























|
 |
 
|
CISCO
SYSTEMS, INC.
September 28, 2001
DEAR CISCO SYSTEMS SHAREHOLDER:
|
You are cordially invited to attend the Annual Meeting of Shareholders
(the Annual Meeting) of Cisco Systems, Inc., which will be
held at Paramounts Great America in the Paramount Theater, located
at 1 Great America Parkway, Santa Clara, California 95054 on Tuesday,
November 13, 2001, at 10:00 a.m. You will find a map with directions
to the meeting on the outside back cover of the Proxy Statement.
Details of the business to be conducted at the Annual Meeting are given
in the attached Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders and the attached
Proxy Statement.
If you do not plan to attend the Annual Meeting, please complete, sign,
date, and return the enclosed proxy promptly in the accompanying reply
envelope. Shareholders who elected to access the 2001 Proxy Statement
and Annual Report over the Internet and vote their proxy online will not
be receiving a paper proxy card. If you decide to attend the Annual Meeting
and wish to change your proxy vote, you may do so automatically by voting
in person at the Annual Meeting.
We look forward to seeing you at the Annual Meeting.
|
|
|
|
|
|
John T. Chambers |
|
President
and Chief Executive Officer |
San
Jose, California
|
YOUR
VOTE IS IMPORTANT
In
order to assure your representation at the Annual Meeting, you are
requested to complete, sign, and date the enclosed proxy as promptly
as possible and return it in the enclosed envelope (to which no
postage need be affixed if mailed in the United States). Please
reference the Voting Electronically via the Internet or by
Telephone section on page 1 of the Proxy Statement for
alternative voting methods.
|
CISCO
SYSTEMS, INC.
170
W. Tasman Drive
San
Jose, California 95134-1706
NOTICE
OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
To
Be Held November 13, 2001
|
The Annual Meeting of Shareholders (the Annual Meeting) of
Cisco Systems, Inc. (the Company) will be held at Paramounts
Great America in the Paramount Theater, located at 1 Great America
Parkway, Santa Clara, California 95054, on Tuesday, November 13,
2001, at 10:00 a.m. for the following purposes:
|
|
|
|
1.
|
To
elect eleven members of the Board of Directors of the Company to serve
until the next Annual Meeting of Shareholders and until their successors
have been elected and qualified; |
|
|
|
2.
|
To
ratify the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the Companys
independent accountants for the fiscal year ending July 27, 2002;
and |
|
|
|
3.
|
To
act upon such other matters as may properly come before the meeting
or any adjournments or postponements thereof. |
|
The foregoing items of business are more fully described in the Proxy
Statement accompanying this Notice. The record date for determining those
shareholders who will be entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the Annual
Meeting and at any adjournments thereof is September 13, 2001. The
stock transfer books will not be closed between the record date and the
date of the Annual Meeting. A list of shareholders entitled to vote at
the Annual Meeting will be available for inspection at the principal executive
offices of the Company.
Whether or not you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, please complete,
sign, date and return the enclosed proxy promptly in the accompanying
reply envelope. If you elected to receive the 2001 Proxy Statement and
Annual Report electronically over the Internet you will not receive a
paper proxy card and should vote online, unless you cancel your enrollment.
If your shares are held in a bank or brokerage account and you did not
elect to receive the materials through the Internet, you may be eligible
to vote your proxy electronically or by telephone. Please refer to the
enclosed proxy card for instructions. You may revoke your proxy vote at
any time prior to the Annual Meeting. If you decide to attend the Annual
Meeting and wish to change your proxy vote, you may do so automatically
by voting in person at the Annual Meeting.
|
|
|
|
BY ORDER OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS |
|
|
|
|
Larry R. Carter |
|
Secretary |
San
Jose, California
|
|
CISCO
SYSTEMS, INC.
170
W. Tasman Drive
San
Jose, California 95134-1706
PROXY
STATEMENT
FOR
ANNUAL
MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
|
These proxy materials are furnished in connection with the solicitation
of proxies by the Board of Directors of Cisco Systems, Inc., a California
corporation (the Company), for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders
(the Annual Meeting) to be held at 10:00 a.m. on November 13,
2001, at Paramounts Great America in the Paramount Theater, located
at 1 Great America Parkway, Santa Clara, California 95054, and at any
adjournments or postponements of the Annual Meeting. These proxy materials
were first mailed on or about September 28, 2001 to all shareholders entitled
to vote at the Annual Meeting.
PURPOSE
OF MEETING
The specific proposals to be considered and acted upon at the Annual Meeting
are summarized in the accompanying Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders.
Each proposal is described in more detail in this Proxy Statement.
|
VOTING
RIGHTS AND SOLICITATION
Voting
|
Holders of the Companys common stock (Common Stock)
are the only securityholders of the Company entitled to vote at the Annual
Meeting. On September 13, 2001, the record date for determination
of shareholders entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting, there were 7,334,019,051
shares of Common Stock outstanding. Each shareholder of record on September 13,
2001 is entitled to one vote for each share of Common Stock held by such
shareholder on that date. Holders of a majority of the outstanding shares
of Common Stock must be present or represented at the Annual Meeting in
order to have a quorum. Abstentions and broker non-votes will be treated
as shares present for the purpose of determining the presence of a quorum
for the transaction of business at the Annual Meeting. In the election
of directors, the eleven nominees receiving the highest number of affirmative
votes will be elected. Proposal No. 2 requires the approval of the
affirmative vote of a majority of the shares of Common Stock present or
represented and voting at the Annual Meeting, together with the affirmative
vote of a majority of the required quorum. Abstentions and broker non-votes
can have the effect of preventing approval of a proposal where the number
of affirmative votes, though a majority of the votes cast, does not constitute
a majority of the required quorum. If the persons present or represented
by proxy at the Annual Meeting constitute the holders of less than a majority
of the outstanding shares of Common Stock as of the record date, the Annual
Meeting may be adjourned to a subsequent date for the purpose of obtaining
a quorum. All votes will be tabulated by the inspector of election appointed
for the Annual Meeting, who will separately tabulate affirmative and negative
votes, abstentions and broker non-votes.
Voting
Electronically via the Internet or by Telephone
Shareholders whose shares are registered in their own names may vote either
via the Internet or by telephone. Specific instructions to be followed
by any registered shareholder interested in voting via Internet or by
telephone are set forth on the enclosed proxy card. The Internet and telephone
voting procedures are designed to authenticate the shareholders
identity and to allow shareholders to vote their shares and confirm that
their voting instructions have been properly recorded.
If your shares are registered in the name of a bank or brokerage firm
and you have not elected to receive your Proxy Statement over the Internet,
you may be eligible to vote your shares electronically over the
Internet
or by telephone. A large number of banks and brokerage firms are participating
in the ADP Investor Communication Services online program. This program
provides eligible shareholders who receive a paper copy of this Proxy
Statement the opportunity to vote via the Internet or by telephone. If
your bank or brokerage firm is participating in ADPs program, your
proxy card will provide instructions. If your proxy card does not reference
Internet or telephone information, please complete and return the proxy
card in the self-addressed, postage paid envelope provided. Shareholders
who elected to receive the 2001 Proxy Statement and Annual Report over
the Internet will be receiving an e-mail on or about September 28, 2001
with information on how to access shareholder information and instructions
for voting.
Proxies
Whether or not you are able to attend the Annual Meeting, you are urged
to submit your proxy, which is solicited by the Companys Board of
Directors (the Board of Directors or the Board)
and which when properly completed will be voted as you direct. In the
event no directions are specified, such proxies will be voted FOR each
of the nominees of the Board of Directors (Proposal No. 1), FOR the ratification
of the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the Companys
independent accountants for the Companys fiscal year ending July
27, 2002 (Proposal No. 2), and in the discretion of the proxy holders
as to any other matters that may properly come before the Annual Meeting.
