O túnel de site para site do IPSec oscila sempre que qualquer alteração é feita no modelo de dispositivo

Introduction

Este documento descreve o problema típico que ocorre quando os túneis IPSec baseados em IKE (Internet Key Exchange, Intercâmbio de chave de Internet) site a site (ou também comumente chamados de LAN a LAN) são sincronizados em cada atualização de modelo de dispositivo em um controlador vManage, explica as causas básicas e fornece uma solução para o problema.

Problema

O túnel IPSec baseado em IKE oscila sempre que o modelo do dispositivo é atualizado no vManage. As alterações não podem estar relacionadas ao túnel IPSec de site para site baseado em IKE, mas fazem com que o túnel bata. O problema pode expor ainda mais mal se, por exemplo, o peering eBGP é executado sobre o túnel IPSec. Devido ao rastreamento da interface do eBGP, o vizinho também oscila e, como consequência, todas as rotas são retiradas e reinstaladas novamente. Isso causa interrupção para o tráfego por sua vez. Por exemplo, essa é a única alteração feita no modelo como confirmada pela visualização da configuração como mostrado na imagem.

Aqui está como se parece nos registros:

tail /var/log/vsyslog -f -n 0
local7.info: Nov 26 15:21:08 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 FTMD[2202]: %Viptela-BRU-SDW-V5K-01-ftmd-6-INFO-1400002: Notification: 11/26/2019 14:21:8 fib-update severity-level:minor host-name:"BRU-SDW-V5K-01" system-ip:10.10.10.242 vpn-id:1 address-family-type:ipv4 fib-last-update-time:2019-11-26T15:18:09+00:00
local7.info: Nov 26 15:21:13 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 BGP.1[6505]: %ADJCHANGE: neighbor 10.0.0.1 Down
local7.info: Nov 26 15:21:13 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 FTMD[2202]: %Viptela-BRU-SDW-V5K-01-FTMD-6-INFO-1000001: VPN 1 Interface ipsec1 DOWN
local7.info: Nov 26 15:21:13 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 CFGMGR[2195]: %Viptela-BRU-SDW-V5K-01-cfgmgr-6-INFO-1400002: Notification: 11/26/2019 14:21:13 bgp-peer-state-change severity-level:major host-name:"BRU-SDW-V5K-01" system-ip:10.10.10.242 vpn-id:1 peer:10.0.0.1 bgp-new-state:idle local-address:10.0.0.2 local-routerid:10.10.10.242 peer-routerid:192.168.9.1
local7.info: Nov 26 15:21:13 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 FTMD[2202]: %Viptela-BRU-SDW-V5K-01-ftmd-6-INFO-1400002: Notification: 11/26/2019 14:21:13 interface-state-change severity-level:major host-name:"BRU-SDW-V5K-01" system-ip:10.10.10.242 vpn-id:1 if-name:"ipsec1" new-state:down
local7.info: Nov 26 15:21:13 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 CFGMGR[2195]: %Viptela-BRU-SDW-V5K-01-cfgmgr-6-INFO-1400002: Notification: 11/26/2019 14:21:13 system-commit severity-level:minor host-name:"BRU-SDW-V5K-01" system-ip:10.10.10.242 user-name:"vmanage-admin"
local7.info: Nov 26 15:21:14 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 FTMD[2202]: %Viptela-BRU-SDW-V5K-01-FTMD-6-INFO-1000001: VPN 1 Interface ipsec1 UP. Speed 10 Duplex Full
local7.info: Nov 26 15:21:14 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 FTMD[2202]: %Viptela-BRU-SDW-V5K-01-ftmd-6-INFO-1400002: Notification: 11/26/2019 14:21:14 interface-state-change severity-level:major host-name:"BRU-SDW-V5K-01" system-ip:10.10.10.242 vpn-id:1 if-name:"ipsec1" new-state:up
local7.warn: Nov 26 15:21:18 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 BGP.1[6505]: 10.0.0.1 unrecognized capability code: 70 - ignored
local7.info: Nov 26 15:21:18 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 BGP.1[6505]: %ADJCHANGE: neighbor 10.0.0.1 Up
local7.info: Nov 26 15:21:18 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 CFGMGR[2195]: %Viptela-BRU-SDW-V5K-01-cfgmgr-6-INFO-1400002: Notification: 11/26/2019 14:21:18 bgp-peer-state-change severity-level:major host-name:"BRU-SDW-V5K-01" system-ip:10.10.10.242 vpn-id:1 peer:10.0.0.1 bgp-new-state:established local-address:10.0.0.2 local-routerid:10.10.10.242 peer-routerid:192.168.9.1

