A National Imperative: Broadband Everywhere by 2010
January 15, 2002
By John Earnhardt, Cisco Government Affairs
Today, TechNet, the high-tech industry's political and
policy trade group co-founded by Cisco in 1997, announced
its approach to a US broadband policy.
On a teleconference,
TechNet unveiled its six broadband principles. Cisco president
and CEO, John Chambers, represented Cisco on the call. Others
on the call included: Craig Barrett, CEO of Intel Corporation;
John Doerr, Partner, Kleiner Perkins Caufield and Byers;
Eric Benhamou, Chairman, 3Com & Palm; Rick White, CEO of
TechNet; Paul Gudonis, CEO of Genuity; Bob Herbold, COO
& Executive Vice President of Microsoft and Milo Medin,
CTO of Excite@Home.
The newly unveiled principles were developed by TechNet's
Broadband Task Force, of which CEO John Chambers was a part.
"What we've learned in this downturn is that the U.S. economy
and the high-tech industry rise and fall together," said
Chambers. "Our fates are intertwined. We believe that in
order for the economy to recover quickly, it is necessary
for government and high-tech to work together. We now must
work together to deliver broadband to the entire nation
by 2010. This must be a national imperative. It is not only
a matter of future economic development, but the responsibility
we have as a nation to deliver the Internet opportunity
across all socio-economic groups."
Cisco's top public policy goal is increasing the adoption
of broadband. However, there are currently regulatory and
policy hurdles in the way of increasing broadband's swift
adoption by the marketplace. There are many bills before
Congress dealing with the roll-out of broadband, as well
as how rural and underserved communities could access broadband,
but many in Congress anecdotally admit that they are not
sure what broadband actually is or does.
"Educating policymakers is key to our success," said Laura
Ipsen, Cisco vice president, Worldwide Government Affairs.
"We decided the best strategy would be to let policymakers
know the positive economic and social impacts that broadband
can bring. According to PriceWaterhouseCoopers, workers
with broadband are 270% more productive than workers using
dial-up. The more productive you are, the stronger your
economy. That information resonates with policymakers."
In addition to the discussions around broadband, its impact
on productivity and economic growth, several other broadband
applications were presented for discussion including:
Education - "E-learning" can have a tremendous
impact on all children, especially in disadvantaged communities,
or for those with physical or mental impairments that require
specialized learning, or for single parents working to move
up in the world.
Medicine - Researchers can collaborate on research
in ways that are not presently possible. Aggregating computing
power across the country could accelerate discoveries, allowing
for faster cures to both common and uncommon diseases. The
expertise of leading doctors will be available to patients
in the most remote regions of the country, reducing costs
and improving healthcare even in the most rural regions
of the U.S.
Business - Nationwide, broadband will revolutionize
large and small businesses. Access to information is imperative
to business; think about the impact that roads and rails
have had on every kind of business. Similarly, broadband
will allow businesses to dramatically change the way in
which they serve customers, manufacture goods and manage
the bottom line.
Entertainment - Consumers will have a range of
new entertainment choices, from Web delivery of movies on
demand, to realistic on-line games, to sharing of high-quality
home videos and photographs. The possibilities are limitless.
Cisco believes that the United States needs to make broadband
a priority and to set a national goal to achieve that end.
TechNet advocates the goal of making a 100 megabit per second
broadband connection available to 100 million homes and
small businesses by 2010.
TechNet has developed six principles that will help spur
the rollout of broadband across the country. The principles,
as released today, are:
First, broadband policy should be "technology neutral."
Government should not pick technology winners and losers.
Instead, competition should drive the deployment of a range
of broadband technologies and services to consumers.
Second, policymakers should exercise regulatory restraint
to encourage the development of new broadband applications
and services. We want new and compelling "killer applications"
to drive consumer demand for broadband, which will, in turn,
spur investment in the network. The FCC should refrain from
regulating advanced services that are essential drivers
of broadband, such as voice and video over the Internet.
While industry will drive much of broadband's growth,
government should be a leading user of broadband, through
it own procurement and e-government investments in education,
health, and other traditional governmental services.
Third, public policy should create an environment in which
all consumers can choose among multiple providers of broadband
networks. Much of the broadband progress we have already
achieved required significant capital outlays. To get true
broadband for everyone, an additional $300 billion must
be invested.. And this investment will not happen in an
uncertain regulatory environment, not by corporations or
by investors. In this environment, government regulation
will have the most significant impact and good government
means regulatory certainty.
Fourth, states and local governments should streamline
the building of broadband networks. Greater intrastate and
interstate consistency should be encouraged. Most importantly,
companies building high-speed networks should gain rights
of way and be relatively free of regulatory restraints and
excessive fees. The primary goal of state and local policy
should be to encourage deployment of broadband to as many
citizens as possible - not merely to generate government
revenues by taxes or tariffs.
Fifth, properly allocating spectrum for valuable wireless
Internet applications is critical for competition among
multiple broadband technologies - and the availability of
broadband to rural communities. We need a national spectrum
policy using market-based approaches to allocate spectrum
to the highest-value applications. Government revenue generation
should be secondary.
Sixth, even as we accelerate broadband deployment some
of the U.S. population, including rural Americans, will
be left behind. We support targeted incentives to encourage
broadband deployment to underserved communities and businesses.
"We find ourselves at a crossroads," says Ipsen. "The
path that we take as a nation this year will impact this
country's economic development for many years to come. Working
with industry groups, such as TechNet; customers, partners
and the government, our recommendation for the path to take
is the one that leads to broadband everywhere in America
by 2010."
|