average speed of the call is typically much less than these values.
Provisioning for Call Control Traffic
When Unified Communications endpoints are separated from their call control application by a WAN, or when two interconnected Unified Communications systems are separated by a WAN, consideration must be given to the amount of bandwidth that must be provisioned for call control and signaling traffic between these endpoints and systems. This section discusses WAN bandwidth provisioning for call signaling traffic where centralized or distributed call processing models are deployed. For more information on Unified Communications centralized and distributed call processing deployment models, see Collaboration Deployment Models.
.Provisioning for Call Control Traffic with Centralized Call Processing
In a centralized call processing deployment, the Unified CM cluster and the applications (such as voicemail) are located at the central site, while several remote sites are connected through an IP WAN. The remote sites rely on the centralized Unified CMs to handle their call processing.
The following considerations apply to this deployment model:
Each time a remote branch phone places a call, the control traffic traverses the IP WAN to reach the Unified CM at the central site, even if the call is local to the branch.
The signaling protocols that may traverse the IP WAN in this deployment model are SCCP (encrypted and non-encrypted), SIP (encrypted and non-encrypted), H.323, MGCP, and CTI-QBE. All the control traffic is exchanged between a Unified CM at the central site and endpoints or gateways at the remote branches.
If RSVP is deployed within the cluster, the control traffic between the Unified CM cluster at the central site and the Cisco RSVP Agents at the remote sites uses the SCCP protocol.
As a consequence, you must provision bandwidth for control traffic that traverses the WAN between the branch routers and the WAN aggregation router at the central site.
The control traffic that traverses the WAN in this scenario can be split into two categories:
Quiescent traffic, which consists of keep-alive messages periodically exchanged between the branch endpoints (phones, gateways, and Cisco RSVP Agents) and Unified CM, regardless of call activity. This traffic is a function of the quantity of endpoints.
Call-related traffic, which consists of signaling messages exchanged between the branch endpoints and the Unified CM at the central site when a call needs to be set up, torn down, forwarded, and so forth. This traffic is a function of the quantity of endpoints and their associated call volume.
To obtain an estimate of the generated call control traffic, it is necessary to make some assumptions regarding the average number of calls per hour made by each branch IP phone. In the interest of simplicity, the calculations in this section assume an average of 10 calls per hour per phone.
NoteIf this average number does not satisfy the needs of your specific deployment, you can calculate the recommended bandwidth by using the advanced formulas provided inAdvanced Formulas.
Given the assumptions made, and initially considering the case of a remote branch with no signaling encryption configured, the recommended bandwidth needed for call control traffic can be obtained from the following formula:
Equation 1A: Recommended Bandwidth Needed for SCCP Control Traffic without Signaling Encryption.
Bandwidth (bps) = 265 ∗ (Number of IP phones and gateways in the branch)
Equation 1B: Recommended Bandwidth Needed for SIP Control Traffic without Signaling Encryption.
Bandwidth (bps) = 538 ∗ (Number of IP phones and gateways in the branch)
If a site features a mix of SCCP and SIP endpoints, the two equations above should be employed separately for the quantity of each type of phone used, and the results added.
Equation 1 and all other formulas within this section include a 25% over-provisioning factor. Control traffic has a bursty nature, with peaks of high activity followed by periods of low activity. For this reason, assigning just the minimum bandwidth required to a control traffic queue can result in undesired effects such as buffering delays and, potentially, packet drops during periods of high activity. The default queue depth for a Class-Based Weighted Fair Queuing (CBWFQ) queue in Cisco IOS equals 64 packets. The bandwidth assigned to this queue determines its servicing rate. Assuming that the bandwidth configured is the average bandwidth consumed by this type of traffic, it is clear that, during the periods of high activity, the servicing rate will not be sufficient to "drain" all the incoming packets out of the queue, thus causing them to be buffered. Note that, if the 64-packet limit is reached, any subsequent packets are either assigned to the best-effort queue or are dropped. It is therefore advisable to introduce this 25% over-provisioning factor to absorb and smooth the variations in the traffic pattern and to minimize the risk of a temporary buffer overrun. This is equivalent to increasing the servicing rate of the queue.
If encryption is configured, the recommended bandwidth is affected because encryption increases the size of signaling packets exchanged between Unified CM and the endpoints. The following formula takes into account the impact of signaling encryption:
Equation 2A: Recommended Bandwidth Needed for SCCP Control Traffic with Signaling Encryption.
Bandwidth with signaling encryption (bps) = 415 ∗ (Number of IP phones and gateways in the branch)
Equation 2B: Recommended Bandwidth Needed for SIP Control Traffic with Signaling Encryption.
Bandwidth with signaling encryption (bps) = 619 ∗ (Number of IP phones and gateways in the branch)
If we now take into account the fact that the smallest bandwidth that can be assigned to a queue on a Cisco IOS router is 8 kbps, we can summarize the values of minimum and recommended bandwidth for various branch office sizes, as shown in Table 3-9.
Table 3-9 Recommended Layer 3 Bandwidth for Call Control Traffic With and Without Signaling Encryption
Branch Office Size (Number of IP Phones and Gateways)
Recommended Bandwidth for SCCP Control Traffic (no encryption)
Recommended Bandwidth for SCCP Control Traffic (with encryption)
Recommended Bandwidth for SIP Control Traffic (no encryption)
Recommended Bandwidth for SIP Control Traffic (with encryption)
1 to 10
NoteIf an RSVP-based locations policy is used for inter-site calls, the values ofTable 3-9 must be increased to compensate for the control traffic of the Cisco RSVP Agent. For example, if 10% of the calls go over the WAN, multiply the value from Table 3-9 by 1.1.
The previous formulas presented in this section assume an average call rate per phone of 10 calls per hour. However, this rate might not correspond to your deployment if the call patterns are significantly different (for example, with call center agents at the branches). To calculate call control bandwidth requirements in these cases, use the following formulas, which contain an additional variable (CH) that represents the average calls per hour per phone:
Equation 3A: Recommended Bandwidth Needed for SCCP Control Traffic for a Branch with No Signaling Encryption.
Bandwidth (bps) = (53 + 21 ∗ CH) ∗ (Number of IP phones and gateways in the branch)
Equation 3B: Recommended Bandwidth Needed for SIP Control Traffic for a Branch with No Signaling Encryption.
Bandwidth (bps) = (138 + 40 ∗ CH) ∗ (Number of IP phones and gateways in the branch)
Equation 4A: Recommended Bandwidth Needed for SCCP Control Traffic for a Remote Branch with Signaling Encryption.
Bandwidth with signaling encryption (bps) = (73.5 + 33.9 ∗ CH) ∗ (Number of IP phones and gateways in the branch)
Equation 4B: Recommended Bandwidth Needed for SIP Control Traffic for a Remote Branch with Signaling Encryption.
Bandwidth with signaling encryption (bps) = (159 + 46 ∗ CH) ∗ (Number of IP phones and gateways in the branch)
NoteEquations 3A and 4A are based on the default SCCP keep-alive period of 30 seconds, while equations 3B and 4B are based on the default SIP keep-alive period of 120 seconds.
Considerations for Shared Line Appearances
Calls placed to shared line appearances, or calls sent to line groups using the Broadcast distribution algorithm, have two net effects on the bandwidth consumed by the system:
Because all the phones on which the line is configured ring simultaneously, they represent a load on the system corresponding to a much higher calls-per-hour (CH) value than the CH of the line. The corresponding bandwidth consumption is therefore increased. The network infrastructure's bandwidth provisioning requires adjustments when WAN-connected shared line functionality is deployed. The CH value employed for Equations 3 and 4 must be increased according to the following formula:
CHS = CHL ∗ (Number line appearances) / (Number of lines)
Where CHS is the shared-line calls per hour to be used in Equations 3 and 4, and CHL is the calls-per-hour rating of the line. For example, if a site is configured with 5 lines making an average of 6 calls per hour but 2 of those lines are shared across 4 different phones, then:
Number of lines = 5
Number of line appearances = (2 lines appear on 4 phones, and 3 lines appear on only one phone) = (2∗4) + 3 = 11 line appearances
CHL = 6
CHS = 6 ∗ (11 / 5) = 13.2
Because each of the ringing phones requires a separate signaling control stream, the quantity of packets sent from Unified CM to the same branch is increased in linear proportion to the quantity of phones ringing. Because Unified CM is attached to the network through an interface that supports 100 Mbps or more, it can instantaneously generate a very large quantity of packets that must be buffered while the queuing mechanism is servicing the signaling traffic. The servicing speed is limited by the WAN interface's effective information transfer speed, which is typically two orders of magnitude smaller than 100 Mbps.