You may revoke or change your proxy vote at any time before the Annual
Meeting by sending a written notice of revocation or submitting another
proxy with a later date to the Secretary of the Company at the Companys
principal executive offices before the beginning of the Annual Meeting.
You may also revoke your proxy vote by attending the Annual Meeting and
voting in person.
Solicitation
of Proxies
The Company will bear the entire cost of this solicitation of proxies,
including the preparation, assembly, printing, and mailing of this Proxy
Statement, the proxy, and any additional solicitation material furnished
to shareholders by the Company. Copies of solicitation material will be
furnished to brokerage houses, fiduciaries, and custodians holding shares
in their names that are beneficially owned by others so that they may
forward the solicitation material to such beneficial owners. In addition,
the Company has retained Georgeson Shareholder Communications Inc. to
act as a proxy solicitor in conjunction with the Annual Meeting. Under
the terms of an agreement dated September 10, 2001, the Company has
agreed to pay $10,000, plus reasonable out of pocket expenses, to Georgeson
Shareholder Communications Inc. for proxy solicitation services. The original
solicitation of proxies by mail may be supplemented by solicitation by
telephone, telegram and other means by directors, officers, and/or employees
of the Company. No additional compensation will be paid to these individuals
for any such services. Except as described above, the Company does not
presently intend to solicit proxies otherwise than by mail and via the
Internet.
|
|
|
PROPOSAL NO. 1
ELECTION
OF DIRECTORS
General
The names of persons who are nominees for director and their positions
and offices with the Company are set forth in the table below. The proxy
holders intend to vote all proxies received by them for the nominees listed
below unless otherwise instructed. In the event any nominee is unable
or declines to serve as a director at the time of the Annual Meeting,
the proxies will be voted for any nominee who may be designated by the
Board of Directors to fill the vacancy. As of the date of this Proxy Statement,
the Board of Directors is not aware of any nominee who is unable or will
decline to serve as a director. The eleven nominees receiving the highest
number of affirmative votes of the shares entitled to vote at the Annual
Meeting will be elected directors of the Company to serve until the next
Annual Meeting of Shareholders and until their successors have been elected
and qualified. Shareholders may not cumulate votes in the election of
directors.
|
| Nominees |
 |
Positions and Offices Held With the Company |
|
 |
|
| Carol A. Bartz |
 |
Director |
 |
| Larry R. Carter |
 |
Senior Vice President, Finance and Administration, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary, and Director |
 |
| John T. Chambers |
 |
President, Chief Executive Officer, and Director |
 |
| Carleton S. Fiorina |
 |
Director |
 |
| Dr. James F. Gibbons |
 |
Director |
 |
| James C. Morgan |
 |
Director |
 |
| John P. Morgridge |
 |
Chairman of the Board |
 |
| Arun Sarin |
 |
Director |
 |
| Donald T. Valentine |
 |
Vice Chairman of the Board |
 |
| Steven M. West |
 |
Director |
 |
| Jerry Yang |
 |
Director |
|
Business
Experience of Nominees
|
Ms. Bartz, 53, has been a member of the Board of Directors since
November 1996. From April 1992 to present she has served as Chairman
of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of Autodesk, Inc. From April
1992 to September 1996 she was Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President
of Autodesk, Inc. Prior to that, she was with Sun Microsystems from August
1983 to April 1992 most recently as Vice President of Worldwide Field
Operations. Ms. Bartz also currently serves on the Boards of Directors
of BEA Systems, Inc., Network Appliance, Inc. and VA Linux Systems,
Inc.
Mr. Carter, 58, was elected to the Board of Directors in July 2000.
He joined the Company in January 1995 as Vice President, Finance
and Administration, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary. In July 1997
he became the Senior Vice President, Finance and Administration, Chief
Financial Officer and Secretary. Prior to his services at the Company
he was with Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. as the Vice President and Corporate
Controller. Mr. Carter currently serves on the Board of Directors
of eSpeed, Inc., Network Appliance, Inc., QLogic Corporation and Transmeta
Corporation.
Mr. Chambers, 52, has been a member of the Board of Directors since
November 1993. He joined the Company as Senior Vice President in January
1991 and became Executive Vice President in June 1994. Mr. Chambers
became President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company as of January 31,
1995. Prior to his services at the Company, he was with Wang Laboratories
for eight years, most recently as Senior Vice President of U.S. Operations.
Mr. Chambers currently serves on the Board of Directors of Wal-Mart
Stores, Inc.
Ms. Fiorina, 46, has been a member of the Board of Directors since
January 2001. From July 1999 to present she has been the President and
Chief Executive Officer of Hewlett-Packard Company and a member of its
Board of Directors. Since September 2000, she has also served as Chairman
of the Board of Directors of Hewlett-Packard Company. From January 1996
to July 1999, she was with Lucent Technologies, Inc., most recently as
Group President of the Global Service Provider Business.
Dr. Gibbons, 70, has been a member of the Board of Directors since
May 1992. He is a Reid Weaver Dennis Professor of Electrical Engineering
at Stanford University. He was Dean of the Stanford University School
of Engineering from 1984 to 1996. Dr. Gibbons also currently serves
on the Boards of Directors of Lockheed Martin Corporation and El Paso
Natural Gas Company.
Mr. Morgan, 63, has been a member of the Board of Directors since
February 1998. He has been Chief Executive Officer of Applied Materials,
Inc. since 1977 and also Chairman of the Board since 1987. He was President
of Applied Materials, Inc. from 1976 to 1987. He was previously a senior
partner with West Ven Management, a private venture capital partnership
affiliated with Bank of America Corporation.
Mr. Morgridge, 68, joined the Company as President and Chief Executive
Officer and was elected to the Board of Directors in October 1988.
Mr. Morgridge became Chairman of the Board on January 31, 1995,
upon his retirement from the positions of President and Chief Executive
Officer of the Company. From 1986 to 1988 he was President and Chief Operating
Officer at GRiD Systems, a manufacturer of laptop computer systems.
Mr. Sarin, 46, has been a member of the Board of Directors since
September 1998. From July 2001 to present he has been the Chief Executive
Officer of Accel-KKR Telecom. He was the Chief Executive Officer of InfoSpace,
Inc., and a member of its Board of Directors from April 2000 to January
2001. He was the Chief Executive Officer of the USA/Asia Pacific Region
for Vodafone AirTouch, Plc from July 1999 to April 2000. From February
1997 to July 1999 he was the President and Chief Operating Officer of
AirTouch Communications, Inc., a wireless telecommunications services
company. He served as President and Chief Executive Officer of AirTouch
International from April 1994 to February 1997. Mr. Sarin joined
AirTouch Communications, Inc. in 1984 and held a variety of positions,
including Vice President and General Manager, Vice President, Chief Financial
Officer and Controller, and Vice President of Corporate Strategy. Mr. Sarin
currently serves on the Boards of Directors of GAP, Inc., Vodafone Plc
and Charles Schwab Corporation.
Mr. Valentine, 69, has been a member of the Board of Directors of
the Company since December 1987 and was elected Chairman of the Board
of Directors in December 1988. He became Vice Chairman of the Board on
January 31, 1995. He has been a general partner of Sequoia Capital
since 1974. Mr. Valentine currently serves as Chairman of the Board
of Directors of Network Appliance, Inc.
Mr. West, 46, has been a member of the Board of Directors since April
1996. He was the President and Chief Executive Officer of Entera, Inc.
from September 1999 to January 2001. From January 1999 to August 1999
he was the President of the Services Business Unit at Electronic Data
Systems Corporation. He was the President and Chief Executive Officer
of Hitachi Data Systems, a joint venture computer hardware services company
owned by Hitachi, Ltd. and Electronic Data Systems Corporation, from June
1996 to January 1999. Prior to that, Mr. West was at Electronic Data
Systems Corporation from November 1984 to June of 1996, most recently
as President of Electronic Data Systems Corporation Infotainment Business
Unit.
