Heightened Focus on Security and Information-Sharing StrategiesInformation technology, particularly the Internet and data networking technologies, are playing a critical role in U.S. Homeland Security efforts. Article Summary Background A National Wake-Up Call Just as it has in the past, information technology can help both the public and private sectors manage network security risks. In some cases, this means using the Internet and networking technology to link disparate IT systems, facilitate the flow of critical information, and allow public safety personnel to communicate more effectively. In others, it means using the latest network security technology to protect IT systems from attack, including the systems that manage and maintain much of the nation's critical physical infrastructure. [ Return to Top ] One Organization with One Mission Folding this patchwork into a single, interoperable IT infrastructure will be one of the Department's top priorities—and also one of its most difficult. "The DHS is currently doing a complete IT inventory," says Dean Rogers, senior alliance manager for Homeland Security at Cisco Systems. "They have already identified 2,500 critical systems, and they're only 40% through the process." The ability of the DHS to network these systems effectively, Rogers says, could play a major role in determining the organization's long-term effectiveness. According to Chris Miller, a technical advisor to the Homeland Security group at Cisco, the benefits of a single, standard network infrastructure extend beyond technology. "The DHS leadership has to make sure these agencies feel like they're one organization with one mission," he says. "Communication is a huge part of that process—having a common infrastructure, such as a single e-mail system or Web portals, that reinforces the idea that each group's mission is aligned with the organization as a whole." Without this sort of cultural reinforcement, many agencies could retain a "silo" mentality, treating information as a source of bureaucratic power rather than as a shared resource. [ Return to Top ] Speaking the Same Language Even within the same jurisdictions, incompatible communications systems can lead to confusion and grave mistakes—as the communications failures between New York City police and firefighters during the World Trade Center attacks demonstrated with tragic results. Yet with more than 87,000 local jurisdictions in the United States, the ability to establish shared voice communications, live video, or data feeds will be a challenging task. In some cases, however, the technology for establishing this infrastructure is already partially in place. A proposal from Homeland Security Office CIO Steve Cooper, for example, would use the National Guard's 3,000-node, coast-to-coast GuardNET network as the foundation of a national security information network. The network would establish a single architecture and set of standards for public safety and criminal justice organizations at every level of government, making it far easier to integrate and share critical information. Another example, the state of Pennsylvania's JNET system, allows dozens of city, county, and state criminal justice agencies to share public safety data over secure Internet connections. "The important point is that all of these solutions rely on the availability of an Internet Protocol infrastructure," Rogers says. "Whether you're talking about border and transportation security, video surveillance solutions, or biometric identification devices, the data these systems require will flow over an IP-enabled, integrated network." In the future, technologies such as mobile IP (in which data sessions can be initiated to mobile users while they roam) and voice over IP could even extend the same shared infrastructure to voice communications, allowing first responders and other public safety personnel to work together effectively, regardless of their jurisdiction or level of government. [ Return to Top ] Private Firms and Public Safety According to Rogers, a single infrastructure attack can also cause a "cascade" effect that multiplies the damage many times. "Harm a power plant, and you can also affect water and sewer treatment systems," Rogers says. "Attack a dam, and you can cause flooding for miles downstream." Protecting critical infrastructure today, however, requires more than just physical security. Private firms routinely control such facilities through networked computer systems and applications; in this environment, every server, switch, router, and network connection represents a potential source of vulnerability. Such attacks also go far beyond the IT systems themselves, since they could give attackers physical control over a facility (such as a dam or chemical plant) and allow them to manipulate it at will. John Stewart, director of information security for Cisco, states that both the nature and the potential source of such attacks requires firms to think beyond the perimeter security measures, such as firewalls and intrusion-detection systems, that many firms still rely on for their information security needs. "You have to change the way you think about network security," he says. "Every device has to be able to protect itself, and your systems have to be intelligent enough to anticipate and respond to completely new types of attacks." New technologies that can instantly recognize and stop a potential attack, such as intrusion-prevention software, will play an important role in this strategy, as will established technologies such as firewalls, virtual private networks, and identification and authentication solutions. [ Return to Top ] Putting the Pieces Together Although the U.S. government has no plans to impose homeland security technology standards in the private sector, many organizations clearly feel a new urgency to adopt such standards wherever possible. In February 2003, for example, the American National Standards Institute created a Homeland Security Standards Panel to develop a national set of security and emergency preparedness standards. The panel has already established a high-profile membership that includes government agencies, academic and research organizations, and private firms—including Cisco and several other information technology companies. According to Miller, it should come as no surprise that so many organizations in both the public and private sector consider standards and interoperability issues such a high priority. "When you're addressing critical infrastructure protection, vulnerability analysis can be an important tool," he says. "But to do a vulnerability analysis, you need a baseline, and that requires you to agree upon a set of standards." What Cisco Offers Further Reading The Critical Infrastructure Protection (CIP) Project is another important source of information for industry, academic, and government professionals concerned with CIP issues, in particular those dealing with information technology and Web security. The organization's CIP Report, a monthly electronic newsletter, routinely focuses on CIP-related technology issues relevant to particular industry sectors, such as telecommunications, banking, and transportation. See Also: About the Author May 5, 2003 [ Return to Top ] |