This traffic may overwhelm the queue depth of the central site's WAN router. By default, the queue depth available for each of the classes of traffic in Cisco IOS is 64. In order to prevent any packets from being dropped before they are queued for the WAN interface, you must ensure that the signaling queue's depth is sized to hold all the packets from at least one full shared-line event for each shared-line phone. Avoiding drops is paramount in ensuring that the call does not create a race condition where dropped packets are retransmitted, causing system response times to suffer.
Therefore, the quantity of packets required to operate shared-line phones is as follows:
– SCCP protocol: 13 packets per shared-line phone
– SIP protocol: 11 packets per shared-line phone
For example, with SCCP and with 6 phones sharing the same line, the queue depth for the signaling class of traffic must be adjusted to a minimum of 78. Table 3-10 provides recommended queue depths based on the quantity of shared line appearances within a branch site.
Table 3-10 Recommended Queue Depth per Branch Site
Number of Shared Line Appearances
Queue Depth (Packets)
When using a Layer 2 WAN technology such as Frame Relay, this adjustment must be made on the circuit corresponding to the branch where the shared-line phones are located.
When using a Layer 3 WAN technology such as MPLS, there may be a single signaling queue servicing multiple branches. In this case, adjustment must be made for the total of all branches serviced.
Provisioning for Call Control Traffic with Distributed Call Processing
In distributed call processing deployments, several sites are connected through an IP WAN. Each site contains a Unified CM cluster and can follow either the single-site model or the centralized call processing model. A gatekeeper may be used for call admission control between sites.
The following considerations apply to this deployment model:
The signaling protocol used to place a call across the WAN is H.323 or SIP.
Control traffic is exchanged between the Cisco IOS gatekeeper and the Unified CM clusters at each site, as well as between the Unified CM clusters themselves.
Therefore, bandwidth for control traffic must be provisioned on the WAN links between Unified CMs as well as between each Unified CM and the gatekeeper. Because the topology is limited to hub-and-spoke, with the gatekeeper typically located at the hub, the WAN link that connects each site to the other sites usually coincides with the link that connects the site to the gatekeeper.
The control traffic that traverses the WAN belongs to one of the following categories:
Quiescent traffic, which consists of registration messages periodically exchanged between each Unified CM and the gatekeeper
Call-related traffic, which in turn consists of two types of traffic:
– Call admission control traffic, exchanged between the Unified CMs and the call admission control device (such as a gatekeeper or Cisco RSVP Agent) before a call can be set up and after it has been torn down.
– Signaling traffic associated with a media stream, exchanged over an intercluster trunk when a call needs to be set up, torn down, forwarded, and so on.
Because the total amount of control traffic depends on the number of calls that are set up and torn down at any given time, it is necessary to make some assumptions about the call patterns and the link utilization. The WAN links that connect each of the spoke sites to the hub site are normally provisioned to accommodate different types of traffic (for example, data, voice, and video). Using a traditional telephony analogy, we can view the portion of the WAN link that has been provisioned for voice as a number of virtual tie lines .
Assuming an average call duration of 2 minutes and 100 percent utilization of each virtual tie line, we can derive that each tie line carries a volume of 30 calls per hour. This assumption allows us to obtain the following formula that expresses the recommended bandwidth for call control traffic as a function of the number of virtual tie lines.
Equation 6 : Recommended Bandwidth Based on Number of Virtual Tie Lines.
Recommended Bandwidth (bps) = 116 ∗ (Number of virtual tie lines)
If we take into account the fact that 8 kbps is the smallest bandwidth that can be assigned to a queue on a Cisco IOS router, we can deduce that a minimum queue size of 8 kbps can accommodate the call control traffic generated by up to 70 virtual tie lines . This amount should be sufficient for most large enterprise deployments.
Wireless LAN Infrastructure
Wireless LAN infrastructure design becomes important when collaboration endpoints are added to the wireless LAN (WLAN) portions of a converged network. With the introduction of Cisco Unified Wireless endpoints, voice and video traffic has moved onto the WLAN and is now converged with the existing data traffic there. Just as with wired LAN and wired WAN infrastructure, the addition of voice and video in the WLAN requires following basic configuration and design best-practices for deploying a highly available network. In addition, proper WLAN infrastructure design requires understanding and deploying QoS on the wireless network to ensure end-to-end voice and video quality on the entire network. The following sections discuss these requirements:
IP telephony architecture has used wired devices since its inception, but enterprise users have long sought the ability to communicate while moving through the company premises. Wireless IP networks have enabled IP telephony to deliver enterprise mobility by providing on-premises roaming communications to the users with wireless IP telephony devices.
Wireless IP telephony and wireless IP video telephony are extensions of their wired counterparts, which leverage the same call elements. Additionally, wireless IP telephony and IP video telephony take advantage of wireless 802.11-enabled media, thus providing a cordless IP voice and video experience. The cordless experience is achieved by leveraging the wireless network infrastructure elements for the transmission and reception of the control and media packets.
The architecture for voice and video over wireless LAN includes the following basic elements, illustrated in Figure 3-19:
Figure 3-19 Basic Layout for a Voice and Video Wireless Network
Wireless Access Points
The wireless access points enable wireless devices (Unified Communications endpoints in the case of voice and video over WLAN) to communicate with wired network elements. Access points function as adapters between the wired and wireless world, creating an entry-way between these two media. Cisco access points can be managed by a wireless LAN controller (WLC) or they can function in autonomous mode. When the access points are managed by a WLC they are referred as Lightweight Access Points, and in this mode they use the Lightweight Access Point Protocol (LWAPP) or Control and Provisioning of Wireless Access Points (CAPWAP) protocol, depending on the controller version, when communicating with the WLC.
Figure 3-20 illustrates the basic relationship between lightweight access points and WLCs. Although the example depicted in Figure 3-20 is for a CAPWAP WLC, from the traffic flow and relationship perspective there are no discernible differences between CAPWAP and LWAPP, so the example also applies to wireless LWAPP networks. Some advantages of leveraging WLCs and lightweight access points for the wireless infrastructure include ease of management, dynamic network tuning, and high availability. However, if you are using the managed mode instead of the autonomous mode in the access points, you need to consider the network tunneling effect of the LWAP-WLC communication architecture when designing your solution. This network tunneling effect is discussed in more depth in the section on Wireless LAN Controller Design Considerations.
Figure 3-20 Lightweight Access Point
Wireless LAN Controllers
Many corporate environments require deployment of wireless networks on a large scale. The wireless LAN controller (WLC) is a device that assumes a central role in the wireless network and helps to make it easier to manage such large-scale deployments. Traditional roles of access points, such as association or authentication of wireless clients, are done by the WLC. Access points, called Lightweight Access Points (LWAPs) in the Unified Communications environment, register themselves with a WLC and tunnel all the management and data packets to the WLCs, which then switch the packets between wireless clients and the wired portion of the network. All the configurations are done on the WLC. LWAPs download the entire configuration from WLCs and act as a wireless interface to the clients.
The authentication database is a core component of the wireless networks, and it holds the credentials of the users to be authenticated while the wireless association is in progress. The authentication database provides the network administrators with a centralized repository to validate the credentials. Network administrators simply add the wireless network users to the authentication database instead of having to add the users to all the wireless access points with which the wireless devices might associate.
