CVRF: Helping Industry Since 2011
Objectivity versus Subjectivity
Data-Driven versus Presentation-Driven
An XML-Based Language
The Product Tree
Converting an Existing Document to CVRF
Root (Document) Level
Looking Ahead: What's Next for CVRF?
This white paper explains design decisions behind the 1.1. Release of the Common Vulnerability Reporting Framework (CVRF); specifically, the use of required elements and the Product Tree. The white paper further demonstrates conversion of a recent Cisco security advisory into a well-formed and valid CVRF document. Enhancements that are planned for future versions of CVRF are also discussed. It is assumed that the reader has a working knowledge of CVRF and of XML.
CVRF: Helping Industry Since 2011
After the release of CVRF 1.0 in May 2011, at a dinner with security professionals, security automation was briefly discussed. I scribbled a phrase that succinctly captured what CVRF did, does, and will do on a napkin: "...the goal of CVRF is to homogenize and automate the creation and consumption of vulnerability documentation." Simple, profound, and complete enough to be a mission statement. Figure 1 expands on the original statement and restates the keywords.
Figure 1. CVRF Mission Statement: Homogenizing and Automating Vulnerability Documents
The goal of CVRF was simple in concept yet complex in execution, taking three years to deliver from idea to standard. The work evolved, but always with the same goal in mind. Currently, CVRF is positioned to be the standard in vulnerability documentation automation. CVRF 1.0 was the initial foray into this space. Now, almost a year later, CVRF 1.1 is a major leap forward and represents the current best-of-breed solution. An exploration of core CVRF concepts follows.
A primary tool of development for CVRF is the mind map. Mind maps are wonderful tools for representing ideas and brainstorming in real-time. Three years of CVRF development is shown to in this white paper through a mind map diagram. The legend is shown in Table 1, and the CVRF mind map is shown in Figure 2.
Table 1. CVRF Mind Mapping Legend
Font Color: Red
Font Color: Black
Font Color: Blue
Font Type: Normal
Font Type: Bold
Figure 2. CVRF Mind Mapping
One of the major design tenets of CVRF was objectivity over subjectivity. Computer security can be an emotional topic at times, but the framework that is used to convey information pertaining to that subject should be free from opinion and bias and report only facts. With this in mind, CVRF was grown in a lab. Each element was named and defined as objectively as possible so that all users, regardless of background, could understand CVRF the same way.
Another design decision made midway through the engineering process was for CVRF to adhere to a data-driven model. This is to say that CVRF is concerned only with packaging up and structuring the data, without regard for how that data will be presented to the end-user. There are no presentation markup elements (for example, HTML<b>|</b> or <i>|</i>) included in CVRF.
CVRF is a language. It is a structured way for one machine to communicate with another machine about a topic human operators find very interesting: information system vulnerabilities. CVRF was built using XML. XML is a meta-language – it doesn't actually do anything. CVRF, like XML, is a static framework used to structure, store, and transport information. CVRF is a structured container for information about information system vulnerabilities. How that information is ultimately transported, parsed, or used is completely up to its users.
Another design decision of CVRF revolved around the consensus that the document must contain a modicum of mandatory, root-level elements. Required elements ensure a solid and consistent foundation on which to construct documents. The required fields are shown in Figure 3.
Figure 3. Required Fields
Throughout CVRF, optional container elements that use a plural term as the identifier (for example, Threats) are followed by a child container that uses the singular version of the same identifier (for example, Threat). The parent container is usually optional (MinOccurs=0) and cannot occur more than once (MaxOccurs=1), while the child container is required (MinOccurs=1) and can have unlimited instances (MaxOccurs=unbounded).
