Table Of Contents
Prerequisites for Ensuring MPLS VPN Clients Communicate over the MPLS VPN Backbone
Restrictions for Ensuring MPLS VPN Clients Communicate over the MPLS VPN Backbone
Information About Ensuring MPLS VPN Clients Communicate over the MPLS VPN Backbone
Introduction to MPLS VPNs Using OSPF Between PE and CE Routers
OSPF Uses Backdoor Paths to Communicate Between VPN Sites
Sham-Links Direct Traffic Between VPN Sites over the MPLS VPN Backbone
How to Ensure That MPLS VPN Clients Communicate over the MPLS VPN Backbone
Configuration Examples for Ensuring MPLS VPN Clients Communicate over the MPLS VPN Backbone
Feature Information for Ensuring MPLS VPN Clients Communicate over the MPLS VPN Backbone
Ensuring That MPLS VPN Clients Using OSPF Communicate over the MPLS VPN Backbone Instead of Through Backdoor Links
This module describes how to configure a sham-link that ensures traffic travels between Virtual Private Network (VPN) client sites over the Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) VPN backbone. This feature is for VPNs that run Open Shortest Path First (OSPF) between the provider edge (PE) and customer edge (CE) routers. By default, OSPF uses backdoor paths between VPN sites, not the MPLS VPN backbone.
Module History
This module was first published on May 2, 2005, and last updated on May 2, 2005.
Finding Feature Information in This Module
Your Cisco IOS software release may not support all features. To find information about feature support and configuration, use the "Feature Information for Ensuring MPLS VPN Clients Communicate over the MPLS VPN Backbone" section.
Contents
•
Prerequisites for Ensuring MPLS VPN Clients Communicate over the MPLS VPN Backbone
•
•
•
•
•
Prerequisites for Ensuring MPLS VPN Clients Communicate over the MPLS VPN Backbone
Before you can configure a sham-link in an MPLS VPN, you must first enable OSPF as follows:
•
•
•
Restrictions for Ensuring MPLS VPN Clients Communicate over the MPLS VPN Backbone
When OSPF is used as a protocol between PE and CE routers, the OSPF metric is preserved when routes are advertised over the VPN backbone. The metric is used on the remote PE routers to select the correct route. For this reason, you should not modify the metric value when OSPF is redistributed to Border Gateway Protocol (BGP), and when BGP is redistributed to OSPF. If you modify the metric value, routing loops may occur.
Information About Ensuring MPLS VPN Clients Communicate over the MPLS VPN Backbone
Before configuring this feature, you should understand the following concepts:
•
•
•
Introduction to MPLS VPNs Using OSPF Between PE and CE Routers
In an MPLS VPN configuration, the OSPF protocol is one way you can connect CE routers to PE routers in the VPN backbone. OSPF is often used by customers that run OSPF as their intrasite routing protocol, subscribe to a VPN service, and want to exchange routing information between their sites using OSPF (during migration or on a permanent basis) over an MPLS VPN backbone.
Figure 1 shows an example of how VPN client sites (areas 0, 1, 2, and 3) that run OSPF can connect over an MPLS VPN backbone.
Figure 1 OSPF Connectivity Between VPN Client Sites and an MPLS VPN Backbone
When OSPF is used to connect PE and CE routers, all routing information learned from a VPN site is placed in the VPN routing and forwarding (VRF) instance associated with the incoming interface. The PE routers that attach to the VPN use the BGP to distribute VPN routes to each other. A CE router can then learn the routes to other sites in the VPN by peering with its attached PE router. The MPLS VPN backbone provides an additional level of routing hierarchy to interconnect the VPN sites running OSPF.
When OSPF routes are propagated over the MPLS VPN backbone, additional information about the prefix in the form of BGP extended communities (route type, domain ID extended communities) is appended to the BGP update. This community information is used by the receiving PE router to decide the type of link-state advertisement (LSA) to be generated when the BGP route is redistributed to the OSPF PECE process. In this way, internal OSPF routes that belong to the same VPN and are advertised over the VPN backbone are seen as interarea routes on the remote sites.