In a typical wireless authentication scenario, the WLC couples with the authentication database to allow the wireless association to proceed or fail. Authentication databases commonly used are LDAP and RADIUS, although under some scenarios the WLC can also store a small user database locally that can be used for authentication purposes.
Supporting Wired Network
The supporting wired network is the portion of the system that serves as a path between WLCs, APs, and wired call elements. Because the APs need or might need to communicate to the wired world, part of the wired network has to enable those communications. The supporting wired network consists of the switches, routers, and wired medium (WAN links and optical links) that work together to communicate with the various components that form the architecture for voice and video over WLAN.
Wireless Collaboration Endpoints
The wireless collaboration endpoints are the components of the architecture for voice and video over WLAN that users employ to communicate with each other. These endpoints can be voice-only or enabled for both voice and video. When end users employ the wireless communications endpoints to call a desired destination, the endpoints in turn forward the request to their associated call processing server. If the call is allowed, the endpoints process the voice or video, encode it, and send it to the receiving device or the next hop of processing. Typical Cisco wireless endpoints are wireless IP phones, voice and video software clients running on desktop computers, mobile smart phones connected through wireless media, and mobile collaboration enterprise tablets.
Wired Call Elements
Whether the wireless collaboration endpoints initiate a session between each other or with wired endpoints, wired call elements are involved in some way. Wired call elements (gateways and call processing entities) are the supporting infrastructure, with voice and video endpoints coupled to that infrastructure.
Wired call elements are needed typically to address two requirements:
Cisco wireless endpoints require a call control or call processing server to route calls efficiently and to provide a feature-rich experience for the end users. The call processing entity resides somewhere in the wired network, either in the LAN or across a WAN.
Call control for the Cisco wireless endpoints is achieved through a call control protocol, either SIP or SCCP.
Media termination on wired endpoints occurs when the end users of the wireless endpoints communicate with IP phones, PSTN users, or video endpoints. Voice gateways, IP phones, video terminals, PBX trunks, and transcoders all serve as termination points for media when a user communicates through them. This media termination occurs by means of coding and decoding of the voice or video session for the user communication.
High Availability for Voice and Video over WLAN
Providing high availability in collaboration solutions is a critical requirement for meeting the modern demands of continuous connectivity. Collaboration deployments designed for high availability increase reliability and up time. Using real-time applications such as voice or video over WLAN without high availability could have very adverse effects on the end user experience, including an inability to make voice or video calls.
Designing a solution for voice and video over WLAN with high availability requires focusing of the following main areas:
When deploying voice and video over WLAN, the same high-availability strategies used in wired networks can be applied to the wired components of the solution for voice and video over WLAN. For example, you can optimize layer convergence in the network to minimize disruption and take advantage of equal-cost redundant paths.
A unique aspect of high availability for voice and video over WLAN is high availability of radio frequency (RF) coverage to provide Wi-Fi channel coverage that is not dependent upon a single WLAN radio. The Wi-Fi channel coverage is provided by the AP radios in the 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz frequency bands. The primary mechanism for providing RF high availability is cell boundary overlap. In general, a cell boundary overlap of 20% to 30% on non-adjacent channels is recommended to provide high availability in the wireless network. For mission-critical environments there should be at least two APs visible at the required signal level (-67 dBm or better). An overlap of 20% means that the RF cells of APs using non-adjacent channels overlap each other on 20% of their coverage area, while the remaining 80% of the coverage area is handled by a single AP. Figure 3-21 depicts a 20% overlap of AP non-adjacent channel cells to provide high availability. Furthermore, when determining the locations for installing the APs, avoid mounting them on reflective surfaces (such as metal, glass, and so forth), which could cause multi-path effects that result in signal distortion.
Figure 3-21 Non-Adjacent Channel Access Point Overlap
Careful deployment of APs and channel configuration within the wireless infrastructure are imperative for proper wireless network operation. For this reason, Cisco requires customers to conduct a complete and thorough site survey before deploying wireless networks in a production environment. The survey should include verifying non-overlapping channel configurations, Wi-Fi channel coverage, and required data and traffic rates; eliminating rogue APs; and identifying and mitigating the impact of potential interference sources.
Additionally, evaluate utilizing a 5 GHz frequency band, which is generally less crowded and thus usually less prone to interference. If Bluetooth is used then 5 GHz 802.11a is highly recommended. Similarly, the usage of Cisco CleanAir technology will increase the WLAN reliability by detecting radio frequency interference in real time and providing a self-healing and self-optimizing wireless network. For further information about Cisco CleanAir technology, refer to the product documentation available at
A crucial piece in planning for voice and video over WLAN is adequately sizing the solution for the desired call capacity. Capacity is defined as the number of simultaneous voice and video sessions over WLAN that can be supported in a given area. Capacity can vary depending upon the RF environment, the collaboration endpoint features, and the WLAN system features. For instance, a solution using Cisco Unified Wireless IP Phones 7925G on a WLAN that provides optimized WLAN services (such as the Cisco Unified Wireless Network) would have a maximum call capacity of 27 simultaneous sessions per channel at a data rate of 24 Mbps or higher for both 802.11a and 802.11g. On the other hand, a similar solution with a wireless device such as a tablet making video calls at 720p and a video rate of 2,500 kbps on a WLAN, where access points are configured as 802.11a/n with a data rate index of Modulation and Coding Scheme 7 in 40 MHz channels, would have a maximum capacity of 7 video calls (two bidirectional voice and video streams) per channel.
To achieve these capacities, there must be minimal wireless LAN background traffic and radio frequency (RF) utilization, and Bluetooth must be disabled in the devices. It is also important to understand that call capacities are established per non-overlapping channel because the limiting factor is the channel capacity and not the number of access points (APs).
The call capacity specified by the actual wireless endpoint should be used for deployment purposes because it is the supported capacity of that endpoint. For capacity information about the wireless endpoints, refer to the following documentation:
Design Considerations for Voice and Video over WLAN
This section provides additional design considerations for deploying collaboration endpoints over WLAN solutions. WLAN configuration specifics can vary depending on the voice or video WLAN devices being used and the WLAN design. The following sections provide general guidelines and best practices for designing the WLAN infrastructure:
Just as with a wired LAN infrastructure, when deploying voice or video in a wireless LAN, you should enable at least two virtual LANs (VLANs) at the Access Layer. The Access Layer in a wireless LAN environment includes the access point (AP) and the first-hop access switch. On the AP and access switch, you should configure both a native VLAN for data traffic and a voice VLAN (under Cisco IOS) or Auxiliary VLAN (under CatOS) for voice traffic. This auxiliary voice VLAN should be separate from all the other wired voice VLANs in the network. However, when the wireless clients (for example, smart phones or software rich-media clients) do not support the concept of an auxiliary VLAN, alternative packet marking strategies (for example, packet classification per port) must be applied to segregate the important traffic such as voice and video and treat it with priority. When deploying a wireless infrastructure, Cisco also recommends configuring a separate management VLAN for the management of WLAN APs. This management VLAN should not have a WLAN appearance; that is, it should not have an associated service set identifier (SSID) and it should not be directly accessible from the WLAN.
To improve the user experience, Cisco recommends designing the cell boundary distribution with a 20% to 30% overlap of non-adjacent channels to facilitate seamless roaming of the wireless client between access points. Furthermore, when devices roam at Layer 3, they move from one AP to another AP across native VLAN boundaries. When the WLAN infrastructure consists of autonomous APs, a Cisco Wireless LAN Controller allows the Cisco Unified Wireless endpoints to keep their IP addresses and roam at Layer 3 while still maintaining an active call. Seamless Layer 3 roaming occurs only when the client is roaming within the same mobility group. For details about the Cisco Wireless LAN Controller and Layer 3 roaming, refer to the product documentation available at
Seamless Layer 3 roaming for clients across a lightweight access point infrastructure is accomplished by WLAN controllers that use dynamic interface tunneling. Cisco Wireless Unified Communications endpoints that roam across WLAN controllers and VLANs can keep their IP address when using the same SSID and therefore can maintain an active call.