Como você pode ver, o vizinho BGP oscilou. No /var/log/messages você pode ver mais informações:

auth.info: Nov 26 15:24:38 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 sshd[27423]: Accepted publickey for vmanage-admin from 10.10.10.253 port 40555 ssh2: RSA SHA256:ySiw9uiBxffv6HrO0iwDE3jm05mmO4IQoc+qgzfuyd4
authpriv.info: Nov 26 15:24:38 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 sshd[27423]: pam_unix(sshd:session): session opened for user vmanage-admin by (uid=0)
local1.info: Nov 26 15:24:38 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 confd[1310]: audit user: vmanage-admin/1232 assigned to groups: vmanage-admin,log
local1.info: Nov 26 15:24:38 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 confd[1310]: netconf id=1232 new tcp session for user "vmanage-admin" from 10.10.10.253
local1.info: Nov 26 15:24:39 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 confd[1310]: netconf id=1232 got rpc: {urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:netconf:base:1.0}get attrs: nc:message-id="1"
local1.info: Nov 26 15:24:39 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 confd[1310]: netconf id=1232 get attrs: nc:message-id="1"
local1.info: Nov 26 15:24:39 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 confd[1310]: netconf id=1232 sending rpc-reply, attrs: nc:message-id="1"
local1.info: Nov 26 15:24:39 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 confd[1310]: netconf id=1232 got rpc: {urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:netconf:base:1.0}get attrs: nc:message-id="2"
local1.info: Nov 26 15:24:39 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 confd[1310]: netconf id=1232 get attrs: nc:message-id="2"
local1.info: Nov 26 15:24:39 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 confd[1310]: netconf id=1232 sending rpc-reply, attrs: nc:message-id="2"
local1.info: Nov 26 15:24:39 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 confd[1310]: netconf id=1232 got rpc: {urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:netconf:base:1.0}get attrs: nc:message-id="3"
local1.info: Nov 26 15:24:39 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 confd[1310]: netconf id=1232 get attrs: nc:message-id="3"
local1.info: Nov 26 15:24:39 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 confd[1310]: netconf id=1232 sending rpc-reply, attrs: nc:message-id="3"
local1.info: Nov 26 15:24:39 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 confd[1310]: netconf id=1232 got rpc: {urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:netconf:base:1.0}get attrs: nc:message-id="4"
local1.info: Nov 26 15:24:39 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 confd[1310]: netconf id=1232 get attrs: nc:message-id="4"
local1.info: Nov 26 15:24:39 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 confd[1310]: netconf id=1232 sending rpc-reply, attrs: nc:message-id="4"
local1.info: Nov 26 15:24:39 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 confd[1310]: netconf id=1232 got rpc: {urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:netconf:base:1.0}lock attrs: nc:message-id="5"
local1.info: Nov 26 15:24:39 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 confd[1310]: netconf id=1232 lock target=candidate attrs: nc:message-id="5"
local1.info: Nov 26 15:24:39 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 confd[1310]: netconf id=1232 sending rpc-reply, attrs: nc:message-id="5"
local1.info: Nov 26 15:24:39 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 confd[1310]: netconf id=1232 got rpc: {urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:netconf:base:1.0}copy-config attrs: nc:message-id="6"
local1.info: Nov 26 15:24:39 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 confd[1310]: netconf id=1232 copy-config source=running target=candidate attrs: nc:message-id="6"
local1.info: Nov 26 15:24:39 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 confd[1310]: netconf id=1232 sending rpc-reply, attrs: nc:message-id="6"
local1.info: Nov 26 15:24:39 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 confd[1310]: netconf id=1232 got rpc: {urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:netconf:base:1.0}edit-config attrs: nc:message-id="7"
local1.info: Nov 26 15:24:39 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 confd[1310]: netconf id=1232 edit-config target=candidate attrs: nc:message-id="7"
