> HA Overview
> The Home Agent (HA) allows mobile nodes to be reached, or served, by their home network through its home address even when the mobile node is not attached to its home network. The HA performs this function through interaction with a Foreign Agent (FA) that the mobile node is communicating with using the Mobile IP (MIP) standard. Such transactions are performed through the use of virtual private networks that create MIP tunnels between the HA and FA.
> When functioning as an HA, the system can either be located within the carrier’s 3G network or in an external enterprise or ISP network. Regardless, the FA terminates the mobile subscriber’s PPP session, and then routes data to and from the appropriate HA on behalf of the subscriber.
> This chapter includes the following sections:

> • | System Components and Capacities

> • | Network Deployment Configurations

> • | Understanding Mobile IP

> System Components
> The following application and line cards are required to support CDMA2000 wireless data services on the system:
> ASR 5000 Platform:

> • | System Management Cards (SMCs): Provides full system control and management of all cards within the ASR 5000 platform. Up to two SMC can be installed; one active, one redundant.

> • | Packet Processing Cards (PSC, PSC2, PPC): Within the ASR 5000 platform, packet processing cards provide high-speed, multi-threaded PPP processing capabilities to support HA services. Up to 14 packet processing cards can be installed, allowing for multiple active and/or redundant cards.

> • | Switch Processor Input/Outputs (SPIO): Installed in the upper-rear chassis slots directly behind the SMCs, SPIOs provide connectivity for local and remote management, Central Office (CO) alarms. Up to two SPIOs can be installed; one active, one redundant.

> • | Ethernet 10/100 and/or Ethernet 1000/Quad Ethernet 1000 Line Cards: Installed directly behind processing cards, these cards provide the RP, AAA, PDN, and Pi interfaces to elements in the data network. Up to 26 line cards should be installed for a fully loaded system with 13 active processing cards, 13 in the upper-rear slots and 13 in the lower-rear slots for redundancy. Redundant processing cards do no not require line cards.

> • | Redundancy Crossbar Cards (RCCs): Installed in the lower-rear chassis slots directly behind the SMCs, RCCs utilize 5 Gbps serial links to ensure connectivity between Ethernet 10/100 or Ethernet 1000/Quad Ethernet 1000 line cards and every processing card in the system for redundancy. Two RCCs can be installed to provide redundancy for all line cards and processing cards.

> Important: Additional information pertaining to each of the application and line cards required to support CDMA2000 wireless data services is located in the Product Overview Guide.
> Supported Standards
> The system supports the following industry standards for 1x/CDMA2000/EV-DO devices.
> Requests for Comments (RFCs)

> • | RFC-768, User Datagram Protocol (UPD), August 1980

> • | RFC-791, Internet Protocol (IP), September 1982

> • | RFC-793, Transmission Control Protocol (TCP), September 1981

> • | RFC-894, A Standard for the Transmission of IP Datagrams over Ethernet Networks, April 1984

> • | RFC-1089, SNMP over Ethernet, February 1989

> • | RFC-1144, Compressing TCP/IP headers for low-speed serial links, February 1990

> • | RFC-1155, Structure and Identification of Management Information for TCP/IP-based Internets, May 1990

> • | RFC-1157, Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP) Version 1, May 1990

> • | RFC-1212, Concise MIB Definitions, March 1991

> • | RFC-1213, Management Information Base for Network Management of TCP/IP-based Internets: MIB-II, March 1991

> • | RFC-1215, A Convention for Defining Traps for use with the SNMP, March 1991

> • | RFC-1224, Techniques for Managing Asynchronously Generated Alerts, May 1991

> • | RFC-1256, ICMP Router Discovery Messages, September 1991

> • | RFC-1305, Network Time Protocol (Version 3) Specification, Implementation and Analysis, March 1992

> • | RFC-1332, The PPP Internet Protocol Control Protocol (IPCP), May 1992

> • | RFC-1398, Definitions of Managed Objects for the Ethernet-Like Interface Types, January 1993