NoteIn dual-band WLANs (those with 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz bands), it is possible to roam between 802.11b/g and 802.11a with the same SSID, provided the client is capable of supporting both bands. However, this can cause gaps in the voice path. If Cisco Unified Wireless IP Phones 7921 or 7925 are used, make sure that firmware version 1.3(4) or higher is installed on the phones to avoid these gaps; otherwise use only one band for voice. (The Cisco Unified Wireless IP Phone 7926 provides seamless inter-band roaming from its first firmware version.)
Wireless endpoints and APs communicate by means of radios on particular channels. When communicating on one channel, wireless endpoints typically are unaware of traffic and communication occurring on other non-overlapping channels.
Optimal channel configuration for 2.4 GHz 802.11b/g/n requires a minimum of five-channel separation between configured channels to prevent interference or overlap between channels. Non-overlapping channels have 22 MHz of separation. Channel 1 is 2.412 GHz, channel 6 is 2.437 GHz, and channel 11 is 2.462 GHz. In North America, with allowable channels of 1 to 11, channels 1, 6, and 11 are the three usable non-overlapping channels for APs and wireless endpoint devices. However, in Europe where the allowable channels are 1 to 13, multiple combinations of five-channel separation are possible. Multiple combinations of five-channel separation are also possible in Japan, where the allowable channels are 1 to 14.
Optimal channel configuration for 5 GHz 802.11a and 802.11n requires a minimum of one-channel separation to prevent interference or overlap between channels. In North America, there are 20 possible non-overlapping channels: 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60, 64, 100, 104, 108, 112, 116, 132, 136, 140, 149, 153, 157, and 161. Europe and Japan allow 16 possible non-overlapping channels: 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60, 64, 100, 104, 108, 112, 116, 132, 136, and 140. Because of the larger set of non-overlapping channels, 802.11a and 5 Ghz 802.11n allow for more densely deployed WLANs; however, Cisco recommends not enabling all channels but using a 12-channel design instead.
Note that the 802.11a and 802.11n bands (when using channels operating at 5.25 to 5.725 GHz, which are 15 of the 24 possible channels) do require support for Dynamic Frequency Selection (DFS) and Transmit Power Control (TPC) on some channels in order to avoid interference with radar (military, satellite, and weather). Regulations require that channels 52 to 64, 100 to 116, and 132 to 140 support DFS and TPC. TPC ensures that transmissions on these channels are not powerful enough to cause interference. DFC monitors channels for radar pulses and, when it detects a radar pulse, DFC stops transmission on the channel and switches to a new channel.
AP coverage should be deployed so that no (or minimal) overlap occurs between APs configured with the same channel. Same- channel overlap should typically occur at 19 dBm of separation. However, proper AP deployment and coverage on non-overlapping channels requires a minimum overlap of 20%. This amount of overlap ensures smooth roaming for wireless endpoints as they move between AP coverage cells. Overlap of less than 20% can result in slower roaming times and poor voice quality.
Deploying wireless devices in a multi-story building such as an office high-rise or hospital introduces a third dimension to wireless AP and channel coverage planning. Both the 2.4 GHz and 5.0 GHz wave forms of 802.11 can pass through floors and ceilings as well as walls. For this reason, not only is it important to consider overlapping cells or channels on the same floor, but it is also necessary to consider channel overlap between adjacent floors. With the 2.4 GHz wireless spectrum limited to only three usable non-overlapping channels, proper overlap design can be achieved only through careful three-dimensional planning.
NoteCareful deployment of APs and channel configuration within the wireless infrastructure are imperative for proper wireless network operation. For this reason, Cisco requires that a complete and thorough site survey be conducted before deploying wireless networks in a production environment. The survey should include verifying non-overlapping channel configurations, AP coverage, and required data and traffic rates; eliminating rogue APs; and identifying and mitigating the impact of potential interference sources.
Wireless Interference and Multipath Distortion
Interference sources within a wireless environment can severely limit endpoint connectivity and channel coverage. In addition, objects and obstructions can cause signal reflection and multipath distortion. Multipath distortion occurs when traffic or signaling travels in more than one direction from the source to the destination. Typically, some of the traffic arrives at the destination before the rest of the traffic, which can result in delay and bit errors in some cases. You can reduce the effects of multipath distortion by eliminating or reducing interference sources and obstructions, and by using diversity antennas so that only a single antenna is receiving traffic at any one time. Interference sources should be identified during the site survey and, if possible, eliminated. At the very least, interference impact should be alleviated by proper AP placement and the use of location-appropriate directional or omni-directional diversity radio antennas.
Possible interference and multipath distortion sources include:
Other APs on overlapping channels
Other 2.4 GHz and 5 Ghz devices, such as 2.4 GHz cordless phones, personal wireless network devices, sulphur plasma lighting systems, microwave ovens, rogue APs, and other WLAN equipment that takes advantage of the license-free operation of the 2.4 GHz and 5 Ghz bands
Metal equipment, structures, and other metal or reflective surfaces such as metal I-beams, filing cabinets, equipment racks, wire mesh or metallic walls, fire doors and fire walls, concrete, and heating and air conditioning ducts
High-power electrical devices such as transformers, heavy-duty electric motors, refrigerators, elevators, and elevator equipment
High-power electrical devices such as transformers, heavy-duty electric motors, refrigerators, elevators and elevator equipment, and any other power devices that could cause electromagnetic interference (EMI)
Because Bluetooth-enabled devices use the same 2.4 GHz radio band as 802.11b/g/n devices, it is possible that Bluetooth and 802.11b/g/n devices can interfere with each other, thus resulting in connectivity issues. Due to the potential for Bluetooth devices to interfere with and disrupt 802.11b/g/n WLAN voice and video devices (resulting in poor voice quality, de-registration, call setup delays, and/or reduce per-channel-cell call capacity), Cisco recommends, when possible, that you deploy all WLAN voice and video devices on the 5 GHz Wi-Fi band using 802.11a and/or 802.11n protocols. By deploying wireless clients on the 5 Ghz radio band, you can avoid interference caused by Bluetooth devices. Additionally, Cisco CleanAir technology is recommended within the wireless infrastructure because it enables real-time interference detection. For more information about Cisco CleanAir technology, refer to the product documentation available at
Note802.11n can operate on both the 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz bands; however, Cisco recommends using 5 GHz for Unified Communications.
Multicast on the WLAN
By design, multicast does not have the acknowledgement level of unicast. According to 802.11 specifications, the access point must buffer all multicast packets until the next Delivery Traffic Indicator Message (DTIM) period is met. The DTIM period is a multiple of the beacon period. If the beacon period is 100 ms (typical default) and the DTIM value is 2, then the access point must wait up to 200 ms before transmitting a single buffered multicast packet. The time period between beacons (as a product of the DTIM setting) is used by battery-powered devices to go into power save mode temporarily. This power save mode helps the device conserve battery power.
Multicast on WLAN presents a twofold problem in which administrators must weigh multicast traffic quality requirements against battery life requirements. First, delaying multicast packets will negatively affect multicast traffic quality, especially for applications that multicast real-time traffic such as voice and video. In order to limit the delay of multicast traffic, DTIM periods should typically be set to a value of 1 so that the amount of time multicast packets are buffered is low enough to eliminate any perceptible delay in multicast traffic delivery. However, when the DTIM period is set to a value of 1, the amount of time that battery-powered WLAN devices are able to go into power save mode is shortened, and therefore battery life is shortened. In order to conserve battery power and lengthen battery life, DTIM periods should typically be set to a value of 2 or more.