As an example, the Threats container can contain multiple Threat containers. If no threats are to be documented, the Threats container should be omitted altogether. However, if a Threat container is defined, at least one (more are allowed) child Threat container must be specified, as shown in the following example:
<Threats> <Threat Type="Impact"> <Description> Successful exploit this vulnerability results in every byte on the target network being replaced by the ones’ compliment of itself. </Description> </Threat> <Threat Type="Exploit Status"> <Description> The exploit is being carried as part of the OKBDGLOBAL.A1 worm and is in widespread use. </Description> </Threat> <Threat Type="Target Set"> <Description> Every network known to man. </Description> </Threat> </Threats>
CVRF has several unrestricted string-type fields that are assumed to be human consumable. These fields allow a document producer to input arbitrary character data without constraints around length or content. The best common practice here is to ensure this character data is free from markup language tags (for example, XML, HTML, XHTML, or other markup). However, in some cases, a document producer may be forced to copy data into a CVRF document that contains markup. Often in a Notes or Entitlement element, unwanted markup is sometimes unavoidable. General guidance in this scenario follows.
- Avoid including markup data in string fields. If unavoidable, escape the special markup characters (for example, “&” becomes “&”).
- If large blocks of markup are to be used, employ CDATA tags.
The XML construct CDATA instructs the parser to ignore whatever text is being enclosed. To migrate an existing document as-is without worrying about encoding XML entities, either escape each special character or use CDATA. Note that if the parser is meant to be able to interpret the text within string sections, CDATA can make it difficult for document consumers to parse and transform CVRF documents.
An exception to this rule is when you want to include un-rendered markup elements inside a string element for illustrative purposes, as shown in the following example:
<Notes> <Note Type="Details" Ordinal="120" Title="Quick Fix" Audience="Technical"> If you change the Tomcat web.xml to the following, the problem will go away: <![CDATA[<parameter timeout="0" />]]> </Note> </Notes>
A CDATA example is below in the section "Converting an Existing Document to CVRF."
Many elements in a CVRF document allow (or require) the document producer to specify one or more Product ID or Group ID references, indicating that the current element applies to one or more products. In most cases, specifying a Product ID or Group ID is optional and as such, omitting the ID indicates that the current entry is general or non-specific. If an element applies to more than one product, the document producer can choose to list all corresponding Product ID values separately or define a group first and then reference the corresponding Group ID.
In the Vulnerability section, the following containers allow product referencing: Products/Product, Threats/Threat, CVSS Score Sets/Score Set, and Remediations/Remediation. Additionally, all of these containers follow the previously mentioned conventions for plural or singular container notation.
The Product Tree is a new construct for CVRF 1.1 and is a total redesign of the way CVRF enumerates products in a vulnerability. In earlier versions, several issues emerged in the way products were specified:
- Inefficiency: It violated the redundancy model of software development. Because each product was encapsulated inside the Vulnerability container, if there were multiple vulnerabilities in the same product, the same XML code would need to be repeated in each Vulnerability container
- Lack of clarity: You could have an Affected Platform and/or an Affected Release that were actually fixed or recommended versions. container
- Machine-parseable names were unenforcable: Affected Platform and Affected Release each had name attributes that were strings with recommendations but no restrictions on how best to populate them
To solve these problems, Product Family and Affected elements were eliminated and replaced with a hierarchical Product Tree, as shown in Figure 4.
Figure 4. CVRF v.1.1 Product Tree
On a high level, the tree contains all of the fully qualified product names that can be referenced elsewhere in a CVRF document. The tree resolved inefficiency, confusion, and lack of enforcement issues.
- Efficiency: Because the Product Tree is an external to the Vulnerability container(s), it can be specified once in the document and referred to many times. Each Vulnerability container can now contain a reference to the same product, rather than having to redundantly list each product
- Clarity: Products are not assigned a status inside the Product Tree. A product's susceptibility or inoculation status will be different across vulnerabilities. Vulnerability/Products/Product assign the status ("Known Affected", "First Fixed", and so on).
- Machine-consumable naming is permitted: Using the branched method, a document producer can create a product name using machine-readable tags combined with human-readable names
Additionally, it affords the user a way to specify complex relationships between products or components (as a precondition for being vulnerable) using the Relationship container.