local1.info: Nov 26 15:24:39 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 confd[1310]: netconf id=1232 sending rpc-reply, attrs: nc:message-id="7"
local1.info: Nov 26 15:24:39 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 confd[1310]: netconf id=1232 got rpc: {urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:netconf:base:1.0}validate attrs: nc:message-id="8"
local1.info: Nov 26 15:24:39 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 confd[1310]: netconf id=1232 validate source=candidate attrs: nc:message-id="8"
local1.info: Nov 26 15:24:39 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 confd[1310]: netconf id=1232 sending rpc-reply, attrs: nc:message-id="8"
local1.info: Nov 26 15:24:39 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 confd[1310]: netconf id=1232 got rpc: {urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:netconf:base:1.0}validate attrs: nc:message-id="9"
local1.info: Nov 26 15:24:39 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 confd[1310]: netconf id=1232 validate source=inline attrs: nc:message-id="9"
local1.info: Nov 26 15:24:39 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 confd[1310]: netconf id=1232 sending rpc-reply, attrs: nc:message-id="9"
local1.info: Nov 26 15:24:39 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 confd[1310]: netconf id=1232 got rpc: {urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:netconf:base:1.0}edit-config attrs: nc:message-id="10"
local1.info: Nov 26 15:24:39 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 confd[1310]: netconf id=1232 edit-config target=candidate attrs: nc:message-id="10"
local1.info: Nov 26 15:24:39 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 confd[1310]: netconf id=1232 sending rpc-reply, attrs: nc:message-id="10"
local1.info: Nov 26 15:24:39 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 confd[1310]: netconf id=1232 got rpc: {urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:netconf:base:1.0}commit attrs: nc:message-id="11"
local1.info: Nov 26 15:24:39 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 confd[1310]: netconf id=1232 commit attrs: nc:message-id="11"
daemon.info: Nov 26 15:24:39 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 charon: 14[CFG] unloaded shared key with id 'ipsec1_1'
daemon.info: Nov 26 15:24:39 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 charon: 07[CFG] vici terminate IKE_SA 'ipsec1_1'
daemon.info: Nov 26 15:24:39 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 charon: 06[IKE] closing CHILD_SA child_ipsec1_1{8} with SPIs 00000107_i (6247108 bytes) 12107f74_o (6235990 bytes) and TS 0.0.0.0/0 === 0.0.0.0/0
daemon.info: Nov 26 15:24:39 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 charon: 06[IKE] closing CHILD_SA child_ipsec1_1{8} with SPIs 00000107_i (6247108 bytes) 12107f74_o (6235990 bytes) and TS 0.0.0.0/0 === 0.0.0.0/0
daemon.info: Nov 26 15:24:39 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 charon: 06[KNL] Deleting SAD entry with SPI 00000107
daemon.info: Nov 26 15:24:39 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 charon: 06[KNL] Deleting SAD entry with SPI 12107f74
daemon.info: Nov 26 15:24:39 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 charon: 06[IKE] sending DELETE for ESP CHILD_SA with SPI 00000107
daemon.info: Nov 26 15:24:39 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 charon: 06[ENC] generating INFORMATIONAL_V1 request 226869087 [ HASH D ]
daemon.info: Nov 26 15:24:39 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 charon: 06[NET] sending packet: from 192.168.9.242[4500] to 192.168.9.1[4500] (76 bytes)
daemon.info: Nov 26 15:24:39 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 charon: 06[IKE] closing CHILD_SA child_ipsec1_1{9} with SPIs 00000108_i (6247912 bytes) 1286959a_o (6235990 bytes) and TS 0.0.0.0/0 === 0.0.0.0/0
daemon.info: Nov 26 15:24:39 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 charon: 06[IKE] closing CHILD_SA child_ipsec1_1{9} with SPIs 00000108_i (6247912 bytes) 1286959a_o (6235990 bytes) and TS 0.0.0.0/0 === 0.0.0.0/0
daemon.info: Nov 26 15:24:39 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 charon: 06[KNL] Deleting SAD entry with SPI 00000108