For WLAN networks with no multicast applications or traffic, the DTIM period should be set to a value of 2 or higher. For WLAN networks where multicast applications are present, the DTIM period should be set to a value of 2 with a 100 ms beacon period whenever possible; however, if multicast traffic quality suffers or if unacceptable delay occurs, then the DTIM value should be lowered to 1. If the DTIM value is set to 1, administrators must keep in mind that battery life of battery-operated devices will be shortened significantly.
Before enabling multicast applications on the wireless network, Cisco recommends testing these applications to ensure that performance and behavior are acceptable.
For additional considerations with multicast traffic, see the chapter on Media Resources.
Wireless AP Configuration and Design
Proper AP selection, deployment, and configuration are essential to ensure that the wireless network handles voice traffic in a way that provides high-quality voice to the end users.
The number of devices active with an AP affects the amount of time each device has access to the transport medium, the Wi-Fi channel. As the number of devices increases, the traffic contention increases. Associating more devices to the AP and the bandwidth of the medium can result in poor performance and slower response times for all the endpoint devices associated to the AP.
While there is no specific mechanism prior to Cisco Wireless LAN Controller release 7.2 to ensure that only a limited number of devices are associated to a single AP, system administrators can manage device-to-AP ratios by conducting periodic site surveys and analyzing user and device traffic patterns. If additional devices and users are added to the network in a particular area, additional site surveys should be conducted to determine whether additional APs are required to handle the number of endpoints that need to access the network.
Additionally, APs that support Cisco CleanAir technology should be considered because they provide the additional function of remote monitoring of the Wi-Fi channel.
When deploying wireless voice, observe the following specific AP configuration requirements:
Enable Address Resolution Protocol (ARP) caching.
ARP caching is required on the AP because it enables the AP to answer ARP requests for the wireless endpoint devices without requiring the endpoint to leave power-save or idle mode. This feature results in extended battery life for the wireless endpoint devices.
Enable Dynamic Transmit Power Control (DTPC) on the AP.
This ensures that the transmit power of the AP matches the transmit power of the voice endpoints. Matching transmit power helps eliminate the possibility of one-way audio traffic. Voice endpoints adjust their transmit power based on the Limit Client Power (mW) setting of the AP to which they are associated.
Assign a Service Set Identifier (SSID) to each VLAN configured on the AP.
SSIDs enable endpoints to select the wireless VLAN they will use for sending and receiving traffic. These wireless VLANs and SSIDs map to wired VLANs. For voice endpoints, this mapping ensures priority queuing treatment and access to the voice VLAN on the wired network.
Enable QoS Element for Wireless Phones on the AP.
This feature ensures that the AP will provide QoS Basic Service Set (QBSS) information elements in beacons. The QBSS element provides an estimate of the channel utilization on the AP, and Cisco wireless voice devices use it to help make roaming decisions and to reject call attempts when loads are too high. The APs also provide 802.11e clear channel assessment (CCA) QBSS in beacons. The CCA-based QBSS values reflect true channel utilization.
Configure two QoS policies on the AP, and apply them to the VLANs and interfaces.
To ensure that voice traffic is given priority queuing treatment, configure a voice policy and a data policy with default classifications for the respective VLANs. (See Interface Queuing, for more information).
Wireless LAN Controller Design Considerations
When designing a wireless network that will service voice or video, it is important to consider the role that the wireless LAN controller plays with regard to the voice and video media path if the access points used are not autonomous or stand alone. Because all wireless traffic is tunneled to its correspondent wireless LAN controller regardless of its point of origin and destination, it is critical to adequately size the network connectivity entry points of the wireless controllers. Figure 3-22 is a representation of this problem. If any mobile device tries to call another mobile device, the traffic has to be hairpinned in the wireless LAN controller and sent to the receiving device. This includes the scenario where both devices are associated to the same AP.
The switch ports where the wireless LAN controllers are connected should provide enough bandwidth coverage for the traffic generated by collaboration devices, whether they are video or voice endpoints and whether their traffic is control or media traffic.
Figure 3-22 Traffic Concentrated at the Wireless LAN Controller Network Entry Point
Additionally, the switch interface and switch platform egress buffer levels should match the maximum combined burst you plan to support in your wireless network.
Failure to select adequate buffer levels could lead to packet drops and severely affect the user experience of video over a wireless LAN, while lack of bandwidth coverage would cause packets to be queued and in extreme cases cause delayed packets
WLAN Quality of Service (QoS)
Just as QoS is necessary for the LAN and WAN wired network infrastructure in order to ensure high voice quality, QoS is also required for the wireless LAN infrastructure. Because of the bursty nature of data traffic and the fact that real-time traffic such as voice and video are sensitive to packet loss and delay, QoS tools are required to manage wireless LAN buffers, limit radio contention, and minimize packet loss, delay, and delay variation.
However, unlike most wired networks, wireless networks are a shared medium, and wireless endpoints do not have dedicated bandwidth for sending and receiving traffic. While wireless endpoints can mark traffic with 802.1p CoS, ToS, DSCP, and PHB, the shared nature of the wireless network means limited admission control and access to the network for these endpoints.
Wireless QoS involves the following main areas of configuration:
As with the wired network infrastructure, it is important to classify or mark pertinent wireless traffic as close to the edge of the network as possible. Because traffic marking is an entrance criterion for queuing schemes throughout the wired and wireless network, marking should be done at the wireless endpoint device whenever possible. Marking or classification by wireless network devices should be identical to that for wired network devices, as indicated in Table 3-11.
In accordance with traffic classification guidelines for wired networks, the Cisco wireless endpoints mark voice media traffic or voice RTP traffic with DSCP 46 (or PHB EF), video media traffic or video RTP traffic with DSCP 34 (or PHB AF41), and call control signaling traffic (SCCP or SIP) with DSCP 24 (or PHB CS3). Once this traffic is marked, it can be given priority or better than best-effort treatment and queuing throughout the network. All wireless voice and video devices that are capable of marking traffic should do it in this manner. All other traffic on the wireless network should be marked as best-effort or with some intermediary classification as outlined in wired network marking guidelines. If the wireless voice or video devices are unable to do packet marking, alternate methods such as port-based marking should be implemented to provide priority to video and voice traffic.
User Priority Mapping
While 802.1p and Differentiated Services Code Point (DSCP) are the standards to set priorities on wired networks, 802.11e is the standard used for wireless networks. This is commonly referred as User Priority (UP), and it is important to map the UP to its appropriate DSCP value. Table 3-11 lists the values for collaboration traffic.
Table 3-11 QoS Traffic Classification
IEEE 802.11e UP
Voice and video control
For further information about 802.11e and its configuration, refer to your corresponding product documentation available at
Once traffic marking has occurred, it is necessary to enable the wired network APs and devices to provide QoS queuing so that voice and video traffic types are given separate queues to reduce the chances of this traffic being dropped or delayed as it traverses the wireless LAN. Queuing on the wireless network occurs in two directions, upstream and downstream. Upstream queuing concerns traffic traveling from the wireless endpoint up to the AP, and from the AP up to the wired network. Downstream queuing concerns traffic traveling from the wired network to the AP and down to the wireless endpoint.
For upstream queuing, devices that support Wi-Fi Multimedia (WMM) are able to take advantage of queueing mechanisms, including priority queueing.
As for downstream QoS, Cisco APs currently provide up to eight queues for downstream traffic being sent to wireless clients. The entrance criterion for these queues can be based on a number of factors, including DSCP, access control lists (ACLs), and VLAN. Although eight queues are available, Cisco recommends using only two queues when deploying wireless voice. All voice media and signaling traffic should be placed in the highest-priority queue, and all other traffic should be placed in the best-effort queue. This ensures the best possible queuing treatment for voice traffic.
In order to set up this two-queue configuration for autonomous APs, create two QoS policies on the AP. Name one policy Voice , and configure it with the class of service Voice < 10 ms Latency (6) as the Default Classification for all packets on the VLAN. Name the other policy Data , and configure it with the class of service Best Effort (0) as the Default Classification for all packets on the VLAN. Then assign the Data policy to the incoming and outgoing radio interface for the data VLAN(s), and assign the Voice policy to the incoming and outgoing radio interfaces for the voice VLAN(s). With the QoS policies applied at the VLAN level, the AP is not forced to examine every packet coming in or going out to determine the type of queuing the packet should receive.
