Introduction to Virtual Private LAN Service
The Cisco® Catalyst® 6500/6800 Series Supervisor Engine 2T supports virtual private LAN service (VPLS) natively in the new PFC4. VPLS is a technology that allows Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) networks to offer Layer 2 Ethernet services. It provides multipoint Ethernet service as compared to Ethernet over MPLS (EoMPLS) that is point to point. VPLS emulates a virtual IEEE Ethernet bridge network.
Unlike Layer 3 VPN, there is no routing interaction between customer and service provider networks. (See Figure 1.)
Figure 1. Virtual Bridges Linked with Virtual Ports, aka Pseudo Wires (PWs)
● Multipoint-to-multipoint configuration
● Forwarding of frames based on learned MAC addresses
● Uses virtual forwarding instances (VFI, like VLAN) for customer separation
VPLS Concepts and Components Are Common for Enterprise and Service Providers Alike.
● User-facing PE (U-PE): The U-PE is the device to which the functions needed to take forwarding or switching decisions at the ingress of the provider network.
● Network PE (N-PE): The N-PE is the device to which the signaling and control functions are allocated when a VPLS-PE is distributed across more than one box.
● Virtual switching instance (VSI): Virtual switching instance that serves one single VPLS A VSI performs standard LAN (that is, Ethernet) bridging functions, including forwarding done by a VSI based on MAC addresses and VLAN tags.
● Pseudowire (PW): PWE3 is a mechanism that emulates the essential attributes of a telecommunications service (such as a T1 leased line or Frame Relay) over a PSN.
● Attachment circuit (AC): The physical or virtual circuit attaching (AC) a CE to a PE. An attachment circuit may be, for example, a Frame Relay DLCI, an ATM VPI/VCI, an Ethernet port, a VLAN, or an MPLS LSP. One or multiple ACs can belong to same VFI.
● VC (virtual circuit): Martini-based data encapsulation, tunnel label is used to reach remote PE, VC label is used to identify VFI. One or multiple VCs can belong to same VFI (see Figure 2).
● VFI (virtual forwarding instance):
◦ VFI creates L2 multipoint bridging among all ACs and VCs. It’s an L2 broadcast domain such as VLAN.
◦ Multiple VFIs can exist on the same PE box to separate user traffic such as VLANs.
Figure 2. VPLS Concepts and Components
Signaling uses LDP to establish and tear down PWs. Using LDP as the signaling VPLS control plane does not have inherent support of auto-discovery. Therefore, LDP-VPLS relies on manual configuration to identify all PE routers.
MPLS in the core, normal LDP sessions per hop to exchange tunnel label or IGP label. Targeted or directed LDP session between PEs to exchange VC label. Tunnel label is used to forward packet from PE to PE VC label and is used to identify L2VPN circuit.
Emulated VC signaling is done using a directed LDP session between PEs. Information such as VC type, VC ID, interface parameter, and so on are negotiated using VC signaling. VPLS on c6500, c6800 platform supports both VC types: VC type 4 (Ethernet VLAN) and VC type 5 (Ethernet). 6500/6800 uses VC type 5 by default, but can negotiate to VC type 4 per peer’s request. Similarly, CW is supported on c6500, c6800 platform but will negotiate to no-CW if peer platform does not support it. (See Figure 3.)
Figure 3. VPLS Signaling Using LDP
VPLS on Supervisor Engine 2T conducts data forwarding in the exact same way as switch would conduct its forwarding between switched ports:
◦ Forwarding is based on VLAN, destination MAC address
◦ Unknown unicast/multicast/broadcast is flooded to all ports (IGMP snooping can be used to limit multicast flooding; storm control can be used to limit other types of flooding)
● MAC learning/aging/withdrawal:
◦ Dynamic learning based on source MAC and VLAN
◦ Refresh aging timers with incoming packet
◦ MAC withdrawal upon topology changes
VPLS uses split-horizon (Figure 4) to avoid loops (Spanning Tree is possible but not desirable to avoid loops):
● Packet received on VPLS VC can only be forwarded to ACs, not the other VPLS VCs
● Require full mesh VCs among all PEs
● For PE redundancy, active/active VSS provides loop prevention (no active/backup scheme such as STP, EEM, or BGP is required)
Figure 4. VPLS Split-Horizon to Prevent Loops in the Network
The Cisco Catalyst 6500/6800 Supervisor Engine 2T will support hierarchical VPLS (H-VPLS) natively in the new PFC4. H-VPLS reduces both signaling and replication overhead by using both full-mesh as well as hub-and-spoke configurations. Hub-and-spoke configurations operate with split horizon to allow packets to be switched between pseudowires (PWs), effectively reducing the number of PWs between PEs. (See Figure 5.)