> • | RFC-1418, SNMP over OSI, March 1993

> • | RFC-1570, PPP LCP Extensions, January 1994

> • | RFC-1643, Definitions of Managed Objects for the Ethernet-like Interface Types, July 1994

> • | RFC-1661, The Point to Point Protocol (PPP), July 1994

> • | RFC-1662, PPP in HDLC-like Framing, July 1994

> • | RFC-1701, Generic Routing Encapsulation (GRE), October 1994

> • | RFC-1771, A Border Gateway Protocol 4 (BGP-4)

> • | RFC-1850, OSPF Version 2 Management Information Base, November 1995

> • | RFC-1901, Introduction to Community-based SNMPv2, January 1996

> • | RFC-1902, Structure of Management Information for Version 2 of the Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMPv2), January 1996

> • | RFC-1903, Textual Conventions for Version 2 of the Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMPv2), January 1996

> • | RFC-1904, Conformance Statements for Version 2 of the Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMPv2), January 1996

> • | RFC-1905, Protocol Operations for Version 2 of the Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMPv2), January 1996

> • | RFC-1906, Transport Mappings for Version 2 of the Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMPv2), January 1996

> • | RFC-1907, Management Information Base for Version 2 of the Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMPv2), January 1996

> • | RFC-1908, Coexistence between Version 1 and Version 2 of the Internet-standard Network Management Framework, January 1996

> • | RFC-1918, Address Allocation for Private Internets, February 1996

> • | RFC-1919, Classical versus Transparent IP Proxies, March 1996

> • | RFC-1962, The PPP Compression Control Protocol (CCP), June 1996

> • | RFC-1974, PPP STAC LZS Compression Protocol, August 1996

> • | RFC-2002, IP Mobility Support, May 1995

> • | RFC-2003, IP Encapsulation within IP, October 1996

> • | RFC-2004, Minimal Encapsulation within IP, October 1996

> • | RFC-2005, Applicability Statement for IP Mobility Support, October 1996

> • | RFC-2118, Microsoft Point-to-Point Compression (MPPC) Protocol, March 1997

> • | RFC-2136, Dynamic Updates in the Domain Name System (DNS UPDATE)

> • | RFC-2211, Specification of the Controlled-Load Network Element Service

> • | RFC-2246, The Transport Layer Security (TLS) Protocol Version 1.0, January 1999

> • | RFC-2290, Mobile IPv4 Configuration Option for PPP IPCP, February 1998

> • | RFC-2328, OSPF Version 2, April 1998

> • | RFC-2344, Reverse Tunneling for Mobile IP, May 1998

> • | RFC-2394, IP Payload Compression Using DEFLATE, December 1998

> • | RFC-2401, Security Architecture for the Internet Protocol, November 1998

> • | RFC-2402, IP Authentication Header (AH), November 1998

> • | RFC-2406, IP Encapsulating Security Payload (ESP), November 1998

> • | RFC-2408, Internet Security Association and Key Management Protocol (ISAKMP), November 1998

> • | RFC-2409, The Internet Key Exchange (IKE), November 1998

> • | RFC-2474, Definition of the Differentiated Services Field (DS Field) in the IPv4 and IPv6 Headers, December 1998

> • | RFC-2475, An Architecture for Differentiated Services, December 1998

> • | RFC-2484, PPP LCP Internationalization Configuration Option, January 1999

> • | RFC-2486, The Network Access Identifier (NAI), January 1999

> • | RFC-2571, An Architecture for Describing SNMP Management Frameworks, April 1999

> • | RFC-2572, Message Processing and Dispatching for the Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP), April 1999

> • | RFC-2573, SNMP Applications, April 1999

> • | RFC-2574, User-based Security Model (USM) for version 3 of the Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMPv3), April 1999