Mr. Yang, 32, has been a member of the Board of Directors since July
2000. He is a founder of Yahoo! Inc., and since March 1995 has been
an executive of Yahoo! Inc. and has served as a member of its Board
of Directors.
Neither Ms. Mary Cirillo nor Mr. Edward Kozel, each
of whom is currently a member of the Board of Directors, is standing for
re-election at the Annual Meeting.
Board
Committees and Meetings
During the Companys fiscal year that ended on July 28, 2001,
the Board of Directors held six meetings. During this period, all of the
directors attended or participated in more than 75% of the aggregate of
(i) the total number of meetings of the Board of Directors and (ii) the
total number of meetings held by all Committees of the Board on which
each such director served except Edward Kozel who attended 62% of such
meetings.
The Company has eight standing Committees: the Acquisition Committee;
the Special Acquisition Committee; the Audit Committee; the Compensation/ Stock Option Committee; the Executive Committee; the Investment/ Finance
Committee; the Nomination Committee; and the Special Stock Option Committee.
The Acquisition Committee reviews acquisition strategies and candidates
with the Companys management, approves acquisitions valued below
a specified dollar threshold and also makes recommendations to the Board
of Directors. This Committee met on two separate occasions during the
last fiscal year. This Committee currently consists of Messrs. Valentine,
Chambers, Morgridge and Sarin and Ms. Bartz.
The Special Acquisition Committee reviews acquisition strategies and candidates
with the Companys management, approves acquisitions valued below
a specified dollar threshold and also makes recommendations to the Board
of Directors. This committee held four meetings during the last fiscal
year. The Committee currently consists of Messrs. Chambers and Kozel
and Ms. Bartz.
The Audit Committee is responsible for reviewing the accounting principles,
policies and practices followed by the Company in accounting for and reporting
its financial results of operations and for selecting and meeting with
the Companys independent accountants. This Committee meets from
time to time with members of the Companys internal audit staff and
also, among other things, reviews the financial, investment and risk management
policies followed by the Company in conducting its business activities;
the Companys annual financial statements; the Companys internal
financial controls; and the performance of the Companys independent
accountants. The Audit Committee operates under a written Audit Committee
Charter adopted by the Board, a copy of which is attached hereto as Appendix A.
This Committee held seven meetings during the last fiscal year. This Committee
currently consists of Ms. Cirillo and Messrs. Sarin and West.
The Board has determined that each of the members of the Audit Committee
is an independent director as defined in Rule 4200 of
the listing standards of the National Association of Securities Dealers,
Inc.
The Compensation/Stock Option Committee is responsible for reviewing
the compensation arrangements in effect for the Companys executive
officers and for administering all of the Companys employee benefit
plans, including the 1996 Stock Incentive Plan. This Committee acted by
unanimous written consent on fourteen separate occasions and met four
times during the last fiscal year. This Committee currently consists of
Messrs. Gibbons and Morgan and Ms. Bartz.
The Executive Committee is authorized to exercise all power and authority
of the Board in the oversight of the management of the business and affairs
of the Company, otherwise than in connection with matters specified by
law to be reserved for the full Board. This Committee held no meetings
during the last fiscal year. This Committee currently consists of Messrs. Morgridge,
Chambers and Valentine.
The Investment/Finance Committee reviews and approves the Companys
investment policy, real estate acquisitions and leasing, and the Companys
currency, interest rate and equity risk management policies. This Committee
also reviews the Companys minority investments, fixed income assets
and its insurance management policies and programs. This Committee held
three meetings during the last fiscal year. This Committee currently consists
of Messrs. Morgridge, Carter, Kozel and Valentine and Ms. Cirillo.
The Nomination Committee is responsible for nominating new members to
be considered for the Board of Directors. This Committee held no meetings
during the last fiscal year. This Committee currently consists of Messrs. Chambers
and Gibbons and Ms. Bartz.
The Special Stock Option Committee has concurrent authorization with the
Compensation/Stock Option Committee to make option grants under the 1996
Stock Incentive Plan to eligible individuals other than executive officers
of the Company. This Committee held no meetings during the last fiscal
year with respect to the approval of such option grants. This Committee
currently consists of Messrs. Chambers and Morgridge and Ms. Bartz.
Director
Compensation
Non-employee directors were each paid a $32,000 annual retainer fee for
serving on the Board during the 2001 fiscal year, except that the fee
paid to Mr. Yang was increased to $40,000 to compensate him for his
period of Board service in July 2000 prior to the start of the Companys
2001 fiscal year and the fee paid to Ms. Fiorina was pro-rated to
$26,667 because her period of Board service did not commence until January
2001. During such fiscal year, non-employee directors were also eligible
to participate in the Discretionary Option Grant Program in effect under
the 1996 Stock Incentive Plan and to receive periodic option grants under
the Automatic Option Grant Program in effect under the 1996 Stock Incentive
Plan. Directors who are also employees of the Company are eligible to
receive options under the Companys 1996 Stock Incentive Plan and
to participate in the Companys 1989 Employee Stock Purchase Plan,
the Companys 401(k) Plan, and the Companys Management
Incentive Plan.
At the Annual Meeting of Shareholders held on November 14, 2000,
each of the following non-employee directors re-elected to the Board received
an option grant under the Automatic Option Grant Program for 15,000 shares
of Common Stock with an exercise price of $53.125 per share: Mses. Bartz
and Cirillo and Messrs. Gibbons, Morgan, Sarin, Valentine and West.
Ms. Fiorina received an initial automatic option grant under the
Automatic Option Grant Program for 30,000 shares on January 9, 2001
when she was first elected to the Board, with an exercise price of $37.125
per share. The exercise price in effect for each option is equal to the
fair market value per share of Common Stock on the grant date. Each option
has a maximum term of nine years measured from the grant date, subject
to earlier termination following the optionees cessation of Board
service. The shares subject to each 15,000-share grant will vest in two
equal annual installments upon the optionees completion of each
year of Board service over the two year period beginning on the grant
date. The shares subject to the 30,000-share grant made to Ms. Fiorina
will vest in four successive equal annual installments upon the completion
of each year of Board service over the four year period beginning on the
grant date. Each option is immediately exercisable for all of the shares
underlying the option; however, any shares purchased under the option
will be subject to the Companys right to repurchase any then unvested
shares, at the option exercise price paid per share, upon the optionees
cessation of Board service. Lastly, the vesting of the shares underlying
the options immediately accelerate in full upon certain changes in control
or ownership of the Company or upon the optionees death or disability
while a Board member.
Recommendation
of the Board of Directors
The Board of Directors recommends that the shareholders vote FOR the
election of each of the nominees listed herein.
|
|
|
PROPOSAL NO. 2
RATIFICATION OF
INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
General
|
The Company is asking the shareholders to ratify the Board of Directors
appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the Companys independent
accountants for the fiscal year ending July 27, 2002. The affirmative
vote of a majority of the shares of Common Stock present or represented
and voting at the Annual Meeting, together with the affirmative vote of
a majority of the required quorum, is required to ratify such appointment.
In the event the shareholders fail to ratify the appointment, the Board
of Directors will reconsider its selection. Even if the appointment is
ratified, the Board of Directors, in its discretion, may direct the appointment
of a different independent accounting firm at any time during the year
if the Board of Directors determines that such a change would be in the
Companys and its shareholders best interests.
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP has audited the Companys financial statements
annually since the Companys 1988 fiscal year. Representatives of
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP are expected to be present at the Annual Meeting
and will have the opportunity to make a statement if they desire to do
so. It is also expected that they will be available to respond to appropriate
questions.