● Minimizes signaling overhead
● Full PW mesh among core devices only
● Packet replication done in the core only
Figure 5. H-VPLS Provides VPLS Scaling
Table 1 shows VPLS IETF standards compliance.
Table 1. VPLS IETF Standards Compliance
Provider-provisioned VPN terminology
Requirements for Layer 2 provider-provisioned VPNs
Transport of Layer 2 frames over MPLS
Pseudowire emulation edge-to-edge (PWE3) architecture
Pseudowire emulation edge-to-edge (PWE3) control word for use over an MPLS PSN
Pseudowire setup and maintenance using the Label Distribution Protocol (LDP)
Encapsulation methods for transport of Ethernet over MPLS networks
VPLS Support on Cisco Catalyst Supervisor Engine 2T
Cisco Catalyst 6500/6800 running as a PE can run as many as 4K VPLS instances with Supervisor Engine 2T. It can have multiple local Layer 2 ports, and as many as 256 VCs in its flooding domain. If remote (peer) MAC is learned, packet is sent using unicast VC. Incoming Layer 2 frame can be dot1q tagged for VLAN mode or both tagged frame and native frame for port mode.
In CFC mode the 67XX series cards will perform the VPLS encapsulation on the Supervisor Engine 2T. In DFC mode the VPLS encapsulation is performed by the downlink 67XX, 68XX or 69XX (also applicable to all new LCs) Series cards and not in the uplink-facing cards such as with Supervisor Engine 720, which also requires SIP or ES+ to perform VPLS functionality. (See Figure 6.)
VPLS Packet forwarding on the Catalyst SUP2T works in the following manner:
Ingress: A lookup on the MAC table will get the peer ID (if no MAC address is present). We then do a bridge domain and peer ID lookup on PFC4, which points to PW rewrite. For peer ID being 0x3ff (flooding case), TCAM will point to the multicast replication table (MET) to replicate packets first, then rewrite for each PW.
Egress: On egress, the first lookup is like a regular Layer 3 MPLS lookup; label lookup in TCAM points to EoM deencapsulation adjacency, which removes the MPLS label and control word. The inner packet starting from inner DMAC is recirculated. Layer 2 lookup in the second pass will provide the outgoing port.
Figure 6. Cisco Catalyst/6800 SUP2T
For more details please refer to the Catalyst 6500 Supervisor 2T architecture white paper.
For more details please refer to the Catalyst 6880-X architecture white paper.
Configuring and Deploying VPLS on Cisco Catalyst 6500/6800 Series Supervisor Engine 2T
VPLS on Supervisor Engine 2T uses the same Cisco IOS® Software code as Supervisor Engine 720, adding additional scalability benefits; the configuration process remains the same on Supervisor Engine 2T as it was with Supervisor Engine 720.
l2 vfi vpls-300 manual
vpn id 300
neighbor 126.96.36.199 encapsulation mpls
neighbor 188.8.131.52 201 encapsulation mpls
no ip address
xconnect vfi vpls-300
! Access port
switchport access vlan 300
switchport mode access
! Trunk port
switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
switchport trunk allowed vlan 300,3001
switchport mode trunk
VPLS over GRE
The Cisco Catalyst 6500/6800 Supervisor Engine 2T will allow a flexible transport option for VPLS deployment by supporting VPLS over GRE deployment models. This allows the user to configure VPLS over an IP network, and thus it can be used for a phased migration to MPLS or Layer 2 multipoint encryption.
Interface tunnel 1
tunnel mode gre
tunnel source 184.108.40.206
tunnel destination 220.127.116.11
Interface tunnel 2
tunnel mode gre
tunnel source 18.104.22.168
tunnel destination 22.214.171.124
ip address 10.1.1.1 255.255.255.0
Integrated Routing and Bridging or Routed PW with VPLS
Cisco Catalyst 6500/6800 Supervisor Engine 2T supports configuration of IP address and VRFs on interfaces where Xconnects are configured with the support of the integrated routing and bridging for VPLS feature. This allows more flexibility for VPLS to be configured in the aggregation layer of campus and data center networks.
