Table Of Contents
Overview
VMS Product Migration
Licensing Considerations
Server Platform Considerations
Data Migration Support Summary
Migration Notes
Notes on AUS
Notes on Security Monitor
Overview
This document provides technical guidance on migrating from CiscoWorks VPN/Security Management Solution (VMS) to Cisco Security Manager.
This chapter contains the following sections:
•
VMS Product Migration
•
Licensing Considerations
•
Server Platform Considerations
•
Data Migration Support Summary
•
Migration Notes
•
Notes on Security Monitor
VMS Product Migration
End-of-Sale and End-of-Life dates are announced for VMS 2.3 at the following URL:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/vpndevc/ps5739/ps2330/prod_end-of-life_notice0900aecd80653315.html
There are no further VMS releases planned beyond the 2.3 Each application within the VMS bundle transitions either by 1) replacement by a new product/application or 2) movement of the application to a new product offering. The component applications of VMS 2.3 are listed in Table 1-1 along with the corresponding replacement product and application. An end-of-sale and end-of-life announcement will follow for VMS, once all VMS applications have completed their transition.
Table 1-1 VMS 2.3 Application Migration
VMS 2.3 Application
|
Replacement Product
|
Replacement Application
|
Firewall Management Center (MC) 1.3.5
|
Cisco Security Manager 3.0 or higher
|
Cisco Security Manager 3.0 or higher
|
Router MC 1.3.1
|
Cisco Security Manager 3.0 or higher
|
Cisco Security Manager 3.0 or higher
|
IPS MC 2.2
|
Cisco Security Manager 3.1 or higher
|
Cisco Security Manager 3.1 or higher
|
MCP 2.0.2
|
Cisco Security Manager 3.0 or higher
|
Performance Monitor 3.0 or higher
|
Auto Update Server 1.3
|
Cisco Security Manager 3.0 or higher
|
Auto Update Server 3.0 or higher
|
RME 3.5
|
Cisco Security Manager 3.0 or higher
|
RME 4.0.x
|
Security Agent MC 4.5
|
Cisco Security Agent 5.2 and higher
|
Cisco Security Agent MC 5.2 and higher
|
Security Monitor 2.2
|
Cisco Security MARS1
|
Cisco Security MARS
|
Licensing Considerations
The licensing model has changed between VMS and Security Manager and it is important to understand the differences when planning the migration.
VMS 2.3 has 3 different versions:
•
VMS Basic, which supports a maximum of 5 devices
•
VMS Restricted, which supports a maximum of 20 devices
•
VMS Unrestricted, which supports an unlimited1 number of devices.
Cisco Security Manager 3.x has three base versions:
•
Cisco Security Manager Enterprise Edition (Standard-5)
•
Cisco Security Manager Enterprise Edition (Standard-25)
•
Cisco Security Manager Enterprise Edition (Professional-50)
The Standard versions support 5 and 25 devices, respectively. The Professional version supports 50 devices and supports incremental device license packages available in increments of 50, 100, 500, and 1000 devices. The Professional version supports the management of the Catalyst 6500 and its associated services modules, while the Standard versions do not include this support.
When migrating from VMS to Security Manager, you should pay attention to licensing to ensure a sufficient device count support and device type support. Extra attention should be paid in the case of VMS Unrestricted used with large networks. When migrating to Security Manager you might need to acquire additional device count licenses to cover the size of the network. If Catalyst 6500 services modules will be managed, the Cisco Security Manager Professional version is required.
VMS customers can get information about upgrading to Security Manager from http://www.cisco.com/go/csmanager.
Cisco Security MARS is provided as an appliance and different models are available based on the required events per second (EPS) load handling requirements. Information on Cisco Security MARS is available at http://www.cisco.com/go/mars.
For more information about Cisco Security Agent, visit http://www.cisco.com/go/csa.
Server Platform Considerations
When planning a migration from VMS to Security Manager, you should to take into account the differences in server platform requirements between the two products. Table 1-2 summarizes the server operating system support for VMS and Security Manager. VMS is available on both Windows and Solaris operating systems. However, Security Manager is only available on Windows. Therefore, if you are using VMS on Solaris you cannot migrate to Security Manager unless you switch to a Windows platform.