OSPF Uses Backdoor Paths to Communicate Between VPN Sites
Although OSPF PECE connections assume that the only path between two client sites is across the MPLS VPN backbone, backdoor paths between VPN sites may exist. For instance, in Figure 2, Vienna, Stockholm, Brighton, and Winchester can communicate through backdoor paths instead of using the MPLS VPN backbone.
If the sites belong to the same OSPF area, the backdoor path will always be selected, because OSPF prefers intra-area paths to interarea paths. (PE routers advertise OSPF routes learned over the VPN backbone as interarea paths.) For this reason, OSPF backdoor paths between VPN sites must be taken into account so that routing is performed based on policy.
Figure 2 Backdoor Paths Between OSPF Client Sites
For example, Figure 2 shows three client sites, each with backdoor links. Because each site runs OSPF within the same Area 1 configuration, all routing between the three sites uses the backdoor paths, rather than the MPLS VPN backbone.
The following example shows BGP routing table entries for the Winchester router (prefix 10.3.1.7/32) from the standpoint of the PE1 router in Figure 2. Prefix 10.3.1.7 is the loopback interface of the Winchester CE router. As shown in bold in this example, the loopback interface is learned via BGP from PE2 and PE3. It is also generated through redistribution into BGP on PE1.
PE1# show ip bgp vpnv4 all 10.3.1.7BGP routing table entry for 100:251:10.3.1.7/32, version 58Paths: (3 available, best #2)Advertised to non peer-group peers:10.3.1.2 10.3.1.5Local10.3.1.5 (metric 30) from 10.3.1.5 (10.3.1.5)Origin incomplete, metric 22, localpref 100, valid, internalExtended Community: RT:1:793 OSPF DOMAIN ID:0.0.0.100 OSPFRT:1:2:0 OSPF 2Local10.2.1.38 from 0.0.0.0 (10.3.1.6)Origin incomplete, metric 86, localpref 100, weight 32768,valid, sourced, bestExtended Community: RT:1:793 OSPF DOMAIN ID:0.0.0.100 OSPFRT:1:2:0 OSPF 2Local10.3.1.2 (metric 30) from 10.3.1.2 (10.3.1.2)Origin incomplete, metric 11, localpref 100, valid, internalExtended Community: RT:1:793 OSPF DOMAIN ID:0.0.0.100 OSPFRT:1:2:0 OSPF 2Within BGP, the locally generated route (10.2.1.38) is considered to be the best route.
However, as shown in bold in the next example, the VRF routing table shows that the selected path is learned via OSPF with a next hop of 10.2.1.38, which is the Vienna CE router.
PE1# show ip route vrf ospf 10.3.1.7Routing entry for 10.3.1.7/32Known via "ospf 100", distance 110, metric 86, type intra areaRedistributing via bgp 215Advertised by bgp 215Last update from 10.2.1.38 on Serial0/0/0, 00:00:17 agoRouting Descriptor Blocks:* 10.2.1.38, from 10.3.1.7, 00:00:17 ago, via Serial0/0/0Route metric is 86, traffic share count is 1This path is selected because:
•
•
If the backdoor paths between sites are used only for backup purposes and do not participate in the VPN service, then the default route selection is acceptable. You can set up the OSPF cost configured with a sham-link to send VPN site traffic over a backdoor path.
Sham-Links Direct Traffic Between VPN Sites over the MPLS VPN Backbone
To ensure that VPN sites that belong to the same OSPF area and share an OSPF backdoor path communicate with each other using the MPLS VPN backbone, you must create a sham-link. (If no backdoor path exists between the sites, no sham-link is required.) A sham-link is an additional OSPF intra-area (logical) link between ingress and egress VRFs on the PE routers that connect to the CE routers of the VPN sites.
Figure 3 shows a sample sham-link between PE1 and PE2. You associate a cost with each sham-link to force traffic to use the sham-link rather than the backdoor path. When a sham-link is configured between PE routers, the PE routers can populate the VRF routing table with the OSPF routes learned over the sham-link.
Figure 3 Using a Sham-Link Between PE Routers to Connect OSPF Client Sites
Because the sham-link is seen as an intra-area link between PE routers, an OSPF adjacency is created and database exchange (for the particular OSPF process) occurs across the link. The PE router can then flood LSAs between sites from across the MPLS VPN backbone. As a result, the desired intra-area connectivity is created.