This section walks the user through a manual conversion of the Cisco RVS4000 and WRVS4400N Web Management Interface Vulnerabilities Security Advisory (//www.cisco.com/en/US/products/csa/cisco-sa-20110525-rvs4000.html) into a CVRF document. Note that this process is meant to be an instructive narrative of how to manually build a CVRF document. In a typical security content environment, this process would be automated and CVRF document producers would have in-house code to parse documents and emit CVRF.
Remember that an XML schema defines the structure and content of the elements inside an XML document, as well as the order they can be in. This means that we might have to hunt around the security advisory to find all of the elements we want or need, but we must conform to the order set out by the schema. Before starting this section, have a quick look at the security advisory and be comfortable with its format and sections.
Note: The following is only a tutorial. The entire security advisory is not translated into the CVRF document and the security advisory is neither a Cisco PSIRT-authored or Cisco PSIRT-endorsed document.
Begin with a standard XML prologue specifying the version, encoding, and the namespace for the schema as shown in the following example
<?xml version="1.0"encoding="UTF-8"?> <cvrfdoc xmlns="http://www.icasi.org/CVRF/schema/cvrf/1.1"
Choose a title for the CVRF document. This is a required, human-readable field, and can be copied from the security advisory title as shown in the following example
<DocumentTitle>Cisco Security Advisory: Cisco RVS4000 and WRVS4400N Web Management Interface Vulnerabilities</DocumentTitle>
Add the required field, Document Type, another human-readable field that is called Security Advisory, as shown in the following example
Add the required field, Document Publisher. All that is required is the type, which can be filled in as Vendor. Note that unlike the previous fields, there are only five different values (vendor, discoverer, coordinator, user, other) to choose from. The following example shows the Document Publisher field.
Add the monolithic and required Document Tracking container. Comments are inline.
The required Identification container holds one ID string and additional optional Alias strings that identify the CVRF document. The required ID element is set to the Cisco specific identifier for the SA, which is derived from the "Advisory ID" field of "cisco-sa-20110525-rvs4000" and is shown in the following example
<Identification> <ID>cisco-sa-20110525-rvs4000</ID> </Identification>
The required Status element is set from the Status of this Notice field in the security advisory, which is Final, as shown in the following example
The required Version element is set from the Revision field of the security advisory, which is "1.1." The Revision History is taken from the security advisory fields of the same name, as shown in the example that follows. All elements are required.
<Version>1.1</Version> <RevisionHistory> <Revision> <Number>1.1</Number> <Date>2011-06-17T00:00:00+00:00</Date> <Description> Modified software table to indicate that First Fixed release for RVS4000v1 is 184.108.40.206. </Description> </Revision> <Revision> <Number>1.0</Number> <Date>2011-05-25T00:00:00+00:00</Date> <Description>Initial public release.</Description> </Revision> </RevisionHistory>
The required Initial and Current Release Date elements are adapted from the security advisory fields Initial Public Release and Last Updated, as shown in the following example
<InitialReleaseDate>2011-05-25T00:00:00+00:00</InitialReleaseDate> <CurrentReleaseDate>2011-06-17T00:00:00+00:00</CurrentReleaseDate> </DocumentTracking>
The next container is Document Notes. This is where all freeform, human-readable text from the security advisory is stored and its use is completely optional. The first Note is created is to hold the security advisory Summary. The only required attributes are Type, which is Summary for the Note, Legal Disclaimer, and Ordinal, which is a locally significant counter used to track all of the Document Notes and that is set to "001" and "002". In the example that follows, the first Note is labeled Summary and the second is called Legal Disclaimer. Both texts include an Audience set to All. Both attributes are human-readable fields. Finally, the XML:lang attribute is included to indicate the language of both Notes, in this case, English. The use of the XML:lang attribute is completely optional when writing in English because it is the default language. Use the XML:lang attribute to specify to a different language. The following example shows this practice in use.