local7.info: Nov 26 15:24:39 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 BGP.1[6505]: %ADJCHANGE: neighbor 10.0.0.1 Down
daemon.info: Nov 26 15:24:39 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 charon: 06[KNL] Deleting SAD entry with SPI 1286959a
local7.info: Nov 26 15:24:39 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 FTMD[2202]: %Viptela-BRU-SDW-V5K-01-FTMD-6-INFO-1000001: VPN 1 Interface ipsec1 DOWN
daemon.info: Nov 26 15:24:39 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 charon: 06[IKE] sending DELETE for ESP CHILD_SA with SPI 00000108
daemon.info: Nov 26 15:24:39 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 charon: 06[ENC] generating INFORMATIONAL_V1 request 2972009957 [ HASH D ]
daemon.info: Nov 26 15:24:39 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 charon: 06[NET] sending packet: from 192.168.9.242[4500] to 192.168.9.1[4500] (76 bytes)
daemon.info: Nov 26 15:24:39 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 charon: 06[IKE] deleting IKE_SA ipsec1_1[10] between 192.168.9.242[192.168.9.242]...192.168.9.1[192.168.9.1]
daemon.info: Nov 26 15:24:39 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 charon: 06[IKE] deleting IKE_SA ipsec1_1[10] between 192.168.9.242[192.168.9.242]...192.168.9.1[192.168.9.1]
daemon.info: Nov 26 15:24:39 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 charon: 06[IKE] sending DELETE for IKE_SA ipsec1_1[10]
daemon.info: Nov 26 15:24:39 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 charon: 06[ENC] generating INFORMATIONAL_V1 request 956819772 [ HASH D ]
daemon.info: Nov 26 15:24:39 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 charon: 06[NET] sending packet: from 192.168.9.242[4500] to 192.168.9.1[4500] (92 bytes)
local1.info: Nov 26 15:24:39 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 confd[1310]: audit user: vmanage-admin/1232 commit thandle 4552 begin
local1.info: Nov 26 15:24:39 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 confd[1310]: audit user: vmanage-admin/1232 commit thandle 4552 /viptela-vpn:vpn/vpn-instance{0}/interface{ge0/0}/description set to "mpls"
local1.info: Nov 26 15:24:39 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 confd[1310]: audit user: vmanage-admin/1232 commit thandle 4552 /viptela-vpn:vpn/vpn-instance{1}/interface{ipsec1}/ike/authentication-type/pre-shared-key/pre-shared-secret set to "****"
local1.info: Nov 26 15:24:39 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 confd[1310]: audit user: vmanage-admin/1232 commit thandle 4552 /viptela-system:system/pseudo-confirm-commit set to "300"
local1.info: Nov 26 15:24:39 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 confd[1310]: audit user: vmanage-admin/1232 commit thandle 4552 end
local1.info: Nov 26 15:24:39 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 confd[1310]: netconf id=1232 sending rpc-reply, attrs: nc:message-id="11"
local7.info: Nov 26 15:24:39 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 CFGMGR[2195]: %Viptela-BRU-SDW-V5K-01-cfgmgr-6-INFO-1400002: Notification: 11/26/2019 14:24:39 bgp-peer-state-change severity-level:major host-name:"BRU-SDW-V5K-01" system-ip:10.10.10.242 vpn-id:1 peer:10.0.0.1 bgp-new-state:idle local-address:10.0.0.2 local-routerid:10.10.10.242 peer-routerid:192.168.9.1
local1.info: Nov 26 15:24:39 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 confd[1310]: netconf id=38 sending notification {http://viptela.com/vpn}bgp-peer-state-change
local7.info: Nov 26 15:24:39 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 FTMD[2202]: %Viptela-BRU-SDW-V5K-01-ftmd-6-INFO-1400002: Notification: 11/26/2019 14:24:39 interface-state-change severity-level:major host-name:"BRU-SDW-V5K-01" system-ip:10.10.10.242 vpn-id:1 if-name:"ipsec1" new-state:down
local1.info: Nov 26 15:24:39 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 confd[1310]: netconf id=38 sending notification {http://viptela.com/vpn}interface-state-change
local7.info: Nov 26 15:24:39 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 CFGMGR[2195]: %Viptela-BRU-SDW-V5K-01-cfgmgr-6-INFO-1400002: Notification: 11/26/2019 14:24:39 system-commit severity-level:minor host-name:"BRU-SDW-V5K-01" system-ip:10.10.10.242 user-name:"vmanage-admin"
local1.info: Nov 26 15:24:39 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 confd[1310]: netconf id=38 sending notification {http://viptela.com/system}system-commit