> • | RFC-2597, Assured Forwarding PHB Group, June 1999

> • | RFC2598 - Expedited Forwarding PHB, June 1999

> • | RFC-2618, RADIUS Authentication Client MIB, June 1999

> • | RFC-2620, RADIUS Accounting Client MIB, June 1999

> • | RFC-2661, Layer Two Tunneling Protocol “L2TP”, August 1999

> • | RFC-2697, A Single Rate Three Color Marker, September 1999

> • | RFC-2698, A Two Rate Three Color Marker, September 1999

> • | RFC-2784, Generic Routing Encapsulation (GRE) - March 2000, IETF

> • | RFC-2794, Mobile IP Network Access Identifier Extension for IPv4, March 2000

> • | RFC-2809, Implementation of L2TP Compulsory Tunneling via RADIUS, April 2000

> • | RFC-2845, Secret Key Transaction Authentication for DNS (TSIG), May 2000

> • | RFC-2865, Remote Authentication Dial In User Service (RADIUS), June 2000

> • | RFC-2866, RADIUS Accounting, June 2000

> • | RFC-2867, RADIUS Accounting Modifications for Tunnel Protocol Support, June 2000

> • | RFC-2868, RADIUS Attributes for Tunnel Protocol Support, June 2000

> • | RFC-2869, RADIUS Extensions, June 2000

> • | RFC-3007, Secure Domain Name System (DNS) Dynamic Update, November 2000

> • | RFC-3012, Mobile IPv4 Challenge/Response Extensions, November 2000

> • | RFC-3095, Robust Header Compression (ROHC): Framework and four profiles: RTP, UDP, ESP and uncompressed, July 2001

> • | RFC-3101, OSPF NSSA Option, January 2003.

> • | RFC-3141, CDMA2000 Wireless Data Requirements for AAA, June 2001

> • | RFC-3143, Known HTTP Proxy/Caching Problems, June 2001

> • | RFC-3193, Securing L2TP using IPSEC, November 2001

> • | RFC-3241 Robust Header Compression (ROHC) over PPP, April 2002

> • | RFC-3409, Lower Layer Guidelines for Robust (RTP/UDP/IP) Header Compression, December 2002

> • | RFC-3519, NAT Traversal for Mobile IP, April 2003

> • | RFC-3543, Registration Revocation in Mobile IPv4, August 2003

> • | RFC 3576 - Dynamic Authorization Extensions to Remote Authentication Dial In User Service (RADIUS), July 2003

> • | RFC-3706, A Traffic-Based Method of Detecting Dead Internet Key Exchange (IKE) Peers, February 2004

> • | RFC-3759, Robust Header Compression (ROHC): Terminology and Channel Mapping Examples, April 2004