<DocumentNotes> <Note Title="Summary" Audience="All" Type="Summary" Ordinal="001" xml:lang="en"> Cisco RVS4000 4-port Gigabit Security Routers and Cisco WRVS4400N Wireless-N Gigabit Security Routers have several
web interface vulnerabilities that can be exploited by a remote, unauthenticated user. Cisco has released free software updates
that address these vulnerabilities. Workarounds that mitigate these vulnerabilities are available. This advisory is posted at
http://tools.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-20110525-rvs4000. </Note> <Note Title="Legal Disclaimer" Audience="All" Type="Legal Disclaimer" Ordinal="002" xml:lang="en"> THIS DOCUMENT IS PROVIDED ON AN "AS IS" BASIS AND DOES NOT IMPLY ANY KIND OF GUARANTEE OR WARRANTY,
INCLUDING THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE. YOUR USE OF THE INFORMATION
ON THE DOCUMENT OR MATERIALS LINKED FROM THE DOCUMENT IS AT YOUR OWN RISK. CISCO RESERVES THE RIGHT TO CHANGE
OR UPDATE THIS DOCUMENT AT ANY TIME. CISCO EXPECTS TO UPDATE THIS DOCUMENT AS NEW INFORMATION BECOMES AVAILABLE.
A stand-alone copy or Paraphrase of the text of this document that omits the distribution URL in the following
section is an uncontrolled copy, and may lack important information or contain factual errors. </Note> </DocumentNotes>
Acknowledgements is an optional container, but because the security advisory credits the original discoverer, an acknowledgement is included here, as shown in the following example
<Acknowledgments> <Acknowledgment> <Name>Michal Sajdak</Name> <Organization>Securitum, Poland</Organization> </Acknowledgment> </Acknowledgments>
Another optional container is Document References. For posterity, a single Related Document that refers to the original HTML security advisory is included. The type of reference is self, because it refers to a different representation of the same document. The URL points to the HTML security advisory and the human-readable Description is trivial, as shown in the example that follows. Note that a CRLF is inserted to preserve readability in the whitepaper but should not be used in an actual CVRF document.
<DocumentReferences> <Reference Type="Self"> <URL>http://tools.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-20110525-rvs4000</URL> <Description xml:lang="en">URL to the html advisory.</Description> </Reference> </DocumentReferences>
The Document Distribution comes next and is located in the security advisory under "Distribution." This is another human-readable field and the document producer may prefer to remove all non-character data. The following example shows the location of the Document Distribution field.
<DocumentDistribution> This advisory is posted on Cisco's worldwide website at
In addition to worldwide web posting, a text version of this notice is clear-signed with the
Cisco PSIRT PGP key and is posted to the following e-mail and
Usenet news recipients. - cust-security - firstname.lastname@example.org - email@example.com -
firstname.lastname@example.org - email@example.com - firstname.lastname@example.org - email@example.com -
firstname.lastname@example.org - email@example.com Future updates of this advisory,
if any, will be placed on Cisco's worldwide website, but may or may not be actively announced on mailing lists
or newsgroups. Users concerned about this problem are encouraged to check the above URL for any updates. </DocumentDistribution>
The Product Tree is built to contain all of the products that are referenced in the Vulnerability section of the CVRF document. In the security advisory, within the Affected Products section, there are five products affected by the vulnerability and in the Software Versions and Fixes section, there are three "first fixed" products (two of the affected versions are end-of-life and no longer supported).