daemon.info: Nov 26 15:24:40 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 charon: 14[CFG] added vici connection: ipsec1_1
daemon.info: Nov 26 15:24:40 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 charon: 14[CFG] loaded IKE shared key with id 'ipsec1_1' for: '192.168.9.242', '192.168.9.1'
daemon.info: Nov 26 15:24:40 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 charon: 14[CFG] vici initiate 'child_ipsec1_1'
daemon.info: Nov 26 15:24:40 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 charon: 15[IKE] initiating Main Mode IKE_SA ipsec1_1[11] to 192.168.9.1
daemon.info: Nov 26 15:24:40 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 charon: 15[IKE] initiating Main Mode IKE_SA ipsec1_1[11] to 192.168.9.1
daemon.info: Nov 26 15:24:40 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 charon: 15[ENC] generating ID_PROT request 0 [ SA V V V V V ]
daemon.info: Nov 26 15:24:40 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 charon: 15[NET] sending packet: from 192.168.9.242[500] to 192.168.9.1[500] (180 bytes)
daemon.info: Nov 26 15:24:40 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 charon: 06[NET] received packet: from 192.168.9.1[500] to 192.168.9.242[500] (104 bytes)
daemon.info: Nov 26 15:24:40 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 charon: 06[ENC] parsed ID_PROT response 0 [ SA V ]
daemon.info: Nov 26 15:24:40 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 charon: 06[IKE] received NAT-T (RFC 3947) vendor ID
daemon.info: Nov 26 15:24:40 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 charon: 06[ENC] generating ID_PROT request 0 [ KE No NAT-D NAT-D ]
daemon.info: Nov 26 15:24:40 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 charon: 06[NET] sending packet: from 192.168.9.242[500] to 192.168.9.1[500] (244 bytes)
daemon.info: Nov 26 15:24:40 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 charon: 08[NET] received packet: from 192.168.9.1[500] to 192.168.9.242[500] (304 bytes)
daemon.info: Nov 26 15:24:40 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 charon: 08[ENC] parsed ID_PROT response 0 [ KE No V V V V NAT-D NAT-D ]
daemon.info: Nov 26 15:24:40 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 charon: 08[IKE] received Cisco Unity vendor ID
daemon.info: Nov 26 15:24:40 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 charon: 08[IKE] received DPD vendor ID
daemon.info: Nov 26 15:24:40 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 charon: 08[ENC] received unknown vendor ID: 5e:b0:e6:33:27:48:bf:3b:80:a6:a7:d5:cd:37:64:1f
daemon.info: Nov 26 15:24:40 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 charon: 08[IKE] received XAuth vendor ID
daemon.info: Nov 26 15:24:40 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 charon: 08[IKE] faking NAT situation to enforce UDP encapsulation
daemon.info: Nov 26 15:24:40 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 charon: 08[ENC] generating ID_PROT request 0 [ ID HASH N(INITIAL_CONTACT) ]
daemon.info: Nov 26 15:24:40 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 charon: 08[NET] sending packet: from 192.168.9.242[4500] to 192.168.9.1[4500] (108 bytes)
daemon.info: Nov 26 15:24:40 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 charon: 07[NET] received packet: from 192.168.9.1[4500] to 192.168.9.242[4500] (76 bytes)
daemon.info: Nov 26 15:24:40 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 charon: 07[ENC] parsed ID_PROT response 0 [ ID HASH ]
daemon.info: Nov 26 15:24:40 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 charon: 07[IKE] IKE_SA ipsec1_1[11] established between 192.168.9.242[192.168.9.242]...192.168.9.1[192.168.9.1]
daemon.info: Nov 26 15:24:40 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 charon: 07[IKE] IKE_SA ipsec1_1[11] established between 192.168.9.242[192.168.9.242]...192.168.9.1[192.168.9.1]
daemon.info: Nov 26 15:24:40 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 charon: 07[IKE] scheduling rekeying in 13069s
daemon.info: Nov 26 15:24:40 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 charon: 07[IKE] maximum IKE_SA lifetime 14509s
daemon.info: Nov 26 15:24:40 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 charon: 07[ENC] generating QUICK_MODE request 1775307947 [ HASH SA No KE ID ID ]