Audit
Fees
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP has billed the Company $1,830,000, in the aggregate,
for professional services rendered by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP for the
audit of the Companys annual financial statements for the Companys
2001 fiscal year and the reviews of the interim financial statements included
in the Companys Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q for the Companys
2001 fiscal year.
Financial
Information Systems Design and Implementation Fees
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP has billed the Company $3,670,000, in the aggregate,
for professional services related to financial information systems design
and implementation as described in Paragraph (c)(4)(ii) of Rule 2-01
of Regulation S-X.
All
Other Fees
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP has billed the Company $13,126,000, in the
aggregate, for professional services rendered by PricewaterhouseCoopers
LLP for all services other than those services covered in the sections
captioned Audit Fees and Financial Information Systems
Design and Implementation Fees for the Companys 2001 fiscal
year. These other services include (i) tax planning and assistance
with the preparation of returns, (ii) services rendered in connection
with acquisitions made by the Company, (iii) assistance with regulatory
filings, and (iv) consultations on the effects of various accounting
issues and changes in professional standards.
In making its recommendation to ratify the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers
LLP as the Companys independent accountants for the fiscal year
ending July 27, 2002, the Audit Committee has considered whether
the non-audit services provided by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP are compatible
with maintaining the independence of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP.
Recommendation
of the Board of Directors
The Board of Directors recommends that the shareholders vote FOR the
ratification of the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP to serve
as the Companys independent accountants for the fiscal year ending
July 27, 2002.
|
|
|
OWNERSHIP
OF SECURITIES
|
The following table sets forth certain information known to the Company
with respect to beneficial ownership of Common Stock as of July 28,
2001 for (i) all persons who are beneficial owners of five percent
or more of the outstanding shares of Common Stock as of July 28,
2001, (ii) each director and nominee for director of the Company,
(iii) the Companys Chief Executive Officer and the other executive
officers named in the Summary Compensation Table below, and (iv) all
executive officers and directors as a group as of July 28, 2001:
|
| |
Number
|
|
| |
of
Shares
|
|
| |
Beneficially
|
Percent
|
| Name |
Owned(1)
|
Owned(2)
|
|
|
|
| Carol
A. Bartz(3) |
297,928
|
*
|
| |
|
|
| Larry
R. Carter(4) |
3,438,081
|
*
|
| |
|
|
| John
T. Chambers(5) |
21,385,667
|
*
|
| |
|
|
| Mary
A. Cirillo(6) |
220,717
|
*
|
| |
|
|
| Carleton
Fiorina |
30,450
|
*
|
| |
|
|
| James
F. Gibbons |
135,920
|
*
|
| |
|
|
| Richard
J. Justice(7) |
1,615,751
|
*
|
| |
|
|
| Edward
R. Kozel(8) |
1,148,889
|
*
|
| |
|
|
| James
C. Morgan(9) |
214,300
|
*
|
| |
|
|
| John
P. Morgridge(10) |
84,127,513
|
1.1
|
| |
|
|
| James
Richardson |
2,629,551
|
*
|
| |
|
|
| Arun
Sarin |
128,000
|
*
|
| |
|
|
| Donald
T. Valentine(11) |
4,014,983
|
*
|
| |
|
|
| Michelangelo
Volpi(12) |
1,801,768
|
*
|
| |
|
|
| Steven
M. West(13) |
140,400
|
*
|
| |
|
|
| Jerry
Yang(14) |
69,721
|
*
|
| |
|
|
| All
executive officers and directors as a group (19 Persons) |
133,230,159
|
1.8
|
| (1) |
Except as indicated in the footnotes to this table and pursuant to
applicable community property laws, the persons named in the table
have sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares of
Common Stock. The number of shares beneficially owned by each person
or group as of July 28, 2001 includes shares of Common Stock
that such person or group had the right to acquire on or within 60 days
after July 28, 2001, including, but not limited to, upon the
exercise of options. |
| |
|
| (2) |
For each individual and group included in the table, percentage ownership
is calculated by dividing the number of shares beneficially owned
by such person or group as described above by the sum of the 7,324,134,100
shares of Common Stock outstanding on July 28, 2001 and the number
of shares of Common Stock that such person or group had the right
to acquire on or within 60 days of July 28, 2001, including,
but not limited to, upon the exercise of options. |
| |
|
| (3) |
Includes 2,928 shares held by Carol Bartzs spouse, Bill Marr. |
| |
|
| (4) |
Includes 27,596 shares held by the Carter Revocable Trust dated October 18,
1994. |
| |
|
| (5) |
Includes 35,928 shares held by the Sequoia Capital VII Partnership,
in which John Chambers holds an economic interest. Mr.
Chambers disclaims beneficial ownership of shares of Common Stock
held by the Sequoia Capital VII Partnership, except to the extent
of his pecuniary interest therein. |
| |
|
| (6) |
Includes 13,500 shares held by Mary Cirillos spouse, Jay Goldberg. |
| |
|
| (7) |
Includes 21,836 shares held by the 1990 Justice Family Trust. |
| |
|
| (8) |
Includes 12,500 shares held by Edward R. and Sara T. Kozel,
Trustees for the Kozel Revocable Trust dated December 27, 1994. |
| |
|
| (9) |
Includes 9,300 shares held by James Morgans spouse, Rebecca Q.
Morgan. |
| |
|
| (10) |
Includes 78,020,191 shares held by John P. Morgridge and Tashia F.
Morgridge as Trustees of the Morgridge Family Trust (UTA DTD 6/30/88),
96,238 shares held by John Morgridges spouse, Tashia F.
Morgridge, and 4,652,222 shares held in the Morgridge Family Foundation. |
| |
|
| (11) |
Includes 1,963,214 shares held by the Donald T. Valentine Family
Trust Under Agreement dated April 29, 1967. Also includes 1,426,769
shares held in total by the following partnerships in which Mr. Valentine
holds a partnership or other economic interest: 506,782 shares held
by Sequioa Capital IX, 93,541 shares held by Sequoia Capital IX
Principles Fund, 78,008 shares held by Sequoia Capital Entrepreneurs
Fund, 179,006 shares held by Sequoia Capital Seed Fund, 19,858 shares
held by Sequoia Technology Partners VII, 454,232 shares held
by Sequoia Capital VII, 7,924 shares held by Sequoia International
Partners, 66,214 shares held by Sequoia Capital VIII, 4,384 shares
held by Sequoia International Partners VIII Q, 840
shares held by Sequoia International Technology Partners VIII,
5,328 shares held by Sequoia 1997, 9,192 shares held by SQP 1997 and
1,460 shares held by CMS Partners (collectively the Sequoia
Entities). Mr. Valentine disclaims beneficial ownership
of shares of Common Stock held by the Sequoia Entities, except to
the extent of his pecuniary interest therein. |
| |
|
| (12) |
Includes 74 shares held by Michelangelo Volpis son, Marco
Volpi. |
| |
|
| (13) |
Includes 400 shares held by Steven Wests spouse, Donna Karam. |
| |
|
| (14) |
Includes 2,388 shares held in the Red Husley Foundation, 34,145 shares
held in the Jerry Yang Charitable Trust and 3,188 shares held in the
Jerry Yang Revocable Trust. |
|
Compliance
with SEC Reporting Requirements
|
Under Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended
(the Exchange Act), the Companys directors, executive
officers and any persons holding more than ten percent of the outstanding
Common Stock are required to report their initial ownership of Common
Stock and any subsequent changes in their ownership to the Securities
and Exchange Commission (SEC). Specific due dates have been
established by the SEC, and the Company is required to disclose in this
Proxy Statement any failure to file by those dates. Based solely of its
review of (i) copies of Section 16(a) reports that the Company
received from such persons for their transactions during the Companys
2001 fiscal year and (ii) written representations received from one
or more of such persons that no annual Form 5 reports were required
to be filed for them for the Companys 2001 fiscal year, the Company
believes that all reports required to be filed under Section 16(a)
have been filed on a timely basis by the foregoing persons for the Companys
2001 fiscal year, except as follows. Ms. Cirillo, a member of the
Board of Directors, filed a late Form 5 report for the Companys
2000 fiscal year and failed to timely file Form 4 reports with respect
to (i) seven purchase transactions that occurred over a twenty-two
month period beginning in December 1998 and covered a total of 1,920
shares of Common Stock and (ii) five sale transactions that occurred
over a twelve month period beginning in January 2000 and covered
a total of 205 shares of Common Stock. These transactions were subsequently
reported by Ms. Cirillo in May 2001 as follows: a late Form 4
for October 2000 in which one of the late purchase transactions was
reported; an amendment to a previously filed Form 4 for December 2000
in which one of the late sale transactions was reported; and an amendment
to the Form 5 filed for the Companys 2000 fiscal year in which
the remaining six late purchase transactions and four late sale transactions
were reported. Mr. Morgan, a member of the Board of Directors, filed
an amended Form 3 in September 2001 in which he reported 300 shares
of Common Stock owned by his spouse which he failed to report on his original
Form 3. Mr. Morgridge, a member of the Board of Directors, filed
a late Form 4 on March 8, 2001 with respect to 346 shares
of Common Stock distributed to him in October 2000 from a partnership
in which he held a limited partnership interest. In addition, Mr. Richardson,
one of the Companys Senior Vice Presidents, filed an amended Form 3
in September 2001 in which he reported an additional 445 shares of Common
Stock purchased under the Companys Employee Stock Purchase Plan
which he failed to include in his Common Stock holdings reported on his
original Form 3.