> • | RFC-3588, Diameter Based Protocol, September 2003

> • | RFC-4005, Diameter Network Access Server Application, August 2005

> • | RFC-4006, Diameter Credit-Control Application, August 2005

> • | Draft, Generalized Key Distribution Extensions for Mobile IP

> • | Draft, AAA Keys for Mobile IP

> Network Deployment Configurations
> This section provides examples of how the system can be deployed within a wireless carrier’s network. As noted previously in this chapter, the system can be deployed in standalone configurations, serving as a Home Agent (HA) and a Packet Data Serving Node/Foreign Agent (PDSN/FA), or in a combined PDSN/FA/HA configuration providing all services from a single chassis.
> Standalone PDSN/FA and HA Deployments
> The following figure depicts a sample network configuration wherein the HA and the PDSN/FA are separate systems.
> PDSN/FA and HA Network Deployment Configuration Example
> The HA allows mobile nodes to be reached, or served, by their home network through its home address even when the mobile node is not attached to its home network. The HA performs this function through interaction with an FA that the mobile node is communicating with using the Mobile IP protocol. Such transactions are performed through the use of virtual private networks that create Mobile IP tunnels between the HA and FA.
> Interface Descriptions
> This section describes the primary interfaces used in a CDMA2000 wireless data network deployment.
> Pi Interfaces
> The Pi interface provides connectivity between the HA and its corresponding FA. The Pi interface is used to establish a Mobile IP tunnels between the PDSN/FA and HA.
> PDN Interfaces
> PDN interface provide connectivity between the PDSN and/or HA to packet data networks such as the Internet or a corporate intranet.
> AAA Interfaces
> Using the LAN ports located on the Switch Processor I/O (SPIO) and Ethernet line cards, these interfaces carry AAA messages to and from RADIUS accounting and authentication servers. The SPIO supports RADIUS-capable management interfaces using either copper or fiber Ethernet connectivity through two auto-sensing 10/100/1000 Mbps Ethernet interfaces or two SFP optical gigabit Ethernet interfaces. User-based RADIUS messaging is transported using the Ethernet line cards.
> While most carriers will configure separate AAA interfaces to allow for out-of-band RADIUS messaging for system administrative users and other operations personnel, it is possible to use a single AAA interface hosted on the Ethernet line cards to support a single RADIUS server that supports both management users and network users.
> Important: Subscriber AAA interfaces should always be configured using Ethernet line card interfaces for the highest performance. The local context should not be used for service subscriber AAA functions.
> Co-Located Deployments
> An advantage of the system is its ability to support both high-density HA and PDSN/FA configurations within the same chassis. The economies of scale presented in this configuration example provide for both improved session handling and reduced cost in deploying a CDMA2000 data network.
> The following figure depicts a sample co-located deployment.
> Co-located PDSN/FA and HA Configuration Example.
> It should be noted that all interfaces defined within the 3GPP2 standards for 1x deployments exist in this configuration as they are described in the two previous sections. This configuration can support communications to external, or standalone, HAs and/or PDSNs/FAs using all prescribed standards.
> Mobile IP Tunneling Methods
> Tunneling by itself is a technology that enables one network to send its data via another network's connections. Tunneling works by encapsulating a network protocol within a packet, carried by the second network. Tunneling is also called encapsulation. Service providers typically use tunneling for two purposes; first, to transport otherwise un-routable packets across the IP network and second, to provide data separation for Virtual Private Networking (VPN) services. In Mobile IP, tunnels are used to transport data packets between the FA and HA.
> The system supports the following tunneling protocols, as defined in the IS-835-A specification and the relevant Request For Comments (RFCs) for Mobile IP:
> IP in IP tunnels
> IP in IP tunnels basically encapsulate one IP packet within another using a simple encapsulation technique. To encapsulate an IP datagram using IP in IP encapsulation, an outer IP header is inserted before the datagram's existing IP header. Between them are other headers for the path, such as security headers specific to the tunnel configuration. Each header chains to the next using IP Protocol values. The outer IP header Source and Destination identify the “endpoints” of the tunnel. The inner IP header Source and Destination identify the original sender and recipient of the datagram, while the inner IP header is not changed by the encapsulator, except to decrement the TTL, and remains unchanged during its delivery to the tunnel exit point. No change to IP options in the inner header occurs during delivery of the encapsulated datagram through the tunnel. If needed, other protocol headers such as the IP Authentication header may be inserted between the outer IP header and the inner IP header.
> The Mobile IP working group has specified the use of encapsulation as a way to deliver datagrams from an MN's HA to an FA, and conversely from an FA to an HA, that can deliver the data locally to the MN at its current location.
> GRE tunnels
> The Generic Routing Encapsulation (GRE) protocol performs encapsulation of IP packets for transport across disparate networks. One advantage of GRE over earlier tunneling protocols is that any transport protocol can be encapsulated in GRE. GRE is a simple, low overhead approach—the GRE protocol itself can be expressed in as few as eight octets as there is no authentication or tunnel configuration parameter negotiation. GRE is also known as IP Protocol 47.
> Important: The chassis simultaneously supports GRE protocols with key in accordance with RFC-1701/RFC-2784 and “Legacy” GRE protocols without key in accordance to RFC-2002.
> Another advantage of GRE tunneling over IP-in-IP tunneling is that GRE tunneling can be used even when conflicting addresses are in use across multiple contexts (for the tunneled data).
> Communications between the FA and HA can be done in either the forward or reverse direction using the above protocols. Additionally, another method of routing information between the FA and various content servers used by the HA exists. This method is called Triangular Routing. Each of these methods is explained below.
> Forward Tunneling
> In the wireless IP world, forward tunneling is a tunnel that transports packets from the packet data network towards the MN. It starts at the HA and ends at the MN's care-of address. Tunnels can be as simple as IP-in-IP tunnels, GRE tunnels, or even IP Security (IPSec) tunnels with encryption. These tunnels can be started automatically, and are selected based on the subscriber's user profile.
> Reverse Tunneling
> A reverse tunnel starts at the MN's care-of address, which is the FA, and terminates at the HA.
> When an MN arrives at a foreign network, it listens for agent advertisements and selects an FA that supports reverse tunnels. The MN requests this service when it registers through the selected FA. At this time, the MN may also specify a delivery technique such as Direct or the Encapsulating Delivery Style.
> Using the Direct Delivery Style, which is the default mode for the system, the MN designates the FA as its default router and sends packets directly to the FA without encapsulation. The FA intercepts them, and tunnels them to the HA.
> Using the Encapsulating Delivery Style, the MN encapsulates all its outgoing packets to the FA. The FA then de-encapsulates and re-tunnels them to the HA, using the FA's care-of address as the entry-point for this new tunnel.
> Following are some of the advantages of reverse tunneling:

> • | All datagrams from the mobile node seem to originate from its home network

> • | The FA can keep track of the HA that the mobile node is registered to and tunnel all datagrams from the mobile node to its HA

> Triangular Routing
> Triangular routing is the path followed by a packet from the MN to the Correspondent Node (CN) via the FA. In this routing scenario, the HA receives all the packets destined to the MN from the CN and redirects them to the MN's care-of-address by forward tunneling. In this case, the MN sends packets to the FA, which are transported using conventional IP routing methods.
> A key advantage of triangular routing is that reverse tunneling is not required, eliminating the need to encapsulate and de-capsulate packets a second time during a Mobile IP session since only a forward tunnel exists between the HA and PDSN/FA.
> A disadvantage of using triangular routing is that the HA is unaware of all user traffic for billing purposes. Also, both the HA and FA are required to be connected to a private network. This can be especially troublesome in large networks, serving numerous enterprise customers, as each FA would have to be connected to each private network.
> The following figure shows an example of how triangular routing is performed.
> Mobile IP, FA and HA Tunneling/Transport Methods.
> How Mobile IP Works
> As described earlier, Mobile IP uses three basic communications protocols; PPP, IP, and Tunneled IP in the form of IP-in-IP or GRE tunnels. The following figure depicts where each of these protocols are used in a basic Mobile IP call.
> Mobile IP Protocol Usage.
> As depicted above, PPP is used to establish a communications session between the MN and the FA. Once a PPP session is established, the MN can communicate with the HA, using the FA as a mediator or broker. Data transport between the FA and HA use tunneled IP, either IP-in-IP or GRE tunneling. Communication between the HA and End Host can be achieved using the Internet or a private IP network and can use any IP protocol.
> The following figure provides a high-level view of the steps required to make a Mobile IP call that is initiated by the MN to a HA. The following table explains each step in detail. Users should keep in mind that steps in the call flow related to the Radio Access Node (RAN) functions are intended to show a high-level overview of radio communications iterations, and as such are outside the scope of packet-based communications presented here.
> Mobile IP Call Flow
> Mobile IP Call Flow Description