- Cisco RVS4000 Gigabit Security Router version 1
- Cisco RVS4000 Gigabit Security Router version 2
- Cisco WRVS4400N Wireless-N Gigabit Security Router version 1.0
- Cisco WRVS4400N Wireless-N Gigabit Security Router version 1.1
- Cisco WRVS4400N Wireless-N Gigabit Security Router version 2.0
- Cisco RVS4000 Gigabit Security Router version 220.127.116.11
- Cisco RVS4000 Gigabit Security Router version 18.104.22.168
- Cisco WRVS4400N Wireless-N Gigabit Security Router 22.214.171.124
In the following example, the Branched method of Product Tree creation is used to insert the products listed above. It affords the most machine-readable method of product enumeration (the Concatenated method does a similar job, but this security advisory contains no product dependencies).
The first element is the Product Tree container that specifies the schema, as shown in the following example
Each product is then constructed using the Branched method. Because all of the products are Cisco products, the top-level Branch container is Type Vendor and Name "Cisco". Both attributes are required, and are shown in the example that follows.
<Branch Type="Vendor" Name="Cisco">
This level of nesting actually splits. We first handle the "RVS4000" products and finish up with the "WRVS4400N" products. This is the Product Family and we assign Type and Name accordingly. The following example shows the split branch type with Type and Name assigned.
<Branch Type="Product Family" Name="RVS4000">
Next is the canonical name of the product. This Type is assigned as Product Name with a Name value of "Gigabit Security Router,"as shown in the following example
<Branch Type="Product Name" Name="Gigabit Security Router">
The last branch contains the product version. Assign this Type as Product Version with a Name value of "1". Terminate this branch with a Full Product Name and the first Product ID. The FullProductName contains the canonical or “friendly” name of the referenced product. In this (and probably most) cases, it is the additive result of the individual branches, or “Cisco RVS4000 Gigabit Security Router version 1”. The ProductID is chosen to be illustrative and demonstrative at “CVRF1.1-PID-0001”. In practice, it can be anything unique to Product Tree. The following example illustrates the product version branch.
<Branch Type="Product Version" Name="1"> <FullProductName ProductID="CVRF1.1-PID-0001">Cisco RVS4000 Gigabit Security Router version 1</FullProductName> </Branch>
Construct the remainder of the Product Tree elements in the same manner, as shown in the following example
<Branch Type="Product Version" Name="2"> <FullProductName ProductID="CVRF1.1-PID-0002">Cisco RVS4000 Gigabit Security Router version 2</FullProductName> </Branch> <Branch Type="Product Version" Name="126.96.36.199"> <FullProductName ProductID="CVRF1.1-PID-0006">Cisco RVS4000 Gigabit Security Router version 188.8.131.52</FullProductName> </Branch> <Branch Type="Product Version" Name="184.108.40.206"> <FullProductName ProductID="CVRF1.1-PID-0007">Cisco RVS4000 Gigabit Security Router version 220.127.116.11</FullProductName> </Branch> </Branch> </Branch> <Branch Type="Product Family" Name="WRVS4400N"> <Branch Type="Product Name" Name="Wireless-N Gigabit Security Router"> <Branch Type="Product Version" Name="1.0”> <FullProductName ProductID="CVRF1.1-PID-0003">Cisco WRVS4400N Wireless-N Gigabit Security Router version 1.0</FullProductName> </Branch> <Branch Type="Product Version" Name="1.1"> <FullProductName ProductID="CVRF1.1-PID-0004">Cisco WRVS4400N Wireless-N Gigabit Security Router version 1.1 </FullProductName> </Branch> <Branch Type="Product Version" Name="2.0"> <FullProductName ProductID="CVRF1.1-PID-0005">Cisco WRVS4400N Wireless-N Gigabit Security Router version 2.0</FullProductName> </Branch> <Branch Type="Product Version" Name="18.104.22.168"> <FullProductName ProductID="CVRF1.1-PID-0008">Cisco WRVS4400N Wireless-N Gigabit Security Router version 22.214.171.124</FullProductName> </Branch> </Branch> </Branch> </Branch> </ProductTree>
The final section contains the actual vulnerabilities documented in the security advisory. The Details section of the security advisory notes that there are three vulnerabilities in the security advisory.