|
|
|
EXECUTIVE
COMPENSATION AND RELATED INFORMATION
|
Compensation/Stock
Option Committee Report
The Compensation/Stock Option Committee (the Committee) of
the Board of Directors sets the compensation of the Chief Executive Officer,
reviews the design, administration and effectiveness of compensation programs
for other key executives, and approves stock option grants for all executive
officers. The Committee, serving under a charter adopted by the Board
of Directors, is composed entirely of outside directors who have never
served as officers of the Company.
Compensation Philosophy and Objectives
The Company operates in the extremely competitive and rapidly changing
high technology industry. The Committee believes that the compensation
programs for the executive officers should be designed to attract, motivate
and retain talented executives responsible for the success of the Company
and should be determined within a framework and based on the achievement
of designated financial targets, individual contribution, customer satisfaction
and financial performance relative to that of the Companys competitors.
Within this overall philosophy, the Committees objectives are to:
|
- Offer a total compensation program that takes into consideration the
compensation practices of a group of specifically identified peer
companies (the Peer Companies) and other selected companies
with which the Company competes for executive talent.
- Provide annual variable incentive awards that take into account the
Companys overall financial performance in terms of designated
corporate objectives and the relative performance of the Peer Companies
as well as individual contributions and a measure of customer satisfaction.
- Align the financial interests of executive officers with those of
shareholders by providing significant equity-based, long-term incentives.
|
|
Compensation
Components and Process
The three major components of the Companys executive officer compensation
are: (i) base salary, (ii) variable incentive awards, and (iii) long-term,
equity-based incentive awards.
|
|
The Committee determines the compensation levels for the executive officers
with the assistance of the Companys Human Resources Department,
which works with an independent consulting firm that furnishes the Committee
with executive compensation data drawn from a nationally recognized survey
of similarly sized technology companies which have been identified as
the Peer Companies. A significant number of the Peer Companies are listed
in the Hambrecht & Quist Technology Index, which is included in the
Stock Performance Graph for this Proxy Statement. Certain companies not
included in this Index were considered Peer Companies because the Company
competes for executive talent with those companies. However, some organizations
in the Hambrecht & Quist Technology Index were excluded from the Peer
Company list because they were not considered competitors for executive
talent or because compensation information was not available.
The positions of the Companys CEO and executive officers were compared
with those of their counterparts at the Peer Companies, and the market
compensation levels for comparable positions were examined to determine
base salary, target incentives and total cash compensation. In addition,
the practices of the Peer Companies concerning stock option grants were
reviewed and compared.
Base Salary. The base salary for each executive officer is determined
at levels considered appropriate for comparable positions at the Peer
Companies. The Companys policy is to target base salary levels between
the 25th and 50th percentile of compensation practices at Peer Companies.
|
|
Variable Incentive Awards. To reinforce the attainment of Company
goals, the Committee believes that a substantial portion of the annual
compensation of each executive officer should be in the form of variable
incentive pay. The annual incentive pool for executive officers is determined
on the basis of the Companys achievement of the financial performance
targets established at the beginning of the fiscal year and also includes
a range for the executives contribution, a measure of customer satisfaction
and a strategic component tied to the Companys performance relative
to a select group of competitors. The incentive plan sets a threshold
level of Company performance based on both revenue and profit before interest
and taxes that must be attained before any incentives are awarded. Once
the fiscal years threshold is reached, specific formulas are in
place to calculate the actual incentive payment for each officer. A target
is set for each executive officer based on targets for comparable positions
at the Peer Companies and is stated in terms of an escalating percentage
of the officers base salary for the year. In fiscal year 2001, the
Company failed to achieve its corporate financial performance targets.
As a result, despite exceeding both the strategic target tied to revenue
performance relative to the selected competitor group and the corporate
target for customer satisfaction, and in accordance with the variable
incentive award formula, no variable incentive awards were paid to the
executive officers.
|
|
Long-Term, Equity-Based Incentive Awards. The goal of the Companys
long-term, equity-based incentive awards is to align the interests of
executive officers with shareholders and to provide each executive officer
with a significant incentive to manage the Company from the perspective
of an owner with an equity stake in the business. The Committee determines
the size of the long-term, equity-based incentives according to each executives
position within the Company and sets a level it considers appropriate
to create a meaningful opportunity for stock ownership. In addition, the
Committee takes into account an individuals recent performance,
his or her potential for future responsibility and promotion, comparable
awards made to individuals in similar positions with the Peer Companies,
and the number of unvested options held by each individual at the time
of the new grant. The relative weight given to each of these factors varies
among individuals at the Committees discretion.
During fiscal year 2001, the Committee made option grants to Messrs. Carter,
Chambers, Justice, Richardson and Volpi under the Companys 1996
Stock Incentive Plan. Each grant allows the officer to acquire shares
of the Companys Common Stock at a fixed price per share (the market
price on the grant date) over a specified period of time. Options granted
to this group of individuals in November 2000 and in May 2001 vest in
periodic installments over a five year period, contingent upon the executive
officers continued employment with the Company. Accordingly, the
option grants will provide a return only if the officer remains with the
Company and only if the market price appreciates over the option term.
|
|
CEO Compensation. The annual base salary for Mr. Chambers
was established by the Committee on July 27, 2000, for the period
July 30, 2000 to July 28, 2001. The Committees decision
was based on both Mr. Chambers personal performance of his
duties and the salary levels paid to chief executive officers of the Peer
Companies, but set below the 25th percentile of the surveyed data in order
to have a substantial portion of his total compensation, in the form of
variable incentive awards and stock option grants, tied to Company performance
and stock price appreciation. On April 1, 2001, Mr. Chambers requested
that his base salary be lowered to a rate of $1.00 annually. On May 11,
2001, the Committee agreed to honor this request until such a time as
the Committee deems it appropriate to return Mr. Chambers base
salary to a market competitive level. The Committee continues to assess
the market data for chief executive officers salary levels at the
Peer Companies to ensure that, when reinstated, Mr. Chambers
compensation is consistent with Ciscos stated compensation objectives
relative to base salary.