VMS does not support Windows 2003, while Security Manager does. Because Microsoft has retired mainstream support for Windows 2000, you may want to migrate to Windows 2003 for use with Security Manager.
Table 1-2 Comparison of Server Operating System Support
Operating System
|
VMS 2.3
|
Security Manager 3.0 & 3.1
|
Windows 2000 Professional, Server, or Advanced Server
|
Supported
|
Supported
|
Windows 2003 Standard Edition or Enterprise Edition
|
Not Supported
|
Supported
|
Solaris 8
|
Supported
|
Not Supported
|
There are also differences between VMS 2.3 and Security Manager 3.0 in the minimum server hardware requirements as shown in (Table 1-3). Given the increased requirements for Cisco Security Manager 3.0, you might need to upgrade the server being used for VMS or use a new server that meet the requirements.
Table 1-3 Comparison of Windows Server Hardware Requirements
Hardware Attribute
|
VMS 2.3
|
Security Manager 3.0 & 3.1
|
CPU
|
1 GHz or faster Pentium
|
2 GHz or faster Pentium 4
|
RAM
|
1 GB minimum
|
2 GB minimum
|
Free Disk Space
|
9 GB minimum
|
20GB minimum
|
Data Migration Support Summary
There are few data migration tools available when migrating from VMS to Cisco Security Manager. The data migration support that is available is summarized in Table 1-4. For some applications there is no data migration support. This document provides strategies and recommendations for migrating to Security Manager where automated data migration tools are not available. For those Security Manager applications where data migration is supported, the upgrade and migration procedures are covered in the indicated installation guide.
Table 1-4 Data Migration Support Summary
VMS 2.3 Application
|
Replacement Application
|
Automated Data Migration Supported?
|
Migration Instructions
|
Firewall MC
|
Security Manager 3.0 or higher
|
No
|
Migrating from Firewall MC
|
Router MC
|
Security Manager 3.0 or higher
|
No
|
Migrating from Router MC
|
IPS MC 2.2
|
Security Manager 3.1 or higher
|
Partial
|
Migrating from IPS MC
|
AUS 2.2
|
AUS 3.0 or higher
|
No
|
See Notes on AUS
|
MCP 2.0.2
|
Performance Monitor 3.0 or higher
|
Partial1
|
Installation and Release Notes for Cisco Performance Monitor 3.0
|
RME 3.5
|
RME 4.0.3
|
Yes
|
Installation and Setup Guide for Resource Manager Essentials 4.0.3 on Windows (With LMS 2.5.1) and Data Migration Guide for LAN Management Solution 2.5.1
|
Common Services 2.2.
|
Common Services 3.0.3
|
Yes
|
Installation and Setup Guide for CiscoWorks Common Services 3.0.3 (Includes CiscoView) on Windows (With LMS 2.5.1) and Data Migration Guide for LAN Management Solution 2.5.1
|
Security Monitor 2.2
|
Cisco Security MARS
|
No
|
—
|
Security Agent MC 4.5
|
Security Agent MC 5.2
|
Yes
|
Installing Management Center for Cisco Security Agents 5.2
|
Migration Notes
This section provides brief notes on specific VMS applications:
Notes on AUS
Notes on Security Monitor
Notes on AUS
Automated data migration from AUS 1.3 to AUS 3.0 is not supported. If AUS is used simply as a deployment method for device configurations, you do not need to perform any additional configuration of AUS after installation. All device inventory and deployment information is configured in Security Manager.
However, if you use AUS to update PIX software images or PIX device manager images, these images need to be loaded in to AUS 3.0. Likewise all file to device assignments need to be re-created. You cannot transfer historical event data from AUS 1.3 to AUS 3.0.
Notes on Security Monitor
Cisco Security MARS is the recommended replacement product for Security Monitor. There is no data migration supported between Security Monitor and Cisco Security MARS.
1 Unlimited from a licensing perspective. Performance limitations would limit the actual number of devices that could be managed by a single VMS server.