- CVE-2011-1645: Retrieval of the configuration file
- CVE-2011-1646: Root operating system arbitrary command injection by an authenticated attacker
- CVE-2011-1647: Retrieval of admin SSL certificate private key
Each vulnerability is documented in its own Vulnerability container.
1) The first element is the Vulnerability container, which has a required attribute, Ordinal, as shown in the following example
<Vulnerability Ordinal="1" xmlns="http://www.icasi.org/CVRF/schema/vuln/1.1">
2) The human readable Title follows and may be copied as the canonical name from the security advisory, as shown in the following example
<Title>Retrieval of the configuration file</Title>
3) The Notes container follows the Title, and structurally, it is the same as the Document Notes container above. In this case, it contains details about the vulnerability and is typed and titled as such. The first usage of CDATA may be observed here, because there is an ampersand (&) in the original text which, from an XML point of view, tells the parser an escape sequence is forthcoming. The following example shows the Notes container
<Notes> <Note Type="Details" Ordinal="003" Title="Details" Audience="All"> <![CDATA[ The Cisco RVS4000 and WRVS4400N Gigabit Security Routers deliver high-speed network access
and IPsec VPN capabilities for small businesses. They also provides firewall and intrusion prevention capabilities.
The Cisco RVS4000 and WRVS4400N Gigabit Security Routers contains a web management interface vulnerability:
Retrieval of the configuration file If an administrator of the device has previously created a backup
of the configuration, using Administration --> Backup & Restore --> Backup, it is possible for a remote
unauthenticated user to access the backup configuration file. This file contains all configuration parameters of
the device, including the HTTP authentication password and VPN pre-shared-keys (PSKs).]]> </Note> </Notes>
4) The release date of the vulnerability is set as the initial release date of the advisory, as shown in the following example
5) The Involvements container houses information about the document producer’s engagement status of vulnerability. In this case, the Party is Cisco (the vendor of the product) and the involvement Status is considered Completed (that is, the vulnerability is fully identified and scoped and the remediation process is finished). The following example shows an SA in Completed status.
<Involvements> <Involvement Party="Vendor" Status="Completed"> <Description>Cisco has completed involvement in this vulnerability.</Description> </Involvement> </Involvements>
6) The CVE number for the vulnerability is found in the Details section of the security advisory, as shown in the following example
7) The Product Statuses enumerates the products that are directly concerned with vulnerability. The guidance here is to list the affected products followed by the fixed or recommended products, as shown in the following example
7a) The “Affected Products/Vulnerable Products” section notes which products and versions are vulnerable. By referring back to the Product Tree, the Product IDs can be enumerated, as shown in the following example
<Status Type="Known Affected"> <ProductID>CVRF1.1-PID-0001</ProductID> <ProductID>CVRF1.1-PID-0002</ProductID> <ProductID>CVRF1.1-PID-0003</ProductID> <ProductID>CVRF1.1-PID-0004</ProductID> <ProductID>CVRF1.1-PID-0005</ProductID> </Status>
7b) In the Software Versions and Fixes section, note which products and versions are fixed. Refer to the Product Tree to enumerate Product IDs, as shown in the following example
<Status Type="First Fixed"> <ProductID>CVRF1.1-PID-0006</ProductID> <ProductID>CVRF1.1-PID-0007</ProductID> <ProductID>CVRF1.1-PID-0008</ProductID> </Status> </Product Statuses>
8) Threat types are found in the Threats container. The Impact section of the security advisory contains a description that relates to the Impact-typed Threat container. The omission of any Product or Group IDs means this threat applies to all of the vulnerable products. The following example shows Threat types.
<Threats> <Threat Type="Impact"> <Description>
Successful exploitation of the vulnerability may result in execution of arbitrary commands on the device by
an authenticated user or retrieval of configuration files and private keys by an unauthenticated user.
The configuration files contain sensitive information in text, such as the HTTP passwords and PSKs.
