This document answers frequently asked questions about Data-over-Cable
Service Interface Specifications (DOCSIS) 2.0.
Competition among products gives vendor manufacturers incentive to
develop cost effective, high quality products. Likewise, competition among
standards gives the developer of a standard the incentive to ensure that they
are reasonable and provide more benefit than they cost. Cable Television
Laboratories, Inc. (CableLabs®
) is a consortium that governs the DOCSIS standard
and ensures interoperability, competition, and quality. Cable Labs is dedicated
to help cable operators integrate new telecommunications technologies into
their business objectives. It might be inevitable that there will be multiple
standards that cover the same business objective. Therefore, with regards to
the deployment of DOCSIS 2.0, two specifications have emerged: Advanced Time
Division Multiplex Access (ATDMA) and Synchronous Code Division Multiple Access
(SCDMA). CableLabs has mandated that, for a cable product to be fully DOCSIS
2.0 compliant, it must support both competing protocols. There have been
several discussions about migration to DOCSIS 2.0 and about which protocol
(ATDMA or SCDMA) is the best fit for any one particular business model. Based
on recent surveys, some providers are still very unsure about the migration to
This document addresses some initial concerns of those who are
considering DOCSIS 2.0 migration and answers some of the questions that they
What is the difference between ATDMA and SCDMA?
A. ATDMA is a direct evolution of DOCSIS 1.x physical layer (PHY), which
uses TDMA multiplexing. DOCSIS 1.x upstream PHY uses a frequency division
multiple access (FDMA)/TDMA burst multiplexing technique. FDMA accommodates
simultaneous operation of multiple radio frequency (RF) channels on different
frequencies. TDMA allows multiple cable modems to share the same individual RF
channel, because it allocates each cable modem its own time slot in which to
transmit. TDMA is carried over in DOCSIS 2.0, with numerous enhancements. SCDMA
is a different approach, in which up to 128 symbols are transmitted
simultaneously via 128 orthogonal codes. SCDMA multiplexing allows multiple
modems to transmit in the same time slot. Both ATDMA and SCDMA provide the same
maximum data throughput, although one might perform better than the other under
specific operating conditions.
Does DOCSIS 2.0 have less rigid upstream performance
A. The upstream performance requirements in the DOCSIS 2.0 Radio Frequency
Interface Specification are not less rigid than the
requirements in DOCSIS 1.0 or 1.1. For maximum reliability and data throughput,
cable operators still need to ensure that their networks comply with the
recommended downstream and upstream radio frequency (RF) parameters in the
DOCSIS Radio Frequency Interface Specification.
The confusion about this arises from the fact that DOCSIS 2.0 provides
for increased upstream throughput—up to a raw data rate of 30.72 Mbps. This is
accomplished through the use of higher-order modulation formats, such as
64-QAM. In order for 64-QAM to work in the harsh upstream environment, either
the upstream RF performance must be significantly improved, or the data
transmission robustness must be improved. DOCSIS 2.0 includes provisions for
improved data transmission robustness from several areas:
DOCSIS 2.0 supports a symbol (T)-spaced adaptive equalizer structure
with 24 taps, compared to 8 taps in DOCSIS 1.x. This allows operation in the
presence of more severe multipath and microreflections, and should accommodate
operation near band edges where group delay is usually a
Some cable modem termination system (CMTS) chipset vendors have
developed robustness-enhancing features through improved burst acquisition.
Carrier and timing lock, power estimates, equalizer training, and constellation
phase lock are all done simultaneously. This allows for shorter preambles and
reduces implementation loss.
Forward error correction (FEC) has been improved. DOCSIS 1.x provides
for the correction of 10 errored bytes per Reed Solomon block (T=10) with no
interleaving, while DOCSIS 2.0 allows correction of 16 bytes per Reed Solomon
block (T=16) with programmable interleaving.
While not specifically a requirement of DOCSIS 2.0, many advanced
physical layer (PHY) silicon vendors have incorporated some form of ingress
cancellation technology into their upstream receiver chips, which further
enhances upstream data transmission robustness. Ingress cancellation is a way
to digitally remove in-channel ingress, common path distortion, and certain
types of impulse noise.
Is SCDMA better for impulse noise environments while ATDMA is better for
A. SCDMA has a Burst Noise Advantage over ATDMA, because of its capability
to spread transmissions out over time. Multiple codewords are sent
simultaneously, which effectively interleaves codewords from different cable
modems. However, SCDMA uses longer symbol times than
ATDMA, and this reduces the number of errored symbols created for a given
forward error correction (FEC) block. This allows those errored symbols to be
corrected with the FEC information.
However, these limitations for SCDMA modems must be considered in the
Must perform periodic ranging for all modems
Only gives throughput benefit when more than 60 percent of upstream
traffic is carried in SCDMA mode.
Significant interoperability issues remain in
SCDMA mode between different cable modem vendors that have not closely followed
the DOCSIS 2.0 specification.
Remember, cable networks are not dominated by
burst noise in absence of ingress or narrow band interference. These two
always occur together, but the narrowband interference can
come and go, thus it is not apparent in a given 30 minute measurement time.