> <X-Refs (online)>step <$paranum> | Description
> 1 | Mobile Node (MN) secures a traffic channel over the airlink with the RAN through the BSC/PCF.
> 2 | The PCF and PDSN establish the R-P interface for the session.
> 3 | The PDSN and MN negotiate Link Control Protocol (LCP).
> 4 | The PDSN and MN negotiate the Internet Protocol Control Protocol (IPCP).
> 5 | The PDSN/FA sends an Agent Advertisement to the MN.
> 6 | The MN sends a Mobile IP Registration Request to the PDSN/FA.
> 7 | The PDSN/FA sends an Access Request message to the visitor AAA server.
> 8 | The visitor AAA server proxies the request to the appropriate home AAA server.
> 9 | The home AAA server sends an Access Accept message to the visitor AAA server.
> 10 | The visitor AAA server forwards the response to the PDSN/FA.
> 11 | Upon receipt of the response, the PDSN/FA forwards a Mobile IP Registration Request to the appropriate HA.
> 12 | The HA sends an Access Request message to the home AAA server to authenticate the MN/subscriber.
> 13 | The home AAA server returns an Access Accept message to the HA.
> 14 | Upon receiving response from home AAA, the HA sends a reply to the PDSN/FA establishing a forward tunnel. Note that the reply includes a Home Address (an IP address) for the MN.
> 15 | The PDSN/FA sends an Accounting Start message to the visitor AAA server. The visitor AAA server proxies messages to the home AAA server as needed.
> 16 | The PDSN return a Mobile IP Registration Reply to the MN establishing the session allowing the MN to send/receive data to/from the PDN.
> 17 | Upon session completion, the MN sends a Registration Request message to the PDSN/FA with a requested lifetime of 0.
> 18 | The PDSN/FA forwards the request to the HA.
> 19 | The HA sends a Registration Reply to the PDSN/FA accepting the request.
> 20 | The PDSN/FA forwards the response to the MN.
> 21 | The MN and PDSN/FA negotiate the termination of LCP effectively ending the PPP session.
> 22 | The PCF and PDSN/FA close terminate the R-P session.
> 23 | The HA sends an Accounting Stop message to the home AAA server.
> 24 | The PDSN/FA sends an Accounting Stop message to the visitor AAA server.
> 25 | The visitor AAA server proxies the accounting data to the home AAA server.

> ‌
> Understanding Mobile IP
> Mobile IP provides a network-layer solution that allows Mobile Nodes (MNs, i.e. mobile phones, wireless PDAs, and other mobile devices) to receive routed IP packets from their home network while they are connected to any visitor network using their permanent or home IP address. Mobile IP allows mobility in a dynamic method that allows nodes to maintain ongoing communications while changing links as the user traverses the global Internet from various locations outside their home network.
> In Mobile IP, the Mobile Node (MN) receives an IP address, either static or dynamic, called the “home address” assigned by its Home Agent (HA). A distinct advantage with Mobile IP is that MNs can hand off between different radio networks that are served by different PDSNs.
> In this scenario, the Network Access Function (such as a PDSN) in the visitor network performs as a Foreign Agent (FA), establishing a virtual session with the MN's HA. Each time the MN registers with a different PDSN/FA, the FA assigns the MN a care-of-address. Packets are then encapsulated into IP tunnels and transported between FA, HA, and the MN.
> Session Continuity Support for 3GPP2 and WiMAX Handoffs
> HA provides this feature for seamless session mobility for WiMAX subscriber and other access technology subscribers as well. By implementation of this feature HA can be configured for:

> • | 3GPP2 HA Service

> • | 3GPP HA Service

> • | WiMAX HA Service

> • | Combination of 3GPP2 and WiMAX HA Services for Dual mode device

> The above configurations provide the session continuity capability that enables a dual mode device (a multi radio device) to continue its active data session as it changes its active network attachment from 3GPP2 to Wimax and vice versa with no perceived user impacts from a user experience perspective. This capability brings the following benefits:

> • | common billing and customer care

> • | accessing home 3GPP2 service through Wimax network and vice versa

> • | better user experience with seamless session continuity

Cisco Systems Inc.
Tel: 408-526-4000
Fax: 408-527-0883