The retrieval of the certificates may aid in further attacks. </Description> </Threat> </Threats>
9) The CVSS scores can be found in the CVSSScoreSets container. A Score Set will always have a Base Score, but the Temporal and Environmental scores, as well as the Vector, are optional. The example that follows shows a temporal score and a Vector.
<CVSSScoreSets> <ScoreSet> <BaseScore>9.3</BaseScore> <TemporalScore>7.7</TemporalScore> <Vector>AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C/E:F/RL:OF/RC:C/CDP:ND/TD:ND/CR:ND/IR:ND/AR:ND</Vector> </ScoreSet> </CVSSScoreSets>
10) The final section for Vulnerability is the Remediation container and is shown in the following example
10a) The first step here is the determine the type of Remediation. The Software Versions and Fixes section states that there is an official vendor fix. Assign that as the Type, as shown in the following example
<Remediation Type="Vendor Fix">
10b) The mandatory Description element is created from the same section, as shown in the following example
<Description> The official fix from Cisco is to upgrade to the latest software release, the first fixed version is 126.96.36.199.
In all cases, customers should exercise caution to be certain the devices to be upgraded contain sufficient memory
and that current hardware and software configurations will continue to be supported properly by the new release.
If the information is not clear, contact the Cisco Small Business Support Center or your contracted maintenance
provider for assistance.
10c) Entitlement is optional to the Remediation container, but likely a legal mandate by the vendor. Entitlement may be copied from the “Obtaining Fixed Software” section, as shown in the following example
<Entitlement> Cisco has released free software updates that address this vulnerability. Prior to deploying software, customers should
consult their maintenance provider or check the software for feature set compatibility and known issues specific to their
environment. Customers may only install and expect support for the feature sets they have purchased. By installing,
downloading, accessing or otherwise using such software upgrades, customers agree to be bound by the terms of Cisco's
software license terms found at http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/general/warranty/English/EU1KEN_.html , or as otherwise set
forth at Cisco.com Downloads at http://www.cisco.com/public/sw-center/sw-usingswc.shtml . Do not contact firstname.lastname@example.org or
email@example.com for software upgrades. Customers should obtain upgraded software through their regular update channels.
For most customers, this means that upgrades should be obtained through the Software Center on Cisco's worldwide website at http://www.cisco.com If the information is not clear, please contact the Cisco Small Business Support Center or your contracted
maintenance provider for assistance. Small Business Support Center contacts are as follows.
+1 866 606 1866 (toll free from within North America) +1 408 418 1866 (toll call from anywhere in the world)
Customers should have their product serial number available. Refer to
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/support/tsd_cisco_small_business_support_center_contacts.html for additional
support contact information, including localized telephone numbers, and instructions and e-mail addresses
for use in various languages. </Entitlement>
10d) A URL to the fixed software is optional but included here because it is specified by the SA in the “Software Versions and Fixes” section. Note the use of the ampersand escape sequence to specify the “&” in the query string portion of the URL, as shown in the following example
10e) The last element in the Remediation section is the optional Product ID. Inclusion of this (these) element(s) constrains the Remediation container to apply to only the product(s) listed. Exclusion of the element implies that the Remediation is general or applies to all vulnerable products, as shown in the following example
10f) The next two Remediation containers are constructed similarly to the previous Remediation section. The only notable differences are the Description, the Product ID, and the URL of the last one. All of this information is in the same section “Obtaining Fixed Software”. The entitlement is omitted to keep the code short, sweet, and DRY. The following example shows the Remediation containers
<Remediation Type="Vendor Fix"> <Description>The official fix from Cisco is to upgrade to the latest software release, the first fixed version is 188.8.131.52.</Description> <Entitlement> ... </Entitlement> <URL>http://www.cisco.com/cisco/software/type.html?mdfid=282414013&flowid=787</URL> <ProductID>CVRF1.1-PID-0002</ProductID> </Remediation> <Remediation Type="Vendor Fix"> <Description>The official fix from Cisco is to upgrade to the latest software release, the first fixed version is 184.108.40.206.</Description> <Entitlement> ... </Entitlement> <URL>http://www.cisco.com/cisco/software/type.html?mdfid=282414016</URL>
10g) Multiple Product IDs are entered, as shown in the following example
<ProductID>CVRF1.1-PID-0003</ProductID> <ProductID>CVRF1.1-PID-0004</ProductID> <ProductID>CVRF1.1-PID-0005</ProductID> </Remediation>
10h) The Remediation container shown below is slightly different because it holds the workaround discussed in the security advisory in the Workarounds section. It applies to all of the vulnerable products. The Remediation type Workaround is shown in the following example
<Remediation Type="Workaround"> <Description> Disable remote management: Caution: Do not disable remote management if you manage the device via the WAN connection.