How to Ensure That MPLS VPN Clients Communicate over the MPLS VPN Backbone
This section explains how to create a sham-link on an MPLS VPN PE router. Perform this task on both PE routers that share the sham-link.
Prerequisites
Before you create a sham-link between PE routers in an MPLS VPN, you must:
•
–
–
–
You can use the /32 address for other sham-links.
•
SUMMARY STEPS
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
DETAILED STEPS
Example
The following is sample output from the show ip ospf sham-links command:
Router# show ip ospf sham-linksSham Link OSPF_SL0 to address 10.2.1.2 is upArea 1 source address 10.2.1.1Run as demand circuitDoNotAge LSA allowed. Cost of using 40 State POINT_TO_POINT,Timer intervals configured, Hello 10, Dead 40, Wait 40,Hello due in 00:00:04Adjacency State FULL (Hello suppressed)Index 2/2, retransmission queue length 4, number of retransmission 0First 0x63311F3C(205)/0x63311FE4(59) Next0x63311F3C(205)/0x63311FE4(59)Last retransmission scan length is 0, maximum is 0Last retransmission scan time is 0 msec, maximum is 0 msecLink State retransmission due in 360 msecConfiguration Examples for Ensuring MPLS VPN Clients Communicate over the MPLS VPN Backbone
The following example shows how to configure a sham-link between two PE routers:
Router1(config)# interface loopback 1Router1(config-if)# ip vrf forwarding ospfRouter1(config-if)# ip address 10.2.1.1 255.255.255.255!Router2(config)# interface loopback 1Router2(config-if)# ip vrf forwarding ospfRouter2(config-if)# ip address 10.2.1.2 255.255.255.255!Router1(config)# router ospf 100 vrf ospfRouter1(config-if)# area 1 sham-link 10.2.1.1 10.2.1.2 cost 40!Router2(config)# router ospf 100 vrf ospfRouter2(config-if)# area 1 sham-link 10.2.1.2 10.2.1.1 cost 40This example shows how a sham-link is used only to affect the OSPF intra-area path selection of the PE and CE routers. The PE router also uses the information received from Multiprotocol BGP (MP-BGP) to set the outgoing label stack of incoming packets, and to decide to which egress PE router to label-switch the packets.
Figure 4 shows a sample MPLS VPN topology in which a sham-link configuration is necessary. A VPN client has three sites, each with a backdoor path. Two sham-links have been configured, one between PE1 and PE2, and another between PE2 and PE3. A sham-link between PE1 and PE3 is not necessary in this configuration, because the Vienna and Winchester sites do not share a backdoor path.
Figure 4 Sham-Link Example
The following example shows the forwarding that occurs between sites from the standpoint of how PE1 views the 10.3.1.7/32 prefix, the loopback1 interface of the Winchester CE router in Figure 4.
PE1# show ip bgp vpnv4 all 10.3.1.7BGP routing table entry for 100:251:10.3.1.7/32, version 124Paths: (1 available, best #1)Local10.3.1.2 (metric 30) from 10.3.1.2 (10.3.1.2)Origin incomplete, metric 11, localpref 100, valid, internal,bestExtended Community: RT:1:793 OSPF DOMAIN ID:0.0.0.100 OSPFRT:1:2:0 OSPF 2PE1# show ip route vrf ospf 10.3.1.7Routing entry for 10.3.1.7/32Known via "ospf 100", distance 110, metric 13, type intra areaRedistributing via bgp 215Last update from 10.3.1.2 00:12:59 agoRouting Descriptor Blocks:10.3.1.2 (Default-IP-Routing-Table), from 10.3.1.7, 00:12:59 agoThe next example shows forwarding information in which the next hop for the route, 10.3.1.2, is the PE3 router rather than the PE2 router (which is the best path according to OSPF). The OSPF route is not redistributed to BGP on the PE, because the other end of the sham-link already redistributed the route to BGP and there is no need for duplication. The OSPF sham-link is used only to influence intra-area path selection. When sending traffic to a particular destination, the PE router uses the MP-BGP forwarding information.