|
|
Mr. Chambers 2001 fiscal year incentive compensation was based
on the actual financial performance of the Company in failing to achieve
designated corporate financial objectives despite attaining a strategic
revenue objective measured against competitor performance and a customer
satisfaction rating in excess of target. Mr. Chambers did not receive
an incentive award for fiscal year 2001 in accordance with the formula
for the incentive plan used for all executive officers. The option grant
made to Mr. Chambers during the 2001 fiscal year was awarded at the
same time the Committee granted stock options to other employees under
the Companys broad-based stock option program. The option grant
made to Mr. Chambers was based upon his performance and leadership
with the Company and placed a significant portion of his total compensation
at risk, since the value of the option grant depends upon the appreciation
of the Companys Common Stock over the option term.
|
|
Compliance with Internal Revenue Code Section 162(m). Section 162(m)
of the Internal Revenue Code disallows a Federal income tax deduction
to publicly held companies for compensation paid to certain of their executive
officers, to the extent that compensation exceeds $1 million per
covered officer in any fiscal year. This limitation applies only to compensation
which is not considered to be performance based. The Companys 1996
Stock Incentive Plan has been structured so that any compensation deemed
paid in connection with the exercise of option grants made under that
plan will qualify as performance-based compensation which will not be
subject to the $1 million limitation. Non-performance based compensation
paid to the Companys executive officers for the 2001 fiscal year
did not exceed the $1 million limit per officer for any of the
Named Officers subject to Section 162(m). The Committee has decided
that it is not appropriate at this time to take any action to limit the
Companys discretion to design the cash compensation packages payable
to the Companys executive officers.
|
|
Submitted
by the Compensation/Stock Option Committee
Carol Bartz, Chairman
James F. Gibbons
James C. Morgan
Compensation
Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
|
|
The members of the Compensation/Stock Option Committee of the Companys
Board of Directors for the Companys 2001 fiscal year were those
named above in the Compensation/Stock Option Committee Report. No member
of this Committee was at any time during the Companys 2001 fiscal
year or at any other time an officer or employee of the Company.
No executive officer of the Company has served on the board of directors
or compensation committee of any other entity that has or has had one
or more executive officers serving as a member of the Board of Directors.
Summary
of Cash and Certain Other Compensation
The following table sets forth the compensation earned, by the Companys
Chief Executive Officer and the four other highest-paid executive officers
whose salary and bonus for the Companys 2001 fiscal year were in
excess of $100,000, for services rendered in all capacities to the Company
and its subsidiaries for each of the last three or fewer fiscal years
during which such individuals served as executive officers of the Company.
No executive officer who would have otherwise been includable in such
table on the basis of salary and bonus earned for the Companys 2001
fiscal year has been excluded by reason of his or her termination of employment
or change in executive status during that fiscal year. The individuals
included in the following table are collectively referred to as the Named
Officers. |
|
|
SUMMARY
COMPENSATION TABLE
|
|
Compensation
|
|
|
|
|
Long-Term
|
|
|
Annual
Compensation
|
Other
Annual
|
Compensation
|
All
Other
|
|
|
Compensation
|
Awards
|
Compensation
|
|
Name
and Principal Position
|
Year
|
Salary($)
|
Bonus($)(1)
|
($)(2)
|
Options(#)
|
($)(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
John
T. Chambers
|
2001
|
268,131
|
0
|
0
|
6,000,000
|
1,500
|
|
President,
Chief Executive
|
2000
|
323,319
|
1,000,000
|
0
|
4,000,000
|
1,500
|
|
Officer,
Director
|
1999
|
305,915
|
637,184
|
0
|
5,000,000
|
1,500
|
|
Larry
R. Carter
|
2001
|
424,212
|
0
|
0
|
600,000
|
1,500
|
|
Senior
Vice President,
|
2000
|
386,262
|
861,750
|
0
|
850,000
|
1,500
|
|
Finance
and Administration,
|
1999
|
367,063
|
612,131
|
13,085
|
640,000
|
1,500
|
|
Chief
Financial Officer,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Secretary
and Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Richard
J. Justice(4)
|
2001
|
384,462
|
0
|
0
|
600,000
|
1,500
|
|
Senior
Vice President,
|
2000
|
335,241
|
748,186
|
17,134
|
900,000
|
1,500
|
|
Worldwide
Field Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
James
Richardson(4)
|
2001
|
383,108
|
0
|
0
|
587,500
|
1,500
|
|
Senior
Vice President,
|
2000
|
277,907
|
580,458
|
0
|
650,000
|
1,500
|
|
Enterprise
Line of Business
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michelangelo
Volpi(4)
|
2001
|
380,346
|
0
|
0
|
600,000
|
1,500
|
|
Senior
Vice President,
|
2000
|
317,885
|
710,331
|
0
|
900,000
|
1,500
|
|
Chief
Strategy Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| (1) |
The amounts shown under the Bonus column represent cash bonuses earned
for the indicated fiscal years. |
|
| (2) |
The amounts reported consist of reimbursement for the payment of taxes
attributable to imputed interest income on certain loans made by the
Company to the Named Officer. |
|
| (3) |
Represents the matching contribution which the Company made on behalf
of each Named Officer to the Companys 401(k) Plan. |
|
| (4) |
Appointed an executive officer on April 17, 2000. Effective August 23,
2001, Messrs. Richardson and Volpi assumed the positions of Senior
Vice President, Chief Marketing Officer and Senior Vice President,
Internet Switching and Services, respectively. |
Stock
Options
The following table provides information with respect to the stock option
grants made during the Companys 2001 fiscal year under the Companys
1996 Stock Incentive Plan to the Named Officers. No stock appreciation
rights were granted to the Named Officers during the fiscal year.
|
|
OPTION
GRANTS IN LAST FISCAL YEAR
|
|
Individual
Grants
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number
of
|
%
of Total
|
|
|
Value
of Assumed Annual
|
|
Securities
|
Options
|
|
|
Rates
of Stock
|
|
Underlying
|
Granted
to
|
|
|
Price
Appreciation
|
|
Options
|
Employees
|
Exercise
|
|
for
Option Term(3)
|
|
Granted
|
in
Fiscal
|
Price
|
Expiration
|
|
|
Name
|
(1)
|
Year
|
($/Share)(2)
|
Date
|
5%($)
|
10%($)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
John
T. Chambers
|
4,000,000
|
1.3429
|
50.3750
|
11/13/09
|
111,092,636
|
273,626,460
|
|
2,000,000
|
.6715
|
18.5700
|
05/14/10
|
20,476,330
|
50,434,177
|
|
Larry
R. Carter
|
400,000
|
.1343
|
50.3750
|
11/13/09
|
11,109,264
|
27,362,646
|
|
200,000
|
.0671
|
18.5700
|
05/14/10
|
2,047,633
|
5,043,418
|
|
Richard
J. Justice
|
400,000
|
.1343
|
50.3750
|
11/13/09
|
11,109,264
|
27,362,646
|
|
200,000
|
.0671
|
18.5700
|
05/14/10
|
2,047,633
|
5,043,418
|
|
James
Richardson
|
400,000
|
.1343
|
50.3750
|
11/13/09
|
11,109,264
|
27,362,646
|
|
187,500
|
.0629
|
18.5700
|
05/14/10
|
1,919,656
|
4,728,204
|
|
Michelangelo
Volpi
|
400,000
|
.1343
|
50.3750
|
11/13/09
|
11,109,264
|
27,362,646
|
|
200,000
|
.0671
|
18.5700
|
05/14/10
|
2,047,633
|
5,043,418
|
|
|
|
| (1) |
Options were granted on November 13, 2000 and May 14, 2001
and have a maximum term of nine years measured from the applicable
grant date, subject to earlier termination in the event of the optionees
cessation of service with the Company. Each of the options granted
in November 2000 will become exercisable for 20% of the option shares
upon the completion of one year of service measured from the grant
date and will become exercisable for the remaining shares in equal
monthly installments over the next 48 months of service thereafter.