For lightweight APs, the WLAN controller has built-in QoS profiles that can provide the same queuing policy. Voice VLAN or voice traffic is configured to use the Platinum policy, which sets priority queueing for the voice queue. Data VLAN or data traffic is configured to use the Silver policy, which sets best-effort queuing for the Data queue. These policies are then assigned to the incoming and outgoing radio interfaces based on the VLAN.
The above configurations ensure that all voice and video media and signaling are given priority queuing treatment in a downstream direction.
NoteBecause Wi-Fi Multimedia (WMM) access is based on Enhanced Distributed Channel Access (EDCA), it is important to assign the right priorities to the traffic to avoid Arbitration Inter-Frame Space (AIFS) alteration and delivery delay. For further information on Cisco Unified Wireless QoS, refer to the latest version of theEnterprise Mobility Design Guide, available at http://www.cisco.com/en/US/netsol/ns820/networking_solutions_design_guidances_list.html.
Wireless Call Admission Control
To avoid exceeding the capacity limit of a given AP channel, some form of call admission control is required. Cisco APs and wireless Unified Communications clients now use Traffic Specification (TSPEC) instead of QoS Basic Service Set (QBSS) for call admission control.
Wi-Fi Multimedia Traffic Specification (WMM TSPEC) is the QoS mechanism that enables WLAN clients to provide an indication of their bandwidth and QoS requirements so that APs can react to those requirements. When a client is preparing to make a call, it sends an Add Traffic Stream (ADDTS) message to the AP with which it is associated, indicating the TSPEC. The AP can then accept or reject the ADDTS request based on whether bandwidth and priority treatment are available. If the call is rejected, the client receives a Network Busy message. If the client is roaming, the TSPEC request is embedded in the re-association request message to the new AP as part of the association process, and the TSPEC response is embedded in the re-association response.
Alternatively, endpoints without WMM TSPEC support, but using SIP as call signaling, can be managed by the AP. Media snooping must be enabled for the service set identifier (SSID). The client's implementation of SIP must match that of the Wireless LAN Controller, including encryption and port numbers. For details about media snooping, refer to the Cisco Wireless LAN Controller Configuration Guide , available at
NoteCurrently there is no call admission control support for video. The QoS Basic Service Set (QBSS) information element is sent by the AP only ifQoS Element for Wireless Phones has been enable on the AP. (Refer to Wireless AP Configuration and Design.)
Organizations are transitioning from traditional IP telephony to media-rich collaboration applications. When enabling video and collaboration applications, IT often faces new challenges, such as how to identify how much network resource is consumed by each application, how to ensure the QoS for different media streams, how to troubleshoot issues, and so forth. The network planner needs to take into account the differences between voice and video applications. Figure 3-23 compares voice and video applications and illustrates these differences. As Figure 3-23 indicates, the characteristics of voice applications are very consistent when compared with the different video applications. Different video applications have different bandwidth requirements; traffic is bursty, unpredictable and highly compressed and often available in a variety of form factors from different vendors. Existing network infrastructure that is fine-tuned for voice traffic might not be a good fit for video traffic.
Figure 3-23 Comparison of Voice and Video
To tackle these new challenges when deploying video and collaboration applications, system designers need to take an architectural approach. Medianet is Cisco's recommended best-practice architecture for video and collaboration deployment. The Medianet architecture extends the network boundary to include the endpoints. The network works together with the endpoints in order to scale, optimize, and enhance the performance of collaboration components.
The idea behind this approach comes from the realization that the endpoints or applications are the place in the architecture where the most information about the applications resides. The endpoints can communicate with the network, making the network media-aware and providing it with important information that can be used to make intelligent decisions. The endpoints and collaboration applications use Media Services Interface (MSI) to communicate with the network and send valuable information about the media flows to the network. With the help of MSI, the endpoints become network aware and can request intelligent network services, for example, to initiate troubleshooting.
If video is critical to your business, medianet will provide you with a framework to help you simplify deployment, troubleshooting, and management of all your video and collaboration applications.
The following sections discuss these medianet capabilities:
To learn about these capabilities and the products that support them, including hardware, software, and license requirements, refer to the Cisco Networking Capabilities for Medianet data sheet, available at
Media Monitoring enhances visibility into the network to simplify, baseline, and accelerate troubleshooting of video, voice, and data applications, as well as validating network performance and configuration before deploying new applications or before events.
Mediatrace discovers Layer 2 and Layer 3 nodes along a flow path. Mediatrace implicitly uses Performance Monitor to provide a dynamic hop-by-hop analysis of media flows in real time to facilitate efficient and targeted diagnostics.
IP Service Level Agreement Video Operation (IP SLA VO) generates synthetic traffic streams that are very similar to real media traffic. It can be used in conjunction with Mediatrace to perform capacity planning analysis and troubleshooting even before applications are deployed.
These three features form a suite of tools to enable the network operator to perform media performance monitoring and troubleshooting.
Performance Monitor is a medianet Cisco IOS software feature that measures the performance of the Real-Time Transport Protocol (RTP), TCP, and IP constant-bit-rate (CBR) traffic on network devices. Performance Monitor analyzes RTP-based audio and video flows and reports on service-affecting metrics such as packet loss and network jitter. For TCP flows, Performance Monitor reports on round-trip time (RTT) and packet loss occurrences. For IP CBR traffic, Performance Monitor reports packet loss occurrences and media rate variation (MRV). Hop-by-hop knowledge of these metrics along the network path leads to granular fault isolation and thus easier troubleshooting of user traffic flows.
Performance Monitor can be applied to a variety of media applications, both for Cisco endpoints and for third-party endpoints. Performance Monitor uses standardized reporting methods that facilitate cross-vendor application support.
Performance Monitor maintains historical data about analyzed flows traversing routers and switches. The metrics collected by Performance Monitor can be exported to a network management tool through NetFlow Version 9 or the Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP). Network management software can further analyze, summarize, and correlate this information to provide traffic profiling, baselining, and troubleshooting services for the application and network operator of the user network. Figure 3-24 illustrates a typical use case for Performance Monitor with network management software (for example, Cisco Prime Collaboration Manager).
Figure 3-24 Performance Monitor Used with Network Management Software
1. The network management software collects the quality metrics from the endpoints.
2. The network management software notices the quality degradation, so a troubleshooting session is started, which involves deploying Performance Monitor or Mediatrace.
3. Performance Monitor or Mediatrace helps isolate the problem.
Performance Monitor can send alarms from the routers and switches through syslog and SNMP traps. Different media applications – for example, Cisco TelePresence conferencing compared to video on demand (VoD) – have different sensitivities to packet loss and jitter. These varying sensitivities can be encoded into Performance Monitor threshold evaluations and actions. An example would be the generation of an SNMP trap when Cisco TelePresence traffic loss is greater than 1%. When a threshold is crossed, an alarm is generated that can notify the operator of the problem. This event may eventually engage further diagnostics such as Mediatrace to troubleshoot and further isolate the cause of degradation.
Cisco recommends enabling Performance Monitor throughout the network for the best benefit. If that is not possible, Performance Monitor should first be deployed in key places in the network to monitor specific business-critical applications. As the organization continues to monitor the applications, if it learns that there are recurring issues on a certain spot, then Performance Monitor should be implemented on that trouble spot as well. Performance Monitor can be used by itself on Cisco IOS CLI level without a network management software server. Cisco recommends using some sort of network management software server (such as Cisco Prime Assurance Manager) so that the network operator can get better visibility into the traffic flows and associated devices and applications.