PE1# show ip bgp vpnv4 all tag | begin 10.3.1.710.3.1.7/32 10.3.1.2 notag/38PE1# show mpls forwarding 10.3.1.2Local Outgoing Prefix Bytes label Outgoing Next Hoplabel label or VC or Tunnel Id switched interface31 42 10.3.1.2/32 0 PO3/0/0 point2pointPE1# show ip cef vrf ospf 10.3.1.710.3.1.7/32, version 73, epoch 0, cached adjacency to POS3/0/00 packets, 0 bytestag information setlocal tag: VPN-route-headfast tag rewrite with PO3/0/0, point2point, tags imposed: {42 38}via 10.3.1.2, 0 dependencies, recursivenext hop 10.1.1.17, POS3/0/0 via 10.3.1.2/32valid cached adjacencytag rewrite with PO3/0/0, point2point, tags imposed: {42 38}If a prefix is learned across the sham-link and the path via the sham-link is selected as the best, the PE router does not generate an MP-BGP update for the prefix. It is not possible to route traffic from one sham-link over another sham-link.
In the following example, PE2 shows how an MP-BGP update for the prefix is not generated. Although 10.3.1.7/32 has been learned via OSPF across the sham-link as shown in bold, no local generation of a route into BGP is performed. The only entry within the BGP table is the MP-BGP update received from PE3 (the egress PE router for the 10.3.1.7/32 prefix).
PE2# show ip route vrf ospf 10.3.1.7Routing entry for 10.3.1.7/32Known via "ospf 100", distance 110, metric 12, type intra areaRedistributing via bgp 215Last update from 10.3.1.2 00:00:10 agoRouting Descriptor Blocks:* 10.3.1.2 (Default-IP-Routing-Table), from 10.3.1.7, 00:00:10 agoRoute metric is 12, traffic share count is 1PE2# show ip bgp vpnv4 all 10.3.1.7BGP routing table entry for 100:251:10.3.1.7/32, version 166Paths: (1 available, best #1)Not advertised to any peerLocal10.3.1.2 (metric 30) from 10.3.1.2 (10.3.1.2)Origin incomplete, metric 11, localpref 100, valid, internal,bestExtended Community: RT:1:793 OSPF DOMAIN ID:0.0.0.100 OSPFRT:1:2:0 OSPF 2The PE router uses the information received from MP-BGP to set the ongoing label stack of incoming packets, and to decide to which egress PE router to label-switch the packets.
Additional References
The following sections provide references related to MPLS VPNs.
Related Documents
Basic MPLS VPNs
MPLS VPN Carrier Supporting Carrier
•
MPLS VPN InterAutonomous Systems
•
Standards
No new or modified standards are supported by this feature, and support for existing standards has not been modified by this feature.
—
MIBs
RFCs
Technical Assistance
Feature Information for Ensuring MPLS VPN Clients Communicate over the MPLS VPN Backbone
Table 1 lists the features in this module and provides links to specific configuration information.
Not all commands may be available in your Cisco IOS software release. For details on when support for specific commands was introduced, see the command reference documents.
Cisco IOS software images are specific to a Cisco IOS software release, a feature set, and a platform. Use Cisco Feature Navigator to find information about platform support and Cisco IOS software image support. Access Cisco Feature Navigator at http://www.cisco.com/go/fn. You must have an account on Cisco.com. If you do not have an account or have forgotten your username or password, click Cancel at the login dialog box and follow the instructions that appear.
Note
Table 1 Feature Information for Ensuring MPLS VPN Clients Communicate over the MPLS VPN Backbone
Ensuring MPLS VPN Clients Communicate over the MPLS VPN Backbone
12.2(8)T
12.0(21)ST
12.0(22)S
This feature allows you to configure a sham-link that directs traffic between Virtual Private Network (VPN) client sites over the Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) VPN backbone.
The following sections provide information about this feature:
•
•
•
•
Any Internet Protocol (IP) addresses used in this document are not intended to be actual addresses. Any examples, command display output, and figures included in the document are shown for illustrative purposes only. Any use of actual IP addresses in illustrative content is unintentional and coincidental.
© 2007 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.