Interface VLAN 10
ip vrf forwarding vrf_1
ip address 126.96.36.199 255.255.255.0
xconnect vfi vpls-300
Figure 7. Routed VPLS Removed the Need for Dedicated DCI Devices or Extending Layer 2 to the WAN Layers
VPLS PE Redundancy with Supervisor Engine 2T
Cisco Catalyst 6500/6800 Supervisor Engine 2T will support VPLS in VSS mode with complete support for NSF/SSO for PE redundancy. This will provide for MCEC-based dual homing into VPLS. (See Figure 8.)
Figure 8. Simplified N-PE VPLS Redundancy with VSS
Deployment Use Cases
Cisco Catalyst Supervisor Engine 2T provides tremendous scale and flexibility with VPLS, thus allowing it to be deployed in many different deployments use cases:
● Extending Layer 2 domains in data centers:
◦ Within different pods in the same single large data center
◦ Across geographically dispersed data center over an MPLS and Layer 3 boundary
● Reducing STP domains and extending Layer 2 in large campus networks
● Service providers offering multipoint Layer 2 Ethernet service
Extending Layer 2 Domains Within Different Pods in Same Single Large-Scale Data Center
In large data centers, especially multitenancy data center hosting providers, new data center pods are added when the number of clients grows. This brings challenges of overlapping VLANs, and 4000 VLANs aren’t enough to scale.
VPLS allows customers to connect discontiguous LAN segments across MPLS/IP core. The VLAN number on different LAN segments can be different: 20 bits of label space to map to bridge domain vs. 12 bits of VLAN space.
As shown in Figure 9, VPLS can be used to scale Layer 2 domains in data centers:
● Each subgroup can support 256K clients:
◦ 256K subnets in the subgroup router (256K comes from routing table size, not bridging limitation)
◦ Each pod supports up to 4K clients
◦ 64 or more pods within each subgroup
● Whole data center supports 256K x m clients
◦ m is the number of subgroups
● Clients can move/expand from any pod to any other pod (within/across subgroups)
● VPLS (VFI/VC) is configured on pod Cisco Catalyst 6k when client is added to the pod for the first time
Figure 9. Large Scale Intra DC VLAN Scaling with VPLS
The following section about inter-DC will explain how the same concept is used between data centers.
Extending Layer 2 Domains Across Geographically Dispersed Large Data Center or Across Data Center over a Layer 3 Boundary
For customers who need to extend Layer 2 to more than two sites and point-to-point connectivity is not sufficient, VPLS provides multipoint connectivity over MPLS or IP infrastructure. VPLS allows customers to extend Layer 2 domains while isolating STP in the individual data centers. (See Figure 10.)
Figure 10. Data Center Interconnect Using VPLS
For more information please refer to the Data Center Interconnect White paper.
Reducing STP Domains and Extending Layer 2 in Large Campus Networks
Based on application requirements, certain customers require network virtualization at Layer 2 between campus sites. It’s an alternate and complementary solution to L3VPNs, where application needs drive the Layer 2 extension. These applications could be certain Layer 2 multicast (trading or market data applications) or legacy client server applications with fixed embedded IP addressing, which requires no interaction to a Layer 3 gateway. (See Figure 11.)
Figure 11. VPLS in Campus Deployments
Service Providers Offering Multipoint Layer 2 Ethernet Service
Service providers can offer L2VPN multipoint connectivity over their own MPLS core. It allows expanding MPLS to the edge or in the access network. This allows service providers to not worry about customer routing policies or IP addressing schemes. It can also serve as a transport network aggregation. Some other deployment scenarios for VPLS are mobile operator backhaul transport using VPLS or VPLSoGRE and multi-tenant DC service providers providing Layer 2 data center interconnect for their customers. (See Figure 12.)
Figure 12. Service Provider Ethernet Offering Using VPLS
The Cisco Catalyst 6500/6800 Supervisor Engine 2T provides the following benefits:
● Native hardware forwarding; no need for SIP or ES+ cards
● No STP required, looping prevented by VPLS split horizon
● VLAN scalability
● MAC scalability: host MAC entries are only in aggregation boxes, which serves this customer. Not exposed in core routers and other aggregation boxes
● VLAN interoperability: same customer can have different VLANs for different servers on different sites
● No MPLS needed in Core Routers if VPLSoGRE is used. VPLS neighbor discovery can be simplified through BGP auto-discovery
● Hardware learning of MAC address; no packet loss due to software MAC learning
● Hardware flooding for unknown destination is rate limited
● Integrated routing bridge (IRB) for VPLS or Routed VPLS
● VPLS PIM and IGMP Snooping for efficient Multicast
● VSS Quad Supervisor SSO support for VPLS adds an additional level of Redundancy