Each of the options granted in May 2001 will become exercisable for
the option shares in a series of successive equal monthly installments
upon completion of each month of service over the 60-month period
measured from the grant date. However, each of the November 2000 and
May 2001 options will immediately become exercisable for all of the
option shares in the event the Company is acquired by a merger or
asset sale, unless the options are assumed by the acquiring entity,
or in the event there is a hostile change in control or ownership
of the Company. |
|
| (2) |
The exercise price may be paid in cash or in shares of Common Stock
valued at fair market value on the exercise date or may be paid with
the proceeds from a same-day sale of the purchased shares. The Company
also has the authority to finance the optionees exercise of
the option by loaning such individual on a full-recourse basis sufficient
funds to cover the exercise price for the purchased shares, together
with any federal and state withholding tax liability incurred by the
optionee in connection with the option exercise. |
|
| (3) |
There is no assurance provided to any executive officer or any other
holder of the Companys securities that the actual stock price
appreciation over the nine year option term will be at the assumed
5% or 10% annual rates of compounded stock price appreciation or at
any other defined level. Unless the market price of the Common Stock
appreciates over the option term, no value will be realized from the
option grants made to the executive officers. |
|
OPTION
EXCERCISES AND HOLDINGS
The table below sets forth information with respect to the Named Officers
concerning their exercise of options during the Companys 2001 fiscal
year and the unexercised options held by them as of the end of such year.
No stock appreciation rights were exercised during the fiscal year, and
no stock appreciation rights were outstanding at the end of the fiscal
year.
|
|
AGGREGATED
OPTION EXERCISES IN LAST FISCAL YEAR
|
|
AND
FISCAL YEAR-END OPTION VALUES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number
of Securities
|
Value
of Unexercised
|
|
Number
of
|
|
|
|
Underlying
Unexercised
|
In-the-Money
Options
|
|
Shares
Acquired
|
|
Value
Realized
|
|
Options
at July 28, 2001
|
at
July 28, 2001($)(2)
|
|
Name
|
on Exercise
|
|
($)(1)
|
|
Exercisable
|
Unexercisable
|
Exercisable
|
Unexercisable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
John
T. Chambers
|
0
|
$
|
|
0
|
18,791,667
|
12,608,333
|
185,775,479
|
8,585,071
|
|
Larry
R. Carter
|
500,000
|
29,009,200
|
3,311,125
|
1,743,875
|
31,218,883
|
1,620,798
|
|
Richard
J. Justice
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
1,516,959
|
1,729,291
|
10,575,554
|
1,124,164
|
|
James
Richardson
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
1,391,979
|
1,632,083
|
10,053,470
|
1,461,388
|
|
Michelangelo
Volpi
|
1,187,312
|
30,412,046
|
916,250
|
1,583,750
|
3,105,965
|
810,740
|
|
|
| (1) |
Based upon the market price of the purchased shares on the exercise
date less the option exercise price paid for such shares. |
|
| (2) |
Based upon the market price of $19.06 per share, which was the closing
selling price per share of Common Stock on the Nasdaq National Market
on the last day of the Companys 2001 fiscal year, less the option
exercise price payable per share. |
|
Employment
Contracts, Termination of Employment, and Change in Control Agreements
As of the end of the Companys 2001 fiscal year, none of the Companys
executive officers had employment or severance agreements with the Company,
and their employment could be terminated at any time at the discretion
of the Board of Directors.
|
|
Each outstanding option under the Companys 1996 Stock Incentive
Plan will vest and become immediately exercisable for all of the option
shares at the time subject to that option in the event there should occur
a hostile take-over of the Company, whether through a tender offer for
more than thirty-five percent of the Companys outstanding voting
securities which the Board does not recommend the shareholders to accept
or a change in the majority of the Board as a result of one or more contested
elections for Board membership.
Certain
Relationships and Related Transactions
|
|
From time to time, the Company may provide loans to certain officers of
the Company in connection with their employment. On December 24,
2000, the Company loaned Kevin Kennedy, who at the time was Senior Vice
President, IOS Technologies and Service Provider Line of Business, the
amount of $3,800,000. The loan is a full recourse obligation of Mr. Kennedy
and bears interest at the rate of 6.01% per year, compounded semi-annually.
The entire balance of the loan (principal and accrued interest) is scheduled
to become due and payable in one lump sum on December 26, 2002, subject
to acceleration in the event Mr. Kennedy should cease to remain in
the Companys service prior to that date. The loan documents provide
that Mr. Kennedy must at all times maintain ownership of a sufficient
number of vested stock options for the Companys common stock such
that the after-tax value of the spread on those options (the excess of
the fair market value of the vested shares subject to those options over
the exercise price payable for those shares) is at least equal to the
unpaid balance of the loan. To the extent the after-tax value of the spread
on the vested options falls below the loan balance by reason of one or
more option exercises, Mr. Kennedy must either pay down the loan
balance or pledge vested shares of the Companys common stock as
collateral for the loan. As of August 31, 2001, the outstanding unpaid
balance of Mr. Kennedys loan was approximately $3,958,000.
|
|
AUDIT
COMMITTEE REPORT
The information contained in this report shall not be deemed to be
soliciting material or filed or incorporated by
reference in future filings with the SEC, or subject to the liabilities
of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the
Company specifically incorporates it by reference into a document filed
under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act.
The Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed with the Companys
management and PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP the audited consolidated financial
statements of the Company contained in the Companys Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the Companys 2001 fiscal year. The Audit Committee
has also discussed with PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP the matters required
to be discussed pursuant to SAS No. 61 (Codification of Statements
on Auditing Standards, AU Section 380), which includes, among
other items, matters related to the conduct of the audit of the Companys
consolidated financial statements.
The Audit Committee has received and reviewed the written disclosures
and the letter from PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP required by Independence
Standards Board Standard No. 1 (Independence Discussions with Audit
Committees), and has discussed with PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP its independence
from the Company.
Based on the review and discussions referred to above, the Audit Committee
recommended to the Board of Directors that the audited consolidated financial
statements be included in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K
for its 2001 fiscal year for filing with the SEC.
Submitted
by the Audit Committee
Steven M. West, Chairman
Mary Cirillo
Arun Sarin
|
|
Back to top
|
STOCK
PERFORMANCE GRAPH
|
|
The graph depicted below shows a comparison of cumulative total shareholder
returns for the Company, the Standard & Poor 500 Stock Index
and the Hambrecht & Quist Technology Index.
|
|
COMPARISON
OF FIVE-YEAR CUMULATIVE TOTAL RETURN |
| |
7/26/96
|
7/25/97
|
7/24/98
|
7/30/99
|
7/28/00
|
7/27/01
|
| Cisco
Systems, Inc. |
$100
|
$155
|
$285
|
$544
|
$1,100
|
$334
|
| Standard
and Poor 500 Stock Index |
100
|
152
|
181
|
218
|
238
|
204
|
| Hambrecht &
Quist Technology Index |
100
|
169
|
182
|
294
|
490
|
244
|
|
Notwithstanding anything to the contrary set forth in any of the Companys
previous filings under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act
that might incorporate future filings made by the Company under those
statutes, the preceding Compensation/Stock Option Committee Report and
the Stock Performance Graph will not be incorporated by reference into
any of those prior filings, nor will such report or graph be incorporated
by reference into any future filings made by the Company under those statutes.