To learn more about use cases, examples of deployment scenarios, and configuration of Performance Monitor, refer to the Medianet documentation available at
Mediatrace is a network diagnostic tool that monitors the state of an audio, video, or data flow across a network path. Mediatrace discovers Layer 2 and Layer 3 devices along the flow path and can provide different levels of information ranging from the device-specific (CPU or memory), to the interface-specific (input interface speed or output interface drops), to the flow-specific (DSCP values, network jitter, and packet loss).
Mediatrace collects information from network nodes along the flow path and presents this information in a single screen that allows for easy analysis. Depending on the type of Mediatrace request (see Table 3-12), the feature may implicitly enable Performance Monitor to gather flow-specific information. Mediatrace can be invoked manually or run in a periodic fashion along a specific path of routers and switches. Mediatrace also supports initiation of the request from an off-path router. Mediatrace can be invoked in multiple ways: locally on a router or switch using the command-line interface (CLI), using Web Services Management Agent (WSMA) from a network management tool, or from a medianet-enabled endpoint.
Table 3-12 Mediatrace Request Types
Mediatrace Request Type
Discover Layer 2 and Layer 3 network nodes along the flow path
Collect system information of network nodes along the path (For example: 1-minute CPU utilization; memory consumed)
Collect Performance Monitor statistics from the network nodes (For example: network jitter; packet loss count)
Figure 3-25 illustrates the Mediatrace initiated from the CLI on a local router by a network operator.
Figure 3-25 Mediatrace Initiated from a Local Router Using the CLI
Figure 3-26 illustrates the Mediatrace imitated from a WSMA by a network operator.
Figure 3-26 Mediatrace Initiated from a WSMA
Figure 3-27 illustrates the Mediatrace imitated from a medianet-capable endpoint.
Figure 3-27 Mediatrace Initiated from an Endpoint
A network node must have Mediatrace enabled in order to participate actively in a Mediatrace. If there are nodes in the media path that are not Mediatrace-enabled, Mediatrace packets pass transparently through those nodes.
The mediatrace command requires a path-specifier that identifies the source and destination IP addresses of the Mediatrace packet. These addresses can be identical to those of a media stream of interest, can be fictional, or can be addresses of routers. The addresses specified must be from the two subnets between which media traffic is being verified, and they must be routable to and from the device where the Mediatrace is run. In most instances the trace will be run on a router or switch that is the first hop from the media endpoint, and the addresses of the actual endpoints will be utilized.
In a system poll, in addition to performing node and interface discovery, statistics from the interfaces are collected. Mediatrace uses SNMP internally to collect this information from the router, and the snmp community configuration command needs to be applied.
Mediatrace can collect additional data along the discovered path by invoking Performance Monitor to gather flow-specific statistics.
The granularity of the Mediatrace poll determines the performance monitor data collected. For instance, if the IP protocol and the Layer 4 ports are specified, the query will be specific to a single media flow. Alternatively, a less specific query can match multiple flows, then the statistics for all matching flows can be aggregated into the report for that node. Depending on the IP protocol specified, Mediatrace alters the query. For TCP flows, it requests information about round-trip time; for RTP, jitter, delay, and latency are included.
Mediatrace uses RSVP as the transport protocol. On Cisco routers, once Mediatrace is enabled, RSVP handling is enabled inherently. To enable Mediatrace on Layer 2 switch, RSVP snooping must be enabled explicitly.
To learn about use cases, examples of deployment scenarios, and configuration of media monitoring, refer to the Medianet documentation available at
IP Service Level Agreement Video Operation (IP SLA VO) functions as a valuable tool to assess the readiness of a network to carry rich-media traffic. It can synthetically generate video profiles mimicking real application traffic, such as Cisco TelePresence activity, IP video surveillance, or IPTV traffic. IP SLA VO can also use user-captured packet traces from the customer's existing network, which can then be included in the synthetically generated traffic stream. This feature can also be used to run network readiness tests prior to important collaboration meetings to validate that the network will be able to support the expected rich-media traffic.
The ability of IP SLA VO to generate realistic RTP traffic similar to real-life Cisco TelePresence, IPTV, or IP surveillance traffic in terms of packet sizes, burstiness, and traffic rate, provides for accurate and realistic stress testing. IP SLA VO adds to the existing IP SLA probes that are available in Cisco IOS software, such as User Datagram Protocol (UDP) jitter and Domain Name System (DNS). Users of IP SLA will find that IP SLA VO simply extends the familiar IP SLA control and scheduling CLI and MIB framework, allowing for easy integration with existing network management tools.
When used in conjunction with Performance Monitor and Mediatrace, IP SLA VO provides the ability to troubleshoot bottlenecks that are likely to occur within the network. IP SLA VO generates metrics such as packet loss, jitter, and end-to-end delay for the generated synthetic traffic. Hop-by-hop metrics gathered by Performance Monitor and Mediatrace on the IP SLA VO traffic can help isolate bottlenecks and possibly lead to remedial actions. Figure 3-28 illustrates the use of IP SLA VO for assessment and then troubleshooting using Performance Monitor and Mediatrace.
Figure 3-28 Pre-Deployment Assessment Procedure
For qualifying the network accurately, it is best to run the IP SLA Video Operation as close to the source and receiver as possible. For example, you can configure probes on the access layer switch that will connect to the future TelePresence system.
IP SLA Video Operation uses NTP to calculate one-way delay values. Therefore NTP must be operational on the source and receiver before you can use IP SLA Video Operation.
When assessing the network for video readiness, use the threshold values in Table 3-13 as a reference to determine whether the network meets the requirement.
Table 3-13 Per-Application Latency, Jitter, and Loss Target Values
< 1000 ms
< 150 ms
< 150 ms
< 10 ms
< 1000 ms
< 100 ms
< 1000 ms
< 100 ms
< 1000 ms
< 100 ms
To learn about use cases, examples of deployment scenarios, and configuration of IP SLA VO, refer to the Medianet documentation available at
The media monitoring features discussed in the preceding sections can greatly help the IT team to gain more visibility into the network for faster troubleshooting and more confident pre-deployment assessment. Where to enable and deploy each feature will depend on the organization's topology and collaboration and video applications priorities and pain points. Here are some factors to consider when deploying these features:
Media monitoring does not have to be in every hop for benefits to be realized. Small deployments can make a big difference in helping organizations troubleshoot and better understand what is going on their networks. Deployment can be done in phases and can co-exist with legacy and third-party devices.
Start in trouble spots or high usage areas first. Performance Monitor should be deployed in key places and focus on monitoring the most critical applications for the organization. Mediatrace should be enabled in as many devices as possible. As issues are detected by Performance Monitor, Mediatrace can be used to achieve a more refined dynamic view of the status of the network hop-by-hop.
While IP SLA VO is one mode of operation of IP SLA, it is important to note that its intended use is specific for pre-deployment assessment and validation. IP SLA VO actually injects traffic into the network, so it should be used in specific situations when that is desired.
IP SLA VO sends realistic video traffic and reports statistics between two points. These statistics are end-to-end. By running Mediatrace together with IP SLA VO, it is possible to get hop-by-hop visibility into the path that the synthetic traffic is going through for more granular testing.
Figure 3-29 shows an example scenario based on a real deployment. In the figure, the green marks indicate Performance Monitor deployments.
Figure 3-29 Performance Monitor Deployment in Phases
The company depicted in Figure 3-29 started deploying performance monitor in the remote offices, focusing only on business-critical applications (Phase 1) because they are more expensive and more difficult to troubleshoot. The company can already start seeing the benefits in this case, by setting up alerts for the more important applications. If issues are reported, the operator can use Mediatrace in the flow where the issue was detected to isolate further the exact location and cause of the issue.
As the company continues to monitor the applications, it learns that there are recurring issues on Campus A. Therefore it decides to deploy Performance Monitor to make sure it is alerted about issues in that campus as soon as they are detected (Phase 2).
Over time, the company learns from the data and decides also to deploy Performance Monitor in another trouble spot (Phase 3).