daemon.info: Nov 26 15:24:40 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 charon: 07[NET] sending packet: from 192.168.9.242[4500] to 192.168.9.1[4500] (316 bytes)
daemon.info: Nov 26 15:24:40 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 charon: 11[NET] received packet: from 192.168.9.1[4500] to 192.168.9.242[4500] (348 bytes)
daemon.info: Nov 26 15:24:40 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 charon: 11[ENC] parsed QUICK_MODE response 1775307947 [ HASH SA No KE ID ID N((24576)) ]
daemon.info: Nov 26 15:24:40 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 charon: 11[KNL] add SAD entry with SPI 00000109
daemon.info: Nov 26 15:24:40 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 charon: 11[KNL] add SAD entry with SPI d8c172fc
daemon.info: Nov 26 15:24:40 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 charon: 11[IKE] CHILD_SA child_ipsec1_1{10} established with SPIs 00000109_i d8c172fc_o and TS 0.0.0.0/0 === 0.0.0.0/0
daemon.info: Nov 26 15:24:40 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 charon: 11[IKE] CHILD_SA child_ipsec1_1{10} established with SPIs 00000109_i d8c172fc_o and TS 0.0.0.0/0 === 0.0.0.0/0
local7.info: Nov 26 15:24:40 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 FTMD[2202]: %Viptela-BRU-SDW-V5K-01-FTMD-6-INFO-1000001: VPN 1 Interface ipsec1 UP. Speed 10 Duplex Full
daemon.info: Nov 26 15:24:40 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 charon: 11[ENC] generating QUICK_MODE request 1775307947 [ HASH ]
daemon.info: Nov 26 15:24:40 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 charon: 11[NET] sending packet: from 192.168.9.242[4500] to 192.168.9.1[4500] (60 bytes)
local7.info: Nov 26 15:24:40 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 FTMD[2202]: %Viptela-BRU-SDW-V5K-01-ftmd-6-INFO-1400002: Notification: 11/26/2019 14:24:40 interface-state-change severity-level:major host-name:"BRU-SDW-V5K-01" system-ip:10.10.10.242 vpn-id:1 if-name:"ipsec1" new-state:up
local1.info: Nov 26 15:24:40 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 confd[1310]: netconf id=38 sending notification {http://viptela.com/vpn}interface-state-change
local1.info: Nov 26 15:24:44 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 confd[1310]: netconf id=1232 got rpc: {urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:netconf:base:1.0}unlock attrs: nc:message-id="12"
local1.info: Nov 26 15:24:44 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 confd[1310]: netconf id=1232 unlock target=candidate attrs: nc:message-id="12"
local1.info: Nov 26 15:24:44 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 confd[1310]: netconf id=1232 sending rpc-reply, attrs: nc:message-id="12"
local1.info: Nov 26 15:24:46 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 confd[1310]: netconf id=1232 close-session attrs: nc:message-id="13"
local1.info: Nov 26 15:24:46 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 confd[1310]: netconf id=1232 sending rpc-reply, attrs: nc:message-id="13"
auth.info: Nov 26 15:24:47 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 sshd[27428]: Received disconnect from 10.10.10.253 port 40555:11: Closed due to user request.
auth.info: Nov 26 15:24:47 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 sshd[27428]: Disconnected from user vmanage-admin 10.10.10.253 port 40555
authpriv.info: Nov 26 15:24:47 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 sshd[27423]: pam_unix(sshd:session): session closed for user vmanage-admin
local7.warn: Nov 26 15:24:47 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 BGP.1[6505]: 10.0.0.1 unrecognized capability code: 70 - ignored
local7.info: Nov 26 15:24:47 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 BGP.1[6505]: %ADJCHANGE: neighbor 10.0.0.1 Up
local7.info: Nov 26 15:24:47 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 CFGMGR[2195]: %Viptela-BRU-SDW-V5K-01-cfgmgr-6-INFO-1400002: Notification: 11/26/2019 14:24:47 bgp-peer-state-change severity-level:major host-name:"BRU-SDW-V5K-01" system-ip:10.10.10.242 vpn-id:1 peer:10.0.0.1 bgp-new-state:established local-address:10.0.0.2 local-routerid:10.10.10.242 peer-routerid:192.168.9.1
local1.info: Nov 26 15:24:47 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 confd[1310]: netconf id=38 sending notification {http://viptela.com/vpn}bgp-peer-state-change