Notes
|
| (1) |
The
graph covers the period from July 26, 1996, the last trading
day before the Companys 1997 fiscal year, to July 27, 2001,
the last trading day before the Companys 2002 fiscal year. |
| |
|
| (2) |
The
graph assumes that $100 was invested in the Company on July 26,
1996, in Common Stock and in each index, and that all dividends were
reinvested. No cash dividends have been declared on shares of Common
Stock. |
| |
|
| (3) |
Shareholder
returns over the indicated period should not be considered indicative
of future shareholder returns. |
| |
|
|
Back to top
SHAREHOLDER
PROPOSALS FOR 2002 PROXY STATEMENT
Shareholders of the Company may submit proposals on matters appropriate
for shareholder action at meetings of the Companys shareholders
in accordance with Rule 14a-8 promulgated under the Exchange Act
(Rule 14a-8). For such proposals to be included in the
Companys proxy materials relating to its Annual Meeting of Shareholders
to be held in 2002, all applicable requirements of Rule 14a-8 must
be satisfied and such proposals must be received by the Company no later
than May 31, 2002. Such proposals should be delivered to Cisco Systems,
Inc., 170 W. Tasman Drive, San Jose, California 95134-1706,
Attn: Secretary, with a copy to Cisco Systems, Inc., 170 W. Tasman
Drive, San Jose, California 95134-1706, Attn: Senior Vice President, Corporate
Affairs.
|
|
Except in the case of proposals made in accordance with Rule 14a-8,
the Bylaws of the Company require that shareholders intending to bring
any business before an annual meeting of shareholders deliver written
notice thereof to the Secretary of the Company not less than sixty nor
more than ninety days prior to the anniversary of the date on which the
Company first mailed its proxy materials for its immediately preceding
annual meeting of shareholders (as specified in the Companys proxy
materials for its immediately preceding annual meeting of shareholders).
However, in the event that the annual meeting is called for a date which
is not within thirty days of the anniversary of the date on which the
immediately preceding annual meeting of shareholders was called, to be
timely, notice by the shareholder must be so received not later than the
close of business on the tenth day following the date on which public
announcement of the date of the annual meeting is first made. In no event
will the public announcement of an adjournment of an annual meeting of
shareholders commence a new time period for the giving of a shareholders
notice as provided above. The Bylaws of the Company further require, among
other things, that the notice by the shareholder set forth a description
of the business to be brought before the meeting and certain information
concerning the shareholder proposing such business, including such shareholders
name and address, the class and number of shares of the Companys
capital stock that are owned beneficially by such shareholder and any
material interest of such shareholder in the business proposed to be brought
before the meeting. The chairman of the meeting may refuse to permit to
be brought before the meeting any shareholder proposal (other than a proposal
made in accordance with Rule 14a-8) not made in compliance with these
requirements. Similar procedures prescribed by the Bylaws of the Company
are applicable to shareholders desiring to nominate candidates for election
as directors.
|
|
In addition, the proxy solicited by the Board of Directors for the 2002
Annual Meeting of Shareholders will confer discretionary authority to
vote on any shareholder proposal presented at that meeting, if the Company
is not provided with notice of such proposal on or prior to July 30,
2002.
|
|
Back to top
FORM
10-K
THE COMPANY WILL MAIL WITHOUT CHARGE, UPON WRITTEN REQUEST, A COPY OF
THE COMPANYS ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K FOR THE FISCAL YEAR
ENDED JULY 28, 2001, INCLUDING THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, SCHEDULES
AND LIST OF EXHIBITS. REQUESTS SHOULD BE SENT TO CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.,
170 W. TASMAN DRIVE, SAN JOSE, CALIFORNIA 95134-1706, ATTN:
INVESTOR RELATIONS.
Back to top
OTHER
MATTERS
The Board knows of no other matters to be presented for shareholder action
at the Annual Meeting. However, if other matters do properly come before
the Annual Meeting or any adjournments or postponements thereof, the Board
intends that the persons named in the proxies will vote upon such matters
in accordance with their best judgment.
|
|
|
|
BY ORDER OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS |
|
|
|
|
Larry R. Carter |
|
Secretary |
Dated:
September 28, 2001
APPENDIX
A
CISCO
SYSTEMS, INC.
CHARTER
FOR THE AUDIT COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
1.
Purpose
|
The primary function of the Audit Committee is to assist the Board of
Directors in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities by reviewing the
financial information which will be provided to the shareholders and others,
the systems of internal controls which management and the Board of Directors
have established, and the Companys audit and financial reporting
process.
The independent accountants ultimate responsibility is to the Board
of Directors and the Audit Committee, as representatives of the shareholders.
These representatives have the ultimate authority to select, evaluate,
and, where appropriate, replace the independent accountants.
The Audit Committee will primarily fulfill these responsibilities by carrying
out the activities enumerated in Section 3 of the Charter. The Committee
shall be given full access to the Companys Internal Control Services
group, Board Chairman, Company executives and independent accountants
as necessary to carry out these responsibilities.
2.
Composition of the Audit Committee
The Audit Committee shall be comprised of three or more directors, each
of whom will be independent as defined by the National Association of
Securities Dealers, Inc. (NASD).
All members of the Committee shall be able to read and understand fundamental
financial statements, including a balance sheet, income statement, and
cash flow statement.
At least one member of the Committee shall have past employment experience
in finance or accounting, requisite professional certification in accounting,
or any other comparable experience or background which results in the
individuals financial sophistication, including being or having
been a chief executive officer, chief financial officer or other senior
officer with financial oversight responsibilities.
3.
Responsibilities and Duties
To fulfill its responsibilities and duties, the Audit Committee shall:
|
|
|
|
1. Review annually the Audit Committee Charter for adequacy and recommend
any changes to the Board. |
|
|
2. Review the accounting principles, policies and practices followed
by the Company in accounting for and reporting its financial results
of operations. |
|
|
3. Review the financial, investment and risk management policies followed
by the Company in operating its business activities. |
|
|
4. Review the Companys annual financial statements. |
|
|
5. Review any management letter prepared by the independent accountants
and review the Companys internal financial controls, including
the activities of the Companys Internal Controls Services department. |
|
|
6. Recommend to the Board of Directors the selection of the independent
accountants. |
|
|
7. Obtain on an annual basis a formal written statement from the independent
accountants delineating all relationships between the accountants
and the Company consistent with Independence Standards Board Standard
No. 1, and review and discuss with the accountants all significant
relationships the accountants have with the Company to determine the
accountants independence. |
|
|
|
8. Review the effectiveness of the independent audit effort, including
approval of the scope of, and fees charged in connection with, the
annual audit, quarterly reviews and any non-audit services being provided. |
|
|
9. Review the performance of the independent accountants and approve
any proposed changes in accountants when circumstances warrant. |
|
|
10. Following completion of the annual audit, review separately with
the independent accountants, the Internal Control Services department,
and management any significant difficulties encountered during the
course of the audit. |
|
|
11. Report to the Board on the major items covered at each Audit Committee
meeting and make recommendations to the Board and management concerning
these matters. |
|
|
12. Perform any other activities consistent with this charter, the
Corporations Bylaws and governing law as the Committee or the
Board deems necessary or appropriate. |
|
4.
Audit Committee Meetings
The Committee will meet on a regular basis, approximately 3 to 4 times
each year, and will hold special meetings as circumstances require. The
timing of the meetings shall be determined by the Audit Committee.
At all Audit Committee meetings a majority of the total number of members
shall constitute a quorum.
5.
Communication Between Audit Committee Meetings
The Committee will meet at any time if the independent accountants believe
that certain communication to the committee (e.g., significant events,
transactions or changes to accounting principles affecting the quality
of financial statements) is required in connection with their review of
quarterly reporting.
Back to top
|
|
|