Organizations quite often deploy different collaboration applications and endpoints from different vendors at the same time in the same infrastructure. The inconsistency introduced by the different characteristics of the applications increases complexity for IT organizations when deploying and managing many different types of applications from different vendors and devices.
Media Awareness enables the network to become aware of application and rich-media context from an end-to-end perspective. The network works together with the video endpoints and applications for optimal quality of experience for end-users and improved visibility for IT.
Media Awareness uses explicit and implicit signaling mechanisms to become application context-aware so that appropriate polices can be applied end-to-end, thus eliminating the need for static configuration. Explicit signaling enables richer application-specific policies.
The Media Awareness solution consists of the following technologies:
Media Services Interface (MSI) — Resides on endpoints and explicitly signals application context attributes (flow metadata) to the network.
Media Services Proxy (MSP) — Uses lightweight deep-packet-inspection techniques to snoop standards-based signaling protocols. MSP produces flow metadata attributes that can be shared among network nodes. MSP is an implicit signaling mechanism.
Network Based Application Recognition (NBAR) — Also uses deep-packet-inspection techniques to identify applications. Similar to MSP, NBAR produces flow metadata attributes that can be shared among network nodes. Thus, NBAR is another implicit signaling mechanism.
Flow Metadata — Allows an application explicitly to signal any arbitrary attributes to the network, which can be used by all the network nodes in the flow path. This allows appropriate policies to be applied at each hop, end-to-end, thereby improving the quality of experience.
Media Services Interface (MSI)
MSI is a software package that provides Cisco rich-media endpoints and applications with a series of application programming interfaces (APIs) to enable them to take advantage of the Medianet services in the network infrastructure. In the Medianet architecture, MSI is the endpoint piece and it offers the following benefits:
Enables a media application to identify itself and its media flow to the network
Based on the knowledge of the application and its media flow, the network can provision better service to the approved application
Enables network management to have better visibility into the application and its media flow
Currently MSI has been adopted by the following applications:
Cisco WebEx meeting applications (WebEx Business Suite WBS28 or higher)
Cisco Jabber for Windows (9.0.1 or later release)
Cisco Jabber for Mac (9.2.1 or later release)
Cisco TelePresence System EX90 and EX60 (Software version TE6.0 or TC6.0 or later)
For a complete list of the devices that support MSI, refer to the Medianet data sheet available at
Media Services Proxy (MSP) uses a variety of standard signaling protocols (SDP, SIP, H.323, H.245, Real Time Streaming Protocol, multicast DNS, and others) to learn about the characteristics of endpoints and applications from legacy systems or third-party devices. MSP enables sharing of flow attributes among network nodes and allows existing endpoints and applications that have yet to implement MSI to be augmented by the Cisco Intelligent Network while the transition to "smart" endpoints is in progress.
MSP is a software feature available on the Cisco IOS software recommended to be positioned at the network access layer. When endpoints establish audio and video calls, the MSP identifies the endpoint attributes by sniffing the signaling and associating these attributes with the endpoint. It then provides services on behalf of the endpoint (for instance, generating metadata that can be used by downstream network nodes).
Figure 3-30 illustrates the signaling that MSP can use to retrieves the endpoint information and media stream information. It also illustrates the services MSP can offer using the information it retrieves from the signaling.
Figure 3-30 Media Service Proxy
Due to the fact that MSP sniffs the call signaling to obtain information about the media channel, it is essential for call signaling to be in clear text. If call signaling is in encrypted format, then MSP will not work.
The Flow Metadata component of Medianet enables the application to convey information about itself to the underlying network. Metadata can be generated by MSI-enabled endpoints. Network elements enabled for MSP or NBAR2 can also generate metadata on behalf of the non-MSI endpoints. Metadata is transported by RSVP protocol and takes the same path as the media stream, so every hop along the media path will have an opportunity to process the metadata and to use metadata for local policy such as QoS.
Metadata uses RSVP as the transport protocol. On a Cisco router, once metadata is enabled, RSVP handling is enabled inherently. To enable metadata on Layer 2 switches, RSVP snooping must be enabled.
Figure 3-31 illustrates the network nodes that can have metadata enabled. If metadata is not enabled on a network element, the RSVP message that carries the metadata will be treated as a regular RSVP message and the metadata content will have no impact to the forwarding router or switch.
Figure 3-31 Deploying Flow Metadata on Campus and Branch
Where to enable the metadata depends on the purpose of its use.
For example, consider the use of metadata for QoS in the case where a PC running a soft client is attached to a campus access switch port. The access switch cannot trust the DSCP or class of service (CoS) marking from the PC and needs to selectively mark the soft client as high priority traffic and mark other traffic as best-effort traffic. Most soft clients send media streams in encrypted format, which makes deep packet inspection impossible. If call signaling is encrypted or is not supported by MSP, then MSP will not work either. To properly mark the media traffic and differentiate it from other PC traffic, the metadata mechanism is the only option in this case. The system administrator can configure a class-map and classify the media traffic based on the metadata, and then use a policy-map for the traffic class to mark the DSCP accordingly. In this case, metadata must be enabled on the access switch.
Other campus switches or routers behind the access switch can simply trust the DSCP marking from the access switch and do not need to use metadata to classify the media stream again. Therefore, metadata does not need to be enabled on these devices.
The campus WAN edge router is another candidate for enabling metadata for QoS purposes. In the direction from LAN to WAN, if the access switch already uses metadata to mark the traffic, the DSCP marking should be trusted. As mention earlier, classification with metadata is not required in this direction. In the other direction for traffic from WAN to LAN, the DSCP value should not be trusted because the service provider might re-mark the DSCP value. For traffic coming from the service provider, the campus WAN edge router can use metadata to classify the traffic and re-mark it accordingly. The other campus switches or routers behind the WAN edge router should trust the DSCP marking by the WAN edge router and do not need to reclassify the traffic using metadata. Figure 3-32 illustrates this DSCP trust model.
Figure 3-32 DSCP Re-Making of Traffic Using Metadata
When MSI is installed, the Windows Jabber client will send metadata; therefore, the network can classify the Windows Jabber traffic based on that metadata. As mentioned earlier, metadata should be enabled on the access switch and the WAN edge router to classify the Jabber traffic. The Jabber client for other platforms might not have MSI support yet. For a list of devices that currently support MSI, refer to the Medianet data sheet available at
Figure 3-33 illustrates the recommended QoS policy for Jabber support evolution. Using metadata and matching on Jabber traffic, the Windows-based Jabber client traffic will be properly re-marked, while the other types of Jabber client traffic will be served as best effort. When the MSI support for other platforms is available, the Jabber client traffic will be re-mark automatically to the right value, so modification of the QoS policy is not required.
Figure 3-33 Recommended QoS Policy for Jabber
Flow metadata makes it easy for management software to report information in a more meaningful way. For example, "John from finance is having quality problems with his Jabber desktop video," is much easier to diagnose than obscure IP addresses and protocol numbers. If metadata is to be integrated with Performance Monitor to provide better application visibility, then metadata should be enabled on every node that has Performance Monitor enabled.
In summary, depending on how metadata is used, it can be enabled on different network elements. If metadata is used for QoS purposes, it should be enabled on the access switch and WAN edge router; if metadata is used with Performance Monitor, it should be enabled wherever performance monitoring is enabled.
Metadata has many attributes, and Table 3-14 lists examples of some of them. Network designers have the flexibility to choose the appropriate attributes to use to meet the design requirements. For example, to classify the media traffic from telepresence devices, one can use telepresence-media in the class-map definition; to classify traffic from telepresence devices regardless of the traffic type (media, data, or control), one can use application-group in class-map .
Table 3-14 Examples of Metadata Attributes
Cisco TelePresence System Codec 3000 MXP
Cisco Jabber Video for TelePresence
application model, vendor, version
CTS-3000, 1.5, Cisco
MOVI, 1.1, Cisco
end point model, version, model
Apple, MAC, xxx
For detailed use cases on media awareness, refer to the Medianet documentation available at