Doing so will result in loss of management connectivity to the device. Remote Management is disabled by default.
If it is enabled, administrators can disable it using the Firewall > Basic Settings screen. Change the setting
for the field "Remote Management" to "Disabled". Disabling remote management limits the exposure of the vulnerabilities
to those on the local LAN. Limit remote management access to specific IP addresses: If remote management is required,
harden the device so that it can be accessed only by certain IP addresses, rather than the default setting of "any".
By entering the configuration screen at Firewall --> Basic Settings, an administrator can change the Remote IP address
field to ensure only devices with the specified IP addresses can access the device. Remove all backup configuration files
from the device: Rebooting the device after performing a configuration backup, will remove the configuration file from the
system so that it can not be retrieved by an unauthenticated user. </Description> <ProductID>CVRF1.1-PID-0001</ProductID> <ProductID>CVRF1.1-PID-0002</ProductID> <ProductID>CVRF1.1-PID-0003</ProductID> <ProductID>CVRF1.1-PID-0004</ProductID> <ProductID>CVRF1.1-PID-0005</ProductID> </Remediation> </Remediations> </Vulnerability>
11) The remaining two vulnerabilities are quite similar to the first in terms of construction and content, and to close out the CVRF document, they are left to the reader to complete. The following example shows the remaining two vulnerabilities.
<Vulnerability Ordinal=”2” xmlns="http://www.icasi.org/CVRF/schema/vuln/1.1"> <Title>Root operating system arbitrary command injection by an authenticated attacker</Title> ... </Vulnerability> <Vulnerability Ordinal=”3” xmlns="http://www.icasi.org/CVRF/schema/vuln/1.1"> <Title>Retrieval of admin SSL certificate private key</Title> ... </Vulnerability> </cvrfdoc>
As CVRF evolves, the standard will change and grow according to the feedback from its users. The following items are on the docket for inclusion in subsequent release(s) of CVRF. The list is not exhaustive and subject to change.
- XML Security: Support for the signing and encrypting of XML documents according to the W3C recommendations on XML Signature Syntax and Processing.
- Producer-Specific Tags: Support for producer-specific elements would enable a document producer to include their own XML tags to add functionality to CVRF. The working group is carefully discussing this feature to avoid enabling the creation of new CVRF dialects and eventual end-user confusion.
- Proof of Concept Container: Support for inclusion of proof of concept / vulnerability reproduction steps. The working group has started work on high-level plans to enable document producers to include step-by-step instructions to reproduce a vulnerability and include exploit code.
Mike Schiffman (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Engineer, Applied Security Research
The author would like to thank Joe Clarke, Cisco Systems; Troy Fridley, Cisco Systems; and Joe Hemmerlein, Microsoft Corporation, for their assistance.
This document is part of the Cisco Security Research & Operations.
This document is provided on an "as is" basis and does not imply any kind of guarantee or warranty, including the warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular use. Your use of the information on the document or materials linked from the document is at your own risk. Cisco reserves the right to change or update this document at any time.