ATDMA uses FEC and byte interleaving to combat impulse and burst noise, while
SCDMA uses time spreading and framing:
Reed-Soloman (RS) FEC encoding involves the transmission of
additional data (overhead) that allows for the correction of byte
Byte interleaving can spread data over the transmission time. If a
portion of that data is corrupted by a burst or impulse, then the errors appear
spread apart—when de-interleaved at the cable modem termination system
(CMTS)—which allows FEC to work more effectively.
Time spreading allows the reduction of the effective carrier-to-noise
ratio (CNR) of noise bursts that are shorter than the spreading
Framing and subframing spread bytes over multiple RS code words, in a
manner similar to byte interleaving in ATDMA.
What is the difference between Processing Gain and Coding
A. Interference removal technology digitally subtracts the interference
signals. The amplitude that can be subtracted is called the Processing Gain.
This is separate from the Coding Gain, which shows how much benefit you can get
when you trade off throughput for interference or noise rejection. Coding Gain
is like adding 3 bytes of forward error correction (FEC) to every 10 bytes of
data. If you add another 1 to 3 bytes of FEC to the same amount of data, you
have achieved Coding Gain.
Cisco cable modem termination system (CMTS) products can remove between
2 or 3 dB of impairment (worst case, most complex signal possible in an hybrid
fiber-coaxial (HFC) network, also known as Common Path Distortion [CPD]) and 25
to 29 dB of impairment (best case, single AM or FM modulated signal). One
typically achieves a 5 to 15 dB Processing Gain on a real HFC network.
In addition, one might see a 1 or 2 dB Processing Gain on some other
CMTS, but that is offset by a 3.5 to 4.5 dB Implementation Loss. Be careful
that you are not mislead by vendors who turn on added Coding Gain, decrease
upstream throughput and capacity, and then claim to maintain
If one mixes ATDMA and S-TDMA, is it necessary to send duplicate maps in
A. It depends on whether you wish to run ATDMA at a wider channel width
than the TDMA signal. This would have ATDMA modems that run at 6.4 MHz and TDMA
modems that run at 3.2 MHz on the same center frequency: a rather poor use of
upstream spectrum, and the throughput is not than advantageous.
If ATDMA and TDMA channels are the same channel width (3.2 MHz), then
the A-LONG and A-SHORT grants have their own modulation profiles, and they can
run within the same maps.
How can one satisfy the high synchronization requirements for SCDMA in a
normal cable network?
A. In order to get high throughput with SCDMA, the modems must all be time
aligned within a fraction of the symbol rate. Otherwise, the “S” (synchronous)
part of CDMA fails, and the data from one modem corrupts the data from other
modems. The result is packet loss. The timing resolution is measured in
nanoseconds. There are issues when you measure things in nanoseconds across a
distance of 40 km (a short network) or up to 320 km (a long network):
minute changes in fiber path distance, caused by temperature
(expansion and contraction of the glass itself)
expansion of the coaxial network (which is why every span has an
the fact that the speed of light also changes with temperature, in
both fiber and coaxial line (Velocity of Propagation as a percentage of speed
Every 1 second, an SCDMA modem must be
time-aligned, if the modem is more than 20 km from the headend, even if less
than half of that network is overhead plant. This represents at least 60 to 80
percent of the cable modems for most multiple service operators (MSOs).
If the hybrid fiber-coaxial (HFC) network is 100 percent underground
(including the fiber), the modems are less than 10 km from the headend, and the
temperature is very constant for a given day. Then the modems can be
time-aligned less often.
Apparently, timing alignment had become a major problem with the modems
of some vendors in general. They lose synchronization with the downstream and
do not realize it, and then transmit at the wrong time. Therefore, the modem
transmits at a time that is reserved for another modem and causes packet loss
both for itself and for the other modem. The packet loss for all modems
vanishes when only the bad modems are removed from the
Does a DOCSIS 1.1 configuration file work in 2.0
A. Any DOCSIS 1.1 configuration file works in 2.0 mode. Even a DOCSIS 1.0
configuration file works. There is one special type, length, value (TLV) field
that prevents the modem from working in a 2.0 mode, even if it is capable.
DOCSIS 2.0 has nothing to do with QoS, it is only a new physical layer (PHY)
chip. Therefore, the MAC version determines whether the cable modem is capable
of doing 1.0/1.1 or 2.0.
At 2.0-capable modem should come up automatically in a 2.0-provisioned
environment, because the TLV 39 field must equal 1. If the TLV 39 field is left
blank, then it defaults to value of 1 and registers in 2.0 mode. You must set
the TLV 39 field to 0 in order to prevent the 2.0-capable modem from coming up
in 2.0 mode. Then, it is forced to come up in 1.x mode.
What are some things to check if the Motorola SB5100 fails to come online
in 2.0 mode with a Cisco cable modem termination system
A. Check whether the SB5100 is actually in DOCSIS 2.0 mode. Motorola has a
private MIB that can be set so that the modem only broadcasts
docsis1.1... in the DHCP Option 60. This is the MIB
Integer (32 bit)
1: false (name)
This object is used to enable DOCSIS 2.0 ATDMA operation mode.
Set to true (1) to enable DOCSIS 2.0 ATDMA operation mode. Set to false (2) to
disable DOCSIS 2.0 ATDMA operation mode. This object is not accessible before
the cable modem (CM) completes registration, except in factory