Preste atenção específica a essas linhas:

local1.info: Nov 26 15:24:39 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 confd[1310]: audit user: vmanage-admin/1232 commit thandle 4552 /viptela-vpn:vpn/vpn-instance{0}/interface{ge0/0}/description set to "mpls"
local1.info: Nov 26 15:24:39 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 confd[1310]: audit user: vmanage-admin/1232 commit thandle 4552 /viptela-vpn:vpn/vpn-instance{1}/interface{ipsec1}/ike/authentication-type/pre-shared-key/pre-shared-secret set to "****"

Apesar do fato de que apenas a descrição da interface é alterada no modelo, a chave da interface ipsec1 também foi atualizada por algum motivo.

Solução

1. Em primeiro lugar, não é possível atualmente evitar tal problema se o modelo de dispositivo vManage baseado em Modelos de recurso for usado. Os modelos de recursos do vManage usam senha em texto claro e, devido à natureza do hash tipo 8, são regenerados sempre que qualquer alteração é feita no modelo, portanto, é necessário alternar para modelos CLI com versões de software atuais. O hash tipo 8 é um texto cifrado começando com símbolos $8$.

Este comportamento está documentado sob o identificador de defeito CSCvn20971

Além disso, há uma solicitação de aprimoramento aberta para os modelos de recursos CSCvr86574

2. Se os modelos de dispositivo baseados em CLI forem usados, o problema pode ser evitado se o hash tipo 8 for especificado na configuração do dispositivo em vez da senha em texto claro. Além disso, a configuração Gerenciar senha criptografada nas configurações do vManage deve ser definida como Ativada para evitar a recalcular senhas criptografadas tipo 8. Isso pode ser encontrado em Administration >Settings.

Depois de aplicado, você pode enviar o modelo novamente. Isso faz com que o túnel bata pela última vez porque ele precisa ser atualizado pela última vez depois disso e sincronizar o vManage e o dispositivo. Quase no momento de todas as tentativas subsequentes, o túnel permanece estável e as alterações são feitas somente na parte relevante da configuração:

local1.info: Nov 26 15:42:37 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 confd[1310]: audit user: vmanage-admin/1267 commit thandle 4651 begin
local1.info: Nov 26 15:42:37 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 confd[1310]: audit user: vmanage-admin/1267 commit thandle 4651 /viptela-vpn:vpn/vpn-instance{0}/interface{ge0/0}/description set to "MPLS"
local1.info: Nov 26 15:42:37 BRU-SDW-V5K-01 confd[1310]: audit user: vmanage-admin/1267 commit thandle 4651 end

Na próxima seção, você pode encontrar a configuração relevante para IPSec baseado em IKE site a site em VPN de serviço para referência.

Configurações

Aqui você pode encontrar a configuração do dispositivo para fins de referência.

Roteador vEdge:

vpn 1
 router
  bgp 65001
   neighbor 10.0.0.1
    no shutdown
    remote-as 65000
   !
  !
 !
 interface ipsec1
  ip address 10.0.0.2/30
  tunnel-source-interface ge0/0
  tunnel-destination      192.168.9.1
  ike
   version      1
   mode         main
   rekey        14400
   cipher-suite aes128-cbc-sha1
   group        2
   authentication-type
    pre-shared-key
     pre-shared-secret $8$cFG/IiaNKkFYXGiHiTCbDEQYcCL4tx1tEhcDh1kO93fzNgc4LDSIIqESFeC6//yU
     local-id          192.168.9.242
     remote-id         192.168.9.1
    !
   !
  !
  ipsec
   rekey                   3600
   replay-window           512
   cipher-suite            aes256-cbc-sha1
   perfect-forward-secrecy group-2
  !
  no shutdown
 !
!

Cisco IOS^®:

router bgp 65000
 bgp log-neighbor-changes
 neighbor 10.0.0.2 remote-as 65001
!
crypto keyring KR
  pre-shared-key address 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 key testtesttesttest
!
crypto ipsec profile IPSEC_PROFILE
 set transform-set TSET
 set pfs group2
 set isakmp-profile IKE_PROFILE
!
crypto isakmp profile IKE_PROFILE
   keyring KR
   self-identity address
   match identity address 0.0.0.0
!
interface Tunnel1
 ip address 10.0.0.1 255.255.255.252
 tunnel source GigabitEthernet2
 tunnel mode ipsec ipv4
 tunnel destination 192.168.9.242
 tunnel protection ipsec profile IPSEC_PROFILE isakmp-profile IKE_PROFILE
!

Dica: devido às melhorias de segurança no vEdge desde a versão do software 19.1, uma chave pré-compartilhada deve ter pelo menos